Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ๐‘บ๐’†๐’„๐’๐’๐’…๐‘ช๐’๐’‚๐’”๐’”

Pages: 1 ... 146147148 149150 ... 1000
4411
The Flood / Re: The truth about Scooby-Doo
« on: June 09, 2017, 06:02:47 PM »
you have a weird obsession with kid shows
I have a weird obsession with the medium of television in general

and when you're this much of a savant you understand there's no difference between kids shows and adult shows, only between good shows and bad shows

4412
The Flood / Re: The truth about Scooby-Doo
« on: June 09, 2017, 03:05:51 PM »
Man your threads are terrible
didnt you literally just make a thread bitching about people not using proper punctuation
it was an ironic meme thread you dip
oh okay sure

so is this one

4413
The Flood / Re: The truth about Scooby-Doo
« on: June 09, 2017, 02:20:28 PM »
Man your threads are terrible
didnt you literally just make a thread bitching about people not using proper punctuation

4414
The Flood / Re: If you could start again, a million miles away...
« on: June 09, 2017, 02:18:12 PM »
asking individuals that question is stupid anyway

if 99.9999% of people loved their life and .0001% didn't, then life isnt worth it

nonexistence is perfect so for you to take the proactivity to deny that perfection and bring upon an existence, that existence needs to also be perfect. And any universe that even allows suffering as a possibility/concept isn't perfect.

But, like, couldn't the .0001% just kill themselves and we could go on living a blessed life?
why should they have to

why even bring in those .0001% when everyone was nonexisting in perfection

4415
The Flood / Re: If you could start again, a million miles away...
« on: June 09, 2017, 02:43:16 AM »
asking individuals that question is stupid anyway

if 99.9999% of people loved their life and .0001% didn't, then life isnt worth it

nonexistence is perfect so for you to take the proactivity to deny that perfection and bring upon an existence, that existence needs to also be perfect. And any universe that even allows suffering as a possibility/concept isn't perfect.

4416
The Flood / Re: If you could start again, a million miles away...
« on: June 09, 2017, 02:18:59 AM »
If you could blow up the world with a flip of a switch, would you do it?
not if it was just the world
for all you know we're the first and only intelligent life fam

religious people always say stuff in a quasi-scientific way like "earth is perfect for life, one thing different about how we're aligned with the sun or whatever and earth couldn't support anything. How do we get that lucky without a god?"

and it's literally backwards thinking, we have all of this biology and life here because the earth is perfect. And if you look at how specific and perfect everything has to be before life can even start to form, it wouldn't be some big shock if we're the beginning and the end

4417
The Flood / Re: If you could start again, a million miles away...
« on: June 09, 2017, 02:08:33 AM »
I'd rather start again a million miles away as someone else. No point in starting over if you just make the same mistakes.
You're under no obligation to continue as yourself, because yourself doesn't exist as anything more than a concept

srs ~
you have the IQ of a small bird why are you trying to be philosophical

4419
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 01:32:48 AM »
"Grey Delisle isn't Azula"

"Mako isn't Aku"

"Tom Kenny isn't Spongebob"

man verb is dumb
of course they're none of those characters

they're their voices

that's IT

even regular actors aren't their characters, but not only do they have the voice, they have their physical likeness as well, making them closer to their characters than any voice actor could be

not complicated
this is a stupid mindset

you can have an identifying connection with something without being literally them

An actor is their character in everything but only the most pedantic definitions

4421
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 01:08:10 AM »
I'm not criticizing the four tropes I listed, I'm saying the Joker uses them all at face value (without any inkling of a subversion or twist) and uses them badly.
I mean you can make any villain look stupid if you break them down like that.

Two-Face: Wow it's just a former good man suffering from split personalities
Gus Fring: Wow it's just a ruthless drug kingpin
Anton Chigurh: Wow it's just a psychopathic hitman
But that's not as far as you can break them down. You would be lying by omission if you described their characters like that. Let's look at Gus and Anton specifically:

Gus Fring: a man who entered the drug business solely to get revenge on those who massacred his lover, but quickly became the monster he had to become to stay afloat in that world. As a contrast to Walter who did it all for himself, Gus literally did it for his (only) family.

Anton Chigurh: A force of nature whose role in the story goes beyond basic antagonism and more resembles an inevitable reckoning. Barely a character at all, actually, beyond his physical traits - he's literally an agent of fate. When he violates his purpose near the end of the film and kills Carla Jean out of his own volition, the cosmos punish him for it and take him out of commission.

Meanwhile, the Joker is every bit as 2-D as I said. You just admitted it too, by trying to break down other characters instead of doing what I just did and defending your own.

4422
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 01:00:12 AM »
"Grey Delisle isn't Azula"

"Mako isn't Aku"

"Tom Kenny isn't Spongebob"

man verb is dumb

4423
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:43:19 AM »
woah man, crazy criminal who would rather cause chaos than profit
I'd say his obsession with Batman and challenging him is a more defining attribute of most Jokers than the anarchist stuff, which is mainly from the Nolan Joker.
so very very unique
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TropesAreTools
it's baffling how you and everyone else who gets defensive when their shitty writing is called out and decide to link this page, always manage to miss the second half:



I'm not criticizing the four tropes I listed, I'm saying the Joker uses them all at face value (without any inkling of a subversion or twist) and uses them badly.

4424
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:38:42 AM »


I love when you can tell that jacob's getting mad

4425
The Flood / Re: Petition To Limit Class's Posts To One A Day
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:36:48 AM »
Aye

4426
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:34:32 AM »
woah man, crazy criminal who would rather cause chaos than profit
I'd say his obsession with Batman and challenging him is a more defining attribute of most Jokers than the anarchist stuff, which is mainly from the Nolan Joker.
so very very unique

4427
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:24:28 AM »
the protagonist of deadly premonition is literally a better character than the joker

4428
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:23:22 AM »
I'd rather they just kill off the Joker completely across all mediums and focus on more interesting villains.
this too

you know you're bad when you're literally a trope

woah man, crazy criminal who would rather cause chaos than profit

so unique

4429
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:16:41 AM »
writing/animating/playing a character =/= understanding what makes the character what they are, and how to best represent them

this isn't complicated stuff my man

4430
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:12:34 AM »
you can only "be" the joker if you physically play the part

your voice isn't enough
No. Just no. Mark Hamill has portrayed the Joker more times than any other actor, and probably understands him on a level that no other living person does.

I know you're a Ledger fanboy, but his version of the Joker, while absolutely praiseworthy, is an incredibly isolated portrayal that, simply put, doesn't fit who the Joker really is.

It's the equivalent of a less extreme Superman: Red Son.
A neat version of the character, but not the real character.
b-but you have to follow my arbitrary rule

4431
i caught these allusions instantly and it only makes me hate the season more
yeah, they weren't subtle

that's not what made the episode brilliant

and exactly - an episode that so succinctly summed up an important part of the human condition made you hate what it came from more than you did

that means you're an idiot

4432
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:07:36 AM »
you can only "be" the joker if you physically play the part

your voice isn't enough
What a surprise, wrong again.
good, now i know i'm right
as if you don't have this ww level hubris that makes you think you're constantly right lmao

4433
The Flood / Re: Has Mark Hamill worked himself into a corner?
« on: June 09, 2017, 12:06:12 AM »
you can only "be" the joker if you physically play the part

your voice isn't enough
What a surprise, wrong again.

4434


The monster one, of course. There was never any danger in a sense of tension - everything from the "breathing" POV shots, the fleshy/wormy appearance of the "threat", and the struggle the inexperienced couple had in using the "device" (sex enhancer/toy) clearly told us that this is an episode with the purpose of both admitting the weirdness of relationships and cherishing the beauty of them.

In short, it knew what to do and it did it perfectly. Cry to the world that sex is so evil, Jacob - it's not.

4435
The Flood / Re: seriously tho
« on: June 08, 2017, 11:50:16 PM »
there are no good sitcoms and modern comedies in general don't make me laugh at all
First clause is wrong, second is just sad

this show's humor hinges primarily on digestible meta-humor, cheap pop culture references, lowest common denominator tripe
Wrong. That's Family Guy's sense of humor - breaking the fourth wall and referencing television for the hell of it is MacFarlane's forte. This show uses meta humor to heighten characters, and every television reference comes out of the mouths of the different characters (as opposed to the author) and reveals things about them. Abed and Jeff might reference the same 80s TV show since they both had abusive/absent parents and were raised on TV, but someone like Pierce is going to reference an obscure 70s show that he thinks people think is cool ("Is that how a Beastmaster would think?" "Oh, I never saw Beastmaster! I just wanted you guys to think I was cool.") Every single joke or plot point is character-based, and has a tangible point. The fact you're only willing to perceive the show on such a biased, base level is so annoying. Watch a damn episode.

the entire castโ€”especially joel mchale, gillian jacobs, and ken jeongโ€”cannot act and simply aren't funny
Also wrong lmao - the cast is amazing. ESPECIALLY Joel McHale and Gillian Jacobs. Why are you so backwards?

i like childish gambino's music at least
Freaks & Geeks and Bonfire are literally his only good songs

4436
The Flood / Re: seriously tho
« on: June 08, 2017, 11:36:08 PM »
woah that was funny hahahahahahjhdjhvlsDVishDFVHdfhvSD;VHhksdvSDVLHSDFadflhVDK;Bsdvkbsk;jv
more clever and well-written than funny

the best jokes come from character establishment, not gags

go watch family guy or naked gun if you want gag based humor

4437
The Flood / seriously tho
« on: June 08, 2017, 11:29:47 PM »


why dont you watch the best-written comedy ever?

4438
The Flood / Re: The truth about Scooby-Doo
« on: June 08, 2017, 11:25:55 PM »
you're like charlie by way of loaf

4439
The Flood / The truth about Scooby-Doo
« on: June 08, 2017, 11:12:55 PM »
Spoiler
The Truth About Scooby Doo

Everyone remembers the cartoon show Scooby-Doo from their early childhood, right? But something you may not remember is what the show was really all about. As I've gotten older, it has become more clear to me what Fred, Shaggy, Daphne, Velma, and Scooby were actually doing as they traversed the continent foiling crimes of all sorts in the Mystery Machine.

What We Remember:
Four teenagers and their trusted dog gallop across the country in their purple and green van solving mysteries of all sort--and in the process meet all kinds of interesting people.

The Truth:
Four high-school dropouts and their sentient dog ride around the country in their psychodelic love machine, earning their way by selling drugs. Oh, and they occasionally take some old guys mask off to solve a mystery.

It may be a little hard to swallow, but just take a look at the evidence...

Take Shaggy for example. Not only is he the inspiration for the current 'grunge' scene, with his sloppy dress and facial hair, but Shaggy is obviously a 'burner', i.e., he smokes marijuana. Why do you think he is constantly hungry? Shaggy can make a six foot hoagie and swallow it whole.

And then there is Scooby himself. While dogs do not generally smoke joints, Scooby gets his 'high' from Scooby-Snacks, which are in fact Hash-Brownies. Whenever Scooby, or Shaggy for that matter, eats a Scooby-Snack, they go ape! It just blows their mind and they do whatever they are told, because they are so lit! Scooby is also hungry all the time.

The other characters do not actively take part in the stoner-fest that Shaggy and Scooby do, but they do condone the selling of it because it helps support their jaunts across the country (and the world--they drove to China once). These other characters do have their own peculiarities however..

Fred and Daphne are always splintering off from the group to go 'solve the case' by themselves. It's no real mystery what these two are really doing--they're getting busy in the back of the Mystery Machine. Daphne with her pretty pink, well, legs and Fred are constantly bumping uglies. Fred is, by the way, pumped up on steroids. One thing that remains a mystery to me though, is why he always wore that stupid scarf around his neck.

And what about Velma? Everyone's least favorite of the cast, was of course, a lesbian. But, as it turned out in the later episodes, she was also into beastiality. Where do you thing Scrappy-Doo came from? Scrappy, who was a dog yet spoke perfect english, was obviously a product of Velma and Scooby.

So the kids spent their teenage years driving around the world, slangin' dope, shooting steroids, eating hash brownies, and fucking their dog, while all the while looking for the perfect 'hit'.

O If we had only known these things when we watched this cartoon as children...

http://mypage.direct.ca/h/honl/escooby.html

it all makes sense now

4440
The Flood / Re: Great shows with terrible fandoms
« on: June 08, 2017, 10:58:02 PM »
Not really related, but I hate how everyone views the Lord of the Rings fanbase as meganerds with absolutely no lives.

I have yet to meet a no life meganerd who was actually a LotR fan, and I have yet to meet a hardcore LotR fan who wasn't either a hipster or inexplicably metal as fvck.
lmao lock requested please

I never would've thought sep7 would've found a way to turn this innocuous topic into a smug way to feel better about themselves, but I guess I underestimated this forum lmao

never even seen LOTR, but I guess being judgy is cool

Pages: 1 ... 146147148 149150 ... 1000