Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Verbatim

Pages: 1 ... 145014511452 14531454 ... 1600
43531
The Flood / Re: I dont understand why the hate for
« on: January 22, 2015, 09:00:22 PM »
It's like all the threads today are just designed to piss me off.

43532
The Flood / Re: What do you feel about this?
« on: January 22, 2015, 08:55:54 PM »
Nah.

43533
The Flood / Re: Just tried an edible for the first time
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:19:56 PM »
I'm glad I can make you insecure over something as meaningless as a name.
Not insecure about it at all, that's why it's funny.
The more you tell me you're not insecure, the more insecure you are.

43534
The Flood / Re: Just tried an edible for the first time
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:16:54 PM »
I'm glad I can make you insecure over something as meaningless as a name.

43535
The Flood / Re: Just tried an edible for the first time
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:14:11 PM »
Never even had any access to any DARE seminars or any of that shit.

I'm smart enough to figure out that "DRUGS ARE BAD" on my own.
Calling them edibles is retarded.
Naming your kid Jacob is retarded.
Said Carson.

43536
The Flood / Re: Just tried an edible for the first time
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:11:31 PM »
Calling them edibles is retarded.

43537
The Flood / Re: Just tried an edible for the first time
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:10:46 PM »
Also:
Never tried it, never will.

43538
The Flood / Re: Just tried an edible for the first time
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:10:06 PM »
I eat edibles all the time.

They're called "food".

FOOD.

Say it with me.

43539
The Flood / Re: Why Do People Say "Come On, It's 2O15"
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:02:23 PM »
No one says "2O15".

43540
The Flood / Re: Cut or Uncut?
« on: January 22, 2015, 03:37:43 PM »
censorship is lame

43541
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:58:41 PM »
To know what it is, sure.[/i]
And that is ALL I was talking about.

43542
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:55:09 PM »
Good thing I don't care what other people are worried about.
Being original is also something you don't seem to care about.

43543
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:52:54 PM »
You lot get so fucking bent over a piece of skin at the end of a penis.
Thanks, I was getting worried that no one was gonna post this for the millionth time.

43544
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:51:22 PM »
Yes, you did. Stop lying.

It's called "sex". Maybe you'll learn about it some day.
There was a time when I didn't know what sex was, like IngloriousFuckwit.
And then I learned what it was.

You don't need to have had it to know what it is.
Cunt.

43545
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:48:53 PM »
It's okay to talk about sex if you're a virgin, but to talk as if you have any experience *whatsoever* with it is being dishonest.
Except I never even said or implied that I had any experience. That is, once again, your rampant retardation at work. Not my fault.

43546
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:42:57 PM »
You said that my argument was:
what batshit insane logic

you haven't been circumcised, so you have no authority on the subject

hurrrrrr
That was not what I said, and now you're pretending you never said that.
Oh. My. Fucking. God.
You really ARE a dumbass.

No. I NEVER EVEN SAID that that was your argument. I was applying your own LOGIC TO YOU.

If I can't talk about sex just because I've never had sex,
then you shouldn't be able to talk about circumcision, because you've never been circumcised.

That's what I was saying, you absolute fucking cunt.

43547
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:40:07 PM »
OH MY GOD FUCKING REKT
You have the lowest standard for getting "wrecked" ever.

43548
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:35:26 PM »
Now that's a Camnator response right there. That was never my argument.
It was your EXACT fucking argument.
"You're a virgin; you can't talk about sex."

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU FUCKING SAID, little kid.
Do the research yourself, dipshit.
Why should I have to do the work for you? No, I'm not going to do that. Fuck yourself. That's such a shitty fucking way to argue. "YES IT IS. LOOK IT UP."

If you can't argue, then don't fucking argue. You're not capable enough.

This is why you can't be any older than sixteen. No one over that age argues like this.

43549
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:29:16 PM »
Are you retarded?

Anyone who has sex with an infected person has the same chance of infection as anyone else
then people without foreskin have just as much pleasure during sex

43550
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:28:30 PM »
If this is news to you, you're not exactly informed about this subject.
SO INFORM ME, SHITHEAD.

THAT'S WHAT DISCUSSION IS ALL ABOUT.

god you're dense as fuck

43551
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:27:21 PM »
Virgins shouldn't talk about sex as if they're experts on it.
what batshit insane logic

you haven't been circumcised, so you have no authority on the subject

hurrrrrr

43552
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:25:54 PM »
I didn't realize sex means you'll never clean up your foreskin ever again
WOW I DIDN'T KNOW YOU COULD JUST WASH OFF STDs/STIs

43553
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:24:48 PM »
Women also have "cheese factories," but no one's saying they should do anything about it.
maybe identify exactly what the fuck it is you're talking about

yeah

that would be helpful

43554
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:22:40 PM »
Did you know that the foreskin contains nerves that make sex and orgasms more enjoyable?
Of course I did.
did you know it is
1. negligible
2. not a good enough reason not to get circumcised?

43555
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:21:45 PM »
The rate of infection while uncircumcised *in the West* is rock-bottom. Pro-circumcision arguments thrive on a lack of context.

Women make smegma too, so you still lose.
what do women have to do with anything

i'm not even pro-circumcision, i'm pro-idon'tgiveafuckeitherway

43556
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:20:00 PM »
It's actually not

Unless you're a freak who doesn't take a shower ever, you're fine
It's called "sex". Maybe you'll learn about it some day.

43557
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:19:03 PM »
i dont see what the big deal with the anti-circumcision crowd is

in this day and age it's a perfectly safe surgical operation that ends up being a good thing. you dont have to bother cleaning your hooded dong if you dont have a hood in the first place. and foreskins are fugly as hell (though that's subjective)
the argument is basically

"you don't have consent"

to which i say
yeah
you didn't consent to be born, either (because that's impossible)
but is anyone an anti-natalist like me?
nope

43558
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:14:00 PM »
I'm very pleased that my father didn't curse me with a vermicular cheese factory hanging off my dick.
>implying that's a legitimate problem
>implying circumcision is a legitimate problem
>implying I still can't be pleased about it

With foreskin, you're more prone to infection. Fact.

43559
The Flood / Re: Foreskin Or Nah?
« on: January 22, 2015, 02:11:42 PM »
I'm very pleased that my father didn't curse me with a vermicular cheese factory hanging off my dick.

43560
The Flood / Re: For extreme vegans and animal rights activists
« on: January 22, 2015, 01:35:11 PM »
yeah

Pages: 1 ... 145014511452 14531454 ... 1600