8881
The Flood / Re: What is your dream job
« on: May 10, 2017, 06:20:02 PM »
none
what a silly thing to dream about
what a silly thing to dream about
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 8881
The Flood / Re: What is your dream job« on: May 10, 2017, 06:20:02 PM »
none
what a silly thing to dream about 8882
The Flood / Re: What food do you really really hate« on: May 10, 2017, 06:19:01 PM »
i don't even like banana-flavored CANDY
if candy can't make it taste good, you know it's fucked 8883
The Flood / Re: What food do you really really hate« on: May 10, 2017, 06:15:49 PM »
i really really really don't like bananas
8884
Gaming / Re: Chess rankings« on: May 10, 2017, 02:51:18 PM »
someone take me on
i'm V3rbatim on chess.com 8886
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 02:41:32 PM »Because they're not necessarily a good thing, especially when every female character has those traits. It's lazy.So why break from reality when these features found in females are a good thing?Where did I say that?They're at a disadvantage if they're a more nurturing character?Exactly what it sounds like. The fact that Street Fighter games don't generally put female characters at an inherent disadvantage just because they're female is an acceptable break from reality.What do you mean by an acceptable break from reality?I don't wanna talk about games I haven't played, but I don't disagree that females are more nurturing than men. But I'd consider what I just described to be an acceptable break from reality.She later brings up that, as often as female supporting characters tend to verbally coddle the player for doing a good job, the male protagonist rarely if ever returns the favor. That would be too organic and sensible.BioShock Infinite isn't like that at all, though. 8887
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 02:30:44 PM »Where did I say that?They're at a disadvantage if they're a more nurturing character?Exactly what it sounds like. The fact that Street Fighter games don't generally put female characters at an inherent disadvantage just because they're female is an acceptable break from reality.What do you mean by an acceptable break from reality?I don't wanna talk about games I haven't played, but I don't disagree that females are more nurturing than men. But I'd consider what I just described to be an acceptable break from reality.She later brings up that, as often as female supporting characters tend to verbally coddle the player for doing a good job, the male protagonist rarely if ever returns the favor. That would be too organic and sensible.BioShock Infinite isn't like that at all, though. 8888
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 12:22:06 PM »Exactly what it sounds like. The fact that Street Fighter games don't generally put female characters at an inherent disadvantage just because they're female is an acceptable break from reality.What do you mean by an acceptable break from reality?I don't wanna talk about games I haven't played, but I don't disagree that females are more nurturing than men. But I'd consider what I just described to be an acceptable break from reality.She later brings up that, as often as female supporting characters tend to verbally coddle the player for doing a good job, the male protagonist rarely if ever returns the favor. That would be too organic and sensible.BioShock Infinite isn't like that at all, though. 8889
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 11:52:45 AM »I don't wanna talk about games I haven't played, but I don't disagree that females are more nurturing than men. But I'd consider what I just described to be an acceptable break from reality.She later brings up that, as often as female supporting characters tend to verbally coddle the player for doing a good job, the male protagonist rarely if ever returns the favor. That would be too organic and sensible.BioShock Infinite isn't like that at all, though. 8890
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 10:43:59 AM »verbatim, you are a bright fellow - but how are you inoronically enjoying these?! Does your mind not see the obvious errors in her statements?I don't know, name a couple. 8891
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 10:39:26 AM »The mechanic that you need to clear an area before proceeding is a common one and doesn't become sexist just because a woman is the one opening up the next sectionYou're not really explaining why, though. You're just saying that it's not sexist. You're not demonstrating how it isn't. Quote The game congraluting you for completing a section isn't sexist just because a woman does itYou're really good at missing her point. She later brings up that, as often as female supporting characters tend to verbally coddle the player for doing a good job, the male protagonist rarely if ever returns the favor. That would be too organic and sensible. 8892
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 10:35:12 AM »The mindset that games are there to represent complex real life relationships and are suppose to be bastions for social progress needs to fuck offNo one said that they're supposed to be. They just can be, and probably should be. 8893
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 10:33:32 AM »What the heck is SFM porn?People import character models into Source Filmmaker and make porn out of it. They're all over 4chan. 8894
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 09:56:32 AM »Wow she really didn't play the game at all. I mean, I know she never plays the games she talks shit about but this kind of triggers me because I really like this game.I haven't. It doesn't look very good, and if I were to play it, I'd probably want to try the original Bioshock first. I do know that Elizabeth is the queen of SFM porn, which doesn't really do much for my perception of her character. 8895
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 09:53:30 AM »Fictional women can be portrayed as whatever the fuck the game designers and the players want them to be.Shockingly enough, nobody has ever denied this. And you know what's great about being able to do whatever you want? It still doesn't absolve you of your sexism, and if anything, exacerbates it, because you're unapologetic. Quote Games aren't designed to cater to feminist criteria. They're designed to be fun for the player.An umbrella that feminist criteria falls under--for players of all genders. They are not mutually exclusive ideals, and no amount of you twisting the narrative will change that. It's not my fault that you want games to be socially regressive and I don't. Quote The only way it's going to happen is if she continues buying the games that at least meet some of her feminist requirements, not whining on the internet.1. How do you know she doesn't already? 2. Is she not openly encouraging her audience to speak with their wallets and support feminist-friendly games (and other media) through her whining? Is she not challenging developers to design games with feminist ideals in mind, while not putting a gun to their heads? Is she not creating discussions like this that could eventually lead up to such changes happening in the industry? Wouldn't all of these things make this avenue a much more viable and efficient solution than what you're suggesting? The only difference is that you have to hear ideologies different from your own. The horror. 8896
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 09:48:20 AM »I'm not sure I understand her point about control, in regards to orders issued being obeyed without hesitation or doubt. It's a video game, you need to be able to control it to play it. So I don't think that's a problem, just that they don't do anything outside of what they're told to do.I haven't played any of the games she talked about except Half-Life 2, so I can't really comment on those--but I've played Breath of the Wild, and a lot of people have had issues with the horses in that game, because they don't always do what you want them to do. I actually like that, though, because it's true to life. You don't have complete control over your horse because the horse is a living being of its own. Something like that can only be as annoying insofar as you allow it to be, in my eyes. 8897
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 08:07:42 AM »There's really nothing wrong with any of these mechanicsNo, they're wrong because they disproportionately, if not only, apply to women. what a retarded post 8898
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 07:55:53 AM »I will summarize my point by referring to the previous paragraph, that males (the majority of the player population) are going to find these games more engaging if they have male characters that risk their lives for female characters.This is a wordy variation of the tired "sex sells" meme that's been refuted time and time again. Or in this case, "machismo sells." Just because the majority of the gaming population consists of males doesn't make it okay or less harmful to cater exclusively to them. It's smart from a business standpoint, but that still doesn't make it okay. It makes it worse, really—women aren't just objects to you people; they're dollar signs. Pretty disgusting. Quote There are plenty of games in the market that have the gender roles reversed in these situations, so instead of whining about the games that don't fit her narrow criteria, perhaps she could be speaking with her wallet and playing the games that do. That's really the only way she's ever going to see positive change in the way females are portrayed in video games.Her point, clearly, is that there's still not enough. And there really aren't. You can say that there's "plenty" but that doesn't actually make it true. The ones that do tend to have various problems of their own, or they're still not quite feminist enough. 8899
Gaming / Anita Sarkeesian: The Lady Sidekick - Tropes vs. Women in Video Games« on: May 10, 2017, 05:48:39 AM »
Sad news: Apparently, this is the LAST Tropes vs. Women video she's ever doing.
The series has had a lot of ups and downs--she's made good points and bad points--but at least she's sending it off with a good subject. So, for the last time: TRIGGER WARNING: The following video contains feminism; if you're a stupid bigot, please move along. YouTube Quote “OK, it looks like I can open it from here, but I can’t go with you. Here goes!” Not a bad video, but having played Half-Life 2, I think she's underselling Alyx's role in that game a little bit. Now that the series is over, here's every video she's ever made in this series: Damsel in Distress: Part 1 Damsel in Distress: Part 2 Damsel in Distress: Part 3 Ms. Male Character Women as Reward Women as Reward: Special DLC Mini-Episode Women as Background Decoration: Part 1 Women as Background Decoration: Part 2 Strategic Butt Coverings Body Language and the Male Gaze Lingerie is Not Armor Are Women Too Hard to Animate? All the Slender Ladies: Body Diversity in Video Games Sinister Seductress Not Your Exotic Fantasy The Lady Sidekick Looking back, I'm a little disappointed that she never really made a video that was dedicated solely to over-sexualization and sexual objectification. Of course, she gives no shortage of attention to that issue in all of her videos—it's a very broad topic, after all—but the closest she comes to fully tackling the subject is her infamous Women as Background Decoration video, where she unfairly criticizes Hitman: Absolution for allegedly encouraging you to kill and degrade the bodies of some scantily-clad women that appear in one scene—when in reality, the game actually penalizes you for doing so. She caught more flak for that than the entirety of her series, and even I was disappointed with that video. She also only made TWO videos in her short-lived Positive Female Characters mini-series, which is unfortunate. Nonetheless, she's made more good points than bad and rustled a lot of people's feathers along the way—and even though all of her criticisms are generally constructive and well-substantiated, and conducted in a very polite, courteous, respectful manner, people still managed to get pissed over her opinions. I think that's pretty funny. Whenever people tell me that I'd be a lot more agreeable if I didn't have such a caustic personality, I think of Anita Sarkeesian to remind myself of how untrue that is. 8900
Gaming / Re: Assasins Creed leak« on: May 09, 2017, 11:13:06 PM »fingers crossedwhat about the next onelike, nothing can top itbotw should've been the open world to end all open worldsWhat happened? odds are, they'll focus less on the world and more on improving other aspects, like the combat 8901
The Flood / Re: Okay, who the fuck came up with this "trailer intro in trailers" idea« on: May 09, 2017, 04:40:53 PM »besides that, i never really understood people's TOTAL AVERSION to seeing a single short advertisementhow does it feel now that nobody can say "some of us have jobs" as a response to you ![]() never thought of that 8902
The Flood / Re: Has political correctness gone too far?« on: May 09, 2017, 04:27:59 PM »
It hasn't gone far enough.
8903
The Flood / Re: >an ex-bnet old user has nearly 200000 subscribers on Youtube« on: May 09, 2017, 04:12:43 PM »
why the fuck wouldn't you even say who it is you dumb bitch
8904
Gaming / Re: Assasins Creed leak« on: May 09, 2017, 04:06:02 PM »like, nothing can top itbotw should've been the open world to end all open worldsWhat happened? 8905
The Flood / Re: Okay, who the fuck came up with this "trailer intro in trailers" idea« on: May 09, 2017, 03:49:10 PM »
besides that, i never really understood people's TOTAL AVERSION to seeing a single short advertisement
ads are the reason the internet is free; if i had to, i would watch ten ads before every video i watch just to keep it that way i don't give a fuck 8906
The Flood / Re: Okay, who the fuck came up with this "trailer intro in trailers" idea« on: May 09, 2017, 03:47:14 PM »i only care to do this when i get bombarded with those anti-drug PSA scare campaigns, where they shove a closeup of some dude's fucked-up face because he kept chewing tobacco or some stupid shit like thatWhenever I get a commercial I mute the video and look at something else for like five to thirty seconds.It's like an abstract for those with pitifully small attention spans.nah it's because of the 5 second skip timer YouTube uses for ads. it's like why me i'm the most anti-drug person on the goddamn planet, i don't need to be told how dumb it is to use any 8907
Gaming / Re: Assasins Creed leak« on: May 09, 2017, 03:33:48 PM »
botw should've been the open world to end all open worlds
8908
Gaming / Re: Petition to get Verbatim to finish Dark Souls« on: May 09, 2017, 02:18:09 PM »i actually could, but i'd have to cut down on some of the shit that i do that might be boring to watchthankfully it's summer so i'll have a lot more time to play itStream it 8909
Gaming / Re: Petition to get Verbatim to finish Dark Souls« on: May 09, 2017, 01:39:14 PM »
thankfully it's summer so i'll have a lot more time to play it
i'll get it done 8910
The Flood / Re: Chally« on: May 09, 2017, 01:34:32 PM »Anyone else find "Chally" cringey?kinda, that's why i never call him that |