This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sprungli
Pages: 1 ... 567 89 ... 130
181
« on: August 04, 2015, 07:05:28 PM »
I love seeing all the competitive types who try and make up excuses for why Halo 4 is the most popular game specific playlist in MCC, why it has more backwards compatibility votes than any other and why H4 comes up a lot more in multi game playlists than 2 or 3. Just admit that the damn thing is more popular by the majority of the playerbase.
That's because the Halo player base left on the MCC is nothing but Reachtards and anyone who joined Halo after.
Halo veterans that have been there since CE weren't gonna wait 6 months for them to fix the MCC.
That makes sense, people that have played Halo for 14 years and stuck with the franchise through the totally problem-free Halo 2 are unwilling to wait six (which is overly dramatic) months. Not as if there are people that actually like Halo 4; it's also strange to assume that those that liked Reach automatically like 4, you've got living proof against that right here.
At least Halo 2 worked day one unlike the MCC which like you said took 6, supposedly, dramatic months to fix. Fuck me for expecting a game that I paid $60 for to work day one right? Yep, totally couldn't work around what Halo 2 had vs what MCC had. It's only 6 months, I should get over myself, because fuck the satisfaction of wanting my games to work and function properly. MCC was a disaster for 6 months, unplayable, literally unplayable. I think you can look past Halo 2's problems vs what MCC had. 6 months is a long time, it makes sense as to why people are so turned off to it now. At least I was able to play Halo 2 whereas the MCC I had to wait 6 months for them to fix, and even now it's still not perfect.
It really wasn't six months though (like I said before you jumped to your preferred interpretation, six is dramatic, 3 is closer to the truth), and the MCC was perfectly playable-lets be specific here in that it was only the online multiplayer that was broke, campaign, playlists and customs were all fine (bar split-screen H2A customs, that still performs poorly).
I'm pretty sure the campaigns didn't work at launch either.
I'm pretty sure they did, I did play them after all
You just happened to have a good copy of the game. Lots of people had problems with game crashing, losing progress, and frame rate issues. Just like how some people say (though I think they are lying) multiplayer hasn't had any issues since X update.
Everyone has the same copy. You don't just happen to get good copies.
The game was broken server side, not locally.
Game crashing and frame rate issues in single player are server side issues?
Not everyone had those issues, so are you suggesting that it was down to the individual copies? Because truly, that's silly.
I wasn't being literal.
So how did you mean it?
Figuratively, I was essentially saying you were one of the lucky ones.
Lucky with SP, unlucky with MP. I remember more people having problems with MP anyways, I don't think SP was anywhere near as broken for anywhere near as long
182
« on: August 04, 2015, 06:52:13 PM »
I love seeing all the competitive types who try and make up excuses for why Halo 4 is the most popular game specific playlist in MCC, why it has more backwards compatibility votes than any other and why H4 comes up a lot more in multi game playlists than 2 or 3. Just admit that the damn thing is more popular by the majority of the playerbase.
That's because the Halo player base left on the MCC is nothing but Reachtards and anyone who joined Halo after.
Halo veterans that have been there since CE weren't gonna wait 6 months for them to fix the MCC.
That makes sense, people that have played Halo for 14 years and stuck with the franchise through the totally problem-free Halo 2 are unwilling to wait six (which is overly dramatic) months. Not as if there are people that actually like Halo 4; it's also strange to assume that those that liked Reach automatically like 4, you've got living proof against that right here.
At least Halo 2 worked day one unlike the MCC which like you said took 6, supposedly, dramatic months to fix. Fuck me for expecting a game that I paid $60 for to work day one right? Yep, totally couldn't work around what Halo 2 had vs what MCC had. It's only 6 months, I should get over myself, because fuck the satisfaction of wanting my games to work and function properly. MCC was a disaster for 6 months, unplayable, literally unplayable. I think you can look past Halo 2's problems vs what MCC had. 6 months is a long time, it makes sense as to why people are so turned off to it now. At least I was able to play Halo 2 whereas the MCC I had to wait 6 months for them to fix, and even now it's still not perfect.
It really wasn't six months though (like I said before you jumped to your preferred interpretation, six is dramatic, 3 is closer to the truth), and the MCC was perfectly playable-lets be specific here in that it was only the online multiplayer that was broke, campaign, playlists and customs were all fine (bar split-screen H2A customs, that still performs poorly).
I'm pretty sure the campaigns didn't work at launch either.
I'm pretty sure they did, I did play them after all
You just happened to have a good copy of the game. Lots of people had problems with game crashing, losing progress, and frame rate issues. Just like how some people say (though I think they are lying) multiplayer hasn't had any issues since X update.
Everyone has the same copy. You don't just happen to get good copies.
The game was broken server side, not locally.
Game crashing and frame rate issues in single player are server side issues?
Not everyone had those issues, so are you suggesting that it was down to the individual copies? Because truly, that's silly.
I wasn't being literal.
So how did you mean it?
183
« on: August 04, 2015, 06:51:17 PM »
Petty insults and a lack of basic grammar really make you look good man. my grammar is better than yours
i don't need capitalization or punctuation
it's better than having missing, extraneous, or awkwardly placed verbiage tossed haphazardly hither and thither
Causation does not mean two things are the same, the mere implication of this is utterly ridiculous. you're hung-up over semantics
and i'm the mad twelve-year-old
okay
Is there a reason why you are unable to comprehend language that utilises vocabulary that's more advanced than that of a twelve year old?
184
« on: August 04, 2015, 06:02:08 PM »
I love seeing all the competitive types who try and make up excuses for why Halo 4 is the most popular game specific playlist in MCC, why it has more backwards compatibility votes than any other and why H4 comes up a lot more in multi game playlists than 2 or 3. Just admit that the damn thing is more popular by the majority of the playerbase.
That's because the Halo player base left on the MCC is nothing but Reachtards and anyone who joined Halo after.
Halo veterans that have been there since CE weren't gonna wait 6 months for them to fix the MCC.
That makes sense, people that have played Halo for 14 years and stuck with the franchise through the totally problem-free Halo 2 are unwilling to wait six (which is overly dramatic) months. Not as if there are people that actually like Halo 4; it's also strange to assume that those that liked Reach automatically like 4, you've got living proof against that right here.
At least Halo 2 worked day one unlike the MCC which like you said took 6, supposedly, dramatic months to fix. Fuck me for expecting a game that I paid $60 for to work day one right? Yep, totally couldn't work around what Halo 2 had vs what MCC had. It's only 6 months, I should get over myself, because fuck the satisfaction of wanting my games to work and function properly. MCC was a disaster for 6 months, unplayable, literally unplayable. I think you can look past Halo 2's problems vs what MCC had. 6 months is a long time, it makes sense as to why people are so turned off to it now. At least I was able to play Halo 2 whereas the MCC I had to wait 6 months for them to fix, and even now it's still not perfect.
It really wasn't six months though (like I said before you jumped to your preferred interpretation, six is dramatic, 3 is closer to the truth), and the MCC was perfectly playable-lets be specific here in that it was only the online multiplayer that was broke, campaign, playlists and customs were all fine (bar split-screen H2A customs, that still performs poorly).
I'm pretty sure the campaigns didn't work at launch either.
I'm pretty sure they did, I did play them after all
You just happened to have a good copy of the game. Lots of people had problems with game crashing, losing progress, and frame rate issues. Just like how some people say (though I think they are lying) multiplayer hasn't had any issues since X update.
Everyone has the same copy. You don't just happen to get good copies.
The game was broken server side, not locally.
Game crashing and frame rate issues in single player are server side issues?
Not everyone had those issues, so are you suggesting that it was down to the individual copies? Because truly, that's silly.
185
« on: August 04, 2015, 05:59:16 PM »
I said "exposed to real life", you said "preparing children for adulthood". Who's putting words in whose mouth? they're the exact same thing in the sense that one thing leads to the other
you wouldn't "expose" someone to real life if you weren't trying to prepare for for it
Either you did, or you believe that real life issues begin at adulthood-which is it?
you're so patronizing for someone who struggles so hard when it comes to forming a coherent sentence
Petty insults and a lack of basic grammar really make you look good man. they're the exact same thing in the sense that one thing leads to the other Causation does not mean two things are the same, the mere implication of this is utterly ridiculous. I genuinely cannot tell if you're stupid or just mad; it has also come across my mind that perhaps you're just a twelve year old, that would explain your sourness over ESRB ratings.
186
« on: August 04, 2015, 05:50:12 PM »
I said "exposed to real life", you said "preparing children for adulthood". Who's putting words in whose mouth?
Either you did, or you believe that real life issues begin at adulthood-which is it?
187
« on: August 04, 2015, 05:44:17 PM »
Why so? You don't think children should be exposed to the real world no
i don't
there's a time and place for everything
preparing children for adulthood should probably come during your teen years
I disagree, I know about two kids that are like that-one's actually, literally special and the other is flourishing into a future peadophile. The reality is, your utopian preference isn't even possible anymore-better to learn about things through a safe, sci-fi filter than through watching IS behead someone on Facebook (for example). Plus, saying that real life issues aren't around until adulthood begins is just downright ignorant.
188
« on: August 04, 2015, 05:38:43 PM »
ITT: console casuals getting rekt over their shit RTS
nobody is getting rekt though
Esoteric is
189
« on: August 04, 2015, 05:37:51 PM »
i just don't like the idea of little kids playing games where you kill, and deal with very complex adult themes, like war
Why so? You don't think children should be exposed to the real world, or in this case, a fantasy representation where most of the worst elements are either removed or turned into things to brofist over and laugh about?
190
« on: August 04, 2015, 03:33:51 PM »
It's going to be good, two words: Creative Assembly.
I just hope they upgrade the original idea from the first game. The first game was good, but not Starcraft worthy of applause.
Still hyped though.
As a basic, stone-age console gimp I prefer Supreme Commander 2 and Halo Wars to Starcraft-there are limits to how you can play an RTS with a controller, a certain simplification that I appreciate PC gamers hate. But seriously, what is needed is a drastic expansion and addition of game mechanics-drastic base building like in Supreme Commander would be ridiculous, so instead a huge boost in available tactics and technologies, as well as unit types and detail would be the way to go-no need to overhaul the core game
191
« on: August 04, 2015, 02:55:35 PM »
It's going to be good, two words: Creative Assembly.
192
« on: August 04, 2015, 02:52:23 PM »
I love seeing all the competitive types who try and make up excuses for why Halo 4 is the most popular game specific playlist in MCC, why it has more backwards compatibility votes than any other and why H4 comes up a lot more in multi game playlists than 2 or 3. Just admit that the damn thing is more popular by the majority of the playerbase.
That's because the Halo player base left on the MCC is nothing but Reachtards and anyone who joined Halo after.
Halo veterans that have been there since CE weren't gonna wait 6 months for them to fix the MCC.
That makes sense, people that have played Halo for 14 years and stuck with the franchise through the totally problem-free Halo 2 are unwilling to wait six (which is overly dramatic) months. Not as if there are people that actually like Halo 4; it's also strange to assume that those that liked Reach automatically like 4, you've got living proof against that right here.
At least Halo 2 worked day one unlike the MCC which like you said took 6, supposedly, dramatic months to fix. Fuck me for expecting a game that I paid $60 for to work day one right? Yep, totally couldn't work around what Halo 2 had vs what MCC had. It's only 6 months, I should get over myself, because fuck the satisfaction of wanting my games to work and function properly. MCC was a disaster for 6 months, unplayable, literally unplayable. I think you can look past Halo 2's problems vs what MCC had. 6 months is a long time, it makes sense as to why people are so turned off to it now. At least I was able to play Halo 2 whereas the MCC I had to wait 6 months for them to fix, and even now it's still not perfect.
It really wasn't six months though (like I said before you jumped to your preferred interpretation, six is dramatic, 3 is closer to the truth), and the MCC was perfectly playable-lets be specific here in that it was only the online multiplayer that was broke, campaign, playlists and customs were all fine (bar split-screen H2A customs, that still performs poorly).
I'm pretty sure the campaigns didn't work at launch either.
I'm pretty sure they did, I did play them after all
You just happened to have a good copy of the game. Lots of people had problems with game crashing, losing progress, and frame rate issues. Just like how some people say (though I think they are lying) multiplayer hasn't had any issues since X update.
See that's where'd i'd disagree, the MCC is still inconsistent with the multiplayer-and the H2A customs run dreadfully in split-screen intermittently. Agh, it's all the past now-as long as lessons have been learnt at 343 and Halo 5 goes well
193
« on: August 04, 2015, 12:32:59 PM »
Is it over, anything good? No sequels pls
Aside from HW2, it was pretty lacklustre.
How come you think that? The purpose was to build upon E3 and to give us more of titles revealed last year, we got the huge bonus of Halo Wars 2 as well-i'd have labeled a success
194
« on: August 04, 2015, 12:30:08 PM »
I love seeing all the competitive types who try and make up excuses for why Halo 4 is the most popular game specific playlist in MCC, why it has more backwards compatibility votes than any other and why H4 comes up a lot more in multi game playlists than 2 or 3. Just admit that the damn thing is more popular by the majority of the playerbase.
That's because the Halo player base left on the MCC is nothing but Reachtards and anyone who joined Halo after.
Halo veterans that have been there since CE weren't gonna wait 6 months for them to fix the MCC.
That makes sense, people that have played Halo for 14 years and stuck with the franchise through the totally problem-free Halo 2 are unwilling to wait six (which is overly dramatic) months. Not as if there are people that actually like Halo 4; it's also strange to assume that those that liked Reach automatically like 4, you've got living proof against that right here.
At least Halo 2 worked day one unlike the MCC which like you said took 6, supposedly, dramatic months to fix. Fuck me for expecting a game that I paid $60 for to work day one right? Yep, totally couldn't work around what Halo 2 had vs what MCC had. It's only 6 months, I should get over myself, because fuck the satisfaction of wanting my games to work and function properly. MCC was a disaster for 6 months, unplayable, literally unplayable. I think you can look past Halo 2's problems vs what MCC had. 6 months is a long time, it makes sense as to why people are so turned off to it now. At least I was able to play Halo 2 whereas the MCC I had to wait 6 months for them to fix, and even now it's still not perfect.
It really wasn't six months though (like I said before you jumped to your preferred interpretation, six is dramatic, 3 is closer to the truth), and the MCC was perfectly playable-lets be specific here in that it was only the online multiplayer that was broke, campaign, playlists and customs were all fine (bar split-screen H2A customs, that still performs poorly).
I'm pretty sure the campaigns didn't work at launch either.
I'm pretty sure they did, I did play them after all
195
« on: August 04, 2015, 03:25:25 AM »
I love seeing all the competitive types who try and make up excuses for why Halo 4 is the most popular game specific playlist in MCC, why it has more backwards compatibility votes than any other and why H4 comes up a lot more in multi game playlists than 2 or 3. Just admit that the damn thing is more popular by the majority of the playerbase.
That's because the Halo player base left on the MCC is nothing but Reachtards and anyone who joined Halo after.
Halo veterans that have been there since CE weren't gonna wait 6 months for them to fix the MCC.
That makes sense, people that have played Halo for 14 years and stuck with the franchise through the totally problem-free Halo 2 are unwilling to wait six (which is overly dramatic) months. Not as if there are people that actually like Halo 4; it's also strange to assume that those that liked Reach automatically like 4, you've got living proof against that right here.
At least Halo 2 worked day one unlike the MCC which like you said took 6, supposedly, dramatic months to fix. Fuck me for expecting a game that I paid $60 for to work day one right? Yep, totally couldn't work around what Halo 2 had vs what MCC had. It's only 6 months, I should get over myself, because fuck the satisfaction of wanting my games to work and function properly. MCC was a disaster for 6 months, unplayable, literally unplayable. I think you can look past Halo 2's problems vs what MCC had. 6 months is a long time, it makes sense as to why people are so turned off to it now. At least I was able to play Halo 2 whereas the MCC I had to wait 6 months for them to fix, and even now it's still not perfect.
It really wasn't six months though (like I said before you jumped to your preferred interpretation, six is dramatic, 3 is closer to the truth), and the MCC was perfectly playable-lets be specific here in that it was only the online multiplayer that was broke, campaign, playlists and customs were all fine (bar split-screen H2A customs, that still performs poorly).
196
« on: August 03, 2015, 05:26:26 PM »
I have never played that, I was FIFA 02-10 but played PES 2008-2010 too
You do realize PES was originally called Winning Eleven, right? Not sure why but they changed the name for western audiences. Imo, in those times PES was better, but that slowly changed in the late 2000's with revamped controls in FIFA along with more licensed teams/leagues.
PES was never Winning Eleven in Europe, before it was PES it was ISS in European markets-Winning Eleven was for America and Japan. And truly, I remember FIFA from way back before I had a PES game, keep in mind that i'm 15. The earliest titles I have are FIFA 02 and FIFA World Cup 2002
197
« on: August 03, 2015, 05:19:34 PM »
[Insert generic sports game hate here]
OT: I'm not the biggest FIFA fan out there by any stretch but I'm definitely considering this one.
don't ever get PES, it's shit
PES 16 is apparently better than FIFA according to people who've played it
Plus it's running on the FOX engine.
The last time PES was good Micheal Owen was playing for Newcastle, it's awkward controls, lack of actual teams, confused design and overall strange feel is crap-Fifa is at least a known, proven quantity that can be enjoyed by pretty much anyone
Not like I care, because both are garbage. Just reporting what's out there.
PES won best sports game last year, and is getting majorly reworked this time, hence the very positive feedback.
Watch Dogs won over 82 awards prior to release, nothing said before release day is trustworthy anymore
Emphasis on the last part of my post about major improvements.
Meanwhile EA reskins teams and adds a female character model to the same game from half a decade ago.
There's as much of a difference between FIFA 10 and FIFA 15 as there is between PES 10 and PES 15
198
« on: August 03, 2015, 05:12:27 PM »
The last time PES was good Micheal Owen was playing for Newcastle
>you now remember Winning Eleven
I have never played that, I was FIFA 02-10 (and 13 to present) but played PES 2008-2010 too
199
« on: August 03, 2015, 05:10:48 PM »
[Insert generic sports game hate here]
OT: I'm not the biggest FIFA fan out there by any stretch but I'm definitely considering this one.
don't ever get PES, it's shit
PES 16 is apparently better than FIFA according to people who've played it
Plus it's running on the FOX engine.
The last time PES was good Micheal Owen was playing for Newcastle, it's awkward controls, lack of actual teams, confused design and overall strange feel is crap-Fifa is at least a known, proven quantity that can be enjoyed by pretty much anyone
Not like I care, because both are garbage. Just reporting what's out there.
PES won best sports game last year, and is getting majorly reworked this time, hence the very positive feedback.
Watch Dogs won over 82 awards prior to release, nothing said before release day is trustworthy anymore
200
« on: August 03, 2015, 04:55:43 PM »
It's literally a waste of space as a tabletop set piece.
The Mc in your handle is literally a waste of characters. Your point being?
201
« on: August 03, 2015, 04:54:44 PM »
i applied to portsmouth university
Man, you feeling okay?
202
« on: August 03, 2015, 04:53:08 PM »
[Insert generic sports game hate here]
OT: I'm not the biggest FIFA fan out there by any stretch but I'm definitely considering this one.
don't ever get PES, it's shit
PES 16 is apparently better than FIFA according to people who've played it
Plus it's running on the FOX engine.
The last time PES was good Micheal Owen was playing for Newcastle, it's awkward controls, lack of actual teams, confused design and overall strange feel is crap-Fifa is at least a known, proven quantity that can be enjoyed by pretty much anyone
203
« on: August 03, 2015, 04:50:48 PM »
I think I last posted three months ago? Idek, this place is genuinely awful. I could never come back but showing up occasionally produces funny moments.
Just the sight of your name is enough to send everyone into fits of laughter
204
« on: August 03, 2015, 04:16:35 PM »
That looks like a colossal waste of space.
It's a Halo tabletop game, not a Plotmaster tabletop game
It is a waste of space though, and just unnecessarily makes playing it more awkward.
I Mcagree, but it's still Mcundeniably cool
I never said it wasn't cool. It's just dumb as a tabletop piece.
Somehow I don't think that it's a standard piece, so just like there are ridiculous things in every other game with a universe, there's a ridiculous piece in this one too. And cool things are not a waste of space
205
« on: August 03, 2015, 02:22:57 PM »
That looks like a colossal waste of space.
It's a Halo tabletop game, not a Plotmaster tabletop game
It is a waste of space though, and just unnecessarily makes playing it more awkward.
I Mcagree, but it's still Mcundeniably cool
206
« on: August 03, 2015, 02:09:36 PM »
That looks like a colossal waste of space.
It's a Halo tabletop game, not a Plotmaster tabletop game
207
« on: August 02, 2015, 05:03:08 PM »
Cheeky nando's with the gf [emoji108]xDDDDD[emoji239][emoji239][emoji239][emoji239][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Spoiler Nando's isn't even that good, KFC is sooo much better KFC is such garbage.
I feel bad for Europoors that think KFC is good fried chicken.
Okay... Keep in mind that I never said it was good, or just good fried chicken-just that it was superior to Nando's
208
« on: August 02, 2015, 04:25:39 PM »
Cheeky nando's with the gf [emoji108]xDDDDD[emoji239][emoji239][emoji239][emoji239][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91] Spoiler Nando's isn't even that good, KFC is sooo much better
209
« on: August 02, 2015, 04:23:09 PM »
What is this a porno?
Yeah, "Portuguese boy gets punished by French pensioner"
210
« on: August 02, 2015, 04:20:31 PM »
Now which other loved franchise has leapt from top-down to open-world 3D? As much as the fanboys would argue, that's turned out pretty well. Spoiler Obviously it would have to be done well, by a great team; we all know some (ie. Obsidian) do a better job than others (ie. Bethesda's dev arm)
Pages: 1 ... 567 89 ... 130
|
Show Posts