3991
The Flood / Re: well I'm addicted to cigarettes now
« on: June 16, 2017, 07:17:48 PM »You might as well try quitting now because it's only going to get more and more difficult.no thanks I'd rather keep my job
my money > my health/mind
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 3991
The Flood / Re: well I'm addicted to cigarettes now« on: June 16, 2017, 07:17:48 PM »You might as well try quitting now because it's only going to get more and more difficult.no thanks I'd rather keep my job my money > my health/mind 3992
The Flood / Re: well I'm addicted to cigarettes now« on: June 16, 2017, 07:03:16 PM »Despite how much you wish it so, not everyone is youbut getting through the day without drugs is the easiest thing to do in the worldwith how hard anti-drug sentiments are pushed in this country, i simply cannot comprehend what goes through the head of somebody who's willing to use any drug for any recreational purpose whatsoeverI care about getting through the day more than my health or social sentiments arent you the guy who couldnt even find a stressful minimum wage job in the year of our ryder 2017 3993
The Flood / Re: well I'm addicted to cigarettes now« on: June 16, 2017, 06:52:50 PM »alternatively, i hope my life goes to complete and utter shit within the next few yearsgood for you not everyone has that strength 3994
The Flood / Re: well I'm addicted to cigarettes now« on: June 16, 2017, 06:50:11 PM »sometimes i've considered getting myself addicted to some drug, only to prove how easy it is to quitI could just, you know, not smoke but I choose to continue, no one's fault but my own it's a 5 minute buzz that destresses you for a half hour or an hour - has nothing on weed or DXM. But I can't get stoned or trip at work. I actually only take up the habit when I have a job for a reason 3995
The Flood / Re: well I'm addicted to cigarettes now« on: June 16, 2017, 06:49:18 PM »with how hard anti-drug sentiments are pushed in this country, i simply cannot comprehend what goes through the head of somebody who's willing to use any drug for any recreational purpose whatsoeverI care about getting through the day more than my health or social sentiments not that hard to understand 3996
The Flood / Re: well I'm addicted to cigarettes now« on: June 16, 2017, 05:09:02 PM »oh shit son v true 3998
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 03:37:17 AM »
and yes it is an error lmao
basically saying to sell out 3999
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 03:36:19 AM »I don't. That's why I like games like Kingdom Hearts and Final Fantasy so much; you can't kill people in general, and the reasons why make sense. Nonviolent AND logically consistent.Don't blame the error of sacrificing integrity for public acceptableness as an excuse to make more errorsit's not an error Unlike games like Fallout. In order to maintain logical consistency, you shouldn't be able to kill anyone, you should only be able to kill non-innocents but have a canonically defined moral character + a character itself lmao, there should be no children present (far less weird to have scarce children in a PA scenario than invincible kids), or children should have a stated, in-lore description of why they're invincible. 4000
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:55:21 AM »"if you don't want to kill kids don't have kids in the game" YouTube Don't blame the error of sacrificing integrity for public acceptableness as an excuse to make more errors 4001
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:52:53 AM »LOL WHATThat would make sense if the lone wanderer were a character and not an insert for the playerevery video game protagonist is an insert for the player just because you're seeing it from their point of view doesn't mean you have to represent them in some games, sure - but it's not a rule am I representing Holden Caulfield when I read catcher? I'd really hope not, and I'm not. A first person POV is just a pov 4002
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:37:05 AM »That would make sense if the lone wanderer were a character and not an insert for the playerYou're the one who went on about Megaton. There's in-game lore about children dying in the nuclear blasts 200 years ago, not to mention the skeletons of tons of kids throughout the game world.even if the bullshit you were spewing was true, that still doesn't even contradict anything if anything, you could argue this about new vegas 4003
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:33:10 AM »see my second post aboveGameplay and plot are intertwined, they're both reflections of the logic of the universe. Neither is more important (in the sense of needing to follow established logic).but you're wrong 4004
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:32:46 AM »?https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/939933-fallout-3/48064854aaaaaaahahahaha You're the one who went on about Megaton. There's in-game lore about children dying in the nuclear blasts 200 years ago, not to mention the skeletons of tons of kids throughout the game world. 4005
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:31:33 AM »oh my fucking god did you seriously just say that lmaogameplay can go against lore all the fuck it wantsyou consistently cannot kill children in fallout 3Nope, the logic that's established is "children cannot die from any number of nuclear payloads" you are just so fucking backwards it's indescribable, why do I still try to talk to you 4006
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:30:20 AM »Holy shit are you legit retardednope, because not being able to kill children is not part of the plotdon't kids die if you blow up megaton thoughwhich is a plot hole Gameplay is supposed to be a simulation of the logic of the universe, just as a narrative is a chain of events through the logic of the universe.Gameplay and plot are intertwined, they're both reflections of the logic of the universe. Neither is more important (in the sense of needing to follow established logic). 4007
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:27:26 AM »you consistently cannot kill children in fallout 3Nope, the logic that's established is "children cannot die from any number of nuclear payloads" which goes against established in-game lore this is called a plot hole, aka unexplained inconsistency 4008
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:24:50 AM »don't kids die if you blow up megaton thoughwhich is a plot hole kids can't die from eight nukes to the face, but them being within a 100 yard radius of an rickety old-world bomb die immediately as I said, it perverts the integrity of the world 4009
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:22:34 AM »
All gameplay should be canon, that's the whole fucking ideal of a video game. It's obviously impossible to do it completely, in the same way that true immersion in a show or book is more or less impossible, but striving for that ideal is the point.
If you water it down with pointless holes in the sheet of the universe, you're lessening the integrity as a whole. 4010
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:14:57 AM »If you're going to be a hyper baby casul and play offline, I don't see why you shouldn't also have a pause feature.LMAO judging people for how they use an item they bought just stop 4011
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 02:05:44 AM »the point of fallout 3 is not to be a perfect simulation of real world physicsI definitely agree. It's supposed to be a simulation of the logic of the universe, just as a narrative is a chain of events through the logic of the universe. If I can kill a an adult, a bear, a big mutant that used to be a human, that means I can also kill any children or dogs I see. If I see one and drop a mini nuke on it, and it doesn't die, that means no children or dogs died in the end of the world 200 years ago. But wait! Here we have in-game lore saying they did! And so we get just blatant plot holes and objectively bad writing. You have such an anti-thought, consumerist point of view. Quote that's not the game's purpose, so it doesn't hurt the game if it doesn't allow you to do something that it wasn't designed to do in the first placeEvery game is supposed to be a simulation of the logic of its universe. It wouldn't break the logic if you couldn't run around killing kids in Kingdom Hearts - you can't run around killing anybody. In Fallout, you can. Quote it's not pertinent to the game's purpose to decapitate dogs, so you could make the case that they're unnecessary and should be removed, while all the other violence stays in, because it better suits the toneLogical consistency is the most important part of any serious work, and is more important than tone by about seventy levels. "Unnecessary?" lmao, it's unnecessary that if you kill the old overseer, a new one takes his place. It's unnecessary that if you're nice to Butch, he's more receptive to you later. Lol things making sense is super unnecessary my man Quote haha what a deep thinker 4013
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 01:40:14 AM »Whatever, Beth shouldn't even write Fallout lmaoTHEY didn't censor shit, the publisher didbethesda would not have allowed you to kill children, and they would've been retarded to also don't want that, don't have kids in the game Quote fuck humans tbhyeah man, let your misanthropic bias cloud basic logic (actually this is more common sense): a human isn't here for any other reason than a dog. Every human is pressured by society into all sorts of different things, does what they can to cope with that / accept it, and then does that to others as part of the society. Again, all through no fault of their own, just of their programming. That's a lesser extent of evil than what a wild animal does in reality, but again, neither can be blamed or seen as evil because of it. If you hold one as being more sacred than the other, you're an idiot. If you see a mass murderer dying as being different than a dog dying, you'd be right. That's because the murderer's gratifying death is a consequence of their actions, not their birth. If it's just an emotional, biased thing (dogs care unconditionally for their family, there has never been a dog mass murderer), then fine. But if you go beyond that and try to say an innocent dog's death is more tragic than an innocent human's that's very untrue zero gore is the ideal irl you could have a show like Breaking Bad be just as amazing and legendary if you took out all the violence, every drop of blood, and replaced it with implications and discretion shots 4014
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 01:23:51 AM »THEY didn't censor shit, the publisher didLiterally only because of censorship standards.right, and they could've "censored" (read: not have) dog decaps as well, and no one would've minded except for sick fucks if you get disturbed by violence to animals and aren't equally disturbed by violence to humans, I don't know what the fuck kind of mentality you have your limit in gore in games should be zero gore 4015
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 01:07:16 AM »Literally only because of censorship standards. You could do everything to a child that you could do to an adult in the original Fallouts (which you should be able to do - don't want that, don't have kids in the game), but the world punished you in a logical, internally-consistent way. Not "I fired my rocket launcher at that magic black kid and he didn't seem to notice".Well it wouldn't make any sense for you not to be able to? You can decapitate people, the same rules of logic would have to apply for everything.i mean 'M not treating it as a BAD thingI mean, you can be sensitive and tough at the same time. Maybe someone loves the dark undertones of the game's story and world, but had their brother get eaten by a crocodile in front of them as a child and can't see any graphic content without getting psychologically triggered. Different people are different. You're not going to be X just because you play the same game as someone else. 4016
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 12:54:32 AM »Well it wouldn't make any sense for you not to be able to? You can decapitate people, the same rules of logic would have to apply for everything.did you forget that i was quite disturbed by the fact that you can decapitate dogs in fallout 3, and the game treats it as this silly fun thingI guess that makes senseBlood is gore. The amount doesn't matter.My understanding of "gore" has always been "body tissue," which includes blood, but it's a rectangle-is-not-a-square type relationship. The better solution would be no decapitations/amputations (or an in-menu option), but even if someone is disturbed by a small amount of blood, dark souls or GTA IV level, you treat that as an bad thing violence is a perversion of the human body, it shouldn't happen in the first place 4017
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 12:46:07 AM »I guess that makes senseBlood is gore. The amount doesn't matter.My understanding of "gore" has always been "body tissue," which includes blood, but it's a rectangle-is-not-a-square type relationship. I still don't know why it's apparently some bad thing to be sensitive to violence though you're sensitive to sex, which might be gross, but is straight up beautiful compared to pain and multilation and bodily harm 4018
The Flood / Re: For once in your life, take a stand with pride« on: June 16, 2017, 12:44:30 AM »
fun fact: when my sister showed Hamilton to me for the first time I thought it was retarded and refused to give it a chance
it reminded me of that cliche where the inner city teacher reaches her kids through rap and hip hop, I thought it was going to be some cheesy black lives matter kind of thing really glad I stopped being stupid 4019
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 12:37:17 AM »Blood is gore. The amount doesn't matter.No.Just look at options menu right nowβthere's an option to turn off blood. I always thought that was hilarious. The game barely even has any blood, yet there's still an option to turn it off if you're that squeamish.is gore a gameplay element p much why Fallout/Dishonored can be too much sometimes 4020
The Flood / Re: dark souls raped me« on: June 16, 2017, 12:36:29 AM »
the average dark souls fan is against enabling pause because that affects the gameplay
gore doesnt |