This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 403404405 406407 ... 1001
12121
« on: May 03, 2016, 10:02:08 PM »
In the name of cultivating good reasons and avoiding bad reasons, I'd say no. Only subjective subjects, such as preference, are safe from the rektening.
Not even, because it's possible to demonstrate whether someone should have said preference.
If I have a preference for color films, and I think a movie like Raging Bull is bad because it isn't in color--sure, that's my opinion, but it's a garbage opinion, because it completely undermines the artistic vision Scorsese had in making that decision.
But Scorsese's vision doesn't matter there. If you think black and white filming is an inherently bad trait in movie quality, that really can't be disproven by facts.
12122
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:57:03 PM »
Is it really reasonable to criticize media by its audience without investigating it yourself?
Not generally, but it gives you an indication of the type of people who enjoy it.
12123
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:51:39 PM »
You're entitled to believe whatever you want to, but some opinions are supported by facts and are therefore more valid than others.
But opinions on things that can't be supported by facts (subjective things like TV show quality) are all equally valid.
12124
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:46:45 PM »
Depends if you like heavy handed lessons about how you're a bad person for doing bad things to pixels
Sounds too preachy. I think I'll pass.
Yeah, you're supposed to love all of these happy monsters (even though they attack you) and spare them instead of being a bad person by killing them for the XP. It's meant to deconstruct the RPG trope of killing all the monsters that you can, but just comes across as so preachy and condescending. The fact that almost all the characters are insufferable doesn't help things.
12125
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:37:00 PM »
Depends if you like heavy handed lessons about how you're a bad person for doing bad things to pixels
12126
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:35:43 PM »
Us Anglos have a chance to save ourselves in June, I just hope the cucks don't come out in full force.
is cuck the new faggot or something
people just love their nonsensical insults
Will you fuck off with the shitposting already?
I mean it was bad before but you've gone into fucking resonance frequency lately.
as if insulting everyone who doesn't agree with you isn't shitposting
12127
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:31:01 PM »
Us Anglos have a chance to save ourselves in June, I just hope the cucks don't come out in full force.
is cuck the new faggot or something people just love their nonsensical insults
12128
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:28:49 PM »
>tfw the shittiest democratic candidate is still a hundred times better than Trump 
12129
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:21:48 PM »
It's so fucking ridiculous when someone has to apologize for shit like this.
"Hurr I made a movie that no one forced any of you to watch and you faggots are still upset about it 7 years later. How can I ever make it up to you???"
lmao ikr you don't see me freaking out and writing hate mail to MNS for The Last Airbender "you RUINED my childhood" well, if your childhood can be ruined by a two hour motion picture then maybe it wasn't as rosy and perfect as you remember it
12130
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:20:07 PM »
what the fuck
EU is even worse than the UN and that's saying something
12131
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:09:28 PM »
 he sunk the ship to kill the captain
12132
« on: May 03, 2016, 09:05:33 PM »
I dropped the dragon ball
Please just stop writing.
someone makes a pun and everyone loses their minds
12133
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:48:06 PM »
We have like two threads on this already faggot.
Yeah but Class was acting like a smug shit in both so I wanted a Fair and Balanced thread.
Plus muh statistics
keep holding this false hope that Trump has more than a zero percent chance of winning a general election
it will just be all the more fun when he loses in a landslide
It's funny how you cucks have been saying this ever since he entered the race.
LITURARLY ZERO PERCENT CHANCE HE'LL WIN DELEGATES
ZERO PERCENT CHANCE HE'LL WIN THOSE STATES
ZERO PERCENT CHANCE HE'LL WIN THE PRIMARY JUST YOU WAIT HAHA S-SERIOUSLY GUYS LITERALLY ZERO R-RIGHT?
You're literally putting words in my mouth. I never said any of those things. I've only said he won't win the general, from day one. I love how you can just say "you cucks" and suddenly I have the exact same opinions as any other liberal who ever lived. If I was like that, I'd think Trump is some huge racist.
12134
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:46:07 PM »
the murkrow one is adorable
I demand absol
12135
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:44:24 PM »
We have like two threads on this already faggot.
Yeah but Class was acting like a smug shit in both so I wanted a Fair and Balanced thread.
Plus muh statistics
keep holding this false hope that Trump has more than a zero percent chance of winning a general election
it will just be all the more fun when he loses in a landslide
You want to give us some empirical data that shows his supposedly abysmal chance of winning a general election?
mark my words that's my empirical data bookmark this thread and come back when he loses terribly and you'll all see how right I am
12136
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:37:54 PM »
We have like two threads on this already faggot.
Yeah but Class was acting like a smug shit in both so I wanted a Fair and Balanced thread.
Plus muh statistics
keep holding this false hope that Trump has more than a zero percent chance of winning a general election it will just be all the more fun when he loses in a landslide
12137
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:36:41 PM »
if my prediction turns out to be a Dewey Defeats Truman situation I'll personally give every member of this forum $50
12138
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:14:24 PM »
and mods you can merge this with Das' subpar thread if you feel like it
12139
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:13:25 PM »
Pls Bernie
I'd adore it if Bernie somehow turned the tables and got the nomination, but it's pretty clear we're shaping up for a Trump against Clinton race. And regardless of how you feel about him, it's almost guaranteed that Trump doesn't have a chance in the general.
12140
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:06:42 PM »
aw
I like this guy
probably helps I'm not a Dragon Ball fan at all
12141
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:05:06 PM »
ha
beat you to the thread
Yeah but this thread has discussion value.
Kasich literally has a zero percent chance of getting the republican nomination and Trump literally has a zero percent chance of winning a general election. Cruz was the GOP's only shot in 2016
12142
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:02:30 PM »
ha
beat you to the thread
12143
« on: May 03, 2016, 08:01:10 PM »
Cruz just dropped out, which means Trump got the Republican nomination! Who's pumped for another Democrat administration?
12144
« on: May 03, 2016, 06:43:52 PM »
If it's unacceptable for women to not wear tops, then it should be unacceptable for men to not wear tops.
I completely agree. You'll never find me with a shirt off, and if I were in shape, no woman would ever be able to coax me into it.
I was only giving a simple explanation for why female breasts are considered sexually appealing, because a lot of people are like, "durr, FOR SOME REASON, these balls of fat are considered appealing!!! humans r weird!!!"
Annoying.
Oh, I see what you mean. I thought you were saying it as a justification for the double standard.
12145
« on: May 03, 2016, 06:35:02 PM »
Doesn't matter. What's socially acceptable for men HAS to be socially acceptable for women.
So you're saying the acceptability of a social norm for women is contingent upon whether it's acceptable for men? In other words, men come first? That's kinda sexist, isn't it?
No, it's not a question of what should be "acceptable." It's a question of what should be unacceptable.
All sexuality should be socially unacceptable.
No, I'm saying that they have to be equal at all times. If a change is made in attitude regarding women, the same change has to be made regarding men, and vice versa. If it's unacceptable for women to not wear tops, then it should be unacceptable for men to not wear tops.
12146
« on: May 03, 2016, 06:30:42 PM »
Breasts on women are, for some reason Because they're a symbol of fertility and maternity. They're baby-feeders, and large baby-feeders, from a primitive biological perspective, have a greater likelihood of propagating the species than smaller ones do. It's not that complicated.
Doesn't matter. What's socially acceptable for men HAS to be socially acceptable for women.
12147
« on: May 03, 2016, 06:21:26 PM »
Same reason a guy can go fuck ten women in one night and be a god, but a woman does it and she's publicly shamed.
People who think sexism is dead are idiots.
Those are man-sluts, or Chad for short. Nobody likes Chad, not even Chad.
Plenty of people do. See that whole lock and key analogy shit.
12148
« on: May 03, 2016, 06:16:33 PM »
random non sequiturs it is
so much for serious getting more serious
sexism against women lives on through double standards and supressed judgment of them
live with it
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1OzioTl7QY2
Don't have headphones on me. Is it really so hard to communicate like a normal person?
12149
« on: May 03, 2016, 06:12:36 PM »
Same reason a guy can go fuck ten women in one night and be a god, but a woman does it and she's publicly shamed. People LOVE to say this.
But it's false. The only people who treat sluts like gods are other sluts.
Everyone else hates them. Doesn't matter if they're a guy or girl.
We've had this discussion before. Just because it doesn't happen where you live doesn't mean it doesn't happen in 90% of America. People love to say it because it's true.
12150
« on: May 03, 2016, 06:09:03 PM »
random non sequiturs it is
so much for serious getting more serious
sexism against women lives on through double standards and supressed judgment of them
live with it
Pages: 1 ... 403404405 406407 ... 1001
|
Show Posts