This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 591592593 594595 ... 1001
17761
« on: October 06, 2015, 05:21:06 PM »
Remind me again why that whole site hasn't been shut down? Because there's a lot more than just 4chan out there. Even if you took them all out, there's nothing stopping anyone from just creating a new one. It's a relatively simple website that wouldn't take much effort in recreating.
I'd love for 4chan and its derivatives/progenitors to be completely destroyed--it just won't solve anything.
Why would you want all imageboards to be destroyed? How is it affecting you personally?
When imageboards turn into sanctums for betamax mass murderers, it affects everyone.
17762
« on: October 06, 2015, 05:10:44 PM »
I am so done with these fucking permavirgin losers
Why were you invovled with them to begin with if you hate them so?
I wasn't. It's an expression.
17763
« on: October 06, 2015, 04:40:37 PM »
they're going to shoot up sep7agon now, fucking idiot, go apologize.
That would require leaving their basements so I think we're safe
one of them just shot up a school, they're capable of leaving their basements.
go apologize, quickly.
Jester is probably snitching on me to his r9k buddies RIP me 
17764
« on: October 06, 2015, 04:38:15 PM »
they're going to shoot up sep7agon now, fucking idiot, go apologize.
That would require leaving their basements so I think we're safe
17765
« on: October 06, 2015, 04:31:59 PM »
Hard to say
I would lean towards Cambodian or Chinese democide, but by raw numbers Soviet action was pretty fucked too.
Yeah there's honestly no reason why the west shouldn't have supported the KMT after WW2, Mao's rule was so goddamn vicious
17766
« on: October 06, 2015, 04:27:16 PM »
That sucks
Edgy
17767
« on: October 06, 2015, 04:22:23 PM »
17768
« on: October 06, 2015, 04:02:29 PM »
What means democide?
any kind of genocide, mass murder, etc done by a government to its own people
17769
« on: October 06, 2015, 03:58:05 PM »
What do you think it was?
17770
« on: October 06, 2015, 02:55:42 PM »
Mine would be at the bottom anyway
OT: Grey Delisle
17771
« on: October 06, 2015, 02:34:42 PM »
being a footrest > being a seat
die
mad cause bad taste
17772
« on: October 06, 2015, 02:03:56 PM »
being a footrest > being a seat
17773
« on: October 06, 2015, 04:04:11 AM »
Giannalogic?
blogger that got threatened and harassed by 4chan freaks
17774
« on: October 06, 2015, 03:00:18 AM »
Between the Oregon shootings and the whole Giannalogic thing today I am so done with these fucking permavirgin losers
I guess getting social acceptance, even if it's just through the internet, isn't enough for these neckbeards. It just makes them more autistic. Something has to be done, tbh. Remind me again why that whole site hasn't been shut down?
17775
« on: October 06, 2015, 01:04:33 AM »
Lizzie Borden
17776
« on: October 06, 2015, 01:02:11 AM »
Are you kidding? You have tons of material. Writing about the feminist movement alone would be more than enough to cover four pages, let alone how positively women have been portrayed in TV lately.
17777
« on: October 05, 2015, 10:13:24 PM »
Then I'd agree with you. I was talking about sex.
17778
« on: October 05, 2015, 10:07:16 PM »
With my consent-based morality, even having a child is evil, because he's not consenting to existence. But at the same time, it's a necessary evil, because our race needs new kids to keep existing. Because of confusions like these, I tend to prioritize the consent of living adults over hypothetical, unborn children. This is legitimately the funniest thing you have ever posted. Thank you.
Without even going into anti-natalism--why is it permissible for you to impose horrible debilitating shit on children?
Because having sex doesn't necessitate childbirth, and tangible things are more important than possible things. If you disallowed two people from having sex, that's breaking their right to consent. If you allow it, it's breaking a hypothetical child's right to consent. And tangible things are more important.
17779
« on: October 05, 2015, 10:03:22 PM »
You don't have a kid with someone who is genetically at-risk.
Oh yeah, and this. Why didn't I use this from the beginning?
You can have a kid with any consenting individual you want, it doesn't matter if the possible child is at risk.
LOL
So much for your consent-based morality.
Imposing the risk of severe mental disability on a child is academically evil. And you know it.
With my consent-based morality, even having a child is evil, because he's not consenting to existence. But at the same time, it's a necessary evil, because our race needs new kids to keep existing. Because of confusions like these, I tend to prioritize the consent of living adults over hypothetical, unborn children.
17780
« on: October 05, 2015, 10:00:58 PM »
What if I don't want you to have my kid, huh?
Then don't fuck her. When you have sex, that's something you just have to consider. Grow up.
17781
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:58:42 PM »
You don't have a kid with someone who is genetically at-risk.
Oh yeah, and this. Why didn't I use this from the beginning?
You can have a kid with any consenting individual you want, it doesn't matter if the possible child is at risk.
17782
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:57:57 PM »
Taking away the fact that she had sex with someone who was intellectually impaired and therefore probably incapable of understanding what was going on and the potential outcome of it, that still leaves a character who ditched the man she loved and ran way with his child. That's not, "Some bad decisions." That's disgusting.
a mother leaving some guy she fucked and raising the kid on her own isn't some huge immoral thing.
What universe do you live in?
Same one as you, buddy. The father has less right to the kid than the mom.
That's ridiculous. If some chick banged you and had your child, then ran away without telling you that you got her pregnant, would you be pissed? I fucking would. That kid is half of me, I deserve to know what happens to him, or if he exists. That just further backs up my argument that her banging a retarded many was messed up to begin with- He didn't understand what was going on and why.
I wouldn't give a shit. And yeah, the mom definitely has more of a right to it, it doesn't matter if he's "half you". Do you have to spend nine months incapacitated and restricted just to bring it into existence?
17783
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:53:10 PM »
Taking away the fact that she had sex with someone who was intellectually impaired and therefore probably incapable of understanding what was going on and the potential outcome of it, that still leaves a character who ditched the man she loved and ran way with his child. That's not, "Some bad decisions." That's disgusting.
a mother leaving some guy she fucked and raising the kid on her own isn't some huge immoral thing.
What universe do you live in?
Same one as you, buddy. The father has less right to the kid than the mom.
17784
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:50:29 PM »
Taking away the fact that she had sex with someone who was intellectually impaired and therefore probably incapable of understanding what was going on and the potential outcome of it, that still leaves a character who ditched the man she loved and ran way with his child. That's not, "Some bad decisions." That's disgusting.
Uh, not really. It's not condonable, but a mother leaving some guy she fucked and raising the kid on her own isn't some huge immoral thing. A newborn baby is more the mother's than the father's.
17785
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:48:03 PM »
The movie quite obviously has anti-drug undertones, so if you didn't catch onto that, that's on you, I guess. You're not supposed to have a passive attitude towards her debaucherous lifestyle--you can feel sympathetic, because she had a fucked up upbringing, but passive is just the incorrect response.
Yeah, that shit was pretty heavy-handed, which is one reason why I have no disdain for Jenny. Her drug use is a literal non issue for me, and she didn't really do any bad things outside of that, so her character is fine in my eyes. Unlike Lt. Dan. Complainers are the most annoying character to me. I don't care that he was a cynic, but all he did was whine about his life the whole movie. Forrest really, really should've let him die like he wanted. It would've been a drastic improvement.
Well, then the theme of "fuck destiny--follow your own path" would've been lost, as well as the what-good-is-life-if-you-have-nothing-to-live-for theme.
yeah but Lieutenant Dan wouldn't have been bitching it up the entire movie so I'd make that trade
17786
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:46:54 PM »
What a bunch of cringy losers. Anyone who browses r9k needs to kill themselves, tbh.
17787
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:43:49 PM »
and she didn't really do any bad things outside of that, so her character is fine in my eyes. >Had sex with retarded man
>Ran away
>Had retarded man's kid
>Didn't tell him she had his kid
She was scum lol
Take away "retarded" from all of those lines and you have a pretty standard character who just made some bad decisions. Like I said earlier, the fact that Forrest is retarded has absolutely no bearing here.
17788
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:39:02 PM »
The movie quite obviously has anti-drug undertones, so if you didn't catch onto that, that's on you, I guess. You're not supposed to have a passive attitude towards her debaucherous lifestyle--you can feel sympathetic, because she had a fucked up upbringing, but passive is just the incorrect response.
Yeah, that shit was pretty heavy-handed, which is one reason why I have no disdain for Jenny. Her drug use is a literal non issue for me, and she didn't really do any bad things outside of that, so her character is fine in my eyes. Unlike Lt. Dan. Complainers are the most annoying character to me. I don't care that he was a cynic, but all he did was whine about his life the whole movie. Forrest really, really should've let him die like he wanted. It would've been a drastic improvement.
17789
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:33:31 PM »
I want to live the rest of my life as Chloe Moretz's foot slave.
damned degenerate
kys normie scum
17790
« on: October 05, 2015, 09:31:46 PM »
If you're capable of giving consent to write a check, you're capable of giving consent to have sex. Yeah, because one definitely doesn't have much more significant consequences than the other.
Like, oh, I don't know, having a fucking child.
So? That literally doesn't matter in the slightest, capability is capability. No one, no matter their IQ, should be barred from doing something to their own body that an able-minded person is allowed to do. That's not only immoral, it's discrimination.
Pages: 1 ... 591592593 594595 ... 1001
|
Show Posts
