i prefer the [img] method

isn't there a page somewhere on the website that explains what happened at b.shit that led to this site's creation

Waste.

If we ever grow large to have mods which don't know us all as well and have strict moderation, I could get banned for calling Lemon a huge faggot even though he clearly is one.

We're not large enough for that, though. Not even close.

By that point, we could easily loosen the rules up a bit more to accommodate the increased traffic. But as long as we remain a tightly-knit community, if we have any desire of growing, I think we should learn to settle down a little bit.

This is what I'm saying. It's like you think you're above the rules and moderator guidelines. If you see something you dislike personally, you'll hand out a ban because hey, who's going to stop you?

I honestly don't see the problem. From my perspective, it's not that Cheat needs to be more lax--it's that all the other moderators ought to be more strict.

I did vote for strict moderation when we had that poll.

Oh, yeah. Reminder. If you're gonna submit a word, do it in a PM--don't post it here. That kinda defeats the point, ya see.

So, Pendulate actually had an interesting idea last time around: Word submissions. If you think you have a good word that you'd like to be featured in one of these threads, you could send it my way in a PM, and I'll make it happen (if the word is good enough). I'll mention your username in the definition somewhere, and have a "thank you" tab where all the names'll be kept. I think it's a pretty good idea.

The basic criteria for word submissions are:
- It has to be relatively uncommon
- It should be at least somewhat practical or useful in casual conversation
- While not completely necessary, you're more likely to get featured if it happens to be a word I don't already know.

You can submit as many words as indiscriminately as you like.

Pendulate actually managed to find a pretty elusive one for me the other day, so today's WotD was partially brought to you by him.

---

The following word was submitted by Pendulate:
Anhedonia - /an - heh - DOE - nee- uh/
the Greek an-, meaning "without", and hedone, meaning "pleasure".

Many of you might be able to guess the meaning of this word by picking apart its roots. "Hedonia" in particular is very telling, as most of us are familiar with the philosophy of hedonism--or the belief that pleasure and happiness are the most important things in life. There's also the so-called "hedonic treadmill" concept, or the belief that, no matter how far our technological pursuits may go, we will never be truly satisfied; we will always find something to be unhappy about.

Anhedonia is a term used in psychiatry to describe a state of mind where it is impossible, or exceedingly difficult, to experience pleasure: After five years of crippling depression, he no longer derives any pleasure from his once most beloved activities, as a result of anhedonia. This state of mind is tightly linked to depressive disorders, and as such, should probably only be used in such contexts where one's anhedonia would be symptomatic of some type of depression.

---

Penury - /PEN - yuhr - ee/
[penurious]
From the Latin penuria, meaning "need"

To live in penury is to live in extreme poverty. You might have heard of words like "destitute"; or, "he was living in utter destitution". They're the poorest of the poor. People living in a state of penury, however, are even poorer than that--they're the poorest of the poorest of the poor. Whereas someone in destitution may have at least showered within the last year, people living in penury may have never bathed in their lives. It's absolute poverty.

Yeah, I'll see if I can work in a more positive word to end today's list off.

---

Copacetic - /KOH - puh - SEH - tik/
Etymology unknown.

"How are you feeling today?"
"Oh, I'm just copacetic, thanks."
"...Oh. I'm sorry to hear that."
"What?"

That was an actual exchange I had with a friend the other day. I used the word copacetic to describe how I felt that day--that is to say, just fine. Perfect. Everything was going smooth.

It's actually a pretty common expression, but perhaps more people ought to know about it, because it apparently sounds like some kind of crippling medical condition when used in the right tone of voice. But nope, all it means is that everything is peachy. I'd like to think most people know what it means, though--especially in America.

---

I hope you're all having a copacetic day, in spite of your penurious, anhedonic lives.

where are all of these weird symbols even coming from

apparently we're just now discovering them

i am currently undergoing the same process

it's not difficult, but the only thing about is it that whenever i want to eat something, i'm like, "oh, shit, i can't"
and then i feel bad

but i'm not starved or anything

OT:

uhhhhhhh
why?

edit:

oh, that's rough

Agreed. Just yesterday verby came over to my crib and we smoked a fat bowl.

your "crib"

So if I come onto the internet and say it's neither natural nor ethically superior, and somebody responds telling me it is, wouldn't I want to be superior?

Most meat-eaters I know are fine with admitting that vegans are ethically superior. Which leads me to think that those who are unwilling to concede are simply insecure.

It's really not terribly difficult to see how not torturing is more ethical than torturing.

If being a vegan was going to kill me tomorrow, I would still be a vegan.

*cringe*

This thread gives me mammories

Fixed that for you.

Quote from: Verbatim on June 18, 2015, 11:34:27 PM

I've strongly disliked all of your avatars ever since the first chihuahua one.

Animal haters are disgusting.

Are you a vegan?