This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐
๐ช๐๐๐๐
Pages: 1 ... 149150151 152153 ... 1001
4501
« on: June 07, 2017, 04:01:29 PM »
No way that ape could be a woman
Keep trying dear
I don't need to keep trying to teach the retard how to do math, so i'll just go.
Maybe you should teach yourself on rape etiquette
Already have
it's a fetish of mine, though that's not saying much since it's insanely common
rape fetish is literally a garbage fetish
not that you choose what gets you off, I'm js
You say that like it's my only one, and one I'd actually share in public.
I know it is, it's just the generic helpless/absolute power fantasy.
then why not just get into femdom
4502
« on: June 07, 2017, 03:21:13 PM »
No way that ape could be a woman
Keep trying dear
I don't need to keep trying to teach the retard how to do math, so i'll just go.
Maybe you should teach yourself on rape etiquette
Already have
it's a fetish of mine, though that's not saying much since it's insanely common
rape fetish is literally a garbage fetish not that you choose what gets you off, I'm js
4503
« on: June 07, 2017, 03:20:24 PM »
A trigger isn't psychological. A trigger is something that causes an impulsive response to psychological trauma. See the DSM-5 for more info.
That's the wrong definition fam I don't give a shit what a bunch of scientists think - scientists are generally bought and sold
4504
« on: June 07, 2017, 02:56:05 PM »
I wouldn't equate hyperbole to efficiency, nor would I say it's a form of brevity.
"Slut shaming is offensive/annoying/irritating/objectionable/odious/etc." works better, because it conveys a more accurate idea. Equating an annoyance with a psychological trigger is just dumb.
A trigger isn't psychological. Calling something objectionable or odious is saying that it's a FACT that it's objectionable or odious. Saying something is your trigger is saying it's offensive or livid-inducing on a PERSONAL level. You don't need to have any psychological problems to be triggered by something.
4505
« on: June 07, 2017, 02:45:37 PM »
What other word are you going to use?
"Slut shaming is my trigger"
"Slut shaming is this thing that makes me irritated at best but more often than that it makes me livid"
the whole point of language is efficiency, deal with it fam
4506
« on: June 07, 2017, 02:40:01 PM »
tfw verb is literally a slut shamer  "b-but I slut shame women and men" yeah, and 75% of the world only slut shames women, you're supporting them by doing anything but fully embracing a woman's sexuality
4507
« on: June 07, 2017, 02:26:47 PM »
Verb BTFO
Google can't blow me out by saying blatantly wrong things.
Google says only men can rape, so I guess it must be true!
Well they cant women don't have sexual urges, remember? Only men do the "horrible" thing called enjoying pleasure
4508
« on: June 07, 2017, 02:24:00 PM »
Perhaps the Democratic Party should change its platform to something that isn't retarded and maybe I'll consider voting for them.
yeah man equality and social tolerance is so retarded
4509
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:17:11 PM »
I mean, we're constantly poking at real global tragedies, but oh man is that fake head in bad taste.
Maybe you are - I'm not.
4510
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:16:17 PM »
so if gore is okay as long as it isn't real gore
why can't I post lolis as long as they aren't 3D lolis
because sex is more offensive than fake violence to any rational person
my avatar barely qualifies as fake gore, it's fake gore-lite
If by rational you mean stuck in the 50s and afraid of their own bodies, then yes.
4511
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:15:27 PM »
It's fine for all I care. I doubt Class is seriously triggered by this and it's small and vague enough not to violate my interpretation of our policy on this.
Well, I am. I don't watch the news or keep up with current events for a fucking reason.
4512
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:14:29 PM »
Triggered, yes.
I hate you for unironically saying that.
Why? Literally everyone has triggers whether you like the word or not.
Yours is self-deprecating people who refuse to better themselves.
im pretty sure you only have triggers if you have like, ptsd or anxiety
Um, wrong? Trigger literally just means something that makes you uneasy/mad/scared
4513
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:13:43 PM »
God this is retarded.
Are you all actually this outraged over his profile pic or is this just something to do on a tuesday night?
Outraged, no. Triggered, yes. What's so hard to understand that depictions of graphic violence are far from acceptable for most people?
And yet, violent films and games are rather popular these days.
It's almost as if most people are able to make the distinction between reality and fiction.
And yet, not everyone plays those violent games. It's almost as if many people don't want that shitty negative energy in their life. Don't pretend that's some unreasonable concept.
4514
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:00:49 PM »
Triggered, yes.
I hate you for unironically saying that.
Why? Literally everyone has triggers whether you like the word or not. Yours is self-deprecating people who refuse to better themselves.
4515
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:27:16 PM »
God this is retarded.
Are you all actually this outraged over his profile pic or is this just something to do on a tuesday night?
Outraged, no. Triggered, yes. What's so hard to understand that depictions of graphic violence are far from acceptable for most people?
4516
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:09:29 PM »
I thought "shock images" weren't allowed. Remember the big fit over Jeff the Killer?
this isn't even shocking
Shocking enough to get her fired.
because people are fucking sensitive little babies like carson here
I'd rather be a sensitive kid who doesn't like violence than an edgy kid who thinks nudity is worse than violence
4517
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:08:34 PM »
I thought "shock images" weren't allowed. Remember the big fit over Jeff the Killer?
this isn't even shocking
Neither was Jeff the Killer.
lol what
jtk was and is terrifying
lol
Didn't you admit later on that it supposedly wasn't actually scary to you and that you were just "trolling"? Not that you were very convincing about it or anything.
yes i did lying about being scared about something in order to get an unpopular mod removed is a bit more becoming than being petrified by a shock image/story
4518
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:00:04 PM »
I thought "shock images" weren't allowed. Remember the big fit over Jeff the Killer?
this isn't even shocking
Neither was Jeff the Killer.
lol what jtk was and is terrifying
4519
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:54:38 PM »
wait what
in the same thread you said I browse /mtfg/ (whatever that is), you said it wouldn't be long before I'm a terf
what
I didn't say that
I said you were becoming one of them (mtfg)
I wish anarchy was still open because I know the exact thread you mentioned me being a terf
why would I call you a TERF
that makes zero sense
yeah that's why I made this thread
4520
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:53:50 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
From your point of view women are better than men, so shouldn't they be held to a higher standard? And if women are better, why should they behave the way men do?
You've become lost in your own web of lies. You don't know which way is up or down.
women being better than men doesnt mean they should be treated ANY differently than men
Shouldn't something that's better than something else be held to a higher standard?
No? Someone with a job is "better" than a homeless man, but they're held to the same social standards. Just because I personally believe women are better than men doesn't mean it's ethical to treat them differently or give them different rights.
4521
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:42:54 PM »
wait what
in the same thread you said I browse /mtfg/ (whatever that is), you said it wouldn't be long before I'm a terf
what
I didn't say that
I said you were becoming one of them (mtfg)
I wish anarchy was still open because I know the exact thread you mentioned me being a terf
4522
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:40:28 PM »
if I like dogs more than cats, am I going to push for my apartment building to only let dogs in and not cats? No.
A personal preference =/= justification for discrimination
4523
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:38:57 PM »
wait what
in the same thread you said I browse /mtfg/ (whatever that is), you said it wouldn't be long before I'm a terf
4524
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:37:25 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
From your point of view women are better than men, so shouldn't they be held to a higher standard? And if women are better, why should they behave the way men do?
You've become lost in your own web of lies. You don't know which way is up or down.
women being better than men doesnt mean they should be treated ANY differently than men
4525
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:38:40 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
like i said, you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made
just answer this: how is holding women to a different standard than men not sexist? How is giving men more power than women not misogynistic?
because i'm not doing either of those things
Yes you are.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing"
^this is holding women to a higher standard AND giving men more power - the power to "do this horrible dehumanizing thing" (the thing not being horrible or dehumanizing anyway)
you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made
You'll grow out of it
4526
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:22:54 PM »
You state your opinion as if it's fact - it's not.
You THINK good and evil are subjective, and they aren't. They're objective. As long as a universe exists that can create suffering-capable life, morality is fixed.
The last point I made, that all phenomena are interdependent, is not an opinion. It is the truth. Nothing that ever comes into being can exist without the conditions that manifest it.
That concepts are subjective is axiomatic. They don't exist outside of our subjective conceptualization. It is that conceptualization that creates them. That is why they are called concepts.
What you seem to be stating is that morality is more than a concept. Which is not how society defines it. You can choose to define morality this way but it does not align with the general definition of what morality is. You say that morality is suffering, but society defines morality as principles that are based on the meaning derived from suffering.
And society is wrong. Morality isn't a concept, it's a law. No different than gravity or conservation of matter.
You can't prove this to be an absolute truth. None of the examples you've given have done so.
It doesn't matter to me in the end, picking apart your perspective was interesting at least.
Just like yours haven't. You've restated the same talking points over and over without saying why they're true. You can use big words all day, they don't make you right.
4527
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:11:13 PM »
You state your opinion as if it's fact - it's not.
You THINK good and evil are subjective, and they aren't. They're objective. As long as a universe exists that can create suffering-capable life, morality is fixed.
The last point I made, that all phenomena are interdependent, is not an opinion. It is the truth. Nothing that ever comes into being can exist without the conditions that manifest it.
That concepts are subjective is axiomatic. They don't exist outside of our subjective conceptualization. It is that conceptualization that creates them. That is why they are called concepts.
What you seem to be stating is that morality is more than a concept. Which is not how society defines it. You can choose to define morality this way but it does not align with the general definition of what morality is. You say that morality is suffering, but society defines morality as principles that are based on the meaning derived from suffering.
And society is wrong. Morality isn't a concept, it's a law. No different than gravity or conservation of matter.
4528
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:09:26 PM »
it's no more graphic than the one i used of trump shooting himself in the fucking head
if you think this is at all offensive you're basically as dumb as a trump supporter
actually you probably ARE a trump supporter
and people complained then too
like one irrelevant person
also, if you don't break the law every day then you're a Trump supporter, because his job is keeping the law, and by helping him keep it you support him
nope
plenty of people
plenty of irrelevant people who need to quit being pusillanimous little whiny cunts
lmao logicial leaps when you're proven wrong "just ONE person man" โ> "okay more than one person but those people are IRRELEVANT for not agreeing with me"
4529
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:07:59 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
like i said, you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made
just answer this: how is holding women to a different standard than men not sexist? How is giving men more power than women not misogynistic?
because i'm not doing either of those things
Yes you are. "women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing"
^this is holding women to a higher standard AND giving men more power - the power to "do this horrible dehumanizing thing" (the thing not being horrible or dehumanizing anyway)
4530
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:03:20 PM »
bumping this thread until every man woman and child has accepted the CoL as our salvation
Pages: 1 ... 149150151 152153 ... 1001
|
Show Posts