Verb has yet to realize that calling relative privation on this doesn't actually apply.

maybe you don't know this, but merely stating that "it doesn't apply" does not mean that it doesn't apply

(never mind the fact that you didn't actually use any fallacies correctly).

i'm not the one using fallacies--you are

either way, i explained each and every one of them, in case you're lost

The UN has limited resources, so how they choose to allocate those resources is always relevant to the matter at hand.

You're credibility is also on the line, because its important to discourage people from placing faith in someone who is consistently self serving or otherwise wrong.

The fallacy in your argument is that you believe that a constructive discussion on opposing viewpoints on the functions of the world government must adhere to a more logical form of discussion and not a more human one.

We do business by Robert's Rules of Order, not by the rules of a term paper.

see, the funny thing is that i actually don't think hentai should be banned under any justification

In other words, I completely agree with LC.

but that doesn't make his arguments any less fallacious LMAO

and yes, all discussion should adhere to a logical form and not a "human" one--we should stray as far from human reasoning as possible when it comes to... well, fucking anything

Dude, his points were were perfectly sound and guided.

the UN may be against hentai because they think it harms women and children, but i don't
i'm against it for other reasons
therefore, pretending that i agree with the UN would be a strawman argument

claiming that there are bigger problems for the UN to worry about is a fallacy of relative privation

trying to dismiss me based on my attitude towards hentai alone is an ad hominem

and finally, he seems to be under the impression that i'm committing a fallacy fallacy, but i'm not, because i never once claimed he was wrong based solely on the fact that he's making fallacious arguments--so, he's committed a fallacy fallacy fallacy

mmmmmmmm

Only not actually because there is zero evidence to suggest that sexual cartoons have any negative effect on real world women and children.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

It's a non-issue that's being used to distract the public from things that actually matter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pooh-pooh

You are because you guys are indecisive and unsure of yourself

No, I'm not.

You literally just pass them
Not really something to learn

Nope.

After making sure the maneuver is legal, you signal, check your mirrors, check your blindspot, make sure no one's there, fade over, speed up (which is the terrifying part), signal right, check your mirrors and blindspot again, and then fade over.

You have to do all of that. It's not just one thing you're doing. It's many things all at once, in an extremely short amount of time. It's not "literally just" anything, and you HAVE to learn how to properly do it before you can do it. Common sense.

I tense up so hard whenever I have to drive near large vehicles like that.

I never learned how to pass vehicles in driver's ed, so I often find myself stuck, and it's just the worst shit ever.

"This ring isn't a cudgel, you barbarian. It's something else. Something much more important."

She's basically saying it's no ordinary weapon. It's not something primitive like a cudgel.

Quote from: Tyger on August 05, 2016, 12:57:15 PM

So are there any alola forms you guys are particularly hoping for?

I'd love alola dragonite that's blue and alola arcanine

what are the alola forms that've been revealed?

i actually like using porygon-z in competitive

i just loathe his design

Quote

-abolish corporate tax
-eliminate federal wage standards
-raise social security retirement age

These, for instance, are all solid policies with a ridiculous amount of evidence behind them.

regarding the abolishment of corp tax--for some reason, the ten minutes of google-tier research i did on the subject last night after you responded to me has done a better job of convincing me than any of your arguments made for it in the past

when you consider one of the main reasons employees aren't paid enough, it's partially because corporations are constrained so heavily by the tax--especially in america, where corp tax is the highest in the world

in other words, i've kinda warmed up to the idea

however, i'm still curious as to how you could support eliminating the FLSA and raising the retirement age--i don't see the "ridiculous" amount of evidence in support of either of those things

edit:
and by "last night" i mean this morning

FUCK i stayed up too late

With a handful of minor exceptions, notice how all of Jill Stein's positions are basically Gary Johnson's, only better.

And if they disagree on anything, it's only because Gary Johnson is an idiot who thinks it's a good idea to abolish corporate taxes and shit. So any time they disagree, Jill Stein almost always has the superior position anyway. Funny, that.

Fucking Lemon left man

Sad!

He actually signed in for the first time in months last week. Didn't post anything.