Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 𝑺𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒅π‘ͺ𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒔

Pages: 1 ... 621622623 624625 ... 1001
18661
The Flood / Re: I'm Verbatim
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:55:18 AM »
I thought you were Fuddy-duddy

18662
The Flood / 6 Gayest Users on Sep7agon - You Won't BELIEVE the Results!
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:34:28 AM »
All 6 are Vien

18663
The Flood / Re: I hate myself so much, it's kind of painful.
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:32:43 AM »
Everyone exists but some people are worthless

these people are called nobodies

18664
Holy shit, Maude Apatow is cute as hell

18665
The Flood / Re: I hate myself so much, it's kind of painful.
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:25:47 AM »
No one cares lol
I literally just made a post about how I care, so you are incorrect my friend.
Exactly, and you're no one. A nobody

18666
>not TLA

lol who cares
I do because she's hot.
tla set the bar for hot cartoons

lok can't touch it if it stood on a step ladder
Other than Azula, who is in A:TLA that worthy of note when it comes to attractiveness?
what is this madness
What have I said wrong?
I made it nice and easy and underlined it for you and everything man

18667
The Flood / Re: I hate myself so much, it's kind of painful.
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:06:06 AM »
No one cares lol

18668
The Flood / Re: users that could be twins?
« on: September 16, 2015, 12:27:23 AM »
Fucking kill yourself
we need to get matching PJs! <3

18669
The Flood / Re: why do wisdom teeth hurt so goddamn much
« on: September 16, 2015, 12:09:41 AM »
They gave my aunt hydros when she got them removed, did you at least get any drugs?

18670
The Flood / Re: Nuka's avatar
« on: September 16, 2015, 12:04:57 AM »
oh

I said before, it's a vintage pepe


that shit is legit disturbing

like

what the hell is with that thing's eyes in the upper right corner

18671
The Flood / Re: Nuka's avatar
« on: September 16, 2015, 12:02:33 AM »
what about it
Damn he changed it

abort thread

18672
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:57:05 PM »
I'm going to get super jacked just to make OP mad
hey you're that asshole from Anarchy

how did you escape

18673
The Flood / Nuka's avatar
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:50:36 PM »
what even

18674
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:47:19 PM »
What a waste of brain cells

18675
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:34:56 PM »
I feel that you're not grasping what's "thin" to me. It's not Casper-tier, it just means you're lean.
It really doesn't matter what your definition of "Thin" is, in this argumentative context. You equated a body type (Thin) with a fitness capacity (Fit), but just conceded that they were not actually equal.
Well, I'm not some master arguer like you or Verbatim. I just said that because Assassin was all about "you have to have muscles to be fit" and I was trying to refute that. Jeez.

18676
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:27:42 PM »
I feel that you're not grasping what's "thin" to me. It's not Casper-tier, it just means you're lean.

18677
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:23:27 PM »
I'm talking about the "fit" definition. There's a big difference between looking like a bodybuilder and being in shape. If you're thin, but can run around, play sports, etc, without getting winded then you're in shape. It's a general term.
If you can run around, play sports, etc without getting winded in any body type, then you're in shape. If a slightly overweight person trains more vigorously to be able to run long distances, then they are more "In-shape" than a skinny person that cannot perform as optimally. "Fitness" is only controlled by physical appearance to a degree. The degree is rather large, but it leads to misconceptions.
I agree completely. This is what I've been trying to say.

18678
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:22:40 PM »
Dude, it sounds like you're only considering cardio to mean in shape, and that muscle strength is nothing. That's pretty silly.
No, I'm considering being in shape to mean being in shape. How you get there is irrelevant. If you lift weights every day and stay in shape while gaining muscle, that's great. If you run on a treadmill every day and stay in shape without gaining muscle, that's great, too.

18679
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:18:30 PM »
You're the one who's using it in relation to body type.
And, for the record, I think you're the odd man out here. I've honestly never once heard physical appearance alone equated to the phrase "In-shape." And I've grown very accustomed to athletic and fitness jargon. It is always used in the context of athletic capabilities.
I miscredited Assassin's quote to you earlier, but I'm saying athletic capabilities matter a lot more than physical appearance.
I mean, in terms of functionality, yes, but there are varying types of functionality that disallow certain physical skills to be applied usefully in other areas of manual labor. Standing outside this issue as well, whether or not somebody's physical appearance matters more or less than their ability to perform some task is mostly subjective.
I'm talking about the "fit" definition. There's a big difference between looking like a bodybuilder and being in shape. If you're thin, but can run around, play sports, etc, without getting winded then you're in shape. It's a general term.

18680
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:14:53 PM »
You're the one who's using it in relation to body type.
And, for the record, I think you're the odd man out here. I've honestly never once heard physical appearance alone equated to the phrase "In-shape." And I've grown very accustomed to athletic and fitness jargon. It is always used in the context of athletic capabilities.
I miscredited Assassin's quote to you earlier, but I'm saying athletic capabilities matter a lot more than physical appearance.

18681
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:04:23 PM »
The heart is a muscle.
The heart is an organ...not a muscle.
the heart is a muscle, bro

this is like

second grade biology
my second grade teacher really dropped the ball then

18682
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:02:18 PM »
The heart is a muscle.
The heart is an organ...not a muscle.

18683
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:01:23 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
You said muscled, having muscles is a requirement for being fit. Are we using thin/skinny, and buff/muscular  interchangeably? If so, that's kinda dumb.
Uh, no. Not at all. You don't need muscles to be fit. If you're thin, you're fit.

And yeah....they're synonyms.
...They're not synonyms at all. Being "Thin" speaks very little about your actual athletic training or your cardiovascular health.
Thin and skinny are synonyms....buff and muscular are synonyms. I never said thin and fit are synonyms, but yeah, if you're not chubby or fat, you're in shape. You don't need to have muscles to be physically fit.
So, if you're anorexic and weigh 90lbs, you're fit/in shape?
No, because if you're anorexic, you're out of shape. This doesn't really need explaining. If you can run a mile in under 8 minutes, you're in shape. Anorexics can't do that, and neither can chubby people.

I don't think you have a typical definition of "In-shape," then. That phrase, in all of my training and athletic activities, has always been used in reference to athletic capacity, not a person's body type.
You're the one who's using it in relation to body type. Your whole argument is "can't be fit if you don't have muscles". While, in reality, it all amounts to what you can do.

18684
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:58:17 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
You said muscled, having muscles is a requirement for being fit. Are we using thin/skinny, and buff/muscular  interchangeably? If so, that's kinda dumb.
Uh, no. Not at all. You don't need muscles to be fit. If you're thin, you're fit.

And yeah....they're synonyms.
If you don't exercise, then you're not physically fit. If you're physically fit, then you will have developed muscles. How does this need saying?
I do exercise, and I don't have muscles galore like some people, because I just do cardio. Being fit just means you're not out of shape.

18685
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:56:45 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
You said muscled, having muscles is a requirement for being fit. Are we using thin/skinny, and buff/muscular  interchangeably? If so, that's kinda dumb.
Uh, no. Not at all. You don't need muscles to be fit. If you're thin, you're fit.

And yeah....they're synonyms.
...They're not synonyms at all. Being "Thin" speaks very little about your actual athletic training or your cardiovascular health.
Thin and skinny are synonyms....buff and muscular are synonyms. I never said thin and fit are synonyms, but yeah, if you're not chubby or fat, you're in shape. You don't need to have muscles to be physically fit.

18686
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:54:11 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
You said muscled, having muscles is a requirement for being fit. Are we using thin/skinny, and buff/muscular  interchangeably? If so, that's kinda dumb.
Uh, no. Not at all. You don't need muscles to be fit. If you're thin, you're fit.

And yeah....they're synonyms.

18687
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:47:44 PM »
I cared about the fact you were equating being comfortable and proud of your body to strength training.
Because for many people, those things are equated. I don't understand what the problem is with this.
I saw you using it as a blanket and not a situational thing, but I guess I was wrong.

18688
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:42:34 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.

18689
Septagon / Re: Facebook is getting a dislike button
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:42:00 PM »
May as well just turn this site into reddit

18690
The Flood / Re: Would you rather be skinny or muscular
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:26:53 PM »
How did I know I would get that response

Pages: 1 ... 621622623 624625 ... 1001