This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Verbatim
Pages: 1 ... 104610471048 10491050 ... 1601
31411
« on: September 10, 2015, 10:16:58 PM »
Lol
Well i enjoyed it
Mostly because i love ocelot
typically i don't enjoy seeing my favorite characters get desecrated not that ocelot is one of my favorite characters, i barely know him but that logic is odd to me
31412
« on: September 10, 2015, 10:13:46 PM »
i don't know, but i couldn't smile ever since
31413
« on: September 10, 2015, 10:10:49 PM »
those videos gave me lockjaw
31414
« on: September 10, 2015, 10:02:07 PM »
Now this is the game I paid for.
31415
« on: September 10, 2015, 09:54:59 PM »
As a feminist, I'm not sure what she's quite getting at without the full context of the quote.
And I don't trust you, at ALL, to have presented her message fairly, so... Guess I'll do some digging, but I'll probably lose interest.
31416
« on: September 10, 2015, 09:44:45 PM »
Dang.
31417
« on: September 10, 2015, 09:44:11 PM »
bf2 was godawful
31418
« on: September 10, 2015, 09:38:49 PM »
the game doesn't look fun at all tbh
31419
« on: September 10, 2015, 09:34:08 PM »
I could be racist and make a Japanese joke your contributions to that religious tract were still the best thing you've ever done, tbh
31420
« on: September 10, 2015, 09:27:56 PM »
It's CIS Scum, yeah. Checked his post history.
what in the fuck happened to his account
31422
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:59:53 PM »
I'm thinking of adding another review to my group of reviews.
What should I review? I kinda wanna do Pokémon Shadows of Almia
Your call. A Pokémon review would be cool. No one's ever done one of those yet.
31423
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:56:59 PM »
... "Shitty"? It was a joke review. I was scouring every inch of the forum in search of reviews I was missing, so I wasn't really looking at things like subtext. I didn't read very much into any of the reviews I found—I just put 'em up there. I wasn't sure if you were being serious or not. If it's a joke review, I'm gonna go ahead and take it off, then, all right?
31424
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:53:31 PM »
The market for the young boys is more than fine. A gay pedophile. Not a good look.
31425
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:46:36 PM »
nahhhh, so much stuff Disney wouldnt dare to touch on
Have you at least seen any Pixar stuff?... they get into some pretty heavy shit, while still being family-oriented
31426
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:39:21 PM »
See this is probably why i have not seen a single disney movie
Maybe if you did Spoiler you would drop the weeb shit
31427
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:37:25 PM »
It's happened at least once before. With Class. Remember?
31428
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:36:19 PM »
I kind of agree, but I kinda don't give a shit, either. There's enough gender neutral Disney films to go around and off-set the films made specifically for girls, even though that's debatable.
Just because a bunch of their films have a princess as the protagonist doesn't mean it's just for girls. That's kinda silly.
31429
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:32:41 PM »
i walked right into that one
31430
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:31:24 PM »
too unethical; didn't eat at
31431
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:27:25 PM »
[Every joke BerzerkCommando has ever told]
31432
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:25:51 PM »
Don't, Cheat.
31433
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:19:10 PM »
I made my own Venom Snake sprite, yay.
i like his noodle arm
31434
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:04:57 PM »
No, leave it up. Personally I thought my review was highly perceptive and quite in depth. I took upon myself the task of reviewing Dishonored with the utmost professionalism and I'd like it if people read my review. All righty then.
31435
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:00:53 PM »
I included your review of Batman: Arkham Knight. It's not very in-depth, so if you'd rather it not be here, I can respect that. I included your review of Dishonored. It doesn't come across like a serious or in-depth review, so if you'd rather I take it out, I can do that. I included your review of Destiny. Do you care? It doesn't really go in detail, and it's rather poorly written (no offense), so if you would like me to remove it, I will. thanx
31436
« on: September 10, 2015, 08:00:26 PM »
derp
wrong thread
31437
« on: September 10, 2015, 07:21:03 PM »
Updated. As you can see, it's pretty much completely different now. They're sorted alphabetically by game, instead of by author. Here's a full list of games we've all reviews thus far: Ace Combat 6: Fires of Liberation
Alien: Isolation
Assassin's Creed III
Assassin's Creed: Unity
Azure Strike Gunvolt
Batman: Arkham Knight
Batman: Arkham Origins
Battlefield: Hardline
Beyond: Two Souls
BioShock Infinite
Borderlands 2
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Call of Duty: Black Ops II
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare
Company of Heroes 2
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Crysis 2
Crysis 3
Dark
Dead Space 3
Deadlight
Dear Esther
Defiance
Destiny
Dishonored
Doom 3 BFG Edition
Dragon Age: Inquisition
Duck Dynasty
Dying Light
F.E.A.R.
Far Cry 3
Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon
Far Cry 4
GoldenEye 007
Gone Home
Grand Theft Auto V
Grim Fandango
Half-Life 2
Halo 4
Heroes of the Storm
Hitman: Absolution
Hotline Miami 2: Wrong Number
Infamous: Second Son
Injustice: Gods Among Us
Insurgency: Modern Infantry Combat
Journey
Killzone: Shadow Fall
Max Payne 3
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Metal Gear
Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake
Metal Gear Solid
Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes
Metro 2033
Metro: Last Light
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Mighty Gunvolt
Natural Selection 2
Need for Speed: Most Wanted
Ori and the Blind Forest
PlanetSide 2
Ratchet & Clank
Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad
Resident Evil: Revelations 2
Resistance: Burning Skies
Sleeping Dogs
Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2
Spec Ops: The Line
SpongeBob SquarePants: Battle for Bikini Bottom
StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty
State of Decay
State of Decay: Breakdown
Super Mario 64
Super Mario Bros.
Super Mario Bros. 2
Super Mario Bros. 3
Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels
Super Mario World
The Last of Us
The Order: 1886
The Walking Dead
The War Z
Thief
This War of Mine
Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Blacklist
Tomb Raider
Tony Hawk's Underground
Wolfenstein: The New Order
World in Conflict In all, that's 93 reviews of 91 different games. Thoughts? Does it look nice? Could it use work? Also, yes, I do not omit the word "the" when alphabetizing (e.g. The Order: 1886 is filed under "T" for "The"). I know. I'm TERRIBLE. But that's how I like to do it.
31438
« on: September 10, 2015, 05:45:53 PM »
You do realize I was only responding to the op, which was about people that claim gender is totally separated from biology. I never implied that's what you were saying. I'm one of those people, though. Except nobody actually believes gender is totally separated from biology—I've yet to meet one. What most people on my side argue is that gender is influenced by societal expectations and environmental factors (your upbringing & conditioning) FAR more than it is dictated by any negligible biological factors. To the point where you may as well not even bring biology up, and instead say, "these are SEX characteristics." Gender describes masculine/feminine traits that aren't biological. They are societal perceptions of masculinity and femininity.
31439
« on: September 10, 2015, 05:32:54 PM »
Nevertheless, people oughtn't do that anyway. You don't need to hope gender is one way or the other in order to call somebody a fucking cunt for forcing his wife to be the "homemaker". Even if gender identity are (largely) biological and innate, that's no justification for treating women are more or less respectfully.
It's just a case of cunts will be cunts. Right—but I'm saying it would be even less of a justification. Did you read my articles, or are you in the process, or what? I'm going over the last couple articles you posted right now. So you're saying it is at least partially determinable by biology. Which is what I was attempting to show.
I'm sorry, I seem to have been under the delusion that this thread was about people that believe gender was totally separated from biology. Which is like conceding that fire burns stuff and then denying that it's hot.
Right, yeah, and Karl Benz is responsible for 30,000 American deaths per year, because without him, there wouldn't be any automobiles. Sure. Fair logic. clearly everything about life is rooted in biology, in the sense that even social constructs are created by a biological apparatus called a "brain" that's not the issue
31440
« on: September 10, 2015, 05:20:18 PM »
If I agree to this partition, the content of the debate doesn't really change. It just shifts from our original question to "Are the differences we see in behaviour chiefly the result of sex or gender", using your definitions. It seems pretty clear to me that biology and (evolutionary) psychology has answered this question, and the answer is sex. I don't find this question terribly interesting, personally. I'm more interested in the implications of gender being a social construct. Because if it is, then that makes our quibbles over it as a society quite insignificant. No longer would anyone be able to make vapid appeals to nature with regards to how people should be treated, or how people should be expected to behave, based solely on their biological sex—the only thing they'd have left to go off of. Gender roles would be destroyed. This can only be a good thing.
Pages: 1 ... 104610471048 10491050 ... 1601
|
Show Posts
