This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 271272273 274275 ... 1001
8161
« on: August 16, 2016, 04:52:58 PM »
You have a right to not be discriminated against.
No, you don't. You have a right not to be discriminated against based on sex, religion, ethnicity, etc., but every employer discriminates: a marketing firm discriminates against applicants that have no sales experience, and the infantry discriminates against all candidates that can't meet physical and mental standards. As a result, women are currently barred from the infantry because it's been shown time and time again that there are exceedingly few who can even pass to women's standards let alone men's, and the logistical ramifications of catering to a minuscule minority outweigh the benefit of including them, not even mentioning the psychological impact of having women in the field.
>you cant discriminate based on sex >discrimination based on sex is good because of X lol okay dude I thought you were supposed to be some champion of logic. If even ONE woman is able to meet the requirements of being in a combat role, the entire institution should bend to cater her.
8162
« on: August 16, 2016, 04:40:43 PM »
Automobile
8163
« on: August 16, 2016, 04:06:52 PM »
There's more requirements to serving in the military than accuracy. But if a woman is able to meet every one of those requirements to the extent that a man is, it's a miscarriage of human rights to deny her enlistment. End of story.
Military service--especially in the infantry--isn't a right, though. Effectively no women would be able to be competitive against men's standards, and their standards are already drastically lower (e.g., a male that couldn't do 3 pullups would be laughed out the door). And then, assuming there are women that are physically comparable to men, that incredibly low number would lead to disproportionately high costs for separate berthing.
You have a right to not be discriminated against. If a man is legally allowed to do something, it's a crime to prohibit women from doing the same thing - or, at the very least, not having a reasonable substitute.
8164
« on: August 16, 2016, 03:56:00 PM »
There's more requirements to serving in the military than accuracy. But if a woman is able to meet every one of those requirements to the extent that a man is, it's a miscarriage of human rights to deny her enlistment. End of story.
8165
« on: August 16, 2016, 03:55:41 PM »
This is why all of your fears of a doomsday situation if women are allowed to serve in combat roles is ridiculous. A very small fraction of women would even pass the requirements to join.
But those who do pass have every right to fight on the battlefield.
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
8166
« on: August 16, 2016, 03:54:35 PM »
This is why all of your fears of a doomsday situation if women are allowed to serve in combat roles is ridiculous. A very small fraction of women would even pass the requirements to join.
But those who do pass have every right to fight on the battlefield.
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
8167
« on: August 16, 2016, 03:52:33 PM »
This is why all of your fears of a doomsday situation if women are allowed to serve in combat roles is ridiculous. A very small fraction of women would even pass the requirements to join.
But those who do pass have every right to fight on the battlefield.
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
8168
« on: August 16, 2016, 03:50:53 PM »
This is why all of your fears of a doomsday situation if women are allowed to serve in combat roles is ridiculous. A very small fraction of women would even pass the requirements to join.
But those who do pass have every right to fight on the battlefield.
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
8169
« on: August 16, 2016, 03:50:15 PM »
This is why all of your fears of a doomsday situation if women are allowed to serve in combat roles is ridiculous. A very small fraction of women would even pass the requirements to join.
But those who do pass have every right to fight on the battlefield.
Nope
Yep
Nope
Yep
8170
« on: August 16, 2016, 03:47:01 PM »
There's more requirements to serving in the military than accuracy. But if a woman is able to meet every one of those requirements to the extent that a man is, it's a miscarriage of human rights to deny her enlistment. End of story.
8171
« on: August 16, 2016, 02:52:04 PM »
This is why all of your fears of a doomsday situation if women are allowed to serve in combat roles is ridiculous. A very small fraction of women would even pass the requirements to join.
But those who do pass have every right to fight on the battlefield.
Nope
Yep
8172
« on: August 16, 2016, 02:33:24 PM »
This is why all of your fears of a doomsday situation if women are allowed to serve in combat roles is ridiculous. A very small fraction of women would even pass the requirements to join.
But those who do pass have every right to fight on the battlefield.
8173
« on: August 16, 2016, 02:23:10 PM »
20
8174
« on: August 15, 2016, 11:31:14 PM »
Why the fuck y'all want watches? Fuckin white people, I swear
watches are sweet, man
8175
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:44:57 PM »
yeah I feel something like this would work a lot better, where the beads are extremely thin and close together
this is probably an instance where you wouldn't want to skimp on the price
yooo i've actually been looking around for a bead doorway to hang outside of my new room and i really dig that one
I also saw a lot of really cool Bob Marley ones while browsing, I feel like those would be such a chill addition to a room.
8176
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:39:28 PM »
yeah I feel something like this would work a lot better, where the beads are extremely thin and close together this is probably an instance where you wouldn't want to skimp on the price
8177
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:35:52 PM »
you sneaky bastards
8178
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:34:23 PM »
I was going to chuckle until I saw the post below it.
the dragon dildo joke is old af, the funny thing here is the cringy noel comment
8179
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:32:48 PM »
8180
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:29:37 PM »
lol, I'm just kidding
I used to have those in my house when I was a kid and they were legit so terrible, always falling off and and getting twisted around and shit
a curtain sounds so much better
8181
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:25:38 PM »
20/10
8182
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:21:51 PM »
I don't even use doors I just do the beads thing 
8183
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:17:00 PM »
The Doors is pretty boring.
this is the end
8184
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:11:31 PM »
8185
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:09:15 PM »
the killer awoke before dawn
8186
« on: August 15, 2016, 09:40:43 PM »
then dont get all pissy at me for talking about my personal life, especially when I don't even do it
I don't get pissed at you for talking about your personal suffering. I get pissed that you let it infect every single post you make.
I was having this talk with TBlocks, actually. I've honestly tried several times to make peace with you, as I don't have a problem with any of your opinions. But the problem I do have is, you have no fucking chill when it comes to how you go about presenting them. You never joke around, lay off, or join in on communal fun. You're a pariah because you instigate and badger people, and as a result you breed hostility. You're the least liked member here, and for good reason. I know some part of your brain gets off on people being mean to you but think about the effects it has on the rest of the forum. If there was one person on this entire forum I'd have to call toxic, it would be you.
wow rethinking my entire existence on here now, thanks man Spoiler this actually isn't sarcasm btw
the fucked up shit people say on here will still madden me to no end, but I'll just grit my teeth and move on when I see it
8187
« on: August 15, 2016, 09:39:04 PM »
They're about SC, not CK.
what
sc = secondclass
ck = carson keller(?)
probably the gayest way to refer to yourself i've ever seen
hey man I needed a concise way to sum it up and I didn't want to oust my last name how the fuck do you know it
8188
« on: August 15, 2016, 09:19:46 PM »
not to mention you bitch about your personal life FAR more than I do
sure i do. there's nothing wrong with doing that, and i only do it to stimulate conversation.
for the first time in a long ass time i'm consistently happy with my life and myself. any "bitching" i do is from a purely intellectual standpoint. i have nothing to complain about.
then dont get all pissy at me for talking about my personal life, especially when I don't even do it
8189
« on: August 15, 2016, 09:11:44 PM »
nah, it's literally all you fucking post about
it's not but alright dude. i've just been posting more about it now just out of coincidence.
not to mention you bitch about your personal life FAR more than I do
8190
« on: August 15, 2016, 09:08:49 PM »
They're about SC, not CK.
what
if you can't decipher what this means, my point about you being literally retarded is just made all the more clear "lets just take the last 6 threads this guy has made and form his gimmick out of them lol"
bro come on
listing a couple of my interests and calling it a gimmick is pretty fucking stupid
nah, it's literally all you fucking post about
Pages: 1 ... 271272273 274275 ... 1001
|
Show Posts
