1591
The Flood / Re: Why is challengerX such a bad person?
« on: June 02, 2018, 04:27:07 AM »
do it bitch
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1591
The Flood / Re: Why is challengerX such a bad person?« on: June 02, 2018, 04:27:07 AM »
do it bitch
1592
The Flood / Re: Why is challengerX such a bad person?« on: June 02, 2018, 03:56:25 AM »give me your rl contact info, I'm going to sue you for liblelLeave him alone you fucking predatorHe doesn't do drugs so he's automatically a better person than youimagine being 11 no joke lol 1593
The Flood / Re: Why is challengerX such a bad person?« on: June 02, 2018, 03:38:58 AM »He doesn't do drugs so he's automatically a better person than youimagine being 11 1594
The Flood / Why is challengerX such a bad person?« on: June 01, 2018, 05:34:46 PM »
He's aggressively malicious, is this some troll thing
1595
The Flood / Re: Sep7agon Drama 2k19« on: June 01, 2018, 05:33:05 PM »ignoring the fact I created the chat you bitch about me in lolThere are plenty of people in the server I find annoying who I haven't banned. The problem with you is that you're a creepy hobo dick sucking junkie pedophile and I just can't have that type of person around.He kinda does give fair/equal treatment.LMAO, I created the server he circlejerks on my manYou reaped what you sowed on this one tbh, don't join a chally server and expect fair treatment I always knew you were scummy, but when I gave up my admin role in the server to make it better (since I was soooo bad), I expected you'd still let me continue as a regular member in my own chat - guess I overestimated you And yeah man, I had a sexual experience where I sucked the dick of an older guy who was temporarily homeless (same guy who now has an apartment and a dog), that doesn't make me a pariah. The way YOU treat people should make you one, though, but I guess sep7 can forgive anything but drugs and promiscuity Spoiler Also pedophile??? Nice libel dude! 1596
The Flood / Re: Sep7agon Drama 2k19« on: June 01, 2018, 05:19:20 PM »He kinda does give fair/equal treatment.LMAO, I created the server he circlejerks on my manYou reaped what you sowed on this one tbh, don't join a chally server and expect fair treatment He berated me and whined about me and kept dragging me down until I conceded his points and said you know what, I'll step down if I'm so bad And as soon as I did that, he banned me from the only sep7 server in existence because "you're annoying". Real fair, real unbiased. Next time I'll stay in power, didn't think challenger would legit snake it up and ban me as soon as I stepped down. Terrible user, terrible person! 1597
The Flood / Re: Sep7agon Drama 2k19« on: June 01, 2018, 03:12:26 AM »Pretty sure I'm allowed to join other Discord servers while being in yours. There's no rule against that.YET 1598
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: June 01, 2018, 01:50:50 AM »Never even watched Roseanne, either of themShould've know that class was only interested in the show and cares more about tv than he does eliminating racism.look at the response to her tweet This is just a terrible precedent for the TV industry 1599
The Flood / Re: Sep7agon Drama 2k19« on: May 31, 2018, 11:44:02 PM »
Joining other discord servers Deci? Wtf we've only treated u with respect and kindness, which you apparently don't want
You reaped what you sowed on this one tbh, don't join a chally server and expect fair treatment 1600
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: May 31, 2018, 07:56:04 PM »Should've know that class was only interested in the show and cares more about tv than he does eliminating racism.look at the response to her tweet ABC is super powerful and titanic and they immediately cancelled everything about her so they wouldn't be taken down a notch in the world lol, her role as a person in society is more or less over because of this racism has been eliminated my friend, but the era of fear and hate is more alive than ever. 1601
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: May 31, 2018, 07:50:30 PM »okay, how about we take government ownership of the media industry, then subcontract out projects to networks & studios? If actors are government workers, they can get tenure, and far more rights in keeping their job even if they post racist shit on the internet. It's not a shitty thing in a public, it's an actress' personal opinion on a private social networking site. Have Twitter ban her, problem solved. Put the social pressure on them, not on the network that hires her. She's not their representative, that's such BS. Her job is to ACT, not to be a social messiah or chancellor.>this seems to be a logical and natural outcome, please explain how the system could realistically be changedDumb afI'm curious about the alternative then. This seems like a pretty logical thing that you can't get around. Companies are made up of and represented by people. These people can do good things and bad things. If high profile people at a certain company do shitty things in public, their bad behavior is negatively associated with the company. If the company doesn't do anything it will be seen as condoning it or being okay with that kind of behavior. How do you get around this? I don't see how you can change this system. Act like a hateful moron in public and there will be consequences for your actions. It's perfectly reasonable for this to extend to your work.Did you read what I said? The system shouldnt have to be "we need to keep our sponsors sponsoring us or else we as a business fail!" it shouldnt be where the business needs to have good PR to keep staying relevant, and even if you're the star of the show, whatever you say in your off time is up to YOU. Roseanne wasn't a representative in any way, she was an ACTRESS. Thinking she has to represent the company, or that the status quo of this is a positive thing, is why we keep getting bullshit decisions like this. Of course, in this climate, the company made the right move. But the climate isn't a good one, and should be changed.You're the star of the show. You literally carry its name and embody it in full. You go on and say dumb racist things online. This reflects very poorly on your employer who would be seen as not caring about their high profile representatives being racist in public. They definitely were not in the wrong to fire her.no, but that doesnt mean she should be fired and her show cancelledmaybe television shouldnt be run like a business, maybe try to make the highest quality content you can and sponsors shouldnt matter My solution isn't perfect, but it's something far better than we have now. No, you shouldn't be taken off a project that affects thousands of people, and the legacy of a television universe, because of a racist tweet. What happens to all the characters now? Their futures are being wiped out of existence because of some petty IRL shit? No, that can't happen. Like I said, this is about where your values & priorities lie. Yours are in all the wrong places. 1602
Serious / Re: So the EU wants to increase restrictions the sharing of copyrighted content.« on: May 31, 2018, 07:38:14 PM »Oh and the reason Epicmafia has blocked Europeans is that the GDPR came into effect last week. :pah I thought that's what this thread was about 1603
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: May 31, 2018, 05:47:12 AM »Then you have a totally backwards idea of meno, but that doesnt mean she should be fired and her show cancelledmaybe television shouldnt be run like a business, maybe try to make the highest quality content you can and sponsors shouldnt matter I'm the biggest champion of free speech here, and not that the 1st amendment pertains to businesses, but the broader concept of free speech can & does in this instance. She doesn't deserve to have her whole show cancelled because she's a racist, and let's not pretend ABC gives a shit about her racism. They care about losing money or creating negative publicity against their bloated corporation. 1604
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: May 31, 2018, 05:39:15 AM »Dumb afI'm curious about the alternative then. This seems like a pretty logical thing that you can't get around. Companies are made up of and represented by people. These people can do good things and bad things. If high profile people at a certain company do shitty things in public, their bad behavior is negatively associated with the company. If the company doesn't do anything it will be seen as condoning it or being okay with that kind of behavior. How do you get around this? I don't see how you can change this system. Act like a hateful moron in public and there will be consequences for your actions. It's perfectly reasonable for this to extend to your work.Did you read what I said? The system shouldnt have to be "we need to keep our sponsors sponsoring us or else we as a business fail!" it shouldnt be where the business needs to have good PR to keep staying relevant, and even if you're the star of the show, whatever you say in your off time is up to YOU. Roseanne wasn't a representative in any way, she was an ACTRESS. Thinking she has to represent the company, or that the status quo of this is a positive thing, is why we keep getting bullshit decisions like this. Of course, in this climate, the company made the right move. But the climate isn't a good one, and should be changed.You're the star of the show. You literally carry its name and embody it in full. You go on and say dumb racist things online. This reflects very poorly on your employer who would be seen as not caring about their high profile representatives being racist in public. They definitely were not in the wrong to fire her.no, but that doesnt mean she should be fired and her show cancelledmaybe television shouldnt be run like a business, maybe try to make the highest quality content you can and sponsors shouldnt matter not even going to make my shitty night worse by getting into this, but if you look at how this whole situation ended and you think "good", or "too bad for everyone who got their career start/revitalization screwed over because of this, but still good!", then you're part of the problem racism is bad, duh -- I'm sure roseanne's personal life and career were already over when she sent those tweets - the respectable thing to do is accept her apology, finish up any projects already in motion with her, then reassess if we still want her with us when those projects are done. But NO, we need a knee-jerk firing because we can't dare to look bad in front of sponsors, in front of social media!! We need to be as clean and perfect as we can, even if it means cancelling creative talent, or stifling the development of good tv shows! Because we're not in it to make good TV, we're in it for the bottom line. And if an actor is saying something that could make a sponsor pull out, that could make a bored 17 year old with too much time on their hands start an internet movement - then by God, quality television is secondary to that bottom line. Yeah, the fucking system needs to be changed. You see no problem with this, you have your values in the gutter. 1605
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: May 31, 2018, 04:35:54 AM »Did you read what I said? The system shouldnt have to be "we need to keep our sponsors sponsoring us or else we as a business fail!" it shouldnt be where the business needs to have good PR to keep staying relevant, and even if you're the star of the show, whatever you say in your off time is up to YOU. Roseanne wasn't a representative in any way, she was an ACTRESS. Thinking she has to represent the company, or that the status quo of this is a positive thing, is why we keep getting bullshit decisions like this. Of course, in this climate, the company made the right move. But the climate isn't a good one, and should be changed.You're the star of the show. You literally carry its name and embody it in full. You go on and say dumb racist things online. This reflects very poorly on your employer who would be seen as not caring about their high profile representatives being racist in public. They definitely were not in the wrong to fire her.no, but that doesnt mean she should be fired and her show cancelledmaybe television shouldnt be run like a business, maybe try to make the highest quality content you can and sponsors shouldnt matter 1606
Serious / Re: So the EU wants to increase restrictions the sharing of copyrighted content.« on: May 30, 2018, 08:31:44 PM »
there's already a consequence -- epicmafia is down completely for european users and will be forever according to Lucid (site admin)
EU players all have to use VPNs to continue to play 1607
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: May 30, 2018, 05:42:31 PM »yea bumblebee was a lot bettereh I never liked that transformerTelling it like it is should be the only criteria you need to meet to become the president of the United States of America*criterion 1608
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: May 30, 2018, 05:04:34 PM »no, but that doesnt mean she should be fired and her show cancelledmaybe television shouldnt be run like a business, maybe try to make the highest quality content you can and sponsors shouldnt matter esp. after she apologized 1609
The Flood / Re: Should Rosanne have been canceled?« on: May 30, 2018, 02:31:28 PM »
maybe television shouldnt be run like a business, maybe try to make the highest quality content you can and sponsors shouldnt matter
sounds like a pipe dream, but we should try to achieve it so BS like this doesnt happen 1610
Serious / Re: A Preventative and Humane Solution to Pedophilia?« on: May 27, 2018, 11:10:52 PM »
Stop having kids.
If they're born fucked up, and there's a way for them to live without affecting anyone else (pictures of naked kids, lolis), you allow that. Don't persecute people for being born wrong. 1611
The Flood / Re: i'm in LA whos gonna chill w/ me« on: May 27, 2018, 10:36:27 PM »crossing my fingers for an ODthats fucked up man i wouldnt wish death on anyone here 1612
The Flood / Re: i'm in LA whos gonna chill w/ me« on: May 27, 2018, 10:07:52 PM »Probably shitty coke smh :/no way dude even my sister is opting out cause its too much for her she bought it for us but giving me the rest -- meet me in LA brosabe 1616
The Flood / Re: How do you imagine world in 2814« on: May 25, 2018, 03:19:25 PM »
Either AI domination or enslavement of them (the moral issue will be raised by 2050 at the soonest, 2100 at the least, and there will undoubtedly be a war over it anytime from 2100-2300) or we just wised up and there's no life.
1617
The Flood / Re: If I were politcally involved I'd be a part of Azula« on: May 24, 2018, 08:33:28 AM »
nah its me
azula and the thousands of other azula fans you underestimate how many awesome ppl are out there 1618
The Flood / If I were politcally involved I'd be a part of Azula« on: May 24, 2018, 08:30:39 AM »
's crew
we'd be the best 1619
Serious / Re: "Compelled" Speech« on: May 24, 2018, 06:27:16 AM »lmao society isnt already like thathttps://giant.gfycat.com/UncomfortableDemandingIrishsetter.webm>we all need to be nice to each other theres tons of places with normalized and accepted bigotry 1620
The Flood / Re: should septagon move to reddit?« on: May 24, 2018, 04:39:07 AM »An obvious next step of Sep7 evolution.OR you all just become wrfers it's inevitable |