Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Verbatim

Pages: 1 ... 116611671168 11691170 ... 1601
35011
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 09:04:46 AM »
I should make it clear, though, that I think harassment is a much bigger deal than simply offending somebody.

If someone is offended, for example, when I use the word "nigger" out of its malicious context, they can go jump off a cliff.

35012
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 09:02:43 AM »
Stop being such a chair Verb.
See, it doesn't work like that. If you trailed my every post and called me a "chair" for the sole purpose of getting a rise out of me, that would be considered harassment. Yes.

The reason it doesn't work this time is because your intent isn't to offend or harass me, but to illustrate a (weak and misguided) point. I shouldn't have to school you through this.

35013
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 08:55:27 AM »
Verb you're talking about the word dingo being 'malicious harassment'. What would you call it?
No, I'm talking about how any word has the potential of being used for malicious harassment. The word could be "cunt," or "dickless retard," or "fat flaming faggot," or "dingo," or "chair".

If you can't tell if someone is using the word "dingo" with normal intent, jocular intent, or malicious intent, then that's on you. I'm saying it's really easy to tell the difference, unless your honest argument is that some words are okay to harass people with, because they aren't traditionally considered offensive, while the ones that are traditionally considered offensive should be banworthy.

Which is what is called an arbitrary line in the sand.

35014
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 08:46:44 AM »
That's hugbox mentality 101.
This is "you're-either-with-me-or-against-me" rhetoric 101.

I'm not about creating a "hugbox", and you know it.

35015
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 08:43:56 AM »
Under that mindset anything and everything is harassment. Words have no meaning.
Not if you're perspicacious enough to glean basic context clues, which, if you've passed the first grade, should be a simple enough task. You should be able to tell the difference between malicious intent and joking intent.

Poe's law is very antiquated.

35016
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 08:37:29 AM »
Just remember that it's not the word "dingo" by itself that qualifies as malicious harassment. That's a straw man.

Malicious harassment counts as malicious harassment.
Any word can be used to maliciously harass anyone--if that's what you intend to do with it.

so, just admit that you're arguing for the authorization of harassment, and you'll have a consistent (though ethically questionable) argument

35017
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 08:35:10 AM »
How on earth does the word 'dingo' qualify as 'malicious harassment'?
The same way the word "cunt" would, if we used that instead. Or "fat cunt". Or "disgusting fat cunt".

It doesn't matter what word you use--it's the intent behind it. Obviously.
Quote
I see people complain about locked threads regularly. My priority is enjoyment. Only reason to come here at all.
Then, frankly, we don't need you.

35018
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 08:26:18 AM »
Perhaps the poll should be "would you leave the forum if we implemented a stricter ruleset".

35019
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 08:20:09 AM »
I wouldn't post at any of those tbh.
i don't care, that's not the point
you asked for "fun" forums that would "slap" you for calling someone a "retard"--something as benign as "retard"

Quote
Should we warn anyone who calls Elegiac dingo again? He certainly has a better case than Bezerk.
If it ever reaches levels of malicious harassment again, I don't really see why not. What George Carlin taught you about words is a two-way street. Words aren't offensive in and of themselves, sure, but words aren't inoffensive in and of themselves, either. They're all neutral. They can all be used or any purpose we desire, because we created them for that exact purpose. And if we designate the word "dingo" as a word to harass another user and make them feel uncomfortable, then that's, in my opinion, worthy of punishment.
Quote
Its The Flood. Not some Nintendo kid friendly site. There's a certain level of maturity expected here and that means being able to take a few insults. (obviously excluding the serious board)
This is just silly. It's not about taking insults--it's about insulting in the first place. You're right--it's big of you to be able to take insults and not cry about it. But let's pretend every single user here was able to take malicious insults.

...Insults are still unacceptable. On principle.

There is simply no place for rude and malignant behavior. No place for it.
Quote
I still think this is a side argument anyways since technically it shouldn't be happening under the hybrid system. That distinctly matches the strict description.

The major difference between the three was how they handled shitposts.
consider your priorities if you're honestly still at all concerned about your right to shitpost here

seriously
i don't even think anyone else but you cares anymore about it

35020
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 08:00:43 AM »
Find me a fun forum that slaps people for something as benign as retard. If this place stops being fun people will go elsewhere.
i wouldn't call "retard" benign
in fact, insults are quite literally the opposite of "benign"

anyways:
http://www.pokebeach.com/forums/
http://www.smogon.com/forums/ (seriously)
http://smashboards.com/forums/
http://zeldauniverse.net/forums/

and these are just ones i've been a part of

if you would leave because you consider flaming other users "fun", ask yourself how much we need you as a member

35021
The Flood / Re: Would you do a gun game to win millions?
« on: July 14, 2015, 07:45:13 AM »
OP's posts hurt my brain

35022
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 07:42:03 AM »
With the system we have now people are getting warnings for calling others retard.
i don't see the problem
it's not like he was joking--he was being malicious

the problem isn't getting warnings for name-calling--the problem is that cheat singled out one user for doing it, when the sort of thing happens all the time, everywhere

find me a good, thriving forum that allows flaming other users--go ahead

35023
The Flood / Re: Would you do a gun game to win millions?
« on: July 14, 2015, 07:35:53 AM »
This ain't even a moral dilemma, it's just... silly.

I guess if you were to force me to play the game, the obvious choice would have to be the table with more guns that don't have any bullets in them. Because I'd have a much higher chance of survival. An extra five million dollars is really not big enough compensation--it would have to be more like a billion dollars.

Even then, can the human brain even comprehend the difference between five million dollars and a billion dollars? With five million dollars, you'd be set for life, if you were smart about it. If you were a billionaire, you probably wouldn't even spend half of it in your lifetime.

But let's not even bother with the tiny differences between five million dollars and ten million dollars. There's nothing you can't buy with a five million dollar bank account. What's 10 gonna do for you?

so yeah, this is just plain silly

i wouldn't be analyzing the situation as critically as i am if you didn't honestly believe this belonged in serious

35024
The Flood / Re: Would you do a gun game to win millions?
« on: July 14, 2015, 07:24:30 AM »
As is being established currently, this thread has absolutely no place here.

OT:
No, I wouldn't risk the chance of death for any sum of money, because I'm not absolutely insane.

35025
Septagon / Re: i think there should be a new poll on moderation style
« on: July 14, 2015, 07:19:47 AM »
YEAH LAX GUYS

LET'S MAKE THE JOINT AN EVEN BIGGER SHITHOLE THAN IT IS

35026
The Flood / Re: good music that will never be popular
« on: July 13, 2015, 11:58:30 PM »
Hipsters! The lot of you!
go listen to the eagles and '90s one hit wonders

35027
The Flood / Re: Is it considered getting off to porn if...
« on: July 13, 2015, 11:57:14 PM »
OT:

theoretically, yes, but more than likely, the physical sensation of the sex itself would probably overpower any gettings-off on the tattoos

35029
The Flood / Re: Real quick - what DC animated movie is this from?
« on: July 13, 2015, 11:25:14 PM »
not trying to be cheeky here, but a reverse google image search would've told you this as well

i don't think enough people know about what a glorious feature that is

35030
Septagon / Re: Is there no limit on how big avatars can be
« on: July 13, 2015, 11:18:43 PM »
200x200 at 40 kilobytes should be plenty

or 150x150 at 30

35031
The Flood / Re: why does the site always go down at midnight
« on: July 13, 2015, 11:14:01 PM »
It's just you.
are you sure

i just assumed you refreshed the servers every night or something, to keep them from... overloading or something, idk

35032
Septagon / Re: Is there no limit on how big avatars can be
« on: July 13, 2015, 11:11:13 PM »
Well yeah, but that doesn't tell you the file size. It's a pretty sweet gif though. What's the issue?
large images (in terms of file size) take a lot of bandwidth

mainly, it slows down the page

35033
The Flood / why does the site always go down at midnight
« on: July 13, 2015, 11:06:07 PM »
or is it just me

35034
The Flood / Re: Is it considered getting off to porn if...
« on: July 13, 2015, 10:42:24 PM »
this might just be the dumbest question i've ever been asked

35035
The Flood / Re: when you first did drugs
« on: July 13, 2015, 10:37:58 PM »
I just wanted to look cool and fit in. 420 blaze it  8)
at least you're honest

35036
The Flood / Re: good music that will never be popular
« on: July 13, 2015, 10:37:04 PM »
Quote
BATTLEFIELD HARDLINE
oh, never played it. . .
i didn't realize you were just referring to the ILYs as Meme Grips 2.0 though

yeah i guess you have a point

35037
The Flood / Re: Sep7agon gave you
« on: July 13, 2015, 10:33:15 PM »
Bad times in several ways.
jesus, you are so mopey all the time, goddamn

35038
The Flood / Re: good music that will never be popular
« on: July 13, 2015, 10:31:20 PM »
death grips or the ILYs?
BATTLEFIELD HARDLINE

Mazzy Star
Childish Gambino
Marina & the Diamonds
donald glover is very popular

35039
The Flood / Re: good music that will never be popular
« on: July 13, 2015, 10:26:55 PM »
death grips or the ILYs?
definitely death grips

pisses me off that i can't think of the damn game

35040
The Flood / Re: good music that will never be popular
« on: July 13, 2015, 10:23:20 PM »
Meme Grips 2.0
pretty sure one of their songs ended up on the trailer to some game

or maybe it was even the soundtrack, i dunno

i know it was a major franchise, too <_<

Pages: 1 ... 116611671168 11691170 ... 1601