This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐
๐ช๐๐๐๐
Pages: 1 ... 646647648 649650 ... 1001
19411
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:30:56 PM »
what's this whole "solid snake" and "liquid snake" and whatever shit?
is there a gas snake too? Why does he come in different states of matter?
19412
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:29:49 PM »
19413
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:29:08 PM »
Depending on how genuine it is, I'd put money on it simply being mental illness.
If someone is doing it to fit in with other otherkin, lord knows why, but that wouldn't really be eligible. Just retarded.
However if someone genuinely believes they are a Dog trapped in a human body, or whatever creature/supernatural being they think they are then that is just screaming delusional/psychotic disorder.
So yeah it's downright silly but I wouldn't just sling abuse at them for being morons if they can't exactly help it.
How is this logically any different than claiming you're a woman trapped in a man's body?
19414
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:25:53 PM »
This isn't Bungie.net with the -blam!- filter.
Any word censor added, I'm gonna bypass it.
Fuck that shit.
If this rule passed, filter evasion would be a bannable offense
19415
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:22:54 PM »
The degeneracy of this forum has gone on long enough. Kids browse this site, for pete's sakes. We have to protect these innocent souls, and the countless guests who will stumble across this forum in the future, by making it completely safe for work. The first step is obviously to censor any words that wouldn't be allowed in a PG-13 movie. These include:
--N**ger
--F**k
--C*nt
--Pu**y
--Go*k
--C*m
--Or***m
--The phrase "p***h m****y"
--B**ner
If anyone uses one of these words once, I would suggest a punishment of a 15% warning level, rising by that amount each time a word is used again. Thank you for helping to make this community a better place.
19416
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:06:01 PM »
season 3 for sure
season 4 was a joke and season 5 lacked the charm of the show's pre-cancellation period
19417
« on: August 25, 2015, 05:05:13 PM »
 replace megan with jacob he's responsible for the pussification of this site people who post in this thread before it gets locked get a free keychain
19418
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:58:13 PM »
It was already removed.
lol you can't be serious this thread was being sarcastic why do we have to police things that only one person is getting offended over lmao
19419
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:29:41 PM »
it's sexual so we have to ban it
sign here to show your opposition to this lewd smut
19420
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:19:40 PM »
okay just objectively look at the two styles and tell me which one physically resembles the look of a beehive more
19421
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:13:36 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
well I'm sorry I'm not a ghetto haircut savant
Um if white women from the 50s are ghetto then sure
that doesn't really look like a beehive when you compare it to hairstyle in OP
but it does
Not really....it's just big. It's poofy. It doesn't have the texture of a beehive.
mesh defines something much more than texture you retard
Beehives have rungs does this shitty unheard of niche haircut have rungs? No it doesn't
19422
« on: August 25, 2015, 04:05:28 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
well I'm sorry I'm not a ghetto haircut savant
Um if white women from the 50s are ghetto then sure
that doesn't really look like a beehive when you compare it to hairstyle in OP
but it does
Not really....it's just big. It's poofy. It doesn't have the texture of a beehive.
19423
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:54:08 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
well I'm sorry I'm not a ghetto haircut savant
Um if white women from the 50s are ghetto then sure
that doesn't really look like a beehive when you compare it to hairstyle in OP
19424
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:44:45 PM »
there's already a hairstyle called the beehive
well I'm sorry I'm not a ghetto haircut savant
19425
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:43:12 PM »
People who are getting hung up on the physical shape of the die are missing the point. The rolling of the "die" isn't really what matters, it's the fact that you're doing it infinite times, and the possible results are infinite.
19426
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:30:26 PM »
bump
the world needs to see this
19427
« on: August 25, 2015, 03:27:15 PM »
Geometrically, each time you add a side to a 3D object, it becomes more like a sphere. So a die with infinite sides is going to approach a ball shape, and you can't really "roll" a ball and expect a definite number to show up, much less do it infinite times.
This is obviously a hypothetical. "Die" could be substituted for an RNG.
19428
« on: August 25, 2015, 01:28:14 PM »
19429
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:54:19 PM »
Will each side of the die eventually show up?
19430
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:37:22 PM »
Do you have any idea how dangerous it is to let an extremely drunk person on a plane?
I mean out of all the things that make airport security look bad you choose this? I shouldn't be surprised since it's you, but wow.
Chally is 100% right, no one in their right mind should let someone waste out of their mind on a plane. Because some much shit can go wrong
if I somehow haven't made it clear, I posted this because it's funny, not to prove some anti-air travel point
19431
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:26:05 PM »
Got to leave it to challenger to shit up a thread for literally no reason
19432
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:25:28 PM »
I used to smoke on a daily basis. Now that school's started, maybe like once a week or two.
19433
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:24:35 PM »
Do you have any idea how dangerous it is to let an extremely drunk person on a plane?
I mean out of all the things that make airport security look bad you choose this? I shouldn't be surprised since it's you, but wow.
dude chill out it's just a funny little article lol
jesus
You're saying airport security made a bad decision. They didn't.
No, I didn't...did you even read the article? She was unable to even walk. Why would they let her on the plane?
It's just a funny event, jeez....
>"fucking airport security man"
LOL
O
L
I was being facetious... Like holy shit man, someone forgot to take their lexapro this morning lmao
19434
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:20:17 PM »
Do you have any idea how dangerous it is to let an extremely drunk person on a plane?
I mean out of all the things that make airport security look bad you choose this? I shouldn't be surprised since it's you, but wow.
dude chill out it's just a funny little article lol
jesus
You're saying airport security made a bad decision. They didn't.
No, I didn't...did you even read the article? She was unable to walk. Why would they let her on the plane? It's just a funny event, jeez....
19435
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:12:21 PM »
19436
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:11:42 PM »
Do you have any idea how dangerous it is to let an extremely drunk person on a plane?
I mean out of all the things that make airport security look bad you choose this? I shouldn't be surprised since it's you, but wow.
dude chill out it's just a funny little article lol jesus
19437
« on: August 25, 2015, 12:03:56 PM »
http://www.barstoolsports.com/iowa/woman-chugs-200-bottle-of-cognac-after-security-wont-let-her-take-it-on-the-plane-then-isnt-allowed-to-board-cause-shes-too-drunk/?utm_source=huffingtonpost.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=pubexchange_facebookA woman was stopped at Beijing Capital International Airport for trying to carry a bottle of cognac worth ยฃ120 on the plane. Faced with either having to throw the whole bottle away or drinking the contents, she opted for the latter. The woman, surnamed Zhao, downed the entire thing at around noon, because she didnโt want to waste the bottle of Rรฉmy Martin XO Excellence that she had purchased at a US airport earlier on her journey. Ms Zhao then became incredibly drunk. She apparently started shouting incoherently and fell to the floor, which is where she stayed until she was removed by security. A security officer was quoted as saying: โShe was so drunkโฆ she couldnโt even stand up by herself. We took her to a room in a wheelchair so she could rest.โ She was given medical care, and was picked up by her family after being released by police some hours later. The woman didnโt sober up until 7pm, when she realised what she had done.
I like this ladyโs style. I like it a lot. Most people probably wouldโve either thrown the bottle away or tried to find a way to mail it to themselves. Not this lady. Sheโs a right here, right now kind of person and sheโll be damned if sheโs simply gonna light $200 on fire. That cognac was getting on the plane. Somehow some way. Whether it be in the bottle or in her body. Pretty fucked up of airport security to not let her on the plane after they issued her the challenge by saying she couldnโt bring liquids on the plane. What choice did she have? They basically told her she had to chug it (ya know, not really but kinda) and then wouldnโt let her get on the plane once she did it. Thatโs like some kind of sick joke. โHere, you have to get rid of this drinkable substance or you canโt get on the plane. Oh you got rid of it? Well now you canโt get on the plane.โ Itโs like an unsolvable riddle. You said she couldnโt get on the plane with the bottle, she got rid of the bottle, now let her on the fucking plane.
19438
« on: August 25, 2015, 10:48:54 AM »
Ladd Russo
Hans Gruber
Ratigan
19439
« on: August 24, 2015, 07:26:26 PM »
There are no Disney movies specifically for girls, so why should they make one for boys exclusively?
19440
« on: August 24, 2015, 07:25:02 PM »
People say I'm Ned Flanders, but I think they only picked him because he's a token Christian character.
can't think of other people as tv characters tbh
You've always reminded me of pre-Flanderization Ned Flanders, more because of how people sometimes treat you in spite of your overall niceness.
Pages: 1 ... 646647648 649650 ... 1001
|
Show Posts
