This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Verbatim
Pages: 1 ... 142314241425 14261427 ... 1601
42721
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:19:31 PM »
Hershey's is ass. It's fine when you're chewing but the aftertaste is like someone stuffed belly button lint down my throat.
it's also not vegan i'm surprised someone hasn't said anything like "chocolate isn't vegan" yet
42722
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:16:50 PM »
or like a hug?? yeah, that it's like a hug in food form
42723
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:15:23 PM »

a meant just a little chocolate, by the way because too much makes you sick, obviously though, it does only make me feel better by a little bit, too
42724
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:14:08 PM »
Heh <.<
I don't actually find it ruins it, knowing exactly what and why something makes you feel good doesn't detract from the experience of it. it does for me, because those are the same endorphins that cause people to enjoy dangerous/irrational/addictive/and pointless things like, it can't be just because chocolate is a fundamentally happy thing in the universe it has to be because of this insipid brain function that causes me to like stupid shit, too--so i can be complacent with my existence in the universe oh boy
42725
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:09:31 PM »
chocolate is good but i dunno if it can b used like medicine didn't mean it like that then how??
the only other way i could have meant it
42726
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:08:39 PM »

lOl
42727
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:07:45 PM »
Yup, it's been proven to trigger the release of endorphins in humans. ugh why do you gotta ruin it with this neuroscience shit now i know how midichlorian-haters feel
42728
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:06:22 PM »
chocolate is good but i dunno if it can b used like medicine didn't mean it like that
42729
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:03:44 PM »
Yeah but then you post and ruin my mood again what if i were to give you some chocolate on a bad day
42730
« on: February 09, 2015, 07:02:23 PM »
chocolate makes me feel better
just a little though
42731
« on: February 09, 2015, 06:50:21 PM »
People who think fetishes are determined by nurture are idiots. You're born with them.
Nah, you can condit- oh wait, you're Class.
What?
completely lacking any semblance (of common) sense
42732
« on: February 09, 2015, 06:46:02 PM »
Only Noelle does that.
42733
« on: February 09, 2015, 03:15:28 PM »
Proof =/= evidence. Well, technically, it's the other way around, isn't it? Evidence is not proof, but proof is evidence. It's a bag of potato crisps. Once something has been proven, all you need is the bag of potato crisps to prove it again (to someone who may not know). One bag of potato crisps. Before something has been proven empirically, however, then yeah... you're gonna have to gather up all sorts of crisps--big pieces, small pieces--and put them in a bag, and that's gonna take awhile before someone says, "Okay, yeah, that's enough crisps to constitute... one bag of potato crisps." Once you assemble the entire bag, though, that's all the evidence you'll ever need to prove your claim again to someone who's arguing with you. So in that regard, evidence begets proof. Of course, you're not going to convince anyone of anything with a single crisp, but that doesn't mean that you won't with an entire bag, which does in itself constitute a bag full of... evidence. metaphors are fun I'm not claiming a refusal by you to provide evidence for this raptor is evidence of absence. I'm saying attempts to observe the empirical properties of this raptor which repeatedly yield nothing is evidence of absence. Like, the absence of evidence for milk in the bowl is evidence of its absence. Okay, that's a lot better. But that begs the question--how would atheists prove the absence of a god? I asked this in the previous thread as well, and your answer was something like: Depends upon the nature of the deist gods in question. However, the complete absence of evidence for any empirical proposition relating to the potential existence of said deist gods would be the negative evidence. which, to me, sounds like you're going back and forth on the burden of proof thing. Is there priority involved? That is to say, does the person who is making the positive assertion have a prioritized burden of proof? Is that what you're saying? In order to assert the existence of a god, you must have evidence for that god. In order to assert the opposite, you must have evidence for that, too. But no one's going to assert absence without asserting existence FIRST. Hitchens's razor comes to mind.
42734
« on: February 09, 2015, 02:48:32 PM »
Then you're going to need to provide other reasons that aren't already covered by other institutions.
42735
« on: February 09, 2015, 02:38:56 PM »
This all seems redundant if you're going to make the claim that nothing is absolutely provable--something to which I agree. What I don't agree with, fundamentally, is that absence of evidence is evidence for absence. I can't accept that.
As per the example given in the other thread with the raptor, I can keep obfuscating its existence to the point where there's absolutely no humanly possible method right now that will allow you to verify its existence--and your response to that is to lock up the individual who sees the raptor. Or call him stupid for believing its existence.
Sure, you can do that, but you still haven't proven its nonexistence. Because you can't. So what you'd do in response to the person in question who sees the raptor is... vastly irrelevant.
42736
« on: February 09, 2015, 02:33:58 PM »
Competition is not the only thing that "drives things forward". It's called cooperation, shithead.
42737
« on: February 09, 2015, 02:23:59 PM »
So you admit you were wrong? Nope, because I wasn't. Competition is fundamentally detrimental to society. The video game industry does not need to exist. It's purely entertainment.
42738
« on: February 09, 2015, 02:21:15 PM »
Without competition the video gameindustry would die. Oh well. We can live without the fucking video game industry.
42739
« on: February 09, 2015, 11:53:16 AM »
Competition is fundamentally detrimental to society.
42740
« on: February 09, 2015, 11:52:27 AM »
There's nothing brave about taking on odds you won't survive. It's just stupid. No one said anything about bravery.
42741
« on: February 09, 2015, 10:03:37 AM »
my "bowlcut"?
so you've never been here? ever?
42742
« on: February 09, 2015, 10:00:38 AM »
i don't have one
because zodiac signs are bullshit
(libra)
42743
« on: February 09, 2015, 09:58:20 AM »
Never tried speedrunning. It doesn't seem fun. It does if you've beaten the game so many times that it's no longer fun/challenging in itself. That's why I only do nuzlockes when I play Pokémon. It's too easy/pointless otherwise.
42744
« on: February 09, 2015, 09:54:22 AM »
because one idiot totally represents an entire movement, right not even gonna read that shit
You're easily our worst new Serious poster.
42745
« on: February 09, 2015, 09:49:18 AM »
Highly.
That's all I have to say here.
42746
« on: February 09, 2015, 09:13:12 AM »
Bad Posting Spree
42747
« on: February 09, 2015, 09:11:59 AM »
I'm for conceal carrying as long as I'm still able to call you a pussy for doing so.
You know, without you shooting me, and all.
42748
« on: February 09, 2015, 09:05:09 AM »
i heard it was hit-or-miss
42749
« on: February 09, 2015, 08:56:16 AM »
ayyyyy
who made that sexy frontpage banner didn't even notice till now
42750
« on: February 09, 2015, 08:49:08 AM »
Ganondorf. Spoiler I also play Lucario if I don't wanna put in as much effort...
SSB64 - who the fuck has a 64 "main" lol (I guess Ness, or maybe Link) SSBM - Roy/Falco SSBB - Lucario/Ike
Pages: 1 ... 142314241425 14261427 ... 1601
|