Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Verbatim

Pages: 1 ... 281282283 284285 ... 1601
8461
The Flood / Re: hey verb why did you like episode 48 so much?
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:46:44 PM »
i might just watch along with you if you make it to episode 64, but i still have other animes to watch

sigh

8462
The Flood / Re: hey verb why did you like episode 48 so much?
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:37:04 PM »
gaara's design is cool but his character isn't as interesting when it was revealed he was evil

when he was first introduced he seemed like he had a shred of decency to him that i liked
Gaara isn't evil.
Spoiler
he doesn't know that yet you FUCK

8463
so if gore is okay as long as it isn't real gore

why can't I post lolis as long as they aren't 3D lolis
because sex is more offensive than fake violence to any rational person

my avatar barely qualifies as fake gore, it's fake gore-lite

8464
The Flood / Re: Should I ask this chick out
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:28:43 PM »
getting rejected can be pretty mortifying depending on your disposition

the kind of dignity loss that makes you not want to speak to a female for months on end, even if you know it's silly and doesn't actually matter
That is more so on your end though for hoping way too much. It's not the womans fault for saying no, and it shouldn't be the end of the world for you.

Besides, it's better to know how someone feels than always wonder "what if?" and regret it for a long period in your life.
it's not really a thing of "why couldn't she just say yes," it's a matter of "why would she say yes, why did i even try"

i do agree with the second part though
That sounds like low self esteem issues and if you think suddenly having a partner would make your life happier, you'd be wrong. You need to have your life in shape mentally before you attempt to include another in it. At least that's how I feel.
i agree, but again, this doesn't really apply to me either—you forget how weird i am

it's not that i think having a partner would make me happier, per se—i just see unhappiness and loneliness in other people, and i want to see if i can't offer anything to help them with that, because those are two things that resonate with me on a personal level

and then i remember—oh yeah, i don't actually have anything to offer to that end, so i can't really help anyone

so, like you said, it's ultimately a matter of adjusting myself first, but i'm the kind of person who wants to have his cake, eat it too, and share it with anyone else who may want it—but no one wants it, and that's kind of a crushing feeling

8465
The Flood / Re: Should I ask this chick out
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:15:14 PM »
getting rejected can be pretty mortifying depending on your disposition

the kind of dignity loss that makes you not want to speak to a female for months on end, even if you know it's silly and doesn't actually matter
That is more so on your end though for hoping way too much. It's not the womans fault for saying no, and it shouldn't be the end of the world for you.

Besides, it's better to know how someone feels than always wonder "what if?" and regret it for a long period in your life.
it's not really a thing of "why couldn't she just say yes," it's a matter of "why would she say yes, why did i even try"

i do agree with the second part though

8466
It's a shame Verbatim's avatar is a fake trump head. It should be the real thing and be allowed on the site.
bird up

8467
The Flood / Re: Should I ask this chick out
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:06:08 PM »
obviously considering theres nothing to lose by doing so
i can think of at least four things
prove it
loss of time, dignity, morale

could possibly get physically hurt depending on how crazy she is
elaborate on dignity?
getting rejected can be pretty mortifying depending on your disposition

the kind of dignity loss that makes you not want to speak to a female for months on end, even if you know it's silly and doesn't actually matter

8468
God this is retarded.

Are you all actually this outraged over his profile pic or is this just something to do on a tuesday night?
Outraged, no. Triggered, yes. What's so hard to understand that depictions of graphic violence are far from acceptable for most people?
And yet, violent films and games are rather popular these days.

It's almost as if most people are able to make the distinction between reality and fiction.
no it's evil because violence is bad and hurts people

didn't you know that, stupid

8469
The Flood / Re: Should I ask this chick out
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:59:34 PM »
obviously considering theres nothing to lose by doing so
i can think of at least four things
prove it
loss of time, dignity, morale

could possibly get physically hurt depending on how crazy she is

8470
The Flood / Re: Should I ask this chick out
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:43:50 PM »
obviously considering theres nothing to lose by doing so
i can think of at least four things

8471
I thought "shock images" weren't allowed. Remember the big fit over Jeff the Killer?
this isn't even shocking
Shocking enough to get her fired.
because people are fucking sensitive little babies like carson here

8472
I thought "shock images" weren't allowed. Remember the big fit over Jeff the Killer?
this isn't even shocking

8473
ahahaha

8474
wasn't expecting challenger to be the one to get it, but i'll take it

8475
The Flood / Re: hey verb why did you like episode 48 so much?
« on: June 06, 2017, 05:00:32 PM »
don't worry, they'll change it again just as you're warming up to it

8478
it's no more graphic than the one i used of trump shooting himself in the fucking head

if you think this is at all offensive you're basically as dumb as a trump supporter

actually you probably ARE a trump supporter
and people complained then too
like one irrelevant person

Quote
also, if you don't break the law every day then you're a Trump supporter, because his job is keeping the law, and by helping him keep it you support him
nope
plenty of people
plenty of irrelevant people who need to quit being pusillanimous little whiny cunts
lmao logicial leaps when you're proven wrong

"just ONE person man" —> "okay more than one person but those people are IRRELEVANT for not agreeing with me"
it was just one person

8479
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too

because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex

sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny

ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.

Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day

hopefully

in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic

women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men

any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women

this isn't hard
like i said, you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made

just answer this: how is holding women to a different standard than men not sexist? How is giving men more power than women not misogynistic?
because i'm not doing either of those things
Yes you are.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing"
^this is holding women to a higher standard AND giving men more power - the power to "do this horrible dehumanizing thing" (the thing not being horrible or dehumanizing anyway)
you'll grow out of it

8480
it's no more graphic than the one i used of trump shooting himself in the fucking head

if you think this is at all offensive you're basically as dumb as a trump supporter

actually you probably ARE a trump supporter
and people complained then too
like one irrelevant person

Quote
also, if you don't break the law every day then you're a Trump supporter, because his job is keeping the law, and by helping him keep it you support him
nope
plenty of people
plenty of irrelevant people who need to quit being pusillanimous little whiny cunts

8481
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too

because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex

sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny

ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.

Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day

hopefully

in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic

women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men

any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women

this isn't hard
like i said, you'll grow out of it
lmao, the true sign of losing an argument is resorting to condescending passive aggressive remarks when a direct hole in your logic has been made

just answer this: how is holding women to a different standard than men not sexist? How is giving men more power than women not misogynistic?
because i'm not doing either of those things

8482
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too

because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex

sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny

ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.

Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day

hopefully

in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic
holding women to a higher standard than men is sexist and misogynistic

women should be socially allowed - no, expected - to behave identically to men

any other opinion, you're giving men more rights than women

this isn't hard
like i said, you'll grow out of it

8483
New Avi? Nah, I got too much class for that.

45 > 44


i wouldn't whine if you did this

8484
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too

because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex

sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny

ok
Now you're getting it! You are lessening women by saying they're incapable of being just as evil as men.

Forcing this imaginary "purity" of women is saying they don't have the power to be sexually deviant and impure. That's misogynistic.
you'll grow out of this mentality one day

hopefully

in all likelihood you'll probably just become even more misogynistic

8486
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too

because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex

sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny
Wrong. Thinking that men objectify women and women don't objectify men is.
"women don't generally do this horrible dehumanizing thing" = misogyny

ok

8487
it's no more graphic than the one i used of trump shooting himself in the fucking head

if you think this is at all offensive you're basically as dumb as a trump supporter

actually you probably ARE a trump supporter
and people complained then too
like one irrelevant person

Quote
also, if you don't break the law every day then you're a Trump supporter, because his job is keeping the law, and by helping him keep it you support him
nope

8488
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too

because they're the ones who objectify women during sex
and women are the ones who objectify men during sex

sexual objectifation is not bad
this is pure misogyny

8490
to reword your toxic bullshit: "only men are capable of receiving pleasure from sex - sex is something that men love and women put up with"
except no because men are scum for liking sex too

because they're the ones who objectify women during sex

Pages: 1 ... 281282283 284285 ... 1601