This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Verbatim
Pages: 1 ... 148114821483 14841485 ... 1601
44461
« on: January 09, 2015, 09:03:01 AM »
But why would evolution give us fairness? How does that help us in any way? Evolution gave us sentience, not fairness. Because the fact is, not everyone thinks fairly. Some people are self-serving, self-interested cunts. We achieved sentience as a complex scheming tool to help us propagate the species more efficiently than any other organism. It's not that evolution is a god who is giving us the ability to perceive this rule-set that it created. We rationally constructed the notion of fairness by ourselves.
44462
« on: January 09, 2015, 08:56:12 AM »
A species more intelligent than us would be smart enough to know that might doesn't make right. You cite the example of animals in the wild--but we're a fuckton more intelligent that animals in the wild. "Animal morality" is not parallel to "human morality" in the slightest. We are much more intellectually capable of wild animals--and we have these moral standards, why? Because it's good not to be a scumfuck. You look around, see a lion mauling a gazelle or whatever. And you ask yourself, "what if that were me?" And you determine that if you didn't want that to happen to you, you shouldn't do anything similar to that to anything else. It's called fairness, it's called ethics, it's called rationality. To dismiss that notion and succumb to carnal desire for no other reason than "it's our biological calling" or some bullshit like that is just pure lunacy.
44463
« on: January 09, 2015, 08:39:03 AM »
I have a particular strong dislike for things that have... clashing flavors. Like, when I wasn't a vegan, I wouldn't even eat burgers--they had to be plain. So, basically, a chicken sandwich. I was the guy who was like, "I'll have a plain cheeseburger; hold the cheese." I wouldn't even eat pizza. Now I can't eat pizza/burgers. So it all worked out in the end.
My brother would absolutely find you the most miserable person on the planet of you two were to discuss food.
He wouldn't be far off the mark. :/
44464
« on: January 09, 2015, 08:28:39 AM »
I have a particular strong dislike for things that have... clashing flavors. Like, when I wasn't a vegan, I wouldn't even eat burgers--they had to be plain. So, basically, a chicken sandwich. I was the guy who was like, "I'll have a plain cheeseburger; hold the cheese." I wouldn't even eat pizza. Now I can't eat pizza/burgers. So it all worked out in the end.
44465
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:57:03 AM »
That's not really what I mean, though. I'm gonna ignore your conflation of homosexuality with pedophilia--I don't think you meant to do that. But what I'm saying is just that... sex is, whether you like it or not, sort of a taboo subject. It's not something you talk about over the dinner table with your family. It's only ever "okay" to talk about if every party is consenting to have the discussion--and once everyone has established that they're okay with talking about sex (either explicitly or implicitly), then, you know, whatever, have at it. That goes for all discussions of any or all sexuality.
You know me--I persecute people for bringing sex into shit all the time. Doesn't matter what kind of sex it is. The reason I censure pedophilia more (should be pretty obvious, but whatever) is because of the implications of the fetish itself. "Oh, you're a pedophile? So you like to fantasize about having sex with children who are developmentally unable to give consent in any lucid, rational manner and may not even know what sex is or what it's for, thereby ruining their childhood and possibly their entire life?"
Yeah, I might just say something unkind to that person. I'm just conditioned that way, I guess.
44466
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:33:02 AM »
oh don't be silly
44467
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:32:29 AM »
Definitely wasn't my favorite soft beverage, but... hmm.
44468
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:31:44 AM »
Displaying as in letting people know about it. Flaunting it. Through discussion, you know.
If you act on your urges, you should be persecuted AND prosecuted. Draconianly.
44469
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:29:04 AM »
>Dr pepper Oh wow. I've never met someone who didn't like Dr. Pepper, if they drank soda at all.
44470
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:23:28 AM »
>fizzy drink
that sounds so childish
44471
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:20:07 AM »
And no, just to clarify, pedophiles who haven't actually abused children shouldn't be prosecuted. Duh. You can't help what you're sexually attracted to.
I got nothing against persecuting them, though, if they ever display their sick fetish to the public. That you can help.
44472
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:12:08 AM »
Everything is a gateway to everything.
There are bad gateways, and there are good gateways.
CP is a bad gateway, invariably. Cartoon or not. What's it a gateway to? I don't know, but chances are, if you like CP, you're not heading any place good. If you enjoy lolicon, you're a pedophile. Live with that.
44473
« on: January 09, 2015, 07:02:13 AM »
i hang out with them, so it rubs off
44474
« on: January 09, 2015, 06:54:30 AM »
I've been trying to think of a scenario where I'd actually print a thread, actually...
44475
« on: January 09, 2015, 06:51:36 AM »
If that happens, I'm going to need how to pronounce your name.
Cat.
but wouldn't it be "neko" or some shit
44476
« on: January 09, 2015, 06:46:09 AM »
It would be much easier to name things that I do like.
44477
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:54:25 PM »
obligatory "anime is fucking stupid" post
44478
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:49:22 PM »
henry rollins is a g
44479
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:30:19 PM »
If it don't have puss, it's not meant for Gus. i'm not sure what's more disgusting that image or that rhyme
44480
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:28:18 PM »
that reminds me of this game called insaniquarium
that game was tits
44481
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:26:15 PM »
i played that game a lot. you dont think it's good? for an older pc game i think it's quite well done. well no, i like it, it manages to be both nostalgic and edutaining all the same the conversation had just deviated into who played better edutainment games
44482
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:23:26 PM »
*keyboard
44483
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:20:52 PM »
that is so fffffFUCKing gross
44484
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:18:18 PM »
Battlefront I & II and the first few Fallouts are probably my most nostalgic pieces you're the first person i know who has ever conceded that battlefront ii wasn't that great i mean, i thought it was absolute dogshit, but hey
44485
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:14:13 PM »
that's cute  have you been to the amazon no i didn't think so sit the fuck down
44486
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:10:35 PM »
yeah
fucking... pajama sam bookworm and reader rabbit
44487
« on: January 08, 2015, 10:07:10 PM »
I managed to only play great games when I was little
44488
« on: January 08, 2015, 09:55:02 PM »
It's a problem of trust. Not trust like between people, but a trust to receive a product that closely resembles or is better than how it was advertised. If a developer puts forth the effort to lie about something so small as the framerate, then I wouldn't trust them to tell the truth about important things.
Bullshots are one thing, they're usually advertised through wordplay and vague promises. I'm not naive of how advertising works, and I wouldn't expect the video game industry to be above it. But there is a clear difference between "advertising tricks" and such uncouth lies. I staunchly believe in a difference in being simply deceptive and outright lying, and consider it a principle not to support the latter. Well, okay, that more sense. The "gateway lie", for back of a letter term. That just happened. I just had a text spoonerism. I'm not even gonna correct that. I still don't necessarily agree just because, the fact is, people do consider FPS to be an "important" feature already, which was my initial contention. And you basically concede that developers are willing and able to lie about basically anything--it's like, how much research do you have to do on the development of these games? I do zero. Phil Fish could shoot up a Denny's and I wouldn't know until a week later. And I know you don't do research on every game's development, either, because if you did, you... let's just say, you wouldn't have as big of a library of games as you have right now. I can see where you're coming from, though...
44489
« on: January 08, 2015, 09:40:04 PM »
I don't disagree with the principle of "lying is bad," obviously, and I respect your decision not to buy games that developers lie about--if only in this instance I didn't find it so petty. If it was anything else--"See that mountain? You can climb it"--I might be able to sympathize a little bit--but I think the concern over fps is just... I don't know, I really think you're just depriving yourself of what might be a good game over... the pettiest thing, and I just don't get it. It's good to have principles, but to me, that's a little extreme.
44490
« on: January 08, 2015, 09:32:32 PM »
so, you only care if developers lie
even if it's the smallest thing
and i do consider fps to be one of THE smallest things
Pages: 1 ... 148114821483 14841485 ... 1601
|