This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 411412413 414415 ... 1001
12361
« on: April 28, 2016, 08:48:58 AM »
wow reported for calling out members Spoiler weeb CUNTs deserve the pain of being birthed
12362
« on: April 28, 2016, 07:38:50 AM »
Rape aside, can we at least all agree that Trannies should reach the final solution?
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
The comic? No.
..
you're joking right? Like, I'm not even seeing what the issue is in that comic. That's shit that some one would post if they were taking the piss out of that community.
The comic is anti-transgender and anti-SJW.
I don't know what you're not getting here. The viewer is supposed to sympathize with the grandpa, even though no person in the real world would ever act like the father.
You're saying it's satire and Nuka is saying it isn't. I don't know anything about the artist, so I don't know what it's supposed to be.
I mean, the point is pretty obvious
It's a bit cringy how harsh everyone in the comic comes on, but as a trans person myself, I deal with things like that pretty much day-in, day-out. When your family is used to you being male, they'll often still refer to you with male intentions - in that coming, growing up "like your father".
I'm still not convinced that it isn't satirical. The reactions are so over the top that I can't help but feel this is making a mockery out of actual issues these people face by portraying them as overly whiny and sensitive about extremely small things like this.
If it's not satirical, it's so counterproductive and the author should go away.
12363
« on: April 28, 2016, 07:08:21 AM »
 Lee Everett is a fantastic character, in his design. The kind of games Telltale makes really have a kind of inherent paradox: character-driven and choice-driven. For something to be character driven, the character has to be heavily developed and strong, with identifiable traits, opinions, and goals. A game where you alone determine what the character does would seemingly invalidate that, make you a stand-in for the character instead of making the character someone in his own right. But Lee averts that. He has plenty of character traits and motivations (love for Clementine, brave, modest, amicable, leadership) that make him an everyman, even when the player can make him go down the path they choose. But the secret is in somehow making every available choice in character for him. Even the most violent, immoral, brutal choice a player can make is handled in a way that makes it feel like something Lee would do. I don't know, it's just rare to see such a strong character in a game where the player decides the plot. He's more or less the same person in every playthrough, but there's still so many different meaningful choices you can make. "Interactive movies" meme aside, Telltale is great at script design.
12364
« on: April 28, 2016, 06:36:34 AM »
Nigger, I can pull up several pure gene white folk who a french. Can you show me a transgender who doesn't get triggered over LBGT rights?
Exactly, you can, I can't. Just like I know several transgenders who don't get triggered over LGBT rights, and you apparently don't. The point is that who you know and anecdotal arguments don't really mean much. It is not satire. The artist is a big member in the SJW community. They are just so indulgent in their ideals that SecondClass thinks it's satire.
Exactly why, that's a ridiculous viewpoint to have, and people like him are only further alienating transgenders and the LGBT community from the rest of the world. Very few TGs in real life are like this; those who speak loudest are the ones who get heard.
12365
« on: April 28, 2016, 05:59:30 AM »
He has a scary non american name guys
12366
« on: April 28, 2016, 04:11:44 AM »
girls are scary
12367
« on: April 28, 2016, 01:35:04 AM »
The one LC quoted is a pro-trans comic by a trans artist.
How....
it was incredibly sympathetic to the grandpa. He was drawn and written as if he honestly didn't know what he did. The father never even tells him. Wouldn't an SJW comic (which this is ridiculously SJW if it's not satire) have some kind of condescending explanation there?
I don't even know what the grandpa did.
It's supposed to be showing off the ignorance of cis people. The fact that the grandpa said "grow up like your father" is implying that he doesn't acknowledge this boy that identifies as a girl as a trans person and sees them as just male or some shit.
I guess so, but he's not saying the girl is a male, he's saying the father is.
patriarchy implications or something i don't know
like i said i don't really follow the logic behind the comic since it apparently isn't satirical
That's so ridiculous, I hate shit like this. All it does is give average people bad impressions. Anyway, my bad on the false information, I didn't know the other comics ITT were shopped. Those ones are very obviously against it all.
12368
« on: April 28, 2016, 12:25:10 AM »
The one LC quoted is a pro-trans comic by a trans artist.
How....
it was incredibly sympathetic to the grandpa. He was drawn and written as if he honestly didn't know what he did. The father never even tells him. Wouldn't an SJW comic (which this is ridiculously SJW if it's not satire) have some kind of condescending explanation there?
I don't even know what the grandpa did.
It's supposed to be showing off the ignorance of cis people. The fact that the grandpa said "grow up like your father" is implying that he doesn't acknowledge this boy that identifies as a girl as a trans person and sees them as just male or some shit.
I guess so, but he's not saying the girl is a male, he's saying the father is.
12369
« on: April 28, 2016, 12:08:16 AM »
And as planes flew high into the night
to light their sacrifical rite
I saw Satan laughing with delight
the day, the music, died
12370
« on: April 28, 2016, 12:06:38 AM »
The one LC quoted is a pro-trans comic by a trans artist.
How.... it was incredibly sympathetic to the grandpa. He was drawn and written as if he honestly didn't know what he did. The father never even tells him. Wouldn't an SJW comic (which this is ridiculously SJW if it's not satire) have some kind of condescending explanation there? I don't even know what the grandpa did.
12371
« on: April 27, 2016, 11:15:53 PM »
Rape aside, can we at least all agree that Trannies should reach the final solution?
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
The comic? No.
..
you're joking right? Like, I'm not even seeing what the issue is in that comic. That's shit that some one would post if they were taking the piss out of that community.
The comic is anti-transgender and anti-SJW.
I don't know what you're not getting here. The viewer is supposed to sympathize with the grandpa, even though no person in the real world would ever act like the father.
You're saying it's satire and Nuka is saying it isn't. I don't know anything about the artist, so I don't know what it's supposed to be.
It's hardly satire, way too thinly veiled. The artist is obviously pushing an anti-TG viewpoint, just look at the other comics that Tackel linked here.
12372
« on: April 27, 2016, 11:07:57 PM »
Rape aside, can we at least all agree that Trannies should reach the final solution?
I can't tell if this is satire or not.
The comic? No.
..
you're joking right? Like, I'm not even seeing what the issue is in that comic. That's shit that some one would post if they were taking the piss out of that community.
The comic is anti-transgender and anti-SJW. I don't know what you're not getting here. The viewer is supposed to sympathize with the grandpa, even though no person in the real world would ever act like the father.
12373
« on: April 27, 2016, 09:43:29 PM »
You're defending the rape, which is justifying it. Saying that this is the girl's fault, in any way whatsoever, is the same thing as saying a girl who gets held down and raped in an alley had it coming for not being smart enough to dress casually.
But then Secondclass hits back with this retarded bullshit whew
Victim blamers are literally mentally handicapped.
Except there is a point where the victim is to be blamed
Rapists exist and they are out there
That fact needs to be considered by everyone when they go out
There is an extent to where you're responsible for preventing bad things from happening to you
You aren't allowed to be absolved of all responsibility and stroll through life like everyone is responsible for keeping you safe
Being raped while walking on a lit street carrying pepper spray is one thing
But to be prancing through the bad part of town at 4 AM half naked and then expecting no one to wuestion whether you could've done anything to protect yourself is another
It would be as if I gave my broken car to a dentist and got mad when he couldn't fix it
Being dumb isn't the same thing as being at fault. The point is that you should be able to wear whatever you want at any point in the day and feel no fear. Because of rapists, that's impossible. The aura of fear we've cultivated around men and the rapes themselves are all on them.
12374
« on: April 27, 2016, 09:29:40 PM »
It's a good thing TDKR was the worst of the trilogy, because otherwise, it would've been straight-up ruined.
Just curious, did you prefer TDK or BB? The Dark Knight obviously had the better villain and more memorable moments, but I feel like Batman Begins had a more interesting overall aesthetic and did more things with the time it had than TDK. In BB, Gotham is very gothic and noir-like, but in TDK it's just kind of a typical big city with noir elements.
12375
« on: April 27, 2016, 09:25:30 PM »
You're defending the rape, which is justifying it. Saying that this is the girl's fault, in any way whatsoever, is the same thing as saying a girl who gets held down and raped in an alley had it coming for not being smart enough to dress casually.
But then Secondclass hits back with this retarded bullshit whew
Victim blamers are literally mentally handicapped.
12376
« on: April 27, 2016, 09:23:49 PM »
Rape aside, can we at least all agree that Trannies should reach the final solution?
I guess trannies = SJWs now
I have never met a tranny that wasn't full blown SJW, so yes.
I've never met a Frenchman who wasn't black, does that mean they all are? Your sheltered little personal bubble isn't a substitute for facts...
12377
« on: April 27, 2016, 09:22:05 PM »
You're still in control of what you do. If I'm blackout drunk and I get into a car and crash into the side of the building, I'm still responsible for the damages.
Yeah I know, but I think the scenarios are a bit different (obviously).
For example if a completely sober person gets someone so drunk they're almost passed out, says they'll take em home, and fucks them.
The key factor I'm getting at is manipulation.
That makes sense, and I think that if there's obvious manipulation going on, that would be a rape-like crime, but the problem is that it's hard to prove things like that in court, and it's a muddled area. If I'm sober and I'm having sex with a drunk person who took the initiative, is that rape? If I'm drunk, she's drunk, but I'm trying to get her to have sex with me, is that rape? You see my concern, I just don't want the word "rapist" applied to anyone who wasn't consciously aware that consent wasn't there, but chose to have sex anyway.
12378
« on: April 27, 2016, 08:36:17 PM »
Rape aside, can we at least all agree that Trannies should reach the final solution?
I guess trannies = SJWs now
12379
« on: April 27, 2016, 08:35:39 PM »
Okay, so...I mean... if you're being told to STOP like this person is seriously pissed off or in pain, then chances are you're doing something wrong and the sex isn't nearly as good as you think it is and yeah you should probably stop before trying to continue. Stopping to reposition is is a normal part of sex anyway.
Just my two cents here.
The reason why really doesn't matter. It could just be that your partner is unconfortable and doesn't want to have sex anymore.
The reason does matter and it should be explained. Fairness is important.
The reason for ending sex doesn't have to be explained. All your partner needs to say is "stop" (or a safe word) and you should immediately oblige. Once that happens, you two can talk about it, give reasonings, and such. If you find the reason unfair or lacking, then it may be justification to end the relationship.
But a bad or nonexistent reason is never justifcation to ignore your partner and keep fucking them, in any world.
It's not "can" talk about it, it's "should" talk about it. I'm not saying keep having sex. Seriously if someone is so mad or uncomfortable that they want to stop completely, then by all means put a stop to it. If both parties are enjoying it then it's not something that would end abruptly like that. But a conversation needs to happen if there's a problem because communication is important, the same way that consent is important.
Oh, I thought you meant a legitimate reason to stop having sex has to be given before the sex is ended. It goes without saying that there would be reasons and a conversation about it afterwards.
There's a legitimate problem I'm that rape accusations can very easily be thrown around and suddenly that person's life is ruined. People know that all they have to do is throw out an accusation, no matter how petty it is. The idea is to get away from that kind of thing.
A lot of these issues can be solved relatively easy by just putting the two in a room with a psychologist and having the issue sorted out there. Unless the situation is actually abusive or violent, people are often way too quick to jump to social defamation.
And considering anyone under the influence unable to give consent is a big part of this.
But that's not what I'm talking about. If you're in the middle of having sex, the girl makes it clear she wants to stop right now, and you ignore her and keep going, how isn't that rape? You'd have every reason to be socially defamed if you pulled that.
No one should be socially defamed until there's proof, because people believe false accusations way too easily.
Okay? In this scenario, you did it. The proof is in the hypothetical.
The question is whether or not you consider that rape, which any reasonable person would.
I'm a little shaky on this but I feel like it's sort of in the grey area but leaning towards it being rape, yeah. It kind of depends on the severity too but if you were told to stop then yes you should stop.
It's not the kind of forcibly pin someone down, rip their clothes off, and have your way with them while they're screaming and crying for you to stop sort of rape. It's someone that you consentually already started to engage in intercourse with what decided that it's not going well and they want you to stop for whatever reason. It's not as severe but it's still not good per say.
I usually get flak for this, but this is why I've always felt there should be "degrees" of rape. As in, the hide in the bushes and jump out at someone would obviously be first degree, things like this would be second.
Drunk sex shouldn't be considered rape whatsoever. You can give consent when you're intoxicated, and you're responsible for your own actions.
You can be drunk to the point you can't really have an active conversation, and sone one manipulate you into doing it.
You're still in control of what you do. If I'm blackout drunk and I get into a car and crash into the side of the building, I'm still responsible for the damages.
12380
« on: April 27, 2016, 08:18:40 PM »
Okay, so...I mean... if you're being told to STOP like this person is seriously pissed off or in pain, then chances are you're doing something wrong and the sex isn't nearly as good as you think it is and yeah you should probably stop before trying to continue. Stopping to reposition is is a normal part of sex anyway.
Just my two cents here.
The reason why really doesn't matter. It could just be that your partner is unconfortable and doesn't want to have sex anymore.
The reason does matter and it should be explained. Fairness is important.
The reason for ending sex doesn't have to be explained. All your partner needs to say is "stop" (or a safe word) and you should immediately oblige. Once that happens, you two can talk about it, give reasonings, and such. If you find the reason unfair or lacking, then it may be justification to end the relationship.
But a bad or nonexistent reason is never justifcation to ignore your partner and keep fucking them, in any world.
It's not "can" talk about it, it's "should" talk about it. I'm not saying keep having sex. Seriously if someone is so mad or uncomfortable that they want to stop completely, then by all means put a stop to it. If both parties are enjoying it then it's not something that would end abruptly like that. But a conversation needs to happen if there's a problem because communication is important, the same way that consent is important.
Oh, I thought you meant a legitimate reason to stop having sex has to be given before the sex is ended. It goes without saying that there would be reasons and a conversation about it afterwards.
There's a legitimate problem I'm that rape accusations can very easily be thrown around and suddenly that person's life is ruined. People know that all they have to do is throw out an accusation, no matter how petty it is. The idea is to get away from that kind of thing.
A lot of these issues can be solved relatively easy by just putting the two in a room with a psychologist and having the issue sorted out there. Unless the situation is actually abusive or violent, people are often way too quick to jump to social defamation.
And considering anyone under the influence unable to give consent is a big part of this.
But that's not what I'm talking about. If you're in the middle of having sex, the girl makes it clear she wants to stop right now, and you ignore her and keep going, how isn't that rape? You'd have every reason to be socially defamed if you pulled that.
No one should be socially defamed until there's proof, because people believe false accusations way too easily.
Okay? In this scenario, you did it. The proof is in the hypothetical.
The question is whether or not you consider that rape, which any reasonable person would.
I'm a little shaky on this but I feel like it's sort of in the grey area but leaning towards it being rape, yeah. It kind of depends on the severity too but if you were told to stop then yes you should stop.
It's not the kind of forcibly pin someone down, rip their clothes off, and have your way with them while they're screaming and crying for you to stop sort of rape. It's someone that you consentually already started to engage in intercourse with what decided that it's not going well and they want you to stop for whatever reason. It's not as severe but it's still not good per say.
I usually get flak for this, but this is why I've always felt there should be "degrees" of rape. As in, the hide in the bushes and jump out at someone would obviously be first degree, things like this would be second. Drunk sex shouldn't be considered rape whatsoever. You can give consent when you're intoxicated, and you're responsible for your own actions.
12381
« on: April 27, 2016, 08:09:29 PM »
um if you don't believe accusers 100% the second they insinuate it you are propagating rape culture
Everyone knows the word rape is used too liberally. Guess that means rape just straight up never happens!
12382
« on: April 27, 2016, 08:08:06 PM »
Okay, so...I mean... if you're being told to STOP like this person is seriously pissed off or in pain, then chances are you're doing something wrong and the sex isn't nearly as good as you think it is and yeah you should probably stop before trying to continue. Stopping to reposition is is a normal part of sex anyway.
Just my two cents here.
The reason why really doesn't matter. It could just be that your partner is unconfortable and doesn't want to have sex anymore.
The reason does matter and it should be explained. Fairness is important.
The reason for ending sex doesn't have to be explained. All your partner needs to say is "stop" (or a safe word) and you should immediately oblige. Once that happens, you two can talk about it, give reasonings, and such. If you find the reason unfair or lacking, then it may be justification to end the relationship.
But a bad or nonexistent reason is never justifcation to ignore your partner and keep fucking them, in any world.
It's not "can" talk about it, it's "should" talk about it. I'm not saying keep having sex. Seriously if someone is so mad or uncomfortable that they want to stop completely, then by all means put a stop to it. If both parties are enjoying it then it's not something that would end abruptly like that. But a conversation needs to happen if there's a problem because communication is important, the same way that consent is important.
Oh, I thought you meant a legitimate reason to stop having sex has to be given before the sex is ended. It goes without saying that there would be reasons and a conversation about it afterwards.
There's a legitimate problem I'm that rape accusations can very easily be thrown around and suddenly that person's life is ruined. People know that all they have to do is throw out an accusation, no matter how petty it is. The idea is to get away from that kind of thing.
A lot of these issues can be solved relatively easy by just putting the two in a room with a psychologist and having the issue sorted out there. Unless the situation is actually abusive or violent, people are often way too quick to jump to social defamation.
And considering anyone under the influence unable to give consent is a big part of this.
But that's not what I'm talking about. If you're in the middle of having sex, the girl makes it clear she wants to stop right now, and you ignore her and keep going, how isn't that rape? You'd have every reason to be socially defamed if you pulled that.
No one should be socially defamed until there's proof, because people believe false accusations way too easily.
Okay? In this scenario, you did it. The proof is in the hypothetical. The question is whether or not you consider that rape, which any reasonable person would.
12383
« on: April 27, 2016, 08:00:08 PM »
Okay, so...I mean... if you're being told to STOP like this person is seriously pissed off or in pain, then chances are you're doing something wrong and the sex isn't nearly as good as you think it is and yeah you should probably stop before trying to continue. Stopping to reposition is is a normal part of sex anyway.
Just my two cents here.
The reason why really doesn't matter. It could just be that your partner is unconfortable and doesn't want to have sex anymore.
The reason does matter and it should be explained. Fairness is important.
The reason for ending sex doesn't have to be explained. All your partner needs to say is "stop" (or a safe word) and you should immediately oblige. Once that happens, you two can talk about it, give reasonings, and such. If you find the reason unfair or lacking, then it may be justification to end the relationship.
But a bad or nonexistent reason is never justifcation to ignore your partner and keep fucking them, in any world.
It's not "can" talk about it, it's "should" talk about it. I'm not saying keep having sex. Seriously if someone is so mad or uncomfortable that they want to stop completely, then by all means put a stop to it. If both parties are enjoying it then it's not something that would end abruptly like that. But a conversation needs to happen if there's a problem because communication is important, the same way that consent is important.
Oh, I thought you meant a legitimate reason to stop having sex has to be given before the sex is ended. It goes without saying that there would be reasons and a conversation about it afterwards.
There's a legitimate problem I'm that rape accusations can very easily be thrown around and suddenly that person's life is ruined. People know that all they have to do is throw out an accusation, no matter how petty it is. The idea is to get away from that kind of thing.
A lot of these issues can be solved relatively easy by just putting the two in a room with a psychologist and having the issue sorted out there. Unless the situation is actually abusive or violent, people are often way too quick to jump to social defamation.
And considering anyone under the influence unable to give consent is a big part of this. But that's not what I'm talking about. If you're in the middle of having sex, the girl makes it clear she wants to stop right now, and you ignore her and keep going, how isn't that rape? You'd have every reason to be socially defamed if you pulled that.
12384
« on: April 27, 2016, 07:46:14 PM »
Okay, so...I mean... if you're being told to STOP like this person is seriously pissed off or in pain, then chances are you're doing something wrong and the sex isn't nearly as good as you think it is and yeah you should probably stop before trying to continue. Stopping to reposition is is a normal part of sex anyway.
Just my two cents here.
The reason why really doesn't matter. It could just be that your partner is unconfortable and doesn't want to have sex anymore.
The reason does matter and it should be explained. Fairness is important.
The reason for ending sex doesn't have to be explained. All your partner needs to say is "stop" (or a safe word) and you should immediately oblige. Once that happens, you two can talk about it, give reasonings, and such. If you find the reason unfair or lacking, then it may be justification to end the relationship.
But a bad or nonexistent reason is never justifcation to ignore your partner and keep fucking them, in any world.
It's not "can" talk about it, it's "should" talk about it. I'm not saying keep having sex. Seriously if someone is so mad or uncomfortable that they want to stop completely, then by all means put a stop to it. If both parties are enjoying it then it's not something that would end abruptly like that. But a conversation needs to happen if there's a problem because communication is important, the same way that consent is important.
Oh, I thought you meant a legitimate reason to stop having sex has to be given before the sex is ended. It goes without saying that there would be reasons and a conversation about it afterwards.
12385
« on: April 27, 2016, 07:38:57 PM »
Okay, so...I mean... if you're being told to STOP like this person is seriously pissed off or in pain, then chances are you're doing something wrong and the sex isn't nearly as good as you think it is and yeah you should probably stop before trying to continue. Stopping to reposition is is a normal part of sex anyway.
Just my two cents here.
The reason why really doesn't matter. It could just be that your partner is unconfortable and doesn't want to have sex anymore.
The reason does matter and it should be explained. Fairness is important.
What? If she is uncomfortable and wants to change positions, you have to STOP. If your thrust even ONCE more, you are literally RAPING her.
This isn't about changing positions, it's about wanting to stop having sex.
12386
« on: April 27, 2016, 07:36:44 PM »
Okay, so...I mean... if you're being told to STOP like this person is seriously pissed off or in pain, then chances are you're doing something wrong and the sex isn't nearly as good as you think it is and yeah you should probably stop before trying to continue. Stopping to reposition is is a normal part of sex anyway.
Just my two cents here.
The reason why really doesn't matter. It could just be that your partner is unconfortable and doesn't want to have sex anymore.
The reason does matter and it should be explained. Fairness is important.
The reason for ending sex doesn't have to be explained. All your partner needs to say is "stop" (or a safe word) and you should immediately oblige. Once that happens, you two can talk about it, give reasonings, and such. If you find the reason unfair or lacking, then it may be justification to end the relationship. But a bad or nonexistent reason is never justifcation to ignore your partner and keep fucking them, in any world.
12387
« on: April 27, 2016, 07:32:19 PM »
Won't happen to me.
12388
« on: April 27, 2016, 07:31:50 PM »
Okay, so...I mean... if you're being told to STOP like this person is seriously pissed off or in pain, then chances are you're doing something wrong and the sex isn't nearly as good as you think it is and yeah you should probably stop before trying to continue. Stopping to reposition is is a normal part of sex anyway.
Just my two cents here.
The reason why really doesn't matter. It could just be that your partner is unconfortable and doesn't want to have sex anymore.
12389
« on: April 27, 2016, 07:27:15 PM »
All of my top contenders are from Square games Aerith's Theme Balamb Garden Deling City Besaid Island Summer's End (Roxas' Theme)
12390
« on: April 27, 2016, 07:20:53 PM »
All of these things might have stemmed from a foolish mistake on the victim's part
There we go. Got what I wanted.
All of these things might have stemmed from a foolish mistake on the victim's part, but it's always 100% on the perpetrator.
The perpetrator is the only one to blame.
Pages: 1 ... 411412413 414415 ... 1001
|
Show Posts
