This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Verbatim
Pages: 1 ... 236237238 239240 ... 1601
7111
« on: July 15, 2017, 10:22:42 PM »
Lucky is the final qualifier, by the way.
7112
« on: July 15, 2017, 10:17:22 PM »
IT'S STARTING
7113
« on: July 15, 2017, 10:16:52 PM »
What I want to happen:
Mew2King sends Armada to loser's.
Mango sends Hungrybox to loser's (not because I want Mango to win; it would just be more dramatic this way).
In Winner's Finals, Mango will send Mew2King to loser's.
Plup vs. The Moon could go either way for me. I like both players the same.
SFAT will eliminate either Lucky or Prince Abu, free.
Hungrybox will eliminate whoever wins between Plup and Moon.
Armada will utterly destroy whoever wins between SFAT and Lucky/Abu.
Hungrybox will eliminate Armada.
In Loser's Finals, Hungrybox will eliminate Mew2King.
In Grand Finals, Hungrybox will reset the bracket against Mango and win Evo.
What will most likely happen:
Armada sends M2K to loser's.
Hungrybox sends Mango to loser's.
Armada sends Hbox to loser's in Winner's Finals.
Plup will eliminate the Moon.
SFAT will eliminate Lucky.
SFAT and Plup could go either way.
Mew2King will eliminate Lucky.
Mango will eliminate Plup.
Mango will eliminate Mew2King.
Hungrybox will eliminate either one of them in Loser's Finals.
Armada wins against Hbox in Grand Finals. No bracket reset.
7114
« on: July 15, 2017, 10:10:53 PM »
https://www.twitch.tv/evo>when fucking video games are more hype than real sporting events >oh wait that's not really that much of a surprise
7115
« on: July 15, 2017, 10:09:30 PM »
The results for top 8 are slowly coming in, but offstream:
Winner's:
Armada vs. Mew2King
Hungrybox vs. Mango
Loser's:
Plup vs. The Moon
SFAT vs. ??? (either Prince Abu or Lucky (it's probably going to be Lucky))
7117
« on: July 15, 2017, 09:54:57 PM »
THE MOON WITH THE UPSET
7118
« on: July 15, 2017, 09:52:14 PM »
someone notify me when the melee championship starts
i would start watching now, top 8 will commence in about an hour
thanks, just signed on now. have i missed anything big?
Predictably: Armada, Mew2King, Hungrybox, and Mango qualified for top 8 winner's side. Armada and Mew2King sent Axe and Leffen to loser's, respectively. Hungrybox almost lost to SFAT and Mango almost lost to Prince Abu, of all people, but they both made it.
7119
« on: July 15, 2017, 09:13:24 PM »
someone notify me when the melee championship starts
i would start watching now, top 8 will commence in about an hour
7120
« on: July 15, 2017, 09:07:00 PM »
I'm talking about people
that's a modifier the base act is "eating shit" not "people eating shit" you are modifying the goalposts
7121
« on: July 15, 2017, 09:06:10 PM »
i wish you were the type of user that's actually difficult and challenging to argue with, but you're just not
everything you say is just so easy to smack down with no effort
my responses are almost automatic, because you're just that easy
I wish you were actually intelligent and didn't resort to personal attacks the second your ego the size of a zeppelin is attacked.
you already know i'm intelligent more importantly, you already know i'm more intelligent than you
7122
« on: July 15, 2017, 08:33:05 AM »
i wish you were the type of user that's actually difficult and challenging to argue with, but you're just not
everything you say is just so easy to smack down with no effort
my responses are almost automatic, because you're just that easy
7123
« on: July 15, 2017, 08:28:49 AM »
Eating shit is a bad thing. Swimming through an ocean of diarrhea is a bad thing. Using heroin is a bad thing.
Doing it to save someone doesn't make it a good thing. That's why somebody has to force you at gun point to do it lmao you just keep proving me right.
and the fact that it's unhealthy, repulsive, and there's no immediate practical purpose for it doesn't make it a bad thing either
it just means you have a small brain
It does though. That's literally what "bad" means hahahaha. You always back yourself into a corner like this.
that's not what bad means at all by this logic, i could say that saving your friend is the definition of good, therefore anything that would allow you to save your friend is also good objectively bad means i literally can't come up with any extreme examples that would prove that it's actually good in that one instance, and i already have some animals survive by eating shit, so there, i proved you wrong for the 7024th time
7124
« on: July 15, 2017, 07:04:12 AM »
Eating shit is a bad thing. Swimming through an ocean of diarrhea is a bad thing. Using heroin is a bad thing.
Doing it to save someone doesn't make it a good thing. That's why somebody has to force you at gun point to do it lmao you just keep proving me right.
and the fact that it's unhealthy, repulsive, and there's no immediate practical purpose for it doesn't make it a bad thing either it just means you have a small brain
7125
« on: July 15, 2017, 06:58:16 AM »
It's hilarious how you're always trying to bring me down to your level. I already explained why your hypothetical is a dumb and unrealistic scenario. but you don't have to because i already know that it is but that's not the point Those are descriptors, not modifiers. they're modifiers Eating shit is unhealthy and serves no purpose.
wow stop using modifiers or i'm gonna declare victory you're just proving that the base act of eating shit is neutral by reaching for these modifiers
7126
« on: July 15, 2017, 06:17:03 AM »
Try what? If you're ever in that situation you're fucked. Either try to take the gun or tell the dude to go fuck himself and die like a man. so you wouldn't try to save your friend okay, that's your prerogative kinda makes you a bad person, but you know, to each his own Because it's a modifier. Which means the base act (eating shit) is a negative.
so why is it objectively bad don't use any modifiers like "it's gross and unhealthy" because those are modifiers you're so fucking dumb dude
7127
« on: July 15, 2017, 06:10:23 AM »
The only people that are gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.
Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake
why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying
that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily
i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"
Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"
that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times
maybe i do
what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
Eating shit is objectively bad.
it's actually not
Really? Why?
someone puts a gun to your best friend's head and tells you if you don't eat shit, he dies
LOL
How the hell is that a good thing? You're being forced at gunpoint to do something bad. It doesn't magically turn into a good thing and eating shit in that situation is even worse than people who have a shit eating fetish and at least enjoy themselves. That's not a good thing. A good thing is something you do of your own free will and enjoy which doesn't harm you. Torture isn't a good thing.
Not to mention there'd be no point because you're both gonna get shot anyways. Is that seriously the best you can come up with? That was the worst fucking example I've ever seen in my life lmao holy fucking shit did Deci hack your account or something?
why is it not good to save your friend, i don't get it
Because you're not going to save your friend.
this isn't your hypothetical this is also you saying that you shouldn't even try, which is pretty funny Adding the modifier of saving your friend doesn't make it a good thing.
why what's an acceptable modifier for you
7128
« on: July 15, 2017, 06:02:50 AM »
The only people that are gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.
Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake
why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying
that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily
i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"
Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"
that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times
maybe i do
what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
Eating shit is objectively bad.
it's actually not
Really? Why?
someone puts a gun to your best friend's head and tells you if you don't eat shit, he dies
LOL
How the hell is that a good thing? You're being forced at gunpoint to do something bad. It doesn't magically turn into a good thing and eating shit in that situation is even worse than people who have a shit eating fetish and at least enjoy themselves. That's not a good thing. A good thing is something you do of your own free will and enjoy which doesn't harm you. Torture isn't a good thing.
Not to mention there'd be no point because you're both gonna get shot anyways. Is that seriously the best you can come up with? That was the worst fucking example I've ever seen in my life lmao holy fucking shit did Deci hack your account or something?
why is it not good to save your friend, i don't get it "objectively bad" means that there's no situation where it would ever be good
7129
« on: July 15, 2017, 05:36:29 AM »
The only people that are gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.
Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake
why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying
that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily
i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"
Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"
that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times
maybe i do
what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
Eating shit is objectively bad.
it's actually not
Really? Why?
someone puts a gun to your best friend's head and tells you if you don't eat shit, he dies
7130
« on: July 15, 2017, 05:28:29 AM »
The only people that are gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.
Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake
why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying
that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily
i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"
Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"
that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times
maybe i do
what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
Eating shit is objectively bad.
it's actually not
7131
« on: July 15, 2017, 04:05:36 AM »
First and for most, this probably would have been a thread to help Roman at the time, but I didn't want to create a thread like this for someone who was just so eager and desperate to fuck, I mean yeah he got some pussy, but look what happened to his dick afterwards. Quality over quantity gents. Now I'm well aware that this place is classless tasteless and downright rundown into shit, this thread is for any of the few remaining classy individuals left, and if you're just looking for something on how to fuck as many women as possible, then this is not the thread for you.
Anyway on with the thread.
Long distance (online) vs Real Life:
The only thing I can say is that as far as getting to a relationship long distance wise, and a good one mind you not a shitty one is that its like winning the lottery in terms of being your true other half. Its like winning the lottery to an extent. Regardless if you would be true to your date in real life, you should be true to anyone you date online as well, lying will always cause problems, what's more is that dishonestly will also fuck you right over. Trust is key to every relationship, if you can't trust someone that you genuinely love, you're not ready. What's more is that if they don't trust you, you're pretty much in trouble as it is. If this is the case it will evidently lead to a breakup. On top of that loving yourself is important, if you don't love yourself to start with, not even a little, you're not ready. You never will be ready until you do. It is also important for you to be yourself. Do not change who you are for someone else, if she doesn't like you for who you are, whether its online or in real life, then she's not for you. The right woman will come into your life, and when she does, you better do everything in your power to not screw it up, because if you do, you will deeply regret it.
Paying for dates
This is implying that you have a date in real life, or that you have finally met with the person that you were dating online and in real life and now you're going out on an actual real life date. I'm just going to be blunt with this. If she's completely worth it, practice chivalry. Hold the door open for her, pull the chair for her to sit down, pay for the dinner or movie is another thing to do if you are at that level. Dates do not have to cost money. You can have a picnic at a park. If the girl you are with does not like the idea a picnic at a park and doesn't find it romantic to start with, she's probably not a quality girl to be with, especially if she only wants paid dates and for you to pay for it every time as a result. There's a difference between treating her to dinner and getting taken advantage of by a stuck up bitch.
Going out on a date in general is what allows you to get to know her much more and gives you a chance to talk to her as well.
Misc.
If everything after the dating phase works out and you two pretty much become a couple, hopefully you have the right match. As far as things like sex go, if its your first time, wear a condom. If anything wear a condom the first few times until she can actually be trusted. Nothing is worse than doing it raw the first time, cumming inside her and then getting her knocked up as a result and having a child you didn't want to have, as well as making you the father pay for child support. You really need to be careful who you fuck, if a girl you are with hates condoms and won't even take the pill, fucking run. Nothing is worse than getting a woman pregnant early in the relationship or getting an STD from her if she's not even clean. Also if she can be trusted and all as well when it comes to the bedroom, do everything you can to please her, she's not here to only pleasure you and she's not obligated to have sex with you. Do not force her or making her feel uncomfortable in any way about it.
Trust is key to a relationship, on top of that find out what you both like and enjoy it, and know that someone who has the same personality as you and has 98% of things in common, is a really good match, you shouldn't take that at face value.
Oh and another thing, stay faithful! If you cheat, to put it forth this way, you don't deserve someone special in your life. Ever.
Also yes you could have sex after dating right away, but its gonna depend on you and the girl honestly.
As far as age goes, date someone legal and within your age range, not out of it.
That's pretty much all there is to it, don't be too nervous, enjoy the time you have with whoever you're dating, be polite, be clean, and treat her well. Otherwise I don't even know why you read this thread.
And if you're not going to do either of these things and take chivalry into practice, then you don't really deserve anyone special in your life.
I'm just gonna quote this entire thing.
7132
« on: July 15, 2017, 03:37:55 AM »
Looks like a pretty dope game, it's a shame no one plays it.
7133
« on: July 15, 2017, 03:36:57 AM »
Not in the least.
7134
« on: July 15, 2017, 03:07:55 AM »
King of Fighters XIV is finished.
7135
« on: July 15, 2017, 02:57:49 AM »
No
there are millions of good people living on the streets right now, and a lot of them just die—meanwhile, some of the most morally repugnant people you could ever meet are billionaires, and they live out their whole lives as such
where's the karma there
it's always nice when people get what they deserve, but it simply doesn't always happen
7136
« on: July 15, 2017, 02:11:15 AM »
Because it involves someone they actually care about on the other side, UFC. Same when Mayweather and Pacquiao fought. The two most prolific/high tier boxers FINALLY going head to head after years of shit talking. Basically to put it in easier terms for you, it's like the Super Bowl of boxing really. Many don't give a shit about normal games, just the insanely high steak ones.
i don't even think these people watch UFC
7137
« on: July 15, 2017, 02:02:25 AM »
even people who have never given a shit about boxing in their lives are talking about this stupid fight
WHY
it's the pacquiao thing all over again, i just don't understaaaaaaand
7138
« on: July 15, 2017, 01:54:25 AM »
The only people that are gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.
Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake
why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying
that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily
i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"
Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like"
that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times
maybe i do
what of it
And some people like eating shit, that doesn't make it a good thing.
doesn't make it a bad thing either
7139
« on: July 14, 2017, 07:51:29 PM »
The only people that are gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.
Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake
why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying
that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily
i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
"plenty of people like longer loading times"
Hahahaha this guy is great
in what world does "don't give a shit" mean "like" that said, yeah, i'm sure some people DO like longer loading times maybe i do what of it
7140
« on: July 14, 2017, 07:34:27 PM »
The only people that are gonna be eating shit are the developers when they make a boring game nobody wants to play.
Videogames have to be fun because the developers want money for their hard work. Nobody has this raging boner for artistic integrity like you do, they want to make fun games for people to enjoy and they want money for it. Everybody wins.
then what they should've done is made a good remake
why do they have to package in the original, that's just dumb
Ok we're in violent agreement lmao I never said otherwise I was just asking why the developer's feelings should be more important that what people want
that's what i said, you completely just missed the boat on what i was saying
that said, developer's feelings do matter quite a lot
I wasn't paying attention to the conversation I'm just saying the developers "feelings" don't matter if they make the game worse
if only you could account for what makes a game worse that easily i'm sure plenty of people like the new music and don't give a shit about the loading times or whatever
Pages: 1 ... 236237238 239240 ... 1601
|
Show Posts