This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐
๐ช๐๐๐๐
Pages: 1 ... 140141142 143144 ... 1001
4231
« on: June 13, 2017, 11:30:41 PM »
TAG: OtherYou think you've lost your love,
Welll I saw her yesterday...
It's you she's dreaming of,
and she told me what to say...
She says she loves you! And you know that can't be bad,
she loves you, and you know you should be glad!
oooooo
Oh, she loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah
She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah
With a love like that, you know you should be glad
With a love like that, you know you should be glad
With a love, like, that! You know you shouuuld..... be glad!
Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.....
4232
« on: June 13, 2017, 10:49:10 PM »
Get wrongfully accused of stealing money that a corpse stole, then use voodoo magic to bring it back to life so it can lead you to its buried treasure.
I agree
4233
« on: June 13, 2017, 10:47:10 PM »
4234
« on: June 13, 2017, 04:56:21 PM »
Even if she meant it literally, that she wanted all her money to disappear and live a completely normal life, there would be NOTHING wrong with that. Boo hoo, you're not rich. That doesn't give every rich person an obligation to stay rich.
Literally the same logic I'd use to be "against" FtM trans people, except even I can recognize that the disdain there is illogical and rooted in emotion. Which, surprise, is the same as the anti-wealth sentiment.
No celebrity ever wants to live a normal life. It's just them bullshitting their way to the top of the headlines for TMZ and other media outlets that focus on famous people.
no envy issues there or anything lmao
If my family got a free pass to superstardom like hers then sign me the fuck up
That's you. Not every celebrity is you. Not complicated stuff
4235
« on: June 13, 2017, 04:47:39 PM »
Even if she meant it literally, that she wanted all her money to disappear and live a completely normal life, there would be NOTHING wrong with that. Boo hoo, you're not rich. That doesn't give every rich person an obligation to stay rich.
Literally the same logic I'd use to be "against" FtM trans people, except even I can recognize that the disdain there is illogical and rooted in emotion. Which, surprise, is the same as the anti-wealth sentiment.
No celebrity ever wants to live a normal life. It's just them bullshitting their way to the top of the headlines for TMZ and other media outlets that focus on famous people.
no envy issues there or anything lmao
4236
« on: June 13, 2017, 04:16:33 PM »
Crisp rat's kush pate 
4237
« on: June 13, 2017, 04:09:14 PM »
They're not wrong though
Even if she meant it literally, that she wanted all her money to disappear live a completely normal life, there would be NOTHING wrong with that. Boo hoo, you're not rich. That doesn't give every rich person an obligation to stay rich.
Literally the same logic I'd use to be "against" FtM trans people, except even I can recognize that the disdain there is illogical and rooted in emotion. Which, surprise, is the same as the anti-wealth sentiment.
People who desire wealth but lack the drive to acquire it don't appreciate what they have.
People who have wealth but desire to be common don't appreciate what they have.
Both types of people are shallow.
Are FtM trans people shallow? Are MtF trans people shallow? Is someone who has a mutiliation fetish and cuts off the tip of their finger shallow? Is a man who gives up his possessions to live in the wild shallow? People giving up things that are considered desirable by society or sects of society aren't shallow. She doesn't appreciate what she has? Why the fuck should she, if what she has is considered negative by HER??God you've become so dumb
4238
« on: June 13, 2017, 04:05:55 PM »
at least his opinions on psychiatry are 100% on-point
#XenuDidNothingWrong
4239
« on: June 13, 2017, 04:02:51 PM »
They're not wrong though
Even if she meant it literally, that she wanted all her money to disappear and live a completely normal life, there would be NOTHING wrong with that. Boo hoo, you're not rich. That doesn't give every rich person an obligation to stay rich. Literally the same logic I'd use to be "against" FtM trans people, except even I can recognize that the disdain there is illogical and rooted in emotion. Which, surprise, is the same as the anti-wealth sentiment.
4240
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:57:12 PM »
Don't go see this shit show. What a tragic fucking waste of Tom Cruise.
 AS IF Tom Cruise isn't a William Shatner esque joke with the acting ability of a pinecone at least Shatner embraces his terribleness and does tongue in cheek stuff with it
4241
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:53:44 PM »
is this it
is this what people mean when they say "deflecting"
4242
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:51:49 PM »
also I find it great that this word triggers you literally this much
Incorrect
oh okay so you just have like an add-on that pings you whenever the word is posted somewhere?
did deci make it
What the fuck are you on about?
You jump on every instance of the word, even correct ones.
Never, outside of the last post, have I ever done so. Literally.
literally my mistake, confused you with this guy
4243
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:48:02 PM »
Maybe I should have cut out the second half so illiterates didn't jump on it, but to be clear: I'm referring to the first definition.
I literally always use literally correctly because I literally respect the literal definition of the word
when something is literally overused, it literally doesn't mean it's misused
i don't disagree, but the point is, it's BEST used when what you're saying would have otherwise been considered figurative, hyperbolic, or metaphorical
not mundane shit
I would agree, which is why it's an overused word. But it's easier and more effective to use it as italics, a sentence enhancer.
4244
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:44:39 PM »
Might makes right is argumentum ad populum, just worded in a less pretentious way. wrong
might makes right is the principle that the physically strong have moral precedence over the weak
something i vehemently disagree with
the not-pretentious way to say "argumentum ad populum" is "appeal to majority"
might makes right is a completely separate thing, because it states that one physically strong man has moral priority over a hundred physically WEAK men, just because they cannot defend themselves against the stronger man
Actually, might makes right refers to the idea that if I can dominate you physically, I also dominate you ideologically. It can be applied on a national, social, or individual scale. But words and phrases, you know, evolve, and it's apt and clever to use it as "if I can dominate you by majority opinion, I also dominate you ideologically." And you literally just made that argument lmao, "pointing out" something is making an argument. no, it isn't
if i point out that your fly is down, i'm not making an argument, i'm pointing it out to embarrass you
You're making a point, which is a board of an argument. Argument [2]: a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong.The argument "your fly is down" is trying to either a) persuade others that the action of pulling it up is right, if you're trying to help; or b) persuade others that the idea that it's down is embarassing, if you're not. There's a reason why statements in coding are called "arguments". Again, why does it matter if I'm disagrees with? That has no bearing on the truth.
it doesn't, but it's still worth pointing out
If it didn't matter, it wouldn't be worth pointing out. I swear, you've secretly started tripping acid habitually over the past year or some shit
4245
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:32:17 PM »
4246
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:31:24 PM »
also I find it great that this word triggers you literally this much
Incorrect
oh okay so you just have like an add-on that pings you whenever the word is posted somewhere?
did deci make it
What the fuck are you on about?
You jump on every instance of the word, even correct ones.
4247
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:30:49 PM »
Every time someone uses the word "literally" incorrectly.
So never?
I can literally take pictures when I go on friday if you want fam
Literally
Maybe "take a shot every time the word literally is overused", but not misused lol
when the dictionary has the word "informal" in the definition, that basically means "this is WRONG but people say it like this anyway, but it's still wrong"
Yeah, I agree. What's your point? Maybe I should have cut out the second half so illiterates didn't jump on it, but to be clear: I'm referring to the first definition. I literally always use literally correctly because I literally respect the literal definition of the word when something is literally overused, it literally doesn't mean it's misused
4248
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:28:07 PM »
Key difference is that while a show like Breaking Bad might employ violence to further the plot/characters, it's never glorified or glamorized. The violence is always presented in a negative light.
Your avatar straight up romanticized graphic violence against the president. Apples and oranges.
i mean i explained rather plainly how it didn't, and nobody disagreed but you
lmao is the fallacy crusader literally trying to say might makes right
...no?
"might makes right" is probably the dumbest aphorism in the entire book
the argument that you THINK i'm making is actually an argumentum ad populum, appeal to majority
but i'm not arguing from that, i'm simply pointing out that the majority of people disagree with you
Might makes right is argumentum ad populum, just worded in a less pretentious way. And you literally just made that argument lmao, "pointing out" something is making an argument. Again, why does it matter if I'm disagreed with? That has no bearing on the truth.
4249
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:17:25 PM »
also I find it great that this word triggers you literally this much
Incorrect
oh okay so you just have like an add-on that pings you whenever the word is posted somewhere? did deci make it
4250
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:15:58 PM »
Key difference is that while a show like Breaking Bad might employ violence to further the plot/characters, it's never glorified or glamorized. The violence is always presented in a negative light.
Your avatar straight up romanticized graphic violence against the president. Apples and oranges.
i mean i explained rather plainly how it didn't, and nobody disagreed but you
lmao is the fallacy crusader literally trying to say might makes right I don't give a shit if you polled the nation of spain and everyone unanimously agreed it was tasteful and didn't glamorize violence it wasn't, and it did
4251
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:14:27 PM »
also I find it great that this word triggers you literally this much
4252
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:13:20 PM »
Every time someone uses the word "literally" incorrectly.
So never? I can literally take pictures when I go on friday if you want fam
Literally
Maybe "take a shot every time the word literally is overused", but not misused lol
4253
« on: June 13, 2017, 03:09:59 PM »
Entertainment media masquerading as news.
Nothing really does that. No source that identifies as "news" is entertaining to anyone but news savants.
News masqurading as entertainment media, on the other hand...
The rise of ESPN-style newsrooms on networks such as FOX and CNN would disagree. The goal isn't to inform anymore, it's to get your heart racing.
That could be considered entertainment in the news (which only makes sense - news shows, like all programs, are designed solely to capture viewers), but I wouldn't say employing those diversions recategories the entire show into an entertainment medium.
CNN owner Zucker has outright stated that "the idea of politics as sports is undeniable ... and we approached it that way", and doesn't consider his pro-Trump panelists to be spokespeople for a world view, but instead "characters in a drama".
It is literally just a drama based on current events.
That's his opinion, and that's great. But adding a little entertainment to a news show doesn't morph the genre into something else. If the entertainment aspects took over the network and the majority of air time was devoted to those ESPN-esque segments, then sure. But from what you've said, that doesn't seem to be the case. You can watch people succeed, suffer, die, win, and lose without anyone actually getting hurt.
pretty sure you tried claiming that i was a bad person for finding entertainment in fictional violence the other day bucko
Key difference is that while a show like Breaking Bad might employ violence to further the plot/characters, it's never glorified or glamorized. The violence is always presented in a negative light. Your avatar straight up romanticized graphic violence against the president. Apples and oranges.
4254
« on: June 13, 2017, 02:57:57 PM »
autism^
4255
« on: June 13, 2017, 02:57:15 PM »
we all feed
on tragedy
it's like blood to a vampire
why can't we just admit it
Maybe, but it's immoral to make the suffering of real people about you / beneficial to you. Hence why the news is terrible and entertainment media (not just television; any story at all) is awesome. You can watch people succeed, suffer, die, win, and lose without anyone actually getting hurt.
4256
« on: June 13, 2017, 02:55:07 PM »
Entertainment media masquerading as news.
Nothing really does that. No source that identifies as "news" is entertaining to anyone but news savants.
News masqurading as entertainment media, on the other hand...
The rise of ESPN-style newsrooms on networks such as FOX and CNN would disagree. The goal isn't to inform anymore, it's to get your heart racing.
That could be considered entertainment in the news (which only makes sense - news shows, like all programs, are designed solely to capture viewers), but I wouldn't say employing those diversions recategories the entire show into an entertainment medium.
4257
« on: June 13, 2017, 02:53:20 PM »
Is there a difference between the two? Yes? One is where you get biased facts that make you feel better about your beliefs, the other is where you get entertainment/deep thought. And social media has the most control.
I can agree with this. The majority of Americans watch primetime TV for at least an hour every night, but the vast, vast majority use social media. Only exception would be the elderly, who consume entertainment media (crime procedurals in particular) and the news way more than they use social media. But they don't drive an iota of change compared to the active generations, so it's a moot contrast.
4258
« on: June 13, 2017, 02:49:13 PM »
Entertainment media masquerading as news.
Nothing really does that. No source that identifies as "news" is entertaining to anyone but news savants. News masqurading as entertainment media, on the other hand...
4259
« on: June 13, 2017, 02:25:29 PM »
Entertainment media is what directs social change. Holy fuck you guys are dumb. Finally, someone with common s Why else does the Jew want to controll Hollywood and tv network companies? It's to disseminate his white genocide race mixing propaganda on a medium that we all consume and emulate.
4260
« on: June 13, 2017, 01:20:17 PM »
Imgur community is liberal trash
UM no?? it's borderline sep7agon level see what I literally just posted for proof
Pages: 1 ... 140141142 143144 ... 1001
|
Show Posts
