I've always wondered this as well. From my perspective, gender is merely a social construct, and is thus meaningless. Therefore, if a biological male identifies as a female, that really doesn't mean anything. Not a single thing.

All it means is that this person prefers to be referred to as a "she" for x reason.
And that x reason is usually conditional or arbitrary.

The best thing to do, I suppose, would be to ask a transgendered individual what it means to be a boy and what it means to be a girl. The answer, I hypothesize, is likely rooted in their conditioning alone--not by any clear-cut, objective definition, as you illustrated. Because there is no clear-cut definition.

I agree completely, but I can tell you right now that it's not going to happen.

Regulation has never been this website's strong suit and it hasn't shown any signs of improvement since I joined.

pretty good

a little less on the internet, though, just because i'm not always sure if people are being serious or not

yes it is

i know the more common form of it is "misanthropes" but that sounds gay as fuck

>hipster

probably the silliest accusation i've ever received on the internet

Apparently.

sprungli represents part of the lower end of the site's intelligentcia, along with cybergama, PSU, kupo, and naoto

k

people who make parody threads should kill themselves

lol

SOMEHTIN TA EAT THATS   ROUND N ORANGE

or you could refute the argument being made

or concede that i'm right, because i am
AS ALWAYS

except no, you idiot

it's a bullshit term because it's so relative
what you consider extreme, someone else might not consider extreme

i consider your misogyny, for example, to be extremist
you don't

it's slanderous, meaningless bullshit

"extremism" is kind of a bullshit word, though, isn't it

senile

If you drop friends over political beliefs you're kinda a shitty friend.

tell us, then, arbiter of sociality, what's actually worth dropping your friends over, then