This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 236237238 239240 ... 1000
7111
« on: September 28, 2016, 11:09:35 PM »
so a slippery slope argument, nice
same argument that people used to prohibit blacks from enlisting
hold women to the same exact standards as any man, and let her enlist if she passes. That's a drop in the bucket for military efficiency, and also lets us stop becoming discriminatory monsters.
7112
« on: September 28, 2016, 11:03:58 PM »
Equality and morality is far more important than having the best military we can possibly have.
Well a military is meant to protect a country, not make everyone feel special. If we have a shitty military that can't defend us because of who we let in it, we might as well ask to be invaded.
Should we be like Sparta and throw anyone not perfect for the military off a cliff? Nah. But we shouldn't willingly lessen our strength due to arbitrary reasoning.
Even if we let the women who qualified serve, it wouldn't be some doomsday thing that cripples the military like everyone is obsessing about.
7113
« on: September 28, 2016, 10:19:37 PM »
b-b-but muh unit cohesion!!!!!!
i cant concentrate on my mission even though im supposedly a trained soldier with boobs next to me!!
Kill yourself, that's bullshit reasoning that feminists have created. Unit Cohesion isn't the fucking reason, I'll fucking serve with blacks an arabs, of which I've had on my fucking squad, just fine. And you know me.
But for whatever reason, raw effectiveness in combat is decreased and there are studies on and by the IDF on co-ed combat arms units that display this perfectly.
Who gives a shit? Equality and morality is far more important than having the best military we can possibly have. Even if we let the women who qualified serve, it wouldn't be some doomsday thing that cripples the military like everyone is obsessing about.
7114
« on: September 28, 2016, 10:13:27 PM »
So... After reading that...
Why are women unfit for combat roles again?
She's a crazy fucking broad who represents one in a million women, if that, and the birthing and facility cost of putting... five women in to an infantry company somewhere far outway the lost five bodies by barring them entirely.
even if it was one in a trillion, that woman deserves every right to serve her country if new data came out that said only one in a million people from kansas qualify for a combat role, would you forbid everyone from kansas from joining? No, you would still let those anomalies enlist when they appeared.
7115
« on: September 28, 2016, 10:10:49 PM »
b-b-but muh unit cohesion!!!!!!
i cant concentrate on my mission even though im supposedly a trained soldier with boobs next to me!!
7116
« on: September 28, 2016, 09:11:23 PM »
thanks
7117
« on: September 28, 2016, 07:26:32 PM »
Your logic makes no sense.
I actually worry that you have some sort of horrible mental illness sometimes.
Maybe actually explain why you disagree? Men in fiction, even the attractive ones, aren't defined by their looks. They're defined by their personal traits, whether that's resourcefulness, ingenuity, charisma, etc. That's not the same for women.
7118
« on: September 28, 2016, 07:09:08 PM »
You act like it's a bad thing that women are pretty.
And it doesn't really lower how seriously women in general are. If anything, it takes them more seriously, since you always have to be on your toes.
It's not a bad thing if they're pretty - it's a bad thing if that's their one defining factor. And women in fiction, antagonists or not, are usually presented that way.
That presentation doesn't make people take them more seriously, it does the opposite.
Pretty simple concept, shouldn't confuse you.
7119
« on: September 28, 2016, 06:48:18 PM »
You act like it's a bad thing that women are pretty.
And it doesn't really lower how seriously women in general are. If anything, it takes them more seriously, since you always have to be on your toes.
It's not a bad thing if they're pretty - it's a bad thing if that's their one defining factor. And women in fiction, antagonists or not, are usually presented that way. That presentation doesn't make people take them more seriously, it does the opposite.
7120
« on: September 28, 2016, 06:28:23 PM »
I love how SecondClass assumed I meant women NEEDED to be sexual to be powerful. A smart woman is a powerful woman, and yes a smart woman would know that sexualization is a great asset. However there are many powerful women without sexualization as an asset.
The new Lara Croft, Faith, femshep(she's wearing armor all the time COME ON), female protagonists in Assassin's Creed...somehow, all of these characters aren't really sexualized. Sure, they have good bodies and definitely are ideal, but they are powerful without shaking their ass in everyone's face. Instead they are commanding, agile, combat ready and smart.
So no, you don't need sexualization to be powerful.
And pretty much any time there's a powerful female antagonist in fiction, she's pretty and flirty.
Listing a few counterexamples doesn't mean the problem isn't there or isn't extremely widespread. And no, a smart woman would recognize that while using her sexuality might be beneficial to her, it does nothing but lowers how seriously women in general are taken.
7121
« on: September 28, 2016, 04:05:24 PM »
I'm too much of a degenerate to buy music
I just download it off youtube
That reminds me, the dude who owns the Youtube to MP3 conversion site is getting sued by record labels.
good thing there's like a bunch of them
7122
« on: September 28, 2016, 03:58:34 PM »
I'm too much of a degenerate to buy music
I just download it off youtube
but the quality
quality seems fine to me I can't tell the difference
7123
« on: September 28, 2016, 03:47:50 PM »
I kinda skimmed through it, because I don't care enough to read it fully. So if I am wrong gladly correct me.
I always saw temptresses as a powerful woman, evil or not. Being capable of seducing almost anyone and use it to their advantage is a powerful ability. As I said before, a smart woman is a deadly woman. A smart woman would know that sexualization can be a great asset when dealing with opponents, maybe not in the combat way but in other ways. If someone can use their sexuality to their advantage well fucking done. That isn't something that is demonized, just the next challenge that is overcomed as the player, and OF COURSE a male character would use terms like bitch for a female opponent they just beat. Like calling a guy a pussy.
For the grotesque part, all I can really say is that male counterparts exist, just instead of sexual they are meant to completely gross you out and scare you. With obese men in hospital gowns coming to kill you, and I highly doubt you can creep out people with a guy in a thong and bowling balls for arms.
She shouldn't have to use her sexuality to be powerful. And pretty much any time there's a powerful female antagonist in fiction, she's pretty and flirty.
7124
« on: September 28, 2016, 03:39:41 PM »
I'm too much of a degenerate to buy music
I just download it off youtube
7125
« on: September 28, 2016, 03:35:27 PM »
I'm more offended that they didn't even add aliens
the fact that my people aren't being represented is a borderline hate crime
So you'd relish the thought of them being shot at, gassed, set on fire, roadkilled, bombed, skewered, etc.
I know equality is all nice and well, but you'd think not having your race being depicted in such scenes would be a lot better.
It's a war game man, you're going waaaaay too into it.
um you totally missed the self depreciating joke there
7126
« on: September 28, 2016, 03:33:57 PM »
Also stop with the emojis
um no
7127
« on: September 28, 2016, 05:27:39 AM »
oh my god β€
7128
« on: September 28, 2016, 05:21:55 AM »
omg I hope I'm mentioned
7129
« on: September 28, 2016, 02:19:55 AM »
Try some Jager.
join the skype group
also yeah I'd kill for some liquor rn
Invite?
what's your skype username I'll add you as a friend then add you to the chat
7130
« on: September 28, 2016, 01:57:22 AM »
Try some Jager.
join the skype group also yeah I'd kill for some liquor rn
7131
« on: September 28, 2016, 01:16:39 AM »
I'm more offended that they didn't even add aliens
the fact that my people aren't being represented is a borderline hate crime
7132
« on: September 28, 2016, 01:15:45 AM »
licorice is awful
it's also spelled retarded for how it's pronounced
it's a sick D&J reference fam
7133
« on: September 28, 2016, 01:09:11 AM »
lovin that licorice
7134
« on: September 28, 2016, 12:40:53 AM »
um obv
7135
« on: September 28, 2016, 12:28:29 AM »
historical accuracy < not being an evil bigoted monster
thanks
7136
« on: September 27, 2016, 11:18:57 PM »
no one cares tho
7137
« on: September 27, 2016, 11:18:11 PM »
ok
7138
« on: September 27, 2016, 11:06:34 PM »
I know this is a joke thread but fuck historical accuracy
idc if the world was shitty in WWI and there were no black or female soldiers, it's 2016 and current games depicting that time period shouldn't be that way
stop
afraid of the truth
Yes. That is the truth. I think it's a wonderful, and a very progressive thing that almost every character in BF1 is black! A great thing for the CURRENT YEAR. And I totally agree. It's CURRENT YEAR after all, who gives a hoot about historical accuracy when you're basing something off a historical event? White people (particularly white men, they're the worst) belong in a bygone age, and their mark on history should be erased and replaced with lots and lots of people of color! After all, whites are the dullest race and lack the vibrancy of all the other races. God, I hate white people.
100% right
7139
« on: September 27, 2016, 10:39:26 PM »
no plug for phone otherwise I'd totally be there
7140
« on: September 27, 2016, 10:35:15 PM »
last post 1 hour 22 minutes ago
it's all over boys
Pages: 1 ... 236237238 239240 ... 1000
|
Show Posts