This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 621622623 624625 ... 1001
18661
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:55:18 AM »
I thought you were Fuddy-duddy
18662
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:34:28 AM »
All 6 are Vien
18663
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:32:43 AM »
Everyone exists but some people are worthless
these people are called nobodies
18664
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:29:54 AM »
Holy shit, Maude Apatow is cute as hell
18665
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:25:47 AM »
No one cares lol
I literally just made a post about how I care, so you are incorrect my friend.
Exactly, and you're no one. A nobody
18666
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:07:52 AM »
>not TLA
lol who cares
I do because she's hot.
tla set the bar for hot cartoons
lok can't touch it if it stood on a step ladder
Other than Azula, who is in A:TLA that worthy of note when it comes to attractiveness?
what is this madness
What have I said wrong?
I made it nice and easy and underlined it for you and everything man
18667
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:06:06 AM »
No one cares lol
18668
« on: September 16, 2015, 12:27:23 AM »
Fucking kill yourself
we need to get matching PJs! <3
18669
« on: September 16, 2015, 12:09:41 AM »
They gave my aunt hydros when she got them removed, did you at least get any drugs?
18670
« on: September 16, 2015, 12:04:57 AM »
oh
I said before, it's a vintage pepe
that shit is legit disturbing like what the hell is with that thing's eyes in the upper right corner
18671
« on: September 16, 2015, 12:02:33 AM »
what about it
Damn he changed it abort thread
18672
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:57:05 PM »
I'm going to get super jacked just to make OP mad
hey you're that asshole from Anarchy how did you escape
18673
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:50:36 PM »
what even
18674
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:47:19 PM »
What a waste of brain cells
18675
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:34:56 PM »
I feel that you're not grasping what's "thin" to me. It's not Casper-tier, it just means you're lean.
It really doesn't matter what your definition of "Thin" is, in this argumentative context. You equated a body type (Thin) with a fitness capacity (Fit), but just conceded that they were not actually equal.
Well, I'm not some master arguer like you or Verbatim. I just said that because Assassin was all about "you have to have muscles to be fit" and I was trying to refute that. Jeez.
18676
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:27:42 PM »
I feel that you're not grasping what's "thin" to me. It's not Casper-tier, it just means you're lean.
18677
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:23:27 PM »
I'm talking about the "fit" definition. There's a big difference between looking like a bodybuilder and being in shape. If you're thin, but can run around, play sports, etc, without getting winded then you're in shape. It's a general term.
If you can run around, play sports, etc without getting winded in any body type, then you're in shape. If a slightly overweight person trains more vigorously to be able to run long distances, then they are more "In-shape" than a skinny person that cannot perform as optimally. "Fitness" is only controlled by physical appearance to a degree. The degree is rather large, but it leads to misconceptions.
I agree completely. This is what I've been trying to say.
18678
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:22:40 PM »
Dude, it sounds like you're only considering cardio to mean in shape, and that muscle strength is nothing. That's pretty silly.
No, I'm considering being in shape to mean being in shape. How you get there is irrelevant. If you lift weights every day and stay in shape while gaining muscle, that's great. If you run on a treadmill every day and stay in shape without gaining muscle, that's great, too.
18679
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:18:30 PM »
You're the one who's using it in relation to body type. And, for the record, I think you're the odd man out here. I've honestly never once heard physical appearance alone equated to the phrase "In-shape." And I've grown very accustomed to athletic and fitness jargon. It is always used in the context of athletic capabilities.
I miscredited Assassin's quote to you earlier, but I'm saying athletic capabilities matter a lot more than physical appearance.
I mean, in terms of functionality, yes, but there are varying types of functionality that disallow certain physical skills to be applied usefully in other areas of manual labor. Standing outside this issue as well, whether or not somebody's physical appearance matters more or less than their ability to perform some task is mostly subjective.
I'm talking about the "fit" definition. There's a big difference between looking like a bodybuilder and being in shape. If you're thin, but can run around, play sports, etc, without getting winded then you're in shape. It's a general term.
18680
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:14:53 PM »
You're the one who's using it in relation to body type. And, for the record, I think you're the odd man out here. I've honestly never once heard physical appearance alone equated to the phrase "In-shape." And I've grown very accustomed to athletic and fitness jargon. It is always used in the context of athletic capabilities.
I miscredited Assassin's quote to you earlier, but I'm saying athletic capabilities matter a lot more than physical appearance.
18681
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:04:23 PM »
The heart is a muscle.
The heart is an organ...not a muscle.
the heart is a muscle, bro
this is like
second grade biology
my second grade teacher really dropped the ball then
18682
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:02:18 PM »
The heart is a muscle.
The heart is an organ...not a muscle.
18683
« on: September 15, 2015, 11:01:23 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
You said muscled, having muscles is a requirement for being fit. Are we using thin/skinny, and buff/muscular interchangeably? If so, that's kinda dumb.
Uh, no. Not at all. You don't need muscles to be fit. If you're thin, you're fit.
And yeah....they're synonyms.
...They're not synonyms at all. Being "Thin" speaks very little about your actual athletic training or your cardiovascular health.
Thin and skinny are synonyms....buff and muscular are synonyms. I never said thin and fit are synonyms, but yeah, if you're not chubby or fat, you're in shape. You don't need to have muscles to be physically fit.
So, if you're anorexic and weigh 90lbs, you're fit/in shape?
No, because if you're anorexic, you're out of shape. This doesn't really need explaining. If you can run a mile in under 8 minutes, you're in shape. Anorexics can't do that, and neither can chubby people. I don't think you have a typical definition of "In-shape," then. That phrase, in all of my training and athletic activities, has always been used in reference to athletic capacity, not a person's body type.
You're the one who's using it in relation to body type. Your whole argument is "can't be fit if you don't have muscles". While, in reality, it all amounts to what you can do.
18684
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:58:17 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
You said muscled, having muscles is a requirement for being fit. Are we using thin/skinny, and buff/muscular interchangeably? If so, that's kinda dumb.
Uh, no. Not at all. You don't need muscles to be fit. If you're thin, you're fit.
And yeah....they're synonyms.
If you don't exercise, then you're not physically fit. If you're physically fit, then you will have developed muscles. How does this need saying?
I do exercise, and I don't have muscles galore like some people, because I just do cardio. Being fit just means you're not out of shape.
18685
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:56:45 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
You said muscled, having muscles is a requirement for being fit. Are we using thin/skinny, and buff/muscular interchangeably? If so, that's kinda dumb.
Uh, no. Not at all. You don't need muscles to be fit. If you're thin, you're fit.
And yeah....they're synonyms.
...They're not synonyms at all. Being "Thin" speaks very little about your actual athletic training or your cardiovascular health.
Thin and skinny are synonyms....buff and muscular are synonyms. I never said thin and fit are synonyms, but yeah, if you're not chubby or fat, you're in shape. You don't need to have muscles to be physically fit.
18686
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:54:11 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
You said muscled, having muscles is a requirement for being fit. Are we using thin/skinny, and buff/muscular interchangeably? If so, that's kinda dumb.
Uh, no. Not at all. You don't need muscles to be fit. If you're thin, you're fit. And yeah....they're synonyms.
18687
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:47:44 PM »
I cared about the fact you were equating being comfortable and proud of your body to strength training. Because for many people, those things are equated. I don't understand what the problem is with this.
I saw you using it as a blanket and not a situational thing, but I guess I was wrong.
18688
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:42:34 PM »
You can be fit without being buff. Being thin is being fit, and it looks way less gross.
18689
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:42:00 PM »
May as well just turn this site into reddit
18690
« on: September 15, 2015, 10:26:53 PM »
How did I know I would get that response
Pages: 1 ... 621622623 624625 ... 1001
|
Show Posts