This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 908909910 911912 ... 1001
27271
« on: September 30, 2014, 01:47:04 AM »
I just PMed Cheat about this, but you had to make an entire thread about some perceived slight? Really telling of your maturity level versus mine.
And if you go through the thread, you'll see that it was actually Nuka who derailed it, so...
27272
« on: September 30, 2014, 01:41:54 AM »
ugh. okay.
I don't want to do this but I didn't get to post my response in the other thread.
Noelle is a girl.
Say what you want, but this is objectively incorrect.
Never mind the fact that you're wrong, you have no proof anyway.
I don't feel like getting banned for "derailing" (translation: disagreeing with the TG "movement"), but I have plenty of proof. The most obvious being that Noel admits to being born a male. And whatever gender you're born as is what you always will be.
Sorry bud, but sex and gender are still different things.
Regardless. As I've proven before, there are people who are physically born outside the binary. Also, people who have had their legal documents changed are legally that gender no matter how much it rustles your jimmies.
"Disagreeing" with something is not an excuse to purposely dismiss someone's identity. You can not "agree" with homosexual relationships because you think they're "objectively wrong", but you still acknowledge their existence as a homosexual couple.
Not talking about birth defects here. And it doesn't "rustle my jimmies" (God, I hate myself just for typing out that phrase) at all. Just because the law recognizes something doesn't make it right.
If someone insisted on being identified as a teddy bear, would you treat them as such and enable that lifestyle? No, you would get them psychiatric help. Same thing with transgenderism. You're identifying as something you factually are not. And you can keep cramming this "sex and gender aren't synonyms" bullshit down my throat as much as you'd like, but that doesn't make it true. When your employer asks for your gender on a job application, he's not asking what kind of special snowflake you are. He's asking whether you have a penis or a vagina.
Say there's someone who looks very much like a man, but they were born female and have a vagina. Say they took hormones, so they have a deeper voice and body hair.
Which restroom should this person use? Mens or Womens?
Women's, because she's objectively a woman.
And when the other restroom users shriek and shout about a man in the womens restroom? Why go through that exercise when the "hypothetical person" could just go in the mens room, take a piss/shit, and get out without drama?
Then that's the price she pays for being an idiot and taking hormones. Really, what did this hypothetical person expect? And it's not an exercise. It's a woman going to the women's bathroom. If you don't want the drama, don't bring that fate upon yourself. Just because you're a special snowflake who was "born the wrong gender" doesn't mean that you should get special treatment.
27273
« on: September 30, 2014, 01:35:02 AM »
ugh. okay.
I don't want to do this but I didn't get to post my response in the other thread.
Noelle is a girl.
Say what you want, but this is objectively incorrect.
Never mind the fact that you're wrong, you have no proof anyway.
I don't feel like getting banned for "derailing" (translation: disagreeing with the TG "movement"), but I have plenty of proof. The most obvious being that Noel admits to being born a male. And whatever gender you're born as is what you always will be.
Sorry bud, but sex and gender are still different things.
Regardless. As I've proven before, there are people who are physically born outside the binary. Also, people who have had their legal documents changed are legally that gender no matter how much it rustles your jimmies.
"Disagreeing" with something is not an excuse to purposely dismiss someone's identity. You can not "agree" with homosexual relationships because you think they're "objectively wrong", but you still acknowledge their existence as a homosexual couple.
Not talking about birth defects here. And it doesn't "rustle my jimmies" (God, I hate myself just for typing out that phrase) at all. Just because the law recognizes something doesn't make it right.
If someone insisted on being identified as a teddy bear, would you treat them as such and enable that lifestyle? No, you would get them psychiatric help. Same thing with transgenderism. You're identifying as something you factually are not. And you can keep cramming this "sex and gender aren't synonyms" bullshit down my throat as much as you'd like, but that doesn't make it true. When your employer asks for your gender on a job application, he's not asking what kind of special snowflake you are. He's asking whether you have a penis or a vagina.
Say there's someone who looks very much like a man, but they were born female and have a vagina. Say they took hormones, so they have a deeper voice and body hair.
Which restroom should this person use? Mens or Womens?
Women's, because she's objectively a woman.
27274
« on: September 30, 2014, 01:28:34 AM »
ugh. okay.
I don't want to do this but I didn't get to post my response in the other thread.
Noelle is a girl.
Say what you want, but this is objectively incorrect.
Never mind the fact that you're wrong, you have no proof anyway.
I don't feel like getting banned for "derailing" (translation: disagreeing with the TG "movement"), but I have plenty of proof. The most obvious being that Noel admits to being born a male. And whatever gender you're born as is what you always will be.
Sorry bud, but sex and gender are still different things.
Regardless. As I've proven before, there are people who are physically born outside the binary. Also, people who have had their legal documents changed are legally that gender no matter how much it rustles your jimmies.
"Disagreeing" with something is not an excuse to purposely dismiss someone's identity. You can not "agree" with homosexual relationships because you think they're "objectively wrong", but you still acknowledge their existence as a homosexual couple.
Not talking about birth defects here. And it doesn't "rustle my jimmies" (God, I hate myself just for typing out that phrase) at all. Just because the law recognizes something doesn't make it right. If someone insisted on being identified as a teddy bear, would you treat them as such and enable that lifestyle? No, you would get them psychiatric help. Same thing with transgenderism. You're identifying as something you factually are not. And you can keep cramming this "sex and gender aren't synonyms" bullshit down my throat as much as you'd like, but that doesn't make it true. When your employer asks for your gender on a job application, he's not asking what kind of special snowflake you are. He's asking whether you have a penis or a vagina.
27275
« on: September 30, 2014, 01:13:16 AM »
I don't feel like getting banned for "derailing" (translation: disagreeing with the TG "movement"), but I have plenty of proof. The most obvious being that Noel admits to being born a male. And whatever gender you're born as is what you always will be.
You are not born as a certain gender, you are born as a certain sex.
"You're not eating bread, you're eating processed wheat!"
27276
« on: September 30, 2014, 01:11:46 AM »
Forum RPers are the cringiest.
27277
« on: September 30, 2014, 01:09:38 AM »
Noelle is a girl.
Say what you want, but this is objectively incorrect.
Never mind the fact that you're wrong, you have no prof anyway.
I don't feel like getting banned for "derailing" (translation: disagreeing with the TG "movement"), but I have plenty of proof. The most obvious being that Noel admits to being born a male. And whatever gender you're born as is what you always will be.
27278
« on: September 30, 2014, 01:03:25 AM »
Noelle is a girl.
Say what you want, but this is objectively incorrect.
27279
« on: September 30, 2014, 12:58:40 AM »
We gonna forget this piece of shit under Fox, or...?
But Blue Harvest was funny...
27280
« on: September 30, 2014, 12:05:59 AM »
I love Castle! And yeah, that premiere was awesome. I was getting a bit pissed at Beckett and Espo throughout it, though.
Yea, admittedly I was on edge the whole frickin; time. 
Spoiler I think that him putting the bag in the dumpster was him at gunpoint. I don't believe he staged it.
Spoiler Yes! That's what I was saying. It was so obvious that he didn't orechesrtate the whole thing. That fake guy in the RV obviously kidnapped him for some reason. The next episode looks sweet. I love Beckett and all, but it will be kickass to actually see Castle in action again.
27281
« on: September 29, 2014, 11:58:13 PM »
I love Castle! And yeah, that premiere was awesome. I was getting a bit pissed at Beckett and Espo throughout it, though.
27282
« on: September 29, 2014, 11:56:14 PM »
China creates the ShΓ²uyΔ« BΓ‘i (η½ε―Ώθ‘£), the "cultural authority" of China. Members are extremely highly trained, having to endure borderline-torturous initiation rituals. ShΓ²uyΔ« agents are currently only twenty in number. Their training consists primarily of stealth, subterfuge, and coercion.
ShΓ²uyΔ« BΓ‘i is now forty in number. All agents are given carbon steel MK2 revolvers and katanas. Five agents are sent into Mongolia to ensure that another rebellion isn't being planned. Ten are assigned to serve as the Emperor's elite guard. Two agents are sent into Japan.
ShΓ²uyΔ« agents succesfully infiltrate Japanese government. Details to follow. Agents in Mongolia have identified the identity of a prominent union leader, who seems to be organizing anti-establishment protests throughout the region. The agents have been ordered to take appropriate action against the insurgent.
27283
« on: September 29, 2014, 11:06:01 PM »
Mrs Charlie cheated on you?
Wow.
Why people? Why the fuck must you cheat?
Humans aren't supposed to be monogamous. Open relationships are the ones that make the most sense.
27284
« on: September 29, 2014, 10:59:19 PM »
She confessed it herself, right? Has she apologized?
27285
« on: September 29, 2014, 10:29:07 PM »
80,000 MK2 revolvers β 80%
New firearm development β 50%
30,000 soldiers β 45%
Norwegian dock & 10 ships complete. China sends 20,000 soldiers to sail to the northwest. Expected to arrive at their destination by page 55.
27286
« on: September 29, 2014, 09:57:09 PM »
Kevlar can witshstand saw blades and other sharp objects similar to that. why the fuck do you think they have Kevlar gloves for woodsmen and jobs in that particular field ? And by "virtually impenetrable" I mean by the standards of the time period not modern day's standards. we don't have bullets sooo why the fuck does it matter, and just because it can cause a bruise doesn't mean it can penetrate it. Not to mention I did my research with the fibers, what the fuck else do you think "research with experimental fibers" means?
Das said it best: Wait... isn't a
synthetic fiber dependent on the ability to manufacture polymers with ridiculously concentrated sulfuric acid in a sterile lab environment that can't even be hand spun afterwords a little... ahead of our time here? And yeah, sharp objects can easily penetrate Kevlar. The whole point is that anything with a continuous driving force behind it (such as a stab) can tear through the fiber with practically no effort, but something that has a fixed driving force (such as a bullet) has a harder time doing it. But it's still possible. And yeah, we do have guns and bullets now. Where have you been?
27287
« on: September 29, 2014, 09:12:25 PM »
Well, this is going to be stupid.
Solution: don't go on the board.
27288
« on: September 29, 2014, 09:10:23 PM »
So you guilted her into going against her beliefs? Nice.
27289
« on: September 29, 2014, 07:50:57 PM »
Is there a way to make posts non-anonymous by default? I'm too much of an attention whore to ever use this feature.
If you'd like to post with your own name, make sure you check the NOT ANONYMOUS box on the reply page (this does not appear on quick reply).
Just don't check le box
No, you do need to check the box. All posts are anonymous by default and right now there's no way to make it the other way around.
Ugh, lame. You should have to check the box to be anonymous, not the reverse of that.
27290
« on: September 29, 2014, 07:45:03 PM »
Is there a way to make posts non-anonymous by default? I'm too much of an attention whore to ever use this feature.
27291
« on: September 29, 2014, 06:47:31 PM »
I'll see if I can make it until then. I've got to post something up that will get me a ticket into hell and leave a sour taste in all of your mouths before I go. Cause it wouldn't be fun any other way.
I like you more and more every day, Sandy.
27292
« on: September 29, 2014, 06:46:04 PM »
27293
« on: September 29, 2014, 06:43:18 PM »
Four more days!!
Get your loli ready
27294
« on: September 29, 2014, 06:22:51 PM »
Pretty sure OP is Dustin, not Sentra. Why would Sentra make an alt when he's not even banned?
27295
« on: September 29, 2014, 05:33:42 PM »
80,000 MK2 revolvers β 60%
New firearm development β 35%
Norwegian dock & 10 ships -- 40%
27296
« on: September 29, 2014, 05:25:11 PM »
greatest drama in TV history
The Walking Dead
Fucking lol
27297
« on: September 29, 2014, 05:20:16 PM »
Due to the research with experimental fibers, Japan has discovered an extremely strong substance that they have named "Kevlar"
The fiber seems to be virtually inpenatrable. And is left unharmed when met with a blade. Japan begins creating light armor with layers of Kevlar. Due page 62.
Uh, no. Do you even know what Kevlar is? You'll have to research aramid fiber before even thinking of actually utilizing it into equippable armor, let alone producing it on a mass scale. And besides, you're completely wrong about the properties of Kevlar. It's not "virtually impenetrable". A single bullet actually has a high chance of piercing it, and is guaranteed to at least cause a huge bruise and plenty of pain. And no, it's not unharmed when met with a sword. Any kind of sharp object will cut right through it. Do some research before you try this shit.
27298
« on: September 29, 2014, 04:19:42 PM »
Depression is just feeling bummed out for melodramatic kids.
27299
« on: September 29, 2014, 03:48:29 PM »
For at least the next week, I only have data. No Internet. So I won't be able to get on plug.dj until around Monday.
27300
« on: September 29, 2014, 02:55:37 PM »
China begins construction of a dock and five ships on Norway's western coast. Expected to be completed by page 55.
Pages: 1 ... 908909910 911912 ... 1001
|
Show Posts
