This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 149150151 152153 ... 1000
4501
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:15:27 PM »
It's fine for all I care. I doubt Class is seriously triggered by this and it's small and vague enough not to violate my interpretation of our policy on this.
Well, I am. I don't watch the news or keep up with current events for a fucking reason.
4502
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:14:29 PM »
Triggered, yes.
I hate you for unironically saying that.
Why? Literally everyone has triggers whether you like the word or not.
Yours is self-deprecating people who refuse to better themselves.
im pretty sure you only have triggers if you have like, ptsd or anxiety
Um, wrong? Trigger literally just means something that makes you uneasy/mad/scared
4503
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:13:43 PM »
God this is retarded.
Are you all actually this outraged over his profile pic or is this just something to do on a tuesday night?
Outraged, no. Triggered, yes. What's so hard to understand that depictions of graphic violence are far from acceptable for most people?
And yet, violent films and games are rather popular these days.
It's almost as if most people are able to make the distinction between reality and fiction.
And yet, not everyone plays those violent games. It's almost as if many people don't want that shitty negative energy in their life. Don't pretend that's some unreasonable concept.
4504
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:00:49 PM »
Triggered, yes.
I hate you for unironically saying that.
Why? Literally everyone has triggers whether you like the word or not. Yours is self-deprecating people who refuse to better themselves.
4505
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:27:16 PM »
God this is retarded.
Are you all actually this outraged over his profile pic or is this just something to do on a tuesday night?
Outraged, no. Triggered, yes. What's so hard to understand that depictions of graphic violence are far from acceptable for most people?
4506
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:09:29 PM »
I thought "shock images" weren't allowed. Remember the big fit over Jeff the Killer?
this isn't even shocking
Shocking enough to get her fired.
because people are fucking sensitive little babies like carson here
I'd rather be a sensitive kid who doesn't like violence than an edgy kid who thinks nudity is worse than violence
4507
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:08:34 PM »
I thought "shock images" weren't allowed. Remember the big fit over Jeff the Killer?
this isn't even shocking
Neither was Jeff the Killer.
lol what
jtk was and is terrifying
lol
Didn't you admit later on that it supposedly wasn't actually scary to you and that you were just "trolling"? Not that you were very convincing about it or anything.
yes i did lying about being scared about something in order to get an unpopular mod removed is a bit more becoming than being petrified by a shock image/story
4508
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:00:04 PM »
I thought "shock images" weren't allowed. Remember the big fit over Jeff the Killer?
this isn't even shocking
Neither was Jeff the Killer.
lol what jtk was and is terrifying
4509
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:54:38 PM »
wait what
in the same thread you said I browse /mtfg/ (whatever that is), you said it wouldn't be long before I'm a terf
what
I didn't say that
I said you were becoming one of them (mtfg)
I wish anarchy was still open because I know the exact thread you mentioned me being a terf
why would I call you a TERF
that makes zero sense
yeah that's why I made this thread
4510
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:53:50 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
From your point of view women are better than men, so shouldn't they be held to a higher standard? And if women are better, why should they behave the way men do?
You've become lost in your own web of lies. You don't know which way is up or down.
women being better than men doesnt mean they should be treated ANY differently than men
Shouldn't something that's better than something else be held to a higher standard?
No? Someone with a job is "better" than a homeless man, but they're held to the same social standards. Just because I personally believe women are better than men doesn't mean it's ethical to treat them differently or give them different rights.
4511
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:42:54 PM »
wait what
in the same thread you said I browse /mtfg/ (whatever that is), you said it wouldn't be long before I'm a terf
what
I didn't say that
I said you were becoming one of them (mtfg)
I wish anarchy was still open because I know the exact thread you mentioned me being a terf
4512
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:40:28 PM »
if I like dogs more than cats, am I going to push for my apartment building to only let dogs in and not cats? No.
A personal preference =/= justification for discrimination
4513
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:38:57 PM »
wait what
in the same thread you said I browse /mtfg/ (whatever that is), you said it wouldn't be long before I'm a terf
4514
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:37:25 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
From your point of view women are better than men, so shouldn't they be held to a higher standard? And if women are better, why should they behave the way men do?
You've become lost in your own web of lies. You don't know which way is up or down.
women being better than men doesnt mean they should be treated ANY differently than men
4515
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:38:40 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
like i said, you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made
just answer this: how is holding women to a different standard than men not sexist? How is giving men more power than women not misogynistic?
because i'm not doing either of those things
Yes you are.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing"
^this is holding women to a higher standard AND giving men more power - the power to "do this horrible dehumanizing thing" (the thing not being horrible or dehumanizing anyway)
you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made
You'll grow out of it
4516
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:22:54 PM »
You state your opinion as if it's fact - it's not.
You THINK good and evil are subjective, and they aren't. They're objective. As long as a universe exists that can create suffering-capable life, morality is fixed.
The last point I made, that all phenomena are interdependent, is not an opinion. It is the truth. Nothing that ever comes into being can exist without the conditions that manifest it.
That concepts are subjective is axiomatic. They don't exist outside of our subjective conceptualization. It is that conceptualization that creates them. That is why they are called concepts.
What you seem to be stating is that morality is more than a concept. Which is not how society defines it. You can choose to define morality this way but it does not align with the general definition of what morality is. You say that morality is suffering, but society defines morality as principles that are based on the meaning derived from suffering.
And society is wrong. Morality isn't a concept, it's a law. No different than gravity or conservation of matter.
You can't prove this to be an absolute truth. None of the examples you've given have done so.
It doesn't matter to me in the end, picking apart your perspective was interesting at least.
Just like yours haven't. You've restated the same talking points over and over without saying why they're true. You can use big words all day, they don't make you right.
4517
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:11:13 PM »
You state your opinion as if it's fact - it's not.
You THINK good and evil are subjective, and they aren't. They're objective. As long as a universe exists that can create suffering-capable life, morality is fixed.
The last point I made, that all phenomena are interdependent, is not an opinion. It is the truth. Nothing that ever comes into being can exist without the conditions that manifest it.
That concepts are subjective is axiomatic. They don't exist outside of our subjective conceptualization. It is that conceptualization that creates them. That is why they are called concepts.
What you seem to be stating is that morality is more than a concept. Which is not how society defines it. You can choose to define morality this way but it does not align with the general definition of what morality is. You say that morality is suffering, but society defines morality as principles that are based on the meaning derived from suffering.
And society is wrong. Morality isn't a concept, it's a law. No different than gravity or conservation of matter.
4518
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:09:26 PM »
it's no more graphic than the one i used of trump shooting himself in the fucking head
if you think this is at all offensive you're basically as dumb as a trump supporter
actually you probably ARE a trump supporter
and people complained then too
like one irrelevant person
also, if you don't break the law every day then you're a Trump supporter, because his job is keeping the law, and by helping him keep it you support him
nope
plenty of people
plenty of irrelevant people who need to quit being pusillanimous little whiny cunts
lmao logicial leaps when you're proven wrong "just ONE person man" β> "okay more than one person but those people are IRRELEVANT for not agreeing with me"
4519
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:07:59 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
like i said, you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made
just answer this: how is holding women to a different standard than men not sexist? How is giving men more power than women not misogynistic?
because i'm not doing either of those things
Yes you are. "women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing"
^this is holding women to a higher standard AND giving men more power - the power to "do this horrible dehumanizing thing" (the thing not being horrible or dehumanizing anyway)
4520
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:03:20 PM »
bumping this thread until every man woman and child has accepted the CoL as our salvation
4521
« on: June 06, 2017, 04:02:04 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic
women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men
any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women
this isn't hard
like i said, you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made just answer this: how is holding women to a different standard than men not sexist? How is giving men more power than women not misogynistic?
4522
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:56:13 PM »
Of all the horrible things on the internet this is what triggers people? Get the fuck over it.
yeah man death and mutilation is triggering go figure
4523
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:51:04 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.
Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day
hopefully
in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women this isn't hard
4524
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:41:00 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny
ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men. Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
4525
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:34:39 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex
sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
4526
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:28:04 PM »
 Jaha: "We all have pain. Some of it is physical from injuries or age. Some is mental from living with the loss of our loved ones. If you think about it, whether we fight that pain or succumb to it the result is the same. It diminishes our lives, robs us of our passions and pastimes and damages relationships between friends and lovers. What if I told you there's a simple way to eliminate it?"
4527
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:25:10 PM »
Season 1 was alright, but I never got back into it.
dude season 3 is the best season The City of Light arc is the best thing this show did
4528
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:23:21 PM »
4529
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:22:34 PM »
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too
because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex sexual objectifation is not bad
4530
« on: June 06, 2017, 03:18:26 PM »
Ignoring your literally batshit insane last sentence
you mean the most true part
what a misogynistic thing to say to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with" it's this^ form of thinking that leads to one of the biggest problems of the 21st century, slut shaming
Pages: 1 ... 149150151 152153 ... 1000
|
Show Posts
