Do you at least get hard?

I can't cum if someone else is working my dick.

As a frequent chicken choker, I would like to know these repercussions.

Lets just say that saturday I learned the repercussions of my masturbation addiction

So if a user downright says they don't care if their PM's are posted and they are posted, what the Hell is the problem?

The release of other user’s personal information, including full names, addresses, social media accounts, images, private messages, etc. without their consent is not tolerated. Doing so will lead to the information being edited out and bans being applied.

No it isn't. "I don't think" means you're unsure if the other options being equally good. "I don't see" means you are assured that the other options are not as good.

I said "I don't see."

Which is the exact same fucking thing.

How about providing a rebuttal that doesn't resort to using that meaningless word?

If you don't need it, you don't need it, and you shouldn't care.

Great argument. :^)

Too bad it's entirely subjective.

Having rights for the sake of having rights is stupid and arbitrary.

Like Hell I'd give it up because it's not about NEED, it's about RIGHTS. And thankfully, the courts have agreed every time it has come up.

You give it up, because you don't NEED it.

Then what was the point of that quote? It clearly wasn't to say "Bernie's plan is the only good one." because you would've just said that instead.

Implications are relative. You might have thought I was implying something, but I wasn't.

You didn't say what you claim you said either, your exact words were:

I don't see anybody else proposing anything better.

Which is where the implication comes in.

If that was my argument, I wouldn't have phrased it the way I did. I would have outright said, "Bernie's plan is the only good one out there."

But I didn't say that.

Yes you did. Your argument was implying that Sanders plan was the only "Good" one because it was the least shitty out of all others.

I never made an argument. Saying that I did doesn't make it so. Sorry.

No, you just don't want to read. Although I'll dumb it down for you.

The first point is that you have no high ground to call someone's comment stupid when you're literally arguing about arguing afterwards. That's completely fucking pointless.

The second is that the comment wasn't stupid at all. You implied that the only good plan was the best out of all negative options regardless of the fact that it was still negative. You're arguing it's okay to do something bad because it's not quite as bad as the alternatives, ignoring the possibility of not doing anything at all if all situations are bad. So hence, you did make an argument despite swearing up and down you didn't and derailing a thread because of it.

Literally none of this made any sense. The mental gymnastics are insane.

Arguing about arguing shows that your opponent wasn't the stupid one in that situation, so there's no reason to claim you "Smacked" someone who was objectively right. Contrary to your name, you're capable of implications as well. You made the comment that you didn't see any better plans. Not only is that comment entirely subjective, but implies that we should do something bad anyways just because there isn't any other good outcomes by "your" reasoning. Hence, you DID argue that point regardless of whether or not it was intentional on your end.

literally what

A cesspit would be a more loving home than the shadow of a site B.net. Yes we do have room.

Noel never said any of that, you guys never cared about Eva, and all you wanted was pictures of me in a Seifuku which is never gonna happen.

Ian our entire friendship  was built on me and Noelle calling your (then)waifu a man and saying "Eva a shit" over and over again.

Privacy is a right.

Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.

>One thread about me
>Everyone that wasn't my friend in that thread was a dick
>Everyone that was either still acts eccentric or just downright ignores me now