3961
The Flood / Re: Pitch me girl names
« on: March 02, 2018, 12:53:35 PM »
Ernesta
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 3962
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:47:53 PM »"your argument is wrong because you live a safe life"Except you’re notit doesn't shock me how it flew over your head that i'm using your exact same argumentCompelling argumentVerbatim you live in a world where there’s always someone above you to take care of thingssays a person beneath me in every way this is ad hominem too, you silly cunt 3963
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:43:41 PM »who's talking about kitchen kniveshahahaha using a knife is one of the most brutal things in the world. You have to stab the shit out of your assailant. At least with a pistol he might run away or if you hit him in the stomach he might live, and least you were just legally standing your ground with a legal weapon you own. Not a kitchen knife you're carrying around for no reason fucking lol dude.that because you are retardcarry a knife aroundLOL if you're in a situation where you're gonna be the big hero and shoot a shooter before he shoots up a theater, you should shoot to kill, you don't want him to live or run away he forfeited his right to live the moment he pulled out a gun in public, and he should die a knife isn't going to save you in that situation 99.99% of the time, sure, but who cares about how brutal it is? again, if you're killing a killer, that's a situation where i wouldn't mind if they suffered a little bit sorry, i don't sympathize with people like that 3964
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:37:20 PM »it doesn't shock me how it flew over your head that i'm using your exact same argumentCompelling argumentVerbatim you live in a world where there’s always someone above you to take care of thingssays a person beneath me in every way thank you for admitting that your logic is dogshit 3965
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:34:51 PM »that because you are retardcarry a knife aroundLOL 3966
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:34:21 PM »FTFYcoward 3967
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:31:38 PM »Verbatim you live in a world where there’s always someone above you to take care of thingssays a person beneath me in every way 3968
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:25:02 PM »What do you suggest I use instead?nothing, because being that scared of shooters is some pussy shit lock your doors, don't piss the wrong people off, know the quickest exit routes in every locale you frequent, carry a knife around, or even learn a martial art and work out if you feel like you have to or, sacrifice your dignity and go through the process of getting yourself a gun through the process i described, because i haven't completely barred guns out of the equation in this scenario (it's just the most cowardly option) 3969
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:15:31 PM »Howbecause you don't need a gun for self-defense i'm not fully opposed to people using guns for the sake of self-defense, but they have to prove themselves first, and that's going to involve extreme levels of background and mental health checks, as well as training, to make sure you're a responsible enough person to have the PRIVILEGE of using such a dangerous weapon it's kinda fucking retarded to think any other way about this To Be Quite Perfectly Fucking Honest 3970
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 12:10:18 PM »It didn't answer my question.yes it did self-defense being a basic right is as far as i'm wiling to concede going from self-defense to the right to bear arms is a huge leap why don't we give people an inalienable right to drive cars? can you imagine why that would be 3971
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 11:50:20 AM »What's wrong with it being a basic human right?i just had a whole conversation about it that you could maybe read 3972
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 11:42:07 AM »>YFW you realize I do have a right to a weapon and it's not a privilegeyou have the legal right, based on the US constitution legal rights are not basic human rights, which is what chakas was specifically asking about, and what my answer was referring to 3973
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 02, 2018, 11:36:05 AM »3974
The Flood / Re: Hot takes« on: March 01, 2018, 11:38:01 PM »In terms of when you're trying to argue that something is immoral, or shouldn't be done, based on its lack of constitutionality.Calling something "unconstitutional" means absolutely nothing.In terms of what the implication being, the constitution is an infallible document written by god himself, which just isn't true at all there's a lot of great stuff, but it isn't gospel truth and shouldn't be treated or looked upon as such 3975
The Flood / Re: Hot takes« on: March 01, 2018, 11:27:36 PM »
Calling something "unconstitutional" means absolutely nothing.
3976
The Flood / Re: Hot takes« on: March 01, 2018, 05:53:07 PM »
PC gaming is for casuals who think they're hardcore.
3977
Gaming / Re: Halo Mega Thread« on: March 01, 2018, 05:47:16 PM »
all i can ever think of when reach is brought up is this video
YouTube 3978
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 02:44:46 PM »bill of nine rights and one privilegeBill of Rights. Not Bill of Privilegesi don't really see the logic thereCool, but I think if one of the amendments in the Bill Of Rights is taken away, it reflects that the government does not view them as rights anymore and believes they are privileges instead. I for one like the sound of "right to free speech" as opposed to "privilege of speech". The removal of one invalidates the resti agree, that's why amendment 2 is the only one i have a serious problem withThey did pretty well if you ask me. They didn't cover everything, but I'm glad what they did cover is law.Rights are not something that can be amended. We are entitled by them by our own existence.you see no danger or folly in allowing men who lived two and a half centuries ago tell you what your basic rights are 3979
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 02:35:44 PM »i don't really see the logic thereCool, but I think if one of the amendments in the Bill Of Rights is taken away, it reflects that the government does not view them as rights anymore and believes they are privileges instead. I for one like the sound of "right to free speech" as opposed to "privilege of speech". The removal of one invalidates the resti agree, that's why amendment 2 is the only one i have a serious problem withThey did pretty well if you ask me. They didn't cover everything, but I'm glad what they did cover is law.Rights are not something that can be amended. We are entitled by them by our own existence.you see no danger or folly in allowing men who lived two and a half centuries ago tell you what your basic rights are free speech (which i do believe is a basic human right) has nothing to do with the right to bear arms just because they were written on the same bill doesn't mean they're inextricably intertwined, unless you could explain how 3980
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 02:13:03 PM »i agree, that's why amendment 2 is the only one i have a serious problem withThey did pretty well if you ask me. They didn't cover everything, but I'm glad what they did cover is law.Rights are not something that can be amended. We are entitled by them by our own existence.you see no danger or folly in allowing men who lived two and a half centuries ago tell you what your basic rights are all in all, the constitution is pretty awesome, but i'm not gonna sit here and pretend it's the word of god or anything, especially when it needed to be fixed up 27 times over the course of 200 years 3981
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 02:02:05 PM »Rights are not something that can be amended. We are entitled by them by our own existence.you see no danger or folly in allowing men who lived two and a half centuries ago tell you what your basic rights are 3982
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 01:49:52 PM »I feel regulation against certain firearms and features as a whole do little to nothing to limit criminals. At least not in this country. Background checks are cool. They make sense, but I believe the Constitution and Bill of Rights the most absolute law of the land and should not be violated.the fact that the constitution has been amended so many times should suggest to you how fallible and subject to change it really is 3983
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 01:40:03 PM »I think banning a simple mechanical concept would be nigh impossible. Even regulating it is exceedingly difficult. You can actually easily manufacture a submachine gun, from materials you can buy at a hardware store (P.A. Luty). The law can only do so much to control what people do in their own homes.i already agreed that it's impossible, i'm just describing how things would be in my perfect world so when i tell you that there would still be millions of good people owning guns under stricter gun control policy and 2A repeal, you know it's coming from a person who would ultimately get rid of all guns if he had it his way in other words, i'm not allowing my personal bias against guns affect how i view guns in the real world we're never getting rid of guns, but that doesn't mean we can't limit public access to them and limiting public access doesn't necessarily mean giving criminals more power, it's quite the opposite 3984
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 01:11:36 PM »
i mean ultimately if i had a button that destroyed all guns and prevented anything similar from ever being created or used again, then i would press it instantly
in fact, i'd smash wayne lapierre's face against it that's my ideal, no guns whatsoever, fuck you never gonna happen though, so i have to try to discuss reality 3985
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 01:08:05 PM »okay, don't be fucking stupidSo you'd prefer rape and murder possibly with illegal projectile weapons so the perpetrators of such can't get their hands on them because they obey the law?still a better outcome than allowing any fucknut to carry a projectile weaponDefending yourself from those that are armed without being armed yourself almost certainly results in bodily harm or death.you are now talking about the right to defend yourself, which is a different subjectno, in the same way that the right to drive an automobile is not a basic human rightSo if I'm a caveman and a rival tribe has sharp rocks and is regularly raping and killing people from my tribe, I can't get my own sharp rock and defend myself and my family because my tribal leaders say so? I specifically mean the ability to arm oneself regardless of what age or state of technology. my entire thesis (that i've stated repeatedly) is that owning guns is like driving cars, in that it's a privilege, not a right that means you can still easily get your hands on weapons if you've jumped through the necessary hoops like a responsible adult, it's just not your godgiven right in the same exact way that driving isn't your god given right and since millions of people still drive, millions of people would still own guns just because something isn't a basic human right doesn't mean it's banned completely 3986
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 12:56:54 PM »still a better outcome than allowing any fucknut to carry a projectile weaponDefending yourself from those that are armed without being armed yourself almost certainly results in bodily harm or death.you are now talking about the right to defend yourself, which is a different subjectno, in the same way that the right to drive an automobile is not a basic human rightSo if I'm a caveman and a rival tribe has sharp rocks and is regularly raping and killing people from my tribe, I can't get my own sharp rock and defend myself and my family because my tribal leaders say so? I specifically mean the ability to arm oneself regardless of what age or state of technology. it's pretty asinine to compare rocks to guns, by the way, or to assume that good and responsible people still wouldn't be armed (the same way good and responsible people drive cars) 3987
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 12:52:35 PM »you are now talking about the right to defend yourself, which is a different subjectno, in the same way that the right to drive an automobile is not a basic human rightSo if I'm a caveman and a rival tribe has sharp rocks and is regularly raping and killing people from my tribe, I can't get my own sharp rock and defend myself and my family because my tribal leaders say so? I specifically mean the ability to arm oneself regardless of what age or state of technology. the fact that we do not allow just anyone to drive has not hindered society in any way, imagine that 3988
The Flood / Re: Is the right to arm oneself a basic human right?« on: March 01, 2018, 12:43:48 PM »
no, in the same way that the right to drive an automobile is not a basic human right
it's a privilege that has to be worked for, and can be taken away 3989
Serious / Re: Florida school shooting - 17+ dead« on: March 01, 2018, 11:58:24 AM »"why adopt gun control rules when criminals just buy their guns illegally from the black market"just to clarify, this is not the argument i'm making, and i made the same point towards deci in the other thread i figured my stance on gun control has been made clear enough in the past that i wouldn't need to clarify, but i support gun control to the extent that even most leftists might consider draconian all i'm saying here is that it's still a two-way street; the black market will always exist, yes, but i'm coming at it from the perspective of someone who's more in line with your thinking, not deci's thinking deci seems to be hung-up on the notion that any degree of gun control is pointless because it's not 100% effective, when, like you said, perfect efficacy is not what we're looking for it's minimization 3990
Serious / Re: Florida school shooting - 17+ dead« on: March 01, 2018, 11:12:57 AM »
It's called the flea market.
|