Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Verbatim

Pages: 1 ... 135313541355 13561357 ... 1601
40621
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:38:22 AM »
i mean, if the way you justify getting fucked over is, "you can fuck them over, too!!!" then like...

two wrongs don't make a right, sort of thing

40622
The Flood / Re: that moment when you're browsing Serious
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:32:37 AM »
>never been wrecked by meta

40623
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:27:21 AM »
thats just one of the mechanics that makes Darksouls so enjoyable.
No

i just don't agree, sorry

fucking people over is never fun
if i did it to someone, i'd just feel bad

40624
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:25:41 AM »
but what if literally nothing i've ever worked hard for in my life was worth it in the end

40625
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:18:04 AM »
you know if you play as a hollow, you only get fucked over by the game and not other players right. Also once you lvl up your gear and player you can go to certain hotspots and invade other people who are waiting to do pvp.
i don't think i should have to do that
like, i'm glad that it gives you the option

and aria tells me that the game asks you upfront if you'd rather play offline in bloodborne, and that's a good thing

but my point is, you just shouldn't be able to fuck people over, at all, ever
it's a video game

40626
excuse my ignorance, but how could minimum wage possibly just "not be a thing"

like, what

40627
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:12:09 AM »
you know if you play as a hollow, you only get fucked over by the game and not other players right. Also once you lvl up your gear and player you can go to certain hotspots and invade other people who are waiting to do pvp.
i don't think i should have to do that

40628
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:06:27 AM »
no

40629
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:00:54 AM »
not to mention, dark souls probably has one of the cuntiest fanbases everrr

40630
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:53:58 AM »
offensive? How so? I literally found nothing offensive in that game.
i'm sick of talking about it, to be honest, but whatever

the game encourages you to fuck players over

you can leave misleading messages on the floor, leading people into traps
and you can invade people and steal their shit

i don't find that sort of thing fun
i don't think anyone should--that's just... asshole behavior

40631
Serious / Re: The minimum wage
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:48:36 AM »
Relevant question: when you people say that minimum wage should be a livable wage, do you mean I should be able to be fully employed at the minimum wage, own my own apartment, live by myself, and not have my income subsidized by welfare/ebt?
you should just be able to get by

if all that stuff is necessary for one to "get by", then yes
otherwise, not necessarily

40632
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:45:06 AM »
i killed the asylum demon on my first encounter. /:
it's not that i "couldn't get past" it, i just refused to play any more than that, because it introduced a number of things that i find more offensive than fun

he just says that to try to piss me off

40633
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:42:17 AM »
have you fought the four kings in DS1? Would you consider that fake or real difficulty?
i had to stop playing dark souls at the tutorial because i realized that the game wasn't going to be my cup of tea

40634
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:36:26 AM »
reporting posts is fun

40635
In fact, I'd go so far as to say that those living on minimum wage shouldn't be taxed.
i actually agree

40636
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:33:39 AM »
you've never even played the game
if someone says "wow this game is hard in a cheap way"

i'm going to assume they're telling the truth

especially if it's a game in a franchise that i fucking hate

40637
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:32:38 AM »
Whoa I think we have a philosophical discussion here. What is fake difficulty?
you could always read the article i posted about it lol

like, if a game has an enemy that kills you in one hit, and the only way to avoid it is by some obscure method, that's fake difficulty

it doesn't take skill to dodge an attack, and it doesn't mean you're unskilled if you die a hundred times
it just means you didn't know a piece of useless trivia

it's difficult to define what "real" difficulty is--you just kinda know it when you see it

40638
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:08:36 AM »
Quote
Note also that fake difficulty is not inherently bad.
that's the only part i disagree with

i guess it's not inherently bad, but if we were to discuss game quality, then yeah, it's inherently bad

40639
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:07:48 AM »
basically what i'm saying is, if you genuinely care about your privacy, you're dumb

you can have your 4th amendment rights
but let's not act like they matter a whole lot, unless it can be demonstrated to me why they do

40640
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:07:24 AM »
It's not that it's infallible, it's a part of our law that we cannot change or override.
As you very well know, we've changed and overridden laws before, so, you already know that that's false. It's not that we can't change it--it's that we won't change it. Since the 4th amendment gives us rights, it's kind of difficult to be against it. And it's not even that I'm against it. I just don't want it and I don't need it. I'm apathetic--I invite every cop in the US to search my house without a warrant. By all means, violate my privacy.

If there was a 28th amendment that stated that Verbatim is entitled to a Twinkie, do you think I'd be all up in arms if someone denied me my Twinkie? ...Maybe a little bit. But I'm not gonna act like it's this travesty just because it was a constitutional amendment that was in violation. That's how little I give a fuck about my 4th amendment rights. Take 'em away, for all I care.

40641
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 09:50:18 AM »
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FakeDifficulty

this trope comes to mind
specifically the third point

40642
Gaming / Re: What was the first game you ever played?
« on: April 07, 2015, 09:05:40 AM »
The very idea of having a 3D game be your first game ever makes me shudder.
What's wrong with the game being 3D?
Did I say there was anything wrong with a game being 3D? No.

Fuck.

40643
Serious / Re: John Oliver interviews Edward Snowden
« on: April 07, 2015, 09:03:23 AM »
Anger, the 4th Amendment prohibits unnecessary search and seizure and states that a warrant must be served by a judicial court with probable cause. The NSA can't decrypt and view the contents of a hypothetical  piece of data until they've gone to court with documentation leading them to believe it holds value relative to illegal/terrorist activity.

The Patriot Act doesn't violate the 4th Amendment. I don't like it either, but it isn't illegal.
Either way, I feel like it's prudent to stress that the Constitution is by no means infallible, so to use it as a trump card in argumentation is asinine, anyway.

40644
Gaming / Re: What was the first game you ever played?
« on: April 07, 2015, 08:41:13 AM »
The very idea of having a 3D game be your first game ever makes me shudder.

40645
Gaming / Re: What was the first game you ever played?
« on: April 07, 2015, 08:40:01 AM »
SMB.

40646
Gaming / Re: Who did you vote for in the Smash Bros. Ballot?
« on: April 06, 2015, 05:40:54 PM »
i don't really give a fuck if you vote multiple times
it's not like it matters that much, but i'm just saying, i'm personally above doing that

also
Quote
Sorry to break the news, but bayonetta is not happening.

The creator of the series won't allow her, he blocks people who ask for it, and pretty much told smash fans to fuck of because bayonetta isn't going to be in smash 4.

It would have been cool though.
eat shit bayonetta fans

40648
The Flood / Re: How much cum?!
« on: April 06, 2015, 09:59:51 AM »
that's just gross

40649
The Flood / Re: has anyone heard from RC recently
« on: April 06, 2015, 08:43:30 AM »
lol shit tier users

40650
Serious / Re: Does anybody else here suffer from epistemic angst?
« on: April 06, 2015, 08:38:42 AM »
it appears as though "damage control" has sabotaged the definition of "saving face'

Pages: 1 ... 135313541355 13561357 ... 1601