This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 172173174 175176 ... 1000
5191
« on: April 08, 2017, 05:29:52 PM »
Hey, any men here under 5'10"
Go ahead and just transition into a girl because girls are supposed to be short and guys are supposed to be tall
Some people might look at you funny if you stay as a man
no one is going to think you're ftm if you're under 5'10" lmao
also no need to get all sarcastic just because I upset your "anybody can transition!  " paradigm
If you lived in reality you'd realize she was just demonstrating your "no one can transition" trite was demonstrably false.
I don't think no one can, I think that some people can and some people can't. AKA, the reasonable way to think.
5192
« on: April 08, 2017, 05:25:54 PM »
Hey, any men here under 5'10"
Go ahead and just transition into a girl because girls are supposed to be short and guys are supposed to be tall
Some people might look at you funny if you stay as a man
no one is going to think you're ftm if you're under 5'10" lmao also no need to get all sarcastic just because I upset your "anybody can transition! " paradigm
5193
« on: April 08, 2017, 05:21:00 PM »
even CIS girls over 6' get weird looks and people wondering if they're trans, let alone an ACTUAL transgender person being above 6'
"Oh man some people think tall girls are trans because they're stupid so I can't transition!"
Eesh
"some" lmao try most, and it's not stupid - 95% of girls are under 6'
5194
« on: April 08, 2017, 05:19:03 PM »
all the people you posted who are over 6'3" are obvious trannies literally because of their height alone
Like I said in the original post, those are...all cis girls
and they're obvious trannies
do you see my point? even CIS girls over 6' get weird looks and people wondering if they're trans, let alone an ACTUAL transgender person being above 6'
idk, they all looked π to me
try seeing them irl and not just in a photo
5195
« on: April 08, 2017, 05:07:35 PM »
all the people you posted who are over 6'3" are obvious trannies literally because of their height alone
Like I said in the original post, those are...all cis girls
and they're obvious trannies do you see my point? even CIS girls over 6' get weird looks and people wondering if they're trans, let alone an ACTUAL transgender person being above 6'
5196
« on: April 08, 2017, 05:06:43 PM »
New York begins assembling a state militia of 5,000 men
Expected to be completed by next page
5197
« on: April 08, 2017, 05:04:50 PM »
ok
5198
« on: April 08, 2017, 05:03:50 PM »
you don't really have any knowledge here so I wouldn't expect you to know, but if you're a MTF and you don't realize it early (before 18) then you're totally screwed in terms of hormones and a believable transition Some random images of transgirls who started HRT after the age of 30
even CIS girls who are above 6' get suspected of being trannies, let alone an actual one Random pictures of cis girls over 6'3" (slight NSFW)
you can see why ignoring my problems and getting high all day is the only thing I can do
it's not just me being mopey - it's the sad truth
No, it's pretty much just you being mopey.
you would literally defend a chris chandler esque transformation so your word here is pretty worthless not to mention that having a few token successes you can cite doesn't change the fact that those are super rare and most transitions over 18 y/o fail because your facial characteristics are so defined by that point and yeah, all the people you posted who are over 6'3" are obvious trannies literally because of their height alone
5199
« on: April 08, 2017, 04:51:37 PM »
Because I think your self esteem is holding you back. I've seen you IRL before, you're perfectly fine, Jesus.
what's so hard for people to understand you don't really have any knowledge here so I wouldn't expect you to know, but if you're a MTF and you don't realize it early (before 18) then you're totally screwed in terms of hormones and a believable transition
tack onto that the fact that height reduction surgery doesn't exist (even CIS girls who are above 6' get suspected of being trannies, let alone an actual one) and you can see why ignoring my problems and getting high all day is the only thing I can do
it's not just me being mopey - it's the sad truth
not really totally screwed
you can just be an ugly girl
I'd take being an ugly girl in a heartbeat but that's not the issue - being an obvious, drag queen esque tranny is If I could pass as an ugly girl I'd be transitioning right now
5200
« on: April 08, 2017, 02:04:21 PM »
who are you
5201
« on: April 08, 2017, 01:16:36 PM »
New York makes slavery legal
5202
« on: April 08, 2017, 01:13:31 PM »
Because I think your self esteem is holding you back. I've seen you IRL before, you're perfectly fine, Jesus.
what's so hard for people to understand you don't really have any knowledge here so I wouldn't expect you to know, but if you're a MTF and you don't realize it early (before 18) then you're totally screwed in terms of hormones and a believable transition tack onto that the fact that height reduction surgery doesn't exist (even CIS girls who are above 6' get suspected of being trannies, let alone an actual one) and you can see why ignoring my problems and getting high all day is the only thing I can do it's not just me being mopey - it's the sad truth
5203
« on: April 08, 2017, 12:48:59 PM »
I don't understand why SC wont just do it....
because I'm ugly and shitty and disgusting and wouldn't be able to pass with all the surgery in the world? what's so hard for people to understand
5204
« on: April 07, 2017, 03:55:00 PM »
Absolutely a good thing.
All gender mentions in any official media, other than those that actually pertain to gender, should be removed. There's no reason for them whatsoever, and when the only justification you have is "but that's how it's always been", it's just sexist to not remove them.
5205
« on: April 07, 2017, 02:56:46 PM »
I wouldn't go that far
You can be "against" sex in general, for men and women - that's fine. But you're a small drop of water in a sea of people who think it's fine for men to have as much sex as they want, but that women should be chaste. While "no sex for anyone" is an ideal I could subscribe to, it will never happen. So by saying "men and women should be chaste", really all you're doing is helping the people who think women should be chaste.
That's why I think promiscuous, sex-desiring women shouldn't be looked upon even if you're against sex in general.
However, a work like this has nothing to do with the individual choice for women to have lots of sex, none, or something between. It's a work made by a man who sexualizes his female characters to the point beyond recognition as humans. You can have a character like Jane from Breaking Bad, who likes sex, but whose entire character isn't defined by her sex appeal like Panty's is.
well, what i meant was that cindy is the kind of feminist who watches shows like this and says "yeah, this is empowering"
it's okay to exploit the female form in the media, and it's fine, because we should all be proud of our sexuality--it's not objectification, because sex is nothing to be ashamed of, sex is wonderful, etc. etc. etc.
she would probably argue that your perspective is hypocritical, because if you're okay with some sexual expression, then there's no logical reason (to her) why you wouldn't be okay with all of it
oh I gotcha I misinterpreted what you meant by sex positive feminist cindy has always been super annoying to me, politics aside
5206
« on: April 07, 2017, 02:32:50 PM »
oh shit this is 30 posts per year
count me out
5207
« on: April 07, 2017, 01:32:57 PM »
She is generally rude and aggressive to the people around her (including Garterbelt, Brief, Stocking, the men she sleeps with, and most prominently Chuck), and is fond of living the celebrity lifestyle of being an Anarchy sister because it brings her closer to the fame she craves. The sad thing is they were so close to creating a cool character
5208
« on: April 07, 2017, 01:27:26 PM »
Unless the show is set in a kitchen, that is an unrealistic depiction of the inferior gender (aka women).
lmao so true xDDD dude did you hear that you dont need a parents permission to get on nick.com anymore??
5209
« on: April 07, 2017, 01:25:16 PM »
New York - blue
5210
« on: April 07, 2017, 01:22:50 PM »
does she watch this or something
isnt she like a staunch feminist
it's one of her favorites if i recall correctly
she is a """""sex-positive""""" feminist, which is just another way of saying closet misogynist really
I wouldn't go that far You can be "against" sex in general, for men and women - that's fine. But you're a small drop of water in a sea of people who think it's fine for men to have as much sex as they want, but that women should be chaste. While "no sex for anyone" is an ideal I could subscribe to, it will never happen. So by saying "men and women should be chaste", really all you're doing is helping the people who think women should be chaste. That's why I think promiscuous, sex-desiring women shouldn't be looked upon even if you're against sex in general. However, a work like this has nothing to do with the individual choice for women to have lots of sex, none, or something between. It's a work made by a man who sexualizes his female characters to the point beyond recognition as humans. You can have a character like Jane from Breaking Bad, who likes sex, but whose entire character isn't defined by her sex appeal like Panty's is.
5211
« on: April 07, 2017, 01:09:27 PM »
does she watch this or something
isnt she like a staunch feminist
5212
« on: April 07, 2017, 01:05:23 PM »
I mean, I'm pretty sure it's satirical
didn't even think of that possibility, but I wouldn't be surprised if this is 100% legit but yeah like you said, even as satire this existing is so cringy and stupid
5213
« on: April 07, 2017, 01:02:07 PM »
It's almost noon.
thats the joke moron
He's a bong its evening there
if you fucking knew that why say it's noon
retard
because real niπ
±π
±a hours happens on our time, and I was reminding hin of that
you shouldn't have stopped having suicidal thoughts tbh
dude it was just a discord server calm down
lmao more like you're an annoying piece of shit in general
Man I remember when Sol came back you were like in love with the dude
he used to be cool af my man
5214
« on: April 07, 2017, 12:59:41 PM »
 The show revolves around the exploits of the Anarchy sisters, Panty and Stocking, angels who were kicked out of Heaven due to their bad behavior. They are sent to Daten Cityβa pun on the Japanese word datenshi (ε 倩使?, lit. "fallen angel")βa place on the border between Heaven and Hell, which is besieged by evil spirits referred to as "Ghosts". The sisters take refuge under the care of the reverend Garterbelt; under his watchful eyes, the sisters are tasked with using their ability to transform their lingerie into weapons, and using them to destroy malicious Ghosts. By doing so, the sisters earn "Heaven Coins" with which they intend to one day use to buy their way back into Heaven. However, Panty and Stocking are constantly sidetracked by their respective interests in men and sugary sweets. Characters
Panty (γγ³γγ£)
Voiced by: Arisa Ogasawara (Japanese); Jamie Marchi[4] (English)
Panty is a blonde-haired pale-skinned angel whose only interests are looking for men to sleep with and basking in the popularity of being an Anarchy sister. She does not take her Ghost-hunting duties as seriously as her sister Stocking, instead preferring to fulfill her personal goal of having sex with 1,000 men on Earth before returning to Heaven. She is generally rude and aggressive to the people around her (including Garterbelt, Brief, Stocking, the men she sleeps with, and most prominently Chuck), and is fond of living the celebrity lifestyle of being an Anarchy sister because it brings her closer to the men and fame she craves. However, she does occasionally exhibit affection toward Stocking and a deep desire for what she believes is best for her, despite their frequent arguing. Although she frequently insults Brief, she sometimes shows a less shallow side to her personality with others. She has the ability to transform her panties into a pistol called Backlace (γγγ―γ¬γΌγΉ BakkurΔsu?). She occasionally wields a second Backlace using Stocking's panties, doubling her firepower and allowing her to combine them into more advanced firearms such as a submachine gun or sniper rifle. She can weaponize male underwear, though the weapon's size and usefulness depends on the size of the original wearer's penis. Daily reminder that this^ is considered an appropriate depiction of women in Japan. That lust you feel towards high school girls is 100% okay, fellow otaku! Women are just sex objects who LOVE fucking all the men they can find!
5215
« on: April 07, 2017, 12:04:35 PM »
It's almost noon.
thats the joke moron
He's a bong its evening there
if you fucking knew that why say it's noon
retard
because real niπ
±π
±a hours happens on our time, and I was reminding hin of that
you shouldn't have stopped having suicidal thoughts tbh
dude it was just a discord server calm down
lmao more like you're an annoying piece of shit in general
5216
« on: April 07, 2017, 11:51:43 AM »
It's almost noon.
thats the joke moron
He's a bong its evening there
if you fucking knew that why say it's noon
retard
because real niπ
±π
±a hours happens on our time, and I was reminding hin of that
you shouldn't have stopped having suicidal thoughts tbh
5217
« on: April 07, 2017, 11:36:27 AM »
It's almost noon.
thats the joke moron
He's a bong its evening there
if you fucking knew that why say it's noon retard
5218
« on: April 07, 2017, 11:30:50 AM »
It's almost noon.
thats the joke moron
5219
« on: April 07, 2017, 10:51:30 AM »
Just here to say cuck =/= sub, and let me explain why:
The core concept of both kinks is humiliation. But whereas a sub gets off to traditionally humiliating acts (serving someone else, being treated as less than human, being degraded), a cuck gets off to the specific idea of his wife fucking another guy. The implication here, of course, is that being in an open relationship is humiliating for the man - which is ridiculously false.
In short, the cuck fetish embraces masculinity, as the humiliation comes from acting in a way that a man isn't "supposed to", while the sub fetish garners arousal from doing things any gender would be humiliated by.
too rigid. Emasculation and forced fem are under the sub side and explicitly play in to the subversion of gender roles much like the way you explain cuckolding fetishes.
Nah, forced feminization and emasculation are subsets of the general humiliation kink, just like cuckolding, petplay, foot worship, etc are. Just like the cuck fetish, the emasculation fetish embraces masculinity as an admirable trait. Someone who disdained masculinity, for example, wouldn't be humiliated by being feminized.
5220
« on: April 07, 2017, 10:04:41 AM »
Just here to say cuck =/= sub, and let me explain why:
The core concept of both kinks is humiliation. But whereas a sub gets off to traditionally humiliating acts (serving someone else, being treated as less than human, being degraded), a cuck gets off to the specific idea of his wife fucking another guy. The implication here, of course, is that being in an open relationship is humiliating for the man - which is ridiculously false.
In short, the cuck fetish embraces masculinity, as the humiliation comes from acting in a way that a man isn't "supposed to", while the sub fetish garners arousal from doing things any gender would be humiliated by.
Pages: 1 ... 172173174 175176 ... 1000
|
Show Posts
