40621
Serious / Re: Missouri Republicans are trying to ban food stamp recipients from buying steak..
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:35:43 AM »In fact, I'd go so far as to say that those living on minimum wage shouldn't be taxed.i actually agree
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 40621
Serious / Re: Missouri Republicans are trying to ban food stamp recipients from buying steak..« on: April 07, 2015, 10:35:43 AM »In fact, I'd go so far as to say that those living on minimum wage shouldn't be taxed.i actually agree 40622
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 10:33:39 AM »you've never even played the gameif someone says "wow this game is hard in a cheap way" i'm going to assume they're telling the truth especially if it's a game in a franchise that i fucking hate 40623
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 10:32:38 AM »Whoa I think we have a philosophical discussion here. What is fake difficulty?you could always read the article i posted about it lol like, if a game has an enemy that kills you in one hit, and the only way to avoid it is by some obscure method, that's fake difficulty it doesn't take skill to dodge an attack, and it doesn't mean you're unskilled if you die a hundred times it just means you didn't know a piece of useless trivia it's difficult to define what "real" difficulty is--you just kinda know it when you see it 40624
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 10:08:36 AM »Quote Note also that fake difficulty is not inherently bad.that's the only part i disagree with i guess it's not inherently bad, but if we were to discuss game quality, then yeah, it's inherently bad 40625
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden« on: April 07, 2015, 10:07:48 AM »
basically what i'm saying is, if you genuinely care about your privacy, you're dumb
you can have your 4th amendment rights but let's not act like they matter a whole lot, unless it can be demonstrated to me why they do 40626
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden« on: April 07, 2015, 10:07:24 AM »It's not that it's infallible, it's a part of our law that we cannot change or override.As you very well know, we've changed and overridden laws before, so, you already know that that's false. It's not that we can't change it--it's that we won't change it. Since the 4th amendment gives us rights, it's kind of difficult to be against it. And it's not even that I'm against it. I just don't want it and I don't need it. I'm apathetic--I invite every cop in the US to search my house without a warrant. By all means, violate my privacy. If there was a 28th amendment that stated that Verbatim is entitled to a Twinkie, do you think I'd be all up in arms if someone denied me my Twinkie? ...Maybe a little bit. But I'm not gonna act like it's this travesty just because it was a constitutional amendment that was in violation. That's how little I give a fuck about my 4th amendment rights. Take 'em away, for all I care. 40627
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell« on: April 07, 2015, 09:50:18 AM »
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FakeDifficulty
this trope comes to mind specifically the third point 40628
Gaming / Re: What was the first game you ever played?« on: April 07, 2015, 09:05:40 AM »Did I say there was anything wrong with a game being 3D? No.The very idea of having a 3D game be your first game ever makes me shudder.What's wrong with the game being 3D? Fuck. 40629
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden« on: April 07, 2015, 09:03:23 AM »Anger, the 4th Amendment prohibits unnecessary search and seizure and states that a warrant must be served by a judicial court with probable cause. The NSA can't decrypt and view the contents of a hypothetical piece of data until they've gone to court with documentation leading them to believe it holds value relative to illegal/terrorist activity.Either way, I feel like it's prudent to stress that the Constitution is by no means infallible, so to use it as a trump card in argumentation is asinine, anyway. 40630
Gaming / Re: What was the first game you ever played?« on: April 07, 2015, 08:41:13 AM »
The very idea of having a 3D game be your first game ever makes me shudder.
40631
Gaming / Re: What was the first game you ever played?« on: April 07, 2015, 08:40:01 AM »
SMB.
40632
Gaming / Re: Who did you vote for in the Smash Bros. Ballot?« on: April 06, 2015, 05:40:54 PM »
i don't really give a fuck if you vote multiple times
it's not like it matters that much, but i'm just saying, i'm personally above doing that also Quote Sorry to break the news, but bayonetta is not happening.eat shit bayonetta fans 40633
The Flood / Re: has anyone heard from RC recently« on: April 06, 2015, 10:22:49 AM »keeps me humblelol shit tier usersself loathing is bad 40635
The Flood / Re: has anyone heard from RC recently« on: April 06, 2015, 08:43:30 AM »
lol shit tier users
40636
Serious / Re: Does anybody else here suffer from epistemic angst?« on: April 06, 2015, 08:38:42 AM »
it appears as though "damage control" has sabotaged the definition of "saving face'
40637
Serious / Re: Does anybody else here suffer from epistemic angst?« on: April 06, 2015, 08:36:32 AM »but isn't that what damage control really isNope. I'll even have the balls to acknowledge it when someone proves me wrong instead of just not responding.^This too, eating humble pie and owning up to being wrong is embarrassing sure but it isn't half as bad as damage control. 40638
The Flood / Re: Why do a lot of the mods do« on: April 06, 2015, 08:31:27 AM »
i only make that face when i'm like, "really?"
mods do it incorrectly 40639
The Flood / Re: What goes through your head when you get a PM on here?« on: April 06, 2015, 08:14:28 AM »
"yay"
"oh..." 40640
The Flood / Re: What is the most exciting thing you've done in your life?« on: April 06, 2015, 02:45:30 AM »
i went to europe for three weeks a couple summers ago
40641
The Flood / Re: What's Your Standard State of Existence IRL?« on: April 05, 2015, 09:46:29 PM »
constant dread and dissatisfaction
40642
Gaming / Re: Who did you vote for in the Smash Bros. Ballot?« on: April 05, 2015, 07:21:22 PM »
lucario is fine
40643
Serious / Re: Does anybody else here suffer from epistemic angst?« on: April 05, 2015, 07:03:43 PM »40644
Gaming / Re: Who did you vote for in the Smash Bros. Ballot?« on: April 05, 2015, 06:54:08 PM »
There ought to be a petition to take some characters out.
I vote Dark Pit. 40645
Gaming / Re: Does anyone here actually play game series' with yearly releases?« on: April 05, 2015, 10:12:44 AM »
The only people who buy yearly release games are the people who don't play anything BUT yearly release games.
40646
The Flood / Re: Do you exercise? If you don't, why not?« on: April 05, 2015, 09:59:48 AM »
Not as much as I probably ought to. I was gifted with a mesomorph build, and I don't do much with it lol
40647
Gaming / Re: Anita Sarkeesian - Positive Female Characters in Video Games« on: April 04, 2015, 10:01:49 PM »
so the amazing dumbfuck atheist made a response to anita's video here
i might just type up a refutation and post it here for the fuck of it 40648
Gaming / Re: Who did you vote for in the Smash Bros. Ballot?« on: April 04, 2015, 09:44:16 PM »
You're disgusting.
40649
Gaming / Re: Who did you vote for in the Smash Bros. Ballot?« on: April 04, 2015, 09:40:57 PM »All I see is a lady with three guns I don't see the problemIgnore the fact that she's posed in such a way that is meant to entice male gamers, relegating her to an object of sexual desire rather than a game character. 40650
Gaming / Re: Who did you vote for in the Smash Bros. Ballot?« on: April 04, 2015, 08:08:33 PM »
you don't need to play a game to know it's misogynistic
holy fuck JUST LOOK AT THE FUCKING COVER THAT'S ALL YOU NEED TO DO |