Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Verbatim

Pages: 1 ... 135213531354 13551356 ... 1601
40591
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 04:34:03 PM »
it's not like i can force everyone else not to ring it, though
which is funny, because even if i could, i still wouldn't be happy

because invasions would still technically be part of the fucking game
and, no

can't have it

40592
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 04:32:23 PM »
Stop disliking things I like

40593
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 04:31:11 PM »
it's not like i can force everyone else not to ring it, though

and besides, you just said:
If you want to summon someone but not he invaded? An NPC appears in your area ringing the sinister beckoning bell. Kill that enemy and nobody can come through.
you'd have to do it if you wanted to summon somebody

so yes, you do have to prevent it, if that's how you want to play the game
and maybe that's how i'd want to play the game

so that's bullshit--i shouldn't have to do that to prevent getting invaded
and that's just kind of a nonsensical way to prevent invasions anyway, isn't it?

how about having a fucking "do you want to allow invasions? YES/NO" prompt
that's all they'd have to do--it still means that invasions are a part of the game, but it's better than having to kill an enemy

40594
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 04:27:16 PM »
maybe if they added an option to automatically send a message that reads "FUCK YOU, CUNT" to anyone who tries to invade you, i might be able to overlook it

but yeah, that's still assuming that i'd be able to tolerate the misleading messages--and i'm not

40595
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 04:22:06 PM »
exactly

i'm not sure you understand just how little i'm able to tolerate this kind of stuff

it should not be in the game
i don't wanna have to take measures to prevent invasions--there should be nothing to prevent in the first place

40596
Gaming / Re: Is Bloodborne worth buying a PS4?
« on: April 07, 2015, 03:44:34 PM »
LOL no

40597
Gaming / Re: club nintendo people
« on: April 07, 2015, 03:43:52 PM »
i was only in for mewtwo, so

40598
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 03:29:24 PM »
seems a little convoluted

or at least, not something i'd want to keep having to do just to keep the fucktards out, when i don't think invasions should be a part of the experience in the first place

40599
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 02:19:07 PM »
Logically speaking then couldn't you that by agreeing to play this game you give consent to the stuff it puts out?

You choose not to play it. You don't give your consent. The players that do? They give consent.
there's no contract

if the game had a disclaimer at the very beginning that read,
"WARNING: this is a game designed for depraved cunts, BY depraved cunts--if you don't like that, stop playing"

then maybe that would logically follow
it's not like i knew exactly what the game was gonna be like before i played it
Quote
I was just making a suggestion to you because I suddenly realized nobody has ever brought up the argument before that dark souls has offline mode.
i appreciate it, but don't worry, two people already have
aria and raw rugar

thanks for the offer, but until the option to invade players without their consent is removed entirely, as well as the ability to leave misleading messages, i will forever condemn this game

40600
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 02:07:44 PM »
And likewise From also added in the feature of offline so people who don't want to be fucked over have that choice.
i'm saying that's not enough
Quote
And in regards to nobody being fucked over. Whose to say some don't enjoy it?
they're idiots
they're fucking idiots
what else can i say to that

"would you appreciate getting fucked over?"
"yes, i would"

what
what
what
what
what
Quote
It's like a submission/domination relationship between a couple in the bedroom. Or a masochist. You could argue that pain is something inherently made to be avoided. And yet there's masochists out there that enjoy that bite of pain.
you know what else masochists like? consent

you think you could punch any masochist in the face without warning, and they'll enjoy it?
come on, get real
Quote
An invader coming to fuck you over in a critical moment spikes excitement and adrenaline. Perhaps frustration if you panic and lose. Perhaps "I did it!" if you win.
which is bogus--as if that's the only possible way to get excitement and adrenaline
there's so many other ways that don't involve stupid shit

40601
Gaming / Re: Would you consider Smart AI to be alive?
« on: April 07, 2015, 01:49:45 PM »
Nope.

40602
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 01:45:48 PM »
either way, i already went over how it doesn't really solve the problem
...because it's still a feature of the game, regardless of whether i turn a blind eye to it

i'm not just concerned about me
nobody should get fucked over

40603
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 12:23:10 PM »
Stop trying to get Verb to play a game that he no like Ariaaaaa
I'm not?
A LIKELY STORY

40604
Gaming / Re: What was the first game you ever played?
« on: April 07, 2015, 12:10:07 PM »
The first game I played was in 2D.
The first thing that pops up into my mind when I read "video game" is a 2D video game.
If I played a 3D game first, that entire perception would be shattered. So it makes me shudder.

It would be like waking up left-handed.

Not that complicated, shithead.

40605
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:52:42 AM »
yeah, that tends to be the common accusation

40606
Gaming / Re: What was the first game you ever played?
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:51:27 AM »
Because I started with a 2D game.

DURRRRR

40607
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:38:22 AM »
i mean, if the way you justify getting fucked over is, "you can fuck them over, too!!!" then like...

two wrongs don't make a right, sort of thing

40608
The Flood / Re: that moment when you're browsing Serious
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:32:37 AM »
>never been wrecked by meta

40609
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:27:21 AM »
thats just one of the mechanics that makes Darksouls so enjoyable.
No

i just don't agree, sorry

fucking people over is never fun
if i did it to someone, i'd just feel bad

40610
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:25:41 AM »
but what if literally nothing i've ever worked hard for in my life was worth it in the end

40611
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:18:04 AM »
you know if you play as a hollow, you only get fucked over by the game and not other players right. Also once you lvl up your gear and player you can go to certain hotspots and invade other people who are waiting to do pvp.
i don't think i should have to do that
like, i'm glad that it gives you the option

and aria tells me that the game asks you upfront if you'd rather play offline in bloodborne, and that's a good thing

but my point is, you just shouldn't be able to fuck people over, at all, ever
it's a video game

40612
excuse my ignorance, but how could minimum wage possibly just "not be a thing"

like, what

40613
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:12:09 AM »
you know if you play as a hollow, you only get fucked over by the game and not other players right. Also once you lvl up your gear and player you can go to certain hotspots and invade other people who are waiting to do pvp.
i don't think i should have to do that

40614
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:06:27 AM »
no

40615
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:00:54 AM »
not to mention, dark souls probably has one of the cuntiest fanbases everrr

40616
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:53:58 AM »
offensive? How so? I literally found nothing offensive in that game.
i'm sick of talking about it, to be honest, but whatever

the game encourages you to fuck players over

you can leave misleading messages on the floor, leading people into traps
and you can invade people and steal their shit

i don't find that sort of thing fun
i don't think anyone should--that's just... asshole behavior

40617
Serious / Re: The minimum wage
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:48:36 AM »
Relevant question: when you people say that minimum wage should be a livable wage, do you mean I should be able to be fully employed at the minimum wage, own my own apartment, live by myself, and not have my income subsidized by welfare/ebt?
you should just be able to get by

if all that stuff is necessary for one to "get by", then yes
otherwise, not necessarily

40618
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:45:06 AM »
i killed the asylum demon on my first encounter. /:
it's not that i "couldn't get past" it, i just refused to play any more than that, because it introduced a number of things that i find more offensive than fun

he just says that to try to piss me off

40619
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:42:17 AM »
have you fought the four kings in DS1? Would you consider that fake or real difficulty?
i had to stop playing dark souls at the tutorial because i realized that the game wasn't going to be my cup of tea

40620
Gaming / Re: Bloodborne players in a nutshell
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:36:26 AM »
reporting posts is fun

Pages: 1 ... 135213531354 13551356 ... 1601