This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - πΊπππππ
πͺππππ
Pages: 1 ... 357358359 360361 ... 1001
10741
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:26:33 PM »
And yeah, all those things you just shrugged off are big fucking deals. If society feels a certain way about a man, they HAVE to feel the same way about a woman, or it's bigotry. And vice versa. If a man is allowed to attempt to serve in combat, a woman HAS to be allowed to attempt to serve in combat, as well. If she's not allowed to even try, that's the fucking definition of inequality. So fucking what?
You worship an abstraction. There is no practical reason to care about inequality, especially when the definitions for it vary wildly.
Inequality is a part of the natural order. This is fact. No two animals are identical. Our genes vary from ethnic group to ethnic group, gender to gender, and person to person.
This obsession some people have is inane. "Oh no we can't have this law! It would be unequal!"
Equality does not and will never exist. It's a ghost in your head, a delusion thousands of people strive for even as nature itself works day in and day out to keep such a thing from existing.
You worship nature, then. Even though there's nothing inherently good about "the natural order" whatsoever, and it promotes misery and suffering. As long as there's life, there's morality, and the biggest moral code is to prevent suffering, physical and emotional. Inequality is one of the largest sources of emotional suffering in the world. Nature is unequal? Who gives a shit? We're better than that. Just because equality is hard to reach doesn't mean we shouldn't try. Men and woman, black and white, everyone is human. We all have our differences, but we all deserve to be treated the same. If you're too edgy to grasp this simple concept, there's not much I can do for you.
10742
« on: June 07, 2016, 04:28:44 AM »
I don't process the joke. I don't get it, I don't see why people find it funny, and I don't know why it exists.
It's the equivalent of "LOL SO RANDOM, LOOK AT THIS SILLY FROG HAHA"
and yet it's all over the internet
Ground shakes, tide ebbs
Can you hear His footsteps?
Ancient God awakes from sleep
Kek has come your souls to reap!
Those who serve him will be saved
Rest will die or be enslaved!
He is the ender and the redeemer
Will you be His victim or a faithful memer?
Enter now the End Times
As you read these bad rhymes
Bow your head and crane your neck
Meme with me and
PRAISE KEK
R
A
I
S
E
K
E
K
10743
« on: June 07, 2016, 04:22:47 AM »
I don't process the joke. I don't get it, I don't see why people find it funny, and I don't know why it exists.
It's the equivalent of "LOL SO RANDOM, LOOK AT THIS SILLY FROG HAHA"
and yet it's all over the internet
10744
« on: June 07, 2016, 04:20:18 AM »
lol That's retarded.
The facts or how they creep me out? Because all of those coincidences are 100% true
10745
« on: June 07, 2016, 04:19:11 AM »
this could be a fun watch for you, maybe
lol just from the thumbnail I can tell it wouldn't be nothing scares me more than like, creepypasta and online horror stuff I don't even like being frightened, I avoid horror games and movies at all costs but the whole Kennedy/Lincoln thing has always particularly freaked me out because it's real, and there's no explanation behind it at all it's like why some of the scariest things can be some of the most mundane things, as long as they're unexplained. Like if you're alone in your house, you know for a fact that a chair was facing toward a wall, and then later in the day, it's facing a different direction. Shit like that is the absolute worst.
10746
« on: June 07, 2016, 04:11:10 AM »
this is like elementary school trivia, but it's always creeped me out so goddamn much, because there's no explanation behind it. Like, if there were a few of these coincidences, it would be chilling but understandable. Sometimes things line up. But there are so many, and a lot of them are things like specific dates or specific amounts of numbers. No one has ever given me any reasoning as to how this is a thing.  What about you?
10747
« on: June 07, 2016, 03:38:43 AM »
and zzzz equals 104%
all you have to do is sleep to surpass expectations
10748
« on: June 07, 2016, 03:31:31 AM »
I never said anything was wrong with Bethesda trying new things, I just said that settlements were gimmicky. There isn't really much to do with them other than build and occasionally kill a group of enemies for them. I would have preferred to have had one large settlement with a more in-depth management system and more unique NPC settlements rather than 30 settlements, many of which are just ignored, a dull system and only 2 major towns.
Fallout 4 has 3 major towns: Diamond City, Goodneighbor, and Bunker Hill
Fallout 3 also only had 3: Rivet City, Megaton, and Tenpenny Tower.
So not sure what you're on about
Fallout 3 also has Underworld, Paradise Falls, Big Town, Little Lamplight, Canterbury Commons, and a few smaller towns.
If you're going to count all of those, then you also have to count the small towns in Fallout 4. Not only the many small encampments where traders are abound, but the faction housing like Old North Church, the Prydwen, the Institute, all the Minutemen bases, etc. And essentially, any settlement you create will eventually turn into an actual town, complete with doctors and trading, if you build it up enough.
I'm talking settlements with unique characters, not settlements with nameless NPCs you can trade with.
Why?
Fallout 3 is sidequest oriented, Fallout 4 is main/faction quest oriented. Each Fallout 3 town has maybe one big quest tied to it, all of the Fallout 4 towns have many quests tied to them. Especially the faction quests.
And yes, F4's main quest is kickass. Far better than "oh, you're locked into being a good guy and working against the Enclave" like in Fallout 3.
Except you're not locked into being a good guy. You can carry out Eden's plans if you want. You can blow up Megaton if you want. You can try to bring peace to Tenpenny Tower or massacre its residents or massacre the ghouls. It's not like Fallout 4 where no matter what you do you're still a parent looking for their son. There's nothing truly evil you can do except for selling that ghoul kid to the Gunner. As I said, you're either the good guy or the good guy on a bad day.
Except not at all. You HAVE to be part of the BoS, you HAVE to work with your father, and the only diversion in the main quest you can have is irradiating the purifier at the last second. Which, as Broken Steel shows, does pretty much nothing anyway. It's a linear questline. In Fallout 4, the main story beats are mirrored with each faction, sure, but the way it's played out and who you're fighting against is completely up to the player. If you hate the Brotherhood of Steel and you're playing Fallout 3 - too bad! If you hate the Brotherhood of Steel and you're playing Fallout 4, you can make the whole game about taking them down. And it's funny you criticize the linear start of the Fallout 4 when Fallout 3 is an even worse offender. I see all these people bitching about "b-but I don't want to look for my son, how DARE the game predetermine my motives!" when Fallout 3 has the same exact problem, but with your boring father instead of your son.
10749
« on: June 07, 2016, 03:20:25 AM »
I never said anything was wrong with Bethesda trying new things, I just said that settlements were gimmicky. There isn't really much to do with them other than build and occasionally kill a group of enemies for them. I would have preferred to have had one large settlement with a more in-depth management system and more unique NPC settlements rather than 30 settlements, many of which are just ignored, a dull system and only 2 major towns.
Fallout 4 has 3 major towns: Diamond City, Goodneighbor, and Bunker Hill
Fallout 3 also only had 3: Rivet City, Megaton, and Tenpenny Tower.
So not sure what you're on about
Fallout 3 also has Underworld, Paradise Falls, Big Town, Little Lamplight, Canterbury Commons, and a few smaller towns.
If you're going to count all of those, then you also have to count the small towns in Fallout 4. Not only the many small encampments where traders are abound, but the faction housing like Old North Church, the Prydwen, the Institute, all the Minutemen bases, etc. And essentially, any settlement you create will eventually turn into an actual town, complete with doctors and trading, if you build it up enough.
I'm talking settlements with unique characters, not settlements with nameless NPCs you can trade with.
Why? Fallout 3 is sidequest oriented, Fallout 4 is main/faction quest oriented. Each Fallout 3 town has maybe one big quest tied to it, all of the Fallout 4 towns have many quests tied to them. Especially the faction quests. And yes, F4's main quest is kickass. Far better than "oh, you're locked into being a good guy and working against the Enclave" like in Fallout 3.
10750
« on: June 07, 2016, 03:12:30 AM »
I never said anything was wrong with Bethesda trying new things, I just said that settlements were gimmicky. There isn't really much to do with them other than build and occasionally kill a group of enemies for them. I would have preferred to have had one large settlement with a more in-depth management system and more unique NPC settlements rather than 30 settlements, many of which are just ignored, a dull system and only 2 major towns.
Fallout 4 has 3 major towns: Diamond City, Goodneighbor, and Bunker Hill
Fallout 3 also only had 3: Rivet City, Megaton, and Tenpenny Tower.
So not sure what you're on about
Fallout 3 also has Underworld, Paradise Falls, Big Town, Little Lamplight, Canterbury Commons, and a few smaller towns.
If you're going to count all of those, then you also have to count the small towns in Fallout 4. Not only the many small encampments where traders are abound, but the faction housing like Old North Church, the Prydwen, the Institute, all the Minutemen bases, etc. And essentially, any settlement you create will eventually turn into an actual town, complete with doctors and trading, if you build it up enough.
10751
« on: June 07, 2016, 03:05:34 AM »
I never said anything was wrong with Bethesda trying new things, I just said that settlements were gimmicky. There isn't really much to do with them other than build and occasionally kill a group of enemies for them. I would have preferred to have had one large settlement with a more in-depth management system and more unique NPC settlements rather than 30 settlements, many of which are just ignored, a dull system and only 2 major towns.
Fallout 4 has 3 major towns: Diamond City, Goodneighbor, and Bunker Hill Fallout 3 also only had 3: Rivet City, Megaton, and Tenpenny Tower. So not sure what you're on about And there's tons to do with settlements. It's like Minecraft, you can build up huge urban metropolises if you have the time and energy.
10752
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:54:25 AM »
Integral in the sense they're a huge part of the game. There's tons of tools, tons of things to do, and tons of customization. They're awesome. God forbid Bethesda try new things.
10753
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:48:49 AM »
Better dialogue system.
It actually had more than 2 unique towns that were far more interesting than any of 4's.
RPG mechanics.
No gimmicky shit like settlements or the legendary system.
There was actually an element of choice rather than forcing you to be either the good guy or the good guy on a bad day.
The game doesn't force you into a specific character, it lets you be whoever you want.
An actual atmosphere.
More unique weapons rather than just workshop weapons with a flashy effect.
LMAO
it's like you're going out of your way to dislike a game
it's like you want to dislike it
because all of this is either nitpicky to the extreme or just untrue
The funny thing is I don't dislike Fallout 4. Call it what you want, god forbid I prefer its predecessors. Stop sperging out whenever anyone dares to criticise the game.
I'm not the one who posts in a Fallout 4 thread all the time, plays Fallout 4 all the time, and then bitches about Fallout 4
pick
a
lane
You know it's possible to enjoy a game while still criticising its faults, right? Stop being autistic.
You can keep lobbing these childish insults at me because you're offended or some shit, I don't really mind. The truth is that Fallout 3 is probably one of the worst games of all time, and it's ridiculous that some people are so blinded by nostalgia to actually enjoy such a piece of trash. Fallout's tone is not a serious one, and retrofuturism was nonexistent in Fallout 3. Go play literally any other post apocalyptic game series if you want that grey and dreary cliche shit.
Jesus Christ you're impossible to talk to. This is you right now.
Stop trying to ram your opinions down other people's throats like they're fact. You do this in like every single thread.
You can throw about phrases like "Fallout has always been X" all you like but you don't seem to really understand it, you just throw it about to make it seem like you know what you're talking about.
Except I'm giving these crazy things called reasons.
So did I but you brushed it off as "nitpicking".
It's fine for you to criticise Fallout 3 but if Luciana or I dare criticise your precious Fallout 4 there's a problem?
Because it was nitpicking. Settlements are kickass and an integral component of the game. But "lol no their gimmicks" you could say anything is a gimmick I could say that the lockpicking and hacking minigames in Fallout 3 are a gimmick, even though they're not I just wanna go eat my breakfast I don't wanna have this pointless discussion.
Then go eat breakfast...this is a forum, the amount of time between replies doesn't matter. It's not a chat room, conversations can go on for days.
10754
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:31:33 AM »
Better dialogue system.
It actually had more than 2 unique towns that were far more interesting than any of 4's.
RPG mechanics.
No gimmicky shit like settlements or the legendary system.
There was actually an element of choice rather than forcing you to be either the good guy or the good guy on a bad day.
The game doesn't force you into a specific character, it lets you be whoever you want.
An actual atmosphere.
More unique weapons rather than just workshop weapons with a flashy effect.
LMAO
it's like you're going out of your way to dislike a game
it's like you want to dislike it
because all of this is either nitpicky to the extreme or just untrue
The funny thing is I don't dislike Fallout 4. Call it what you want, god forbid I prefer its predecessors. Stop sperging out whenever anyone dares to criticise the game.
I'm not the one who posts in a Fallout 4 thread all the time, plays Fallout 4 all the time, and then bitches about Fallout 4
pick
a
lane
You know it's possible to enjoy a game while still criticising its faults, right? Stop being autistic.
You can keep lobbing these childish insults at me because you're offended or some shit, I don't really mind. The truth is that Fallout 3 is probably one of the worst games of all time, and it's ridiculous that some people are so blinded by nostalgia to actually enjoy such a piece of trash. Fallout's tone is not a serious one, and retrofuturism was nonexistent in Fallout 3. Go play literally any other post apocalyptic game series if you want that grey and dreary cliche shit.
Jesus Christ you're impossible to talk to. This is you right now.
Stop trying to ram your opinions down other people's throats like they're fact. You do this in like every single thread.
You can throw about phrases like "Fallout has always been X" all you like but you don't seem to really understand it, you just throw it about to make it seem like you know what you're talking about.
Except I'm giving these crazy things called reasons.
10755
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:25:58 AM »
Better dialogue system.
It actually had more than 2 unique towns that were far more interesting than any of 4's.
RPG mechanics.
No gimmicky shit like settlements or the legendary system.
There was actually an element of choice rather than forcing you to be either the good guy or the good guy on a bad day.
The game doesn't force you into a specific character, it lets you be whoever you want.
An actual atmosphere.
More unique weapons rather than just workshop weapons with a flashy effect.
LMAO
it's like you're going out of your way to dislike a game
it's like you want to dislike it
because all of this is either nitpicky to the extreme or just untrue
The funny thing is I don't dislike Fallout 4. Call it what you want, god forbid I prefer its predecessors. Stop sperging out whenever anyone dares to criticise the game.
I'm not the one who posts in a Fallout 4 thread all the time, plays Fallout 4 all the time, and then bitches about Fallout 4
pick
a
lane
You know it's possible to enjoy a game while still criticising its faults, right? Stop being autistic.
You can keep lobbing these childish insults at me because you're offended or some shit, I don't really mind. The truth is that Fallout 3 is probably one of the worst games of all time, and it's ridiculous that some people are so blinded by nostalgia to actually enjoy such a piece of trash. Fallout's tone is not a serious one, and retrofuturism was nonexistent in Fallout 3. Go play literally any other post apocalyptic game series if you want that grey and dreary cliche shit.
10756
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:22:51 AM »
10757
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:21:56 AM »
Better dialogue system.
It actually had more than 2 unique towns that were far more interesting than any of 4's.
RPG mechanics.
No gimmicky shit like settlements or the legendary system.
There was actually an element of choice rather than forcing you to be either the good guy or the good guy on a bad day.
The game doesn't force you into a specific character, it lets you be whoever you want.
An actual atmosphere.
More unique weapons rather than just workshop weapons with a flashy effect.
LMAO
it's like you're going out of your way to dislike a game
it's like you want to dislike it
because all of this is either nitpicky to the extreme or just untrue
The funny thing is I don't dislike Fallout 4. Call it what you want, god forbid I prefer its predecessors. Stop sperging out whenever anyone dares to criticise the game.
I'm not the one who posts in a Fallout 4 thread all the time, plays Fallout 4 all the time, and then bitches about Fallout 4 pick a lane
10758
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:20:22 AM »
Fallout 1 was the second worst Fallout game, btw
It goes 2 > NV > 4 > 1 > 3
10759
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:19:34 AM »
Better dialogue system.
It actually had more than 2 unique towns that were far more interesting than any of 4's.
RPG mechanics.
No gimmicky shit like settlements or the legendary system.
There was actually an element of choice rather than forcing you to be either the good guy or the good guy on a bad day.
The game doesn't force you into a specific character, it lets you be whoever you want.
An actual atmosphere.
More unique weapons rather than just workshop weapons with a flashy effect.
LMAO it's like you're going out of your way to dislike a game it's like you want to dislike it because all of this is either nitpicky to the extreme or just untrue
10760
« on: June 07, 2016, 02:11:16 AM »
 I can't be the only one who uses this feature
10761
« on: June 07, 2016, 01:55:50 AM »
What, regular pizza isn't greasy and fattening enough?
10762
« on: June 07, 2016, 01:52:39 AM »
I couldn't care less what I leave behind. Life is for the living, the dead don't need to be remembered.
10763
« on: June 07, 2016, 01:46:57 AM »
I'll take Fallout 3's clunky gunplay yet better atmosphere, aesthetic and questing over Fallout 4's adequate gunplay, lack of atmosphere and shit aesthetic any day.
Fallout 3 had better side quests. That's it. It was a bad game, just in every way. The main plot was laughable. And aesthetic? What? It wasn't even a Fallout aesthetic, it was a generic post-apocalypse aesthetic. The only things Fallout-esque in the slightest were the billboards.
10764
« on: June 06, 2016, 11:57:16 PM »
Then you just don't like the aesthetic of the Fallout franchise. There's nothing wrong with that, but 4 is far truer to the feel of the series than 3 was. 3 was just a generic destroyed metropolis, something you might see in Killzone. 4's changes to the buildings, guns, nuka cola bottles, etc, are all in the vein of retrofuturism. They're not supposed to look realistic, Fallout's art style has never been about realism.
I see where you're coming from, though, you should check out The Last Of Us if you haven't played that yet. That's a realistic post-apocalyptic game, unlike the Fallout series.
You are.... COMPLETELY missing the point of what I am saying. I'm not saying the series is realistic. I love Fallout. I'm saying the way THEY CHANGED THE DESIGN ON THINGS BOTHERS ME, AND THE LOCATION OF FALLOUT 4 IS NOT THAT INTERESTING.
And sorry last I checked, the buildings that were destroyed in every Fallout game before 4 that weren't super science like, looked like typical 1950's buildings. It's supposed to have that retro 1950's sci-fi feel to it. Fallout 4 doesn't.
Go back and look at the buildings in Fallout 1 and 2. They were far more like F4 buildings than F3 or FNV buildings. Bethesda changed the design when they acquired the franchise and made 3, then they changed it back to the classic Fallout feel after they got criticism for that. Not liking the location is fine, but Fallout 3 was far from a traditional Fallout art style like Fallout 4 is.
10765
« on: June 06, 2016, 11:50:27 PM »
I'm really having trouble getting back into this game. It's just so damn boring. It's not bad, just BORINGGGGGGGG. I listened to a Fallout 3 song in 4 and it made me realize how much I loved that world, and aesthetic much more. NV plays into that too.
This game though, idk. It just bores me.
Go back eight years ago and you'd be saying the exact same shit about 3. People just love to hate what's popular.
4 is objectively better than 3, in every way. NV is better than 4, though, I'll give you that.
I'm not talking about gunplay, or graphics. I'm aware that's better. I said aesthetic, and location, along with the music in general. I liked it all better when I played Fallout 3 first, as opposed to playing Fallout 4 when it first came out.
The location is piss boring to me. In fact the only compliment I'd give it is the verticality they did in the cities. But things like how the guns look? The buildings? The way they changed the nuka cola, medkit packs, water, literally everything? No, I don't like it in the slightest.
In fact I'd argue the guns look like they were designed by a 5 year old. At least 3's guns looked like something real, and rather creative. 4's just look so stupid to me.
Fallout NV plays into this too since it uses the same items and art style and models.
Then you just don't like the aesthetic of the Fallout franchise. There's nothing wrong with that, but 4 is far truer to the feel of the series than 3 was. 3 was just a generic destroyed metropolis, something you might see in Killzone. 4's changes to the buildings, guns, nuka cola bottles, etc, are all in the vein of retrofuturism. They're not supposed to look realistic, Fallout's art style has never been about realism. I see where you're coming from, though, you should check out The Last Of Us if you haven't played that yet. That's a realistic post-apocalyptic game, unlike the Fallout series.
10766
« on: June 06, 2016, 11:45:03 PM »
Burning rapists is evil all of a sudden.
Death penalty is justified, anyone who disagrees is a fucking moron.
"all of a sudden" What the fuck? It's always evil to burn someone alive, just like it's always evil to execute someone. If you caught Hitler or Satan himself, it would be objectively fucking wrong to kill them, much less burn them alive. You're a scumbag.
10767
« on: June 06, 2016, 11:41:38 PM »
Anyone who takes advantage over anyone like that should be burned alive.
I really hope you're being exaggerative, or you're just as bad as a rapist. The death penalty is never a justfied punishment, let alone fucking torture.
Class this really isn't something worth having a discussion with me about. With all do respect, just leave it at that.
And advocating cruel and unusual punishment isn't something worth having a discussion with me about. Fuck human rights, right? As soon as you commit a crime, that all just goes out the window.
Honestly fuck people who think this way.
People who harp on others about a subject they're sensitive about are fucking worthless and need to shut the fuck up.
Yeah, BC can say whatever evil shit he wants to, and I'm not allowed to respond to it or else I'll hurt his feelings. I guess he's the only one who's allowed to have a sensitivity.
Speaking from emotion isn't speaking what I actually logically think. Fucking moron. Stop. Drop it.
I can say, whatever, I want to. When you say evil shit, I don't know if you're being sincere or not, hence why my first fucking post here was wondering whether or not you were exaggerating. I guess saying "yes" would've just been too fucking easy.
Or maybe, with how smart you claim to be, you could have simply read that I made it clear I did not want to continue talking and just dropped it.
The answer isn't fucking yes. What do you want me to tell you to appease your pointless comments back to me? Cause I have no fucking clue what you are trying to accomplish.
Are you going to fucking shut up and drop it or are you going to continue to be a cunt?
When have I ever claimed to be smart? Are you mixing me up with someone else?
Whether or not you want to discuss something doesn't matter to me at all. I see evil shit posted on here, I address that evil shit. Simple as that.
Don't see you combating the OP over saying something that is overwhelmingly fucked up and evil. A bit contradictory right?
Probably because OP is a troll. He's said far more fucked up shit than this, and he does it for attention.
You're actually being sincere.
Class let me ask you, do you know why I do not like discussing this topic? Do you know why I always say shit whenever shit like this is said?
I frankly don't care about any personal reasons you have to hate rapists. Everyone hates rapists. But torturing someone, burning them alive, is far more monstrous than raping someone. I'd rather meet an advocate of rape than an advocate of torture.
10768
« on: June 06, 2016, 11:37:53 PM »
Anyone who takes advantage over anyone like that should be burned alive.
I really hope you're being exaggerative, or you're just as bad as a rapist. The death penalty is never a justfied punishment, let alone fucking torture.
Class this really isn't something worth having a discussion with me about. With all do respect, just leave it at that.
And advocating cruel and unusual punishment isn't something worth having a discussion with me about. Fuck human rights, right? As soon as you commit a crime, that all just goes out the window.
Honestly fuck people who think this way.
People who harp on others about a subject they're sensitive about are fucking worthless and need to shut the fuck up.
Yeah, BC can say whatever evil shit he wants to, and I'm not allowed to respond to it or else I'll hurt his feelings. I guess he's the only one who's allowed to have a sensitivity.
Speaking from emotion isn't speaking what I actually logically think. Fucking moron. Stop. Drop it.
I can say, whatever, I want to. When you say evil shit, I don't know if you're being sincere or not, hence why my first fucking post here was wondering whether or not you were exaggerating. I guess saying "yes" would've just been too fucking easy.
Or maybe, with how smart you claim to be, you could have simply read that I made it clear I did not want to continue talking and just dropped it.
The answer isn't fucking yes. What do you want me to tell you to appease your pointless comments back to me? Cause I have no fucking clue what you are trying to accomplish.
Are you going to fucking shut up and drop it or are you going to continue to be a cunt?
When have I ever claimed to be smart? Are you mixing me up with someone else?
Whether or not you want to discuss something doesn't matter to me at all. I see evil shit posted on here, I address that evil shit. Simple as that.
Don't see you combating the OP over saying something that is overwhelmingly fucked up and evil. A bit contradictory right?
Probably because OP is a troll. He's said far more fucked up shit than this, and he does it for attention. You're actually being sincere.
10769
« on: June 06, 2016, 11:32:07 PM »
Anyone who takes advantage over anyone like that should be burned alive.
I really hope you're being exaggerative, or you're just as bad as a rapist. The death penalty is never a justfied punishment, let alone fucking torture.
Class this really isn't something worth having a discussion with me about. With all do respect, just leave it at that.
And advocating cruel and unusual punishment isn't something worth having a discussion with me about. Fuck human rights, right? As soon as you commit a crime, that all just goes out the window.
Honestly fuck people who think this way.
People who harp on others about a subject they're sensitive about are fucking worthless and need to shut the fuck up.
Yeah, BC can say whatever evil shit he wants to, and I'm not allowed to respond to it or else I'll hurt his feelings. I guess he's the only one who's allowed to have a sensitivity.
Speaking from emotion isn't speaking what I actually logically think. Fucking moron. Stop. Drop it.
I can say, whatever, I want to. When you say evil shit, I don't know if you're being sincere or not, hence why my first fucking post here was wondering whether or not you were exaggerating. I guess saying "yes" would've just been too fucking easy.
Or maybe, with how smart you claim to be, you could have simply read that I made it clear I did not want to continue talking and just dropped it.
The answer isn't fucking yes. What do you want me to tell you to appease your pointless comments back to me? Cause I have no fucking clue what you are trying to accomplish.
Are you going to fucking shut up and drop it or are you going to continue to be a cunt?
When have I ever claimed to be smart? Are you mixing me up with someone else? Whether or not you want to discuss something doesn't matter to me at all. I see evil shit posted on here, I address that evil shit. Simple as that.
10770
« on: June 06, 2016, 11:26:44 PM »
Anyone who takes advantage over anyone like that should be burned alive.
I really hope you're being exaggerative, or you're just as bad as a rapist. The death penalty is never a justfied punishment, let alone fucking torture.
Class this really isn't something worth having a discussion with me about. With all do respect, just leave it at that.
And advocating cruel and unusual punishment isn't something worth having a discussion with me about. Fuck human rights, right? As soon as you commit a crime, that all just goes out the window.
Honestly fuck people who think this way.
People who harp on others about a subject they're sensitive about are fucking worthless and need to shut the fuck up.
Yeah, BC can say whatever evil shit he wants to, and I'm not allowed to respond to it or else I'll hurt his feelings. I guess he's the only one who's allowed to have a sensitivity.
Speaking from emotion isn't speaking what I actually logically think. Fucking moron. Stop. Drop it.
I can say, whatever, I want to. When you say evil shit, I don't know if you're being sincere or not, hence why my first fucking post here was wondering whether or not you were exaggerating. I guess saying "yes" would've just been too fucking easy.
Pages: 1 ... 357358359 360361 ... 1001
|
Show Posts