This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Verbatim
Pages: 1 ... 129512961297 12981299 ... 1601
38881
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:39:27 PM »
How is a realistic figure bad? Wouldn't being able to fully create the human body to look like what it does naked and for it to feel realistic more arty than just being lifeless plastic? No. What the fuck does "more arty" mean anyway? You're pulling words out of your fucking ass. The EXPLICIT PURPOSE of this figure is to derive cheap sexual pleasure. It's not an expression of the female form, at all.
38882
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:37:43 PM »
You are basically implying it when you ignore men being the most killed thing and are usually being psychopaths as sexism. Men usually being those things is sexist. This is a horrible spin off of feminist logic. You act like feminists believe that if anything bad happens to a woman in a video game, we think it's sexist. Except we don't. I don't anyway. Maybe Anita Sarkeesian believes that. But I don't. So quit this shitty-ass fucking example already. Killing men isn't sexist unless it's explicitly stated in-game, "KILL ALL MEN, BECAUSE MEN ARE PIGS." That would be sexist. Same thing for women. Okay, obviously, it doesn't have to be that blunt. But the general themes and ideas expressed by the game should give you an idea if the game is really misogynist or misandrist. Do you feel uncomfortable playing video games because men are killed in them? I doubt it. What is the most killed sex in those games? That's right men. Doesn't matter. Violence =/= sexism. Against EITHER gender.
38883
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:25:06 PM »
You haven't paid any attention to Tomodachi life have you? Seems like a pointless game.
38884
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:22:44 PM »
It's only sexist when it's about women and it's just people being portrayed as whatever when it's men so it's OK. I LITERALLY never said anything remotely similar to that. It's possible to portray sexism against men in video games. I just haven't seen it yet. Except for character designs. That's IT.
38885
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:21:13 PM »
No, it's sexist since men are usually being portrayed as drones or killers No, because men are also portrayed as literally everything else that they are portrayed as. Duh. Like: Fucking HEROES.
38886
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:20:24 PM »
Ah, the SJW double standard. ...HOW is it a double standard. I don't care if you kill women in video games either. It's not sexist. Yet you were saying meat eaters have a fucked up moral compass. I never used the term "moral compass". Ever. I said you were evil and selfish.
38887
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:15:41 PM »
Actually the figure having squeezable boobs would be a lot more arty than it being just plastic due to it being more realistic. except there is bad art, and there is good art the worst art is realistic
38888
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:14:40 PM »
I hardly see the problem with it when the creator of said work intended the character to serve erotic purposes. Unless you're saying that that is stupid on the creator's part, in which case I agree. I just see nothing immoral about it. i also wouldn't use a retarded word like "immoral" we should throw the word "morality" out because it's garbage anyway, no, it's not even about morality how can you agree with me and say that it's stupid on the creator's part and not concede that sexual objectification is a problem
38889
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:12:24 PM »
It might not be as easy but men are exploited. Very few males are that built. i don't deny that It's making men look like drones and killers. So men being the typical enemy in games is sexist. No, it's making people look like drones and killers. Most of them just happen to be men.
38890
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:07:42 PM »
How does it make myself and anybody else who doesn't see the problem with this a massive cunt? not a massive cunt, but a selfish cunt not caring makes you a selfish cunt--that's the keyword it's not that you don't see the problem--you see it VERY clearly it's just that you don't think it is a problem and that's because you probably don't respect art as much as i do, and don't really care if an otherwise respectable work of art has blemishes of sexism and exploitation on it i do, though
38891
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:02:21 PM »
i don't think i ever said MGS wasn't an enjoyable franchise
it was just directed by a lecherous piece of shit, that's all
38892
« on: May 13, 2015, 07:00:45 PM »
god forbid we treat a fictional character as an object yes treating characters like objects for erotic purposes in a work of art that is otherwise meant to be taken seriously is stupid
38893
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:59:10 PM »
Like I said most men out there don't look like him. They may have a flat chest but they're not going to be as built as him. Him having a build is just to make him more attractive to young girls. and that's a problem toothat's what i'm saying i don't think it's as big a problem, just because it's not as though ken's build is exaggerated or anything unlike quiet, whose bust is extremely exaggerated It's still sexualizing something to make it look more attractive to the target buyer. The reason why you don't here about him is because Kent is a male. If these women like Anita Sarkeesian are actually for equality than they would be bringing up how men are treated in video games as well. I'm not Anita Sarkeesian. I DO bring up--well, okay, I try to bring up male sexualization as well. It's not always that easy just because, frankly, it's much easier to exploit women and women are exploited MUCH more. Undeniably. If anything men are the ones having the worse of it. FUCK no! Are you insane? When was the last time you played a game where women were getting killed in mass amounts like men? That's not sexist at all, though?...
38894
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:50:56 PM »
oh the horror
some girl is made to feel inadequate by seeing a woman with more attractive features
oh deary me
we must stop this oppression
ban cultural ideas of what is and is not attractive
god forbid somebody not feel perfect
that's only part of what it's about though
38895
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:48:10 PM »
i'm not really fixing to debate this anyway
if you don't care, you don't care, but i just don't think that's a logical mindset
38896
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:45:12 PM »
A action figure having squeezable boobs is not going to affect them in anyway. if you don't care about something just because it doesn't personally affect YOU, then you're a selfish cunt
38897
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:44:15 PM »
Sex-negativity is literally retarded, Verb.
There's nothing wrong at all with celebrating sexuality or sexually idealized bodies, especially in fiction.
lol yeah there is you're gonna be the last person to convince me of that, mr. subjective value good luck
38898
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:43:13 PM »
People losing their shit over Quiet and I'm still there gazing at the paragon of masculinity that is Naked Snake
i don't think so i mean, it's no secret that ko-meme-a is a closet faggot as well i think there's a few better examples you could've given as a paragon of masculinity in his series though like... liquid and... raiden well, maybe not raiden, he's kinda girly looking but that's supposed to look masculine in japan, so
38899
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:38:46 PM »
I can understand the criticism towards her design and even i think its silly but i dont really care that much in the end. well, thank you
38900
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:37:32 PM »
So what does that SJW term mean? traditionally, someone who hates women i use it more as a term to describe people who cavalierly or nonchalantly disregard all sexism towards women in the media and pass it off as nothing to complain about these people indirectly subjugate women sad thing is, a lot of them are women
38901
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:33:57 PM »
it isn't
i never once claimed to know all the answers, especially not offhand
38902
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:32:17 PM »
not at the moment
that isn't to say one can't be developed
38903
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:31:07 PM »
oh look, it's the forum misogynist
just kidding
most of you are probably misogynists
38904
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:23:36 PM »
Reggie was playing a Virtual Boy there.
I think that's the first time they've acknowledged that thing's existence since it bombed.
38905
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:19:45 PM »
it really isn't
if you think value is subjective, there is no conversation to be had
value is objective
38906
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:14:58 PM »
and i'd actually argue very very many people look like ken--it's not that difficult to get a light build and a tan
but that's another topic
the reason you don't hear "SJWs" like me complaining about ken dolls is because ken dolls are ancient history
that doesn't mean i think it's okay, though
38907
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:12:44 PM »
For the SJW's which is just Verb here bitching about this how many men out there look like Kent? Quiet having squeezable boobs is no different than Kent being muscular for his looks. They're both sexual based things.
uhhhh yes and you realize pointing out another example of sexism on the other side doesn't make ANYTHING better, right? no, of course you don't
38908
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:06:09 PM »
He didn't make Rumble Roses. He did, however, have characters from Rumble Roses in MGS3. does he not have some kind of sex problem that makes him a lecher or something, though i could've sworn i read that in an interview once
38909
« on: May 13, 2015, 06:02:32 PM »
#CastrateKojima
38910
« on: May 13, 2015, 05:53:44 PM »
I mean, I guess I shouldn't be that angry, because we're talking about the retarded manchild who made Rumble Roses and lived in the sexual limbo that is Japan for his whole life, so...
Pages: 1 ... 129512961297 12981299 ... 1601
|
Show Posts
