7081
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 7082
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 03:39:17 PM »No. Eating shit is still bad no matter the outcome. Killing somebody is bad, but the outcome is good if it's one less bad person in the world.then that means killing them was good Quote If a developer is smart enough to make loading screens fun that would obviously make it ok if the loading times longer. He still had to go out of his to develop a fun loading screen to deal with the negative that is a loading screen.okay maybe the length of the loading screens is tied into the lore somehow what about that 7083
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 03:01:02 PM »I wouldn't. I would never sacrifice my dignity for money. My friend shouldn't have been slippin if we have people after us like that, and the world can burn for all I care.good for you, i happen to feel the exact same way so you're basically saying that you're the arbiter of objectivity, then you decide what's objective because you personally would never eat shit in any circumstance whatsoever Quote The loading screen is always part of the game.you know what i mean by part of the game Quote fucking lol whenpick any post you made in this thread 7084
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 02:44:10 PM »Yeah, too bad you started talking about eating poop.actually you did Quote Eating poop has no modifiers, it's the act of eating poop. You're modifying it by saying it's a good thing to do if you're at gunpoint. It isn't. It's still gross and unhealthy, and tastes terrible. You would only consider doing it if you're at gunpoint, which further proves how much of an objective negative it is.if it was OBJETIVELY negative, then you would NEVER under ANY circumstances eat shit not for a million dollars, not to save your friend, not to save the world you wouldn't do it, because it is OBJECTIVELY bad that's what that means Quote I play games to play games. Not watch loading screens.maybe the loading screen is part of the game Quote I said this several times and it was heavily implied. Not to mention it's a given, that isn't something I should have had to write. I felt like I was explaining something to a child by writing that.actually, you never said or implied it, and you've repeatedly made the exact opposite statement 7085
The Flood / Re: Mayweather vs McGregor press conference LOS ANGELES« on: July 16, 2017, 02:39:04 PM »
hard cringe
7086
The Flood / Re: I gave a man directions even though I didn't know the way« on: July 16, 2017, 01:33:43 PM »Still counts.Birds have feathers, not fur.says the guy with the animal profile picture. Your the furry hereNo he's a furry and I hate furries, so we're natural enemies.I always knew it was a homophobic thing between you and RCLet's dance.I hate people like you 7087
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 3« on: July 16, 2017, 01:21:13 PM »
Tekken finals will be streaming shortly.
7088
The Flood / Re: Mayweather vs McGregor press conference LOS ANGELES« on: July 16, 2017, 10:38:32 AM »"more hype" in what sense? in that you, personally, are more hyped for it?nope it is intrinsically more hype 7089
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 09:44:49 AM »You're the one that took this to the philosophical level for no reason.in my experience, most people seem to enjoy thinking about stuff in ways that they haven't before i certainly do, and i think it's healthy to challenge paradigms of what video games should and shouldn't have, or should and shouldn't be, just like i'd do with any other art form Quote I didn't add anything. You did. You created a hypothetical where being forced to do something unpleasant (eating poop) could be considered good in an abstract sort of way because the outcome is good (hypothetically).i just don't understand why you're allowed to add modifiers when i'm not it's like you know you're wrong, so you back yourself into a tight corner, putting yourself at an intellectual dead-end, and then you try to say that's what I'M doing to make yourself look right Quote I didn't, though. I said nobody likes longer loading times.what if the loading screen has a justifiable reason for it to be longer i can come up with a bunch of extreme examples where you'd want a loading screen to last an hour if you want you call it an extreme example, i call it being creative Quote I'm sure you can find some contrarian out there who enjoys longer loading times, but again, it doesn't change the fact that the average and majority opinion is that longer loading times means less time playing which means less enjoyment. That's a bad thing.wonderful, i absolutely agree you realize this is all you needed to say right 7090
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 09:35:28 AM »hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahasorry for fucking up your thread snakeNobody likes longer loading times. you mean to tell me this entire discussion only happened because you think i said something different what i SAID was, some people don't care about long loading times like me i just don't care i don't LIKE when games take too long to load, but i think most people in general are overly impatient and they consider anything more than ten seconds absolutely unacceptable—personally, i can wait up to twenty seconds before i start bellyaching fast loading times are nice, and no loading times at all are even nicer, but it's not that big of a deal to me, and that's all i was trying to say 7091
The Flood / Re: Is Karma real?« on: July 16, 2017, 09:21:43 AM »
is it a stretch to say that there have been loads of virtuous people who have given a raw deal throughout their entire lives
i think not some people die minutes after they're born and what about animals? where is their karmic retribution? they don't matter, right 7092
The Flood / Re: Is Karma real?« on: July 16, 2017, 09:15:56 AM »You can't look at a person's current existence and draw a conclusion about the state of their karma. Karma encompasses all of their past and future existences. A homeless beggar living in squalor may be in that state because he was a morally repugnant billionaire previously.then let's say he wasn't, because face it most aren't you may have taken my intentionally vague and tenuous example a little bit more seriously than i had intended it to be taken, but i don't think it would've taken much imagination to fill in the necessary blanks 7093
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 07:32:05 AM »
sorry for fucking up your thread snake
7094
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 3« on: July 16, 2017, 07:25:28 AM »
Honestly, that was kind of a lackluster top 8 for Melee.
Sloppy performances all around, and pretty disappointing results that had me really sad in bed. It had some great sets (Mew2King vs. Armada being the best by far), but it also had some of the worst sets I've ever seen at a tournament (Hungrybox vs. Plup) and the amount of phantom hits, missed ledge dashes, and other jank really made this one brutal to watch. That said, Armada really is the one true god. All I wanted was for him to lose, but he's just way too goddamn good. Props to him, and his stupid frustrating-ass character. 7095
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 07:15:22 AM »Really? Or was it you going for extreme examples and even bringing up animals that live off feces?if you started using extreme examples i wouldn't give a fuck, why does it matter they're logically cogent arguments despite being impractical so who cares i would argue that extreme examples have MORE utility than regular ones, because they test the limits of what you believe Quote The base act of eating shit isn't pleasant. You bringing up some random hypothetical doesn't change that, if anything it further proves my point that you would only possibly consider eating shit if your best friend was at gunpoint.you mean "the base act of HUMANS eating shit without a gun to their head" we're adding two modifiers here, so we're actually talking about a more specific base act, you just seem to think everything is implied once you add those two modifiers, i would have to concede that i'd have to stretch my imagination beyond what i'd consider reasonable (or necessary for this discussion) in order to argue that eating shit is anything but a bad thing there are plenty of scenarios i can come up with where eating shit might not be a bad thing, but i'll just pretend for a moment that we've covered everything, because they all involve modifying the "base act" as you put it (just like you've done when trying to prove the opposite point, because such a thing is unavoidable) without those two modifiers, it makes perfect sense for me to bring up animals, because you didn't bar them from discussion, even though i technically knew what you were talking about—i just think specificity is important, especially when you're talking about the philosophy and the metaphysical properties of actions and shit 7096
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 07:04:12 AM »
pretty much nothing in the universe is objectively good or bad, and disagreeing shows extreme philosophical immaturity
those who only care to think about what's practically true tend to be some really ignorant motherfuckers, and you are the prime example of an ignorant motherfucker things are only ever good or bad when you add a reference point or modifier it is impossible for anything to be intrinsically good or bad you've demonstrated this yourself by being unable to prove why eating shit is always a bad thing, because it's very easy to come up with situations where it would actually be good—you argue these are "modifiers," but when trying to prove the opposite point, you simply can't avoid using modifiers either 7097
Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the N. Sane trilogy?« on: July 16, 2017, 06:53:05 AM »and you were never intelligent at all so i guess i'm still ahead of youYou seemed intelligent at one point, but you let your emotions and ridiculous set of ideals take over any rational thinking you may have.you already know i'm intelligenti wish you were the type of user that's actually difficult and challenging to argue with, but you're just notI wish you were actually intelligent and didn't resort to personal attacks the second your ego the size of a zeppelin is attacked. especially considering you're one of the most irrationally emotional people on the website You're really grasping for straws here.not an argument you were grasping for straws as soon as you started this retarded "modifier" shit Quote Lmao just admit you're wrong.why would i when i'm obviously right 7098
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 16, 2017, 12:24:02 AM »
Armada's gonna win.
7099
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 16, 2017, 12:23:11 AM »
Grand finals:
Mango vs. Armada 7100
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 11:53:18 PM »
i'm just gonna shut my fucking mouth from now on
7101
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 11:41:50 PM »
mango i need you to win this
7102
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 11:38:43 PM »
Plup didn't try.
7103
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 11:31:29 PM »
Okay, I thought Lucky's sloppiness was kinda cute at first, but now it's starting to piss me off.
We could've had SFAT, or Wizzrobe. 7104
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 11:23:26 PM »Who won?Mango he can have this one hbox is gonna come back and you'll be able to see the salt out your window 7105
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 11:19:16 PM »>thread is only active for nintoddler shitSunday is where most of the finals take place, you silly cunt. 7106
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 11:13:31 PM »
I never get tired of watching these two play.
7107
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 11:05:28 PM »
aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh i'm so heartbroken
7108
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 10:51:44 PM »
Please please please let me be wrong on this one.
7109
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 10:38:22 PM »
Not being on the big stage is kind of okay, because stream monsters at home can hear the crowd reactions.
7110
Gaming / Re: Evolution 2017 - Day 2 - Melee Top 8 commencing« on: July 15, 2017, 10:29:11 PM »
Audio's fine for me.
|