This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 179180181 182183 ... 1001
5401
« on: March 06, 2017, 02:37:55 AM »
I'd rather be a Nobody
While she is best girl, no
I can accept this
5402
« on: March 06, 2017, 02:32:08 AM »
Um, Charlie is funny and actually a genius.
Desty is funny too and Charlie is only smart/evil when it comes to the Waitress
5403
« on: March 06, 2017, 02:28:42 AM »
Dennis -- Roman
(self-explanatory)
Dee -- SecondClass
(petty, vain, spiteful, vengeful)
Mac -- Jive
(obsessed with physical form, in denial about literally everything)
Charlie -- Desty
(barely understandable, eccentric, possibly illiterate)
Frank -- MyNameIsCharlie
(horny old dude who tries to hang out with his younger peers)
Rickety Cricket -- Deci
(is constantly belittled and disparaged but always comes back for more)
your turn
5404
« on: March 06, 2017, 02:23:05 AM »
I'd rather be a Nobody
5405
« on: March 06, 2017, 01:30:25 AM »
It's just like that old gypsy woman said!
5406
« on: March 05, 2017, 07:34:07 AM »
5407
« on: March 05, 2017, 04:38:34 AM »
I call the girl who Grey Delisle voices
So do you want the Banshee pilot or Nova?
omg she voices multiple people? I need to get this game
5408
« on: March 05, 2017, 04:34:51 AM »
you know how the Waitress has banged pretty much every non-Charlie character except for Cricket? that changes this episode the title: Charlie Bashes a Street Rat Spoiler I just wanted a plot to justify that amazing title tbh
5409
« on: March 05, 2017, 04:32:48 AM »
I call the girl who Grey Delisle voices
5410
« on: March 04, 2017, 08:40:18 AM »
man dur ein ?
5411
« on: March 03, 2017, 04:37:26 AM »
literally perfect
5412
« on: March 03, 2017, 02:30:21 AM »
Does the fact that they get heavily searched at the airport in Cars 2 imply there was a cars 9/11 that increased airport security
If there was a cars 9/11 then there was a cars George Bush, which qualifies the existence of a cars Jeb Bush.
please beep
5413
« on: March 03, 2017, 02:23:06 AM »
Does the fact that they get heavily searched at the airport in Cars 2 imply there was a cars 9/11 that increased airport security
does car Islam forbid using certain fuels
5414
« on: March 03, 2017, 01:57:48 AM »
 a car jesus was crucified in the Cars canon
5415
« on: March 02, 2017, 09:34:08 PM »
Is that Dr. House's father?
xander berkeley is everyone's father
5416
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:59:11 PM »
 hate this dude
5417
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:57:59 PM »
the female geese
5418
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:57:28 PM »
Women would be smart enough to break rules that are designed to give them a disadvantage.
Men would cling to some "honor" bound notion of following the rules until it was too late.
It's amazing how we can all just cast all men and women into some same kinda mindset.
women will always cling to wanting to be subjected to men
and men will always want to be on top
Generally, men are more obsessed with their ego, and women care more about reality. Note my word "generally"
5419
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:54:00 PM »
Like sure, men would probably lose, or just break the rules too.
But theyre proving the point that women can't win against men with fists, which was the point....
No one ever said the average woman is stronger than the average male. If that was the point you were trying to make here, you're super insecure about your sex.
5420
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:49:41 PM »
Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.
"Negative thing" does not mean weakness.
You could just as easily argue that the necessity for physical strength in the first place is also a negative thing, and that the physical strength that men typically possess is symbolic of the shit we probably wouldn't need if the world were a fairer, better place. It's more nuanced than you think.
That's nice. Well get back to me when animals killing each other and survival of the fittest stops existing. You won't find it on this planet.
Read my other post if you want my opinion on that. I'm staying basic and to the definition for a reason. Otherwise we could be here all night. Having those kinds of conversations with you, while interesting, is most certainly an effort.
Animals killing each other and survival of the fittest are both bad things.
It's only that we as sapient organisms (animals don't know right and wrong) can recognize that.
Going back to the man vs woman thing, sure - the average man could beat the shit out of the average woman. But that doesn't make him "better" and that's not how wars are fought in the first place. In short, this is a dumb thread.
But this particular war was between genders with fists
Dumb thread, but technically males would win.... making them better.
Women would be smart enough to break rules that are designed to give them a disadvantage. Men would cling to some "honor" bound notion of following the rules until it was too late.
5421
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:45:33 PM »
Considering one side is quite literally stronger than the other on a physical level, and have larger skeleton size and bone mass? Men easily.
What Class try and refute this
He won't. He realizes that men are stronger; he just considers physical strength to be a negative thing.
And he has a point. The fact that women generally can't defend themselves against men is probably a bad thing.
That used to be the case, then Samuel Colt came along and leveled the playing field for all.
Hence why I've always supported guns and self-defense tools.
5422
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:43:53 PM »
Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.
"Negative thing" does not mean weakness.
You could just as easily argue that the necessity for physical strength in the first place is also a negative thing, and that the physical strength that men typically possess is symbolic of the shit we probably wouldn't need if the world were a fairer, better place. It's more nuanced than you think.
That's nice. Well get back to me when animals killing each other and survival of the fittest stops existing. You won't find it on this planet.
Read my other post if you want my opinion on that. I'm staying basic and to the definition for a reason. Otherwise we could be here all night. Having those kinds of conversations with you, while interesting, is most certainly an effort.
Animals killing each other and survival of the fittest are both bad things. It's only that we as sapient organisms (animals don't know right and wrong) can recognize that. Going back to the man vs woman thing, sure - the average man could beat the shit out of the average woman. But that doesn't make him "better" and that's not how wars are fought in the first place. In short, this is a dumb thread.
5423
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:38:00 PM »
The fact that you have to exclude anything BUT physical strength (weapons, tactics, subterfuge, etc) from being a factor in this war shows how one-sided an actual gender war would be.
I'm only going on what the OP presented. If we're going into weapons and tactics and all that stuff, that's about as muddled as you can get. Women are smart, they've invented a lot of smart shit, and they know how to shoot guns and form tactics. Just because they're not present on the battlefield or in leadership roles due to the cultural bit I was trying to avoid, doesn't mean they're not mentally capable of such things. Women have led some of the most powerful nations in history at a time.
But that's an entirely different can of worms and will get as murky and subjective as you could possibly think.
I was talking to OP with the "you" comment
5424
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:36:10 PM »
Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.
Power is meaningless. Look at my jesus on the cross example from the other thread. A society that's completely pure and moral, and is so innocent that it has no army isn't "lesser" than the society that pillages and destroys it. It's still better than the warmongering society, even after its destruction.
5425
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:34:40 PM »
The fact that you have to exclude anything BUT physical strength (weapons, tactics, subterfuge, etc) from being a factor in this war shows how one-sided an actual gender war would be.
5426
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:10:14 PM »
easily women
5427
« on: March 02, 2017, 12:48:05 AM »
Never trust a junkie.
Why are you so interested in the culture of the 80s/90s? class sucks eggs
why were you fat inb4 he does an ingloriouswho and stops after the first page
favorite legend of zelda Ask me something you big-breasted flat-chested Negromorph
you have to swallow one marble for every anime you've watched, do you live? 
what do you hate most about yourself
5428
« on: March 02, 2017, 12:37:16 AM »
o wow
chocolate or vanilla
chocolate, always
ice cream, milkshakes, i always prefer chocolate
the only chocolate I really like is dark taking a bite an hour off of an 85% chocolate bar feels so good
5429
« on: March 02, 2017, 12:35:27 AM »
You're a man
you need balls or a dick to be a man
that's why you're a man
I had them all removed
no you didn't lol
yes I did lol
5430
« on: March 02, 2017, 12:35:07 AM »
what should I do
bored af
Pages: 1 ... 179180181 182183 ... 1001
|
Show Posts
