This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Verbatim
Pages: 1 ... 458459460 461462 ... 1601
13771
« on: September 20, 2016, 09:14:11 AM »
Is that a sandcastle?
Yeah, was confirmed awhile ago. They're called Sandygast and Palossand.
Pretty meh update. Passimian is the better of the two monkeys, but I probably wouldn't have caught either of them anyway. Lycanroc's midday form confirmed better than midnight  I had a feeling this was gonna happen. I'll just pray that the midnight form has an awesome signature move, or maybe a good hidden ability. Extreme Evoboost is the only exciting thing, because it basically confirms that not all Z-moves are going to be just "hurr durr MASSIVE DAMAGE" attacks. It's good to see a little bit of variety. That animation is obnoxiously long, though. It's almost a full minute.
13772
« on: September 19, 2016, 10:02:06 PM »
Now you're just putting words in my mouth so I will fit your definition of a conservative. I never said improvement is an impossibility, but we need more time, and that's something we're quickly running out of.
No, we don't need time, we need resources--and we need worthless conservative faggots to stop hindering progress by claiming that we can't make progress. That humans are just too shitty to do anything remotely humanitarian. When it's that specific mentality that's holding us back. Because you're emotional and illogical like that.
13773
« on: September 19, 2016, 09:56:54 PM »
I fail to see how recognizing that we aren't perfect is a logical fallacy, if anything, it's logic.
Because it doesn't preclude us from trying to be as perfect as possible. Pretending like we literally cannot improve is not logic. It's bullshit disguised as fear disguised as bullshit. Very emotional and illogical. Like a conservative.
13774
« on: September 19, 2016, 09:54:28 PM »
Yeah but you were never really invested in any of the Halo multiplayers to a significant extent. You were basically given the same experience as Destiny lite by only having experienced the Campaign and not Multiplayer in its peak.
Thus, it shouldn't be GotD, because it peaked--and now it's over. A game of the decade should have an exemplary multiplayer AND single player experience long after its shelf life. Halo: CE had a very weak single player campaign, which should automatically bar it from discussion. You might think that's an unreasonably high standard, but we're talking game of the decade here.
13776
« on: September 19, 2016, 09:48:08 PM »
For 2000-2010. I think the Halo series has a shot of being up there.
you're kidding
As much as I hate it, I can't deny the impact Halo 1 had on consoles. I personally like Metal Gear more so. But I'm probably not thinking of some other games I loved.
If impact is the only factor in determining the game of the decade, then perhaps Halo isn't the worst choice--but I wouldn't necessarily say Pong is the best game of the 70s. I think there are other factors that should be examined as well, such as longevity (has it aged well) and the game's content itself. You might love Halo: CE, but it aged like a fruit fly. Metal Gear is a more solid choice, but personally, I'd give it to Wind Waker.
13777
« on: September 19, 2016, 09:17:47 PM »
I have a few leftist ideas, actually. But full on leftists are always the same to me, they always resort to childish, emotional behavior and petty insults when I try to seriously argue about it. I've never been proven wrong.
There's literally nothing wrong with emotional behavior and petty insults. Get thicker skin and suck it up. Emotional arguments are the problem--and conservatives almost exclusively make emotional appeals. Leftists never do.
13778
« on: September 19, 2016, 09:12:06 PM »
For 2000-2010. I think the Halo series has a shot of being up there.
you're kidding
13779
« on: September 19, 2016, 07:20:52 PM »
Dark Souls multiplayer forsakes any possibility of it being game of the decade for me. It also has yet to outlast its meme status, which is necessary to mitigate bias or rose-tinted goggles when talking about the game.
I think it's too early to say right now. There are a lot of great games out. You gave me an idea for a different thread, though.
13780
« on: September 19, 2016, 03:57:42 PM »
you don't trick unless you know it will fuck up the opponent. Otherwise you just use the specs yourself.
Like giving choice specs to a wall can completely fuck them up because they're reliant on using some combination of a status move/recovery move/protect
Or giving specs to something like azumarill/scizor who 100% won't be running a special set
Well yeah, that was the other thing. Since Flee's just now getting into this stuff, he's not gonna know when and when not to use moves like Trick, because he doesn't know what items are typically held by which Pokémon.
13781
« on: September 19, 2016, 01:49:36 PM »
I have no idea what either of them do. And Adaptability seems great for Hyper Beam.
In thinking about it, yeah, Adaptability is better for the set you're going for. Nasty Plot is like Swords Dance for special attacks--ie. it doubles your special attack stat. Scary shit. Trick is a silly move that switches Porygon-Z's item with its opponent's, and since you're giving the defending Pokémon something like Choice Specs, it can severely cripple any Pokémon that need to use a different move every turn (Choice items lock you in to one move until you switch out). You might also get something nifty like Leftovers in return, which can be nice. I don't like it because Porygon-Z isn't the fastest Pokémon in the world, which makes it difficult to use effectively against anything that outspeeds it. It could also totally backfire, and you might get something horrible in return, like Black Sludge or another Choice item. Not to mention, by giving our opponent Specs, you're sacrificing a lot of your own attack power (and potentially giving your opponent some attack power). It's just kinda dicey.
13782
« on: September 19, 2016, 01:34:57 PM »
To be fair, Porygon Z is one of the few Pokemon that Hyper Beam is actually viable on. It's pretty badass as a revenge killer.
Time to breed a Porygon-Z I suppose. What would you suggest?
Porygon-Z @ Choice Specs
Ability: Adaptability
EVs: 252 SpA / 4 SpD / 252 Spe
Modest/Timid Nature
- Tri Attack/Hyper Beam
- Dark Pulse/Shadow Ball
- Thunderbolt/Ice Beam
- Trick
I'd say Nasty Plot > Trick, and give it a Life Orb instead. People shit themselves when Porygon gets a boost off. I always thought Trick + Choice was kinda gimmicky. I also prefer Download as an ability, but it's kinda tricky to use if you're just starting out.
13783
« on: September 19, 2016, 10:53:16 AM »
yeah but then you have to use hyper beam...
I prefer tri attack because you can use it every turn so it's a net gain in damage over 2 turns plus the chance to burn/freeze/para
hyper beam is his favorite move
13784
« on: September 19, 2016, 08:55:44 AM »
Smogon rules are well-regarded for being a much more "balanced" way to play the game which promotes team variety, especially because each of the metagame's core tiers (PU, NU, RU, UU, and OU) are based on how often a Pokémon is used, rather than how "good" a Pokémon is.
Also, Pokémon are banned only when they actually break the game, or when they promote decidedly un-competitive tactics--not just because they're a "Mythical Pokémon."
VGC is criticized for its arbitrary ban list and no team regulation whatsoever. You can put as many Pokémon to sleep as you want. Pokémon like Primal Groudon and Mega Kangaskhan run rampant on every single team, because they're that powerful. It's just a joke of a metagame when you don't have some regulation--but it's the official way to play.
13785
« on: September 19, 2016, 12:18:28 AM »
Not in recent memory, no. Maybe never.
13786
« on: September 18, 2016, 10:54:01 PM »
Going by your criteria, every single person on the planet is a huge bigot.
Not an unreasonable standard.
13787
« on: September 18, 2016, 08:55:33 PM »
Jesus fucking christ I hate Tracer with a passion.
how come seems she gets a lot of shit
13788
« on: September 18, 2016, 06:26:00 PM »
if you steal anything ever, YOU'RE the cunt, and he should be fucked in the ass in prison until dead
how about that
How did Verb figure out your password?
he's not very creative literally winona117
13789
« on: September 18, 2016, 06:19:53 PM »
if you steal anything ever, YOU'RE the cunt, and he should be fucked in the ass in prison until dead
how about that
amen
13790
« on: September 18, 2016, 06:16:22 PM »
Teen Titans Go!
13791
« on: September 18, 2016, 05:28:08 PM »
Wet implies you can get dry
lmao no it doesn't this is what we call "grasping for straws"
13792
« on: September 18, 2016, 05:17:22 PM »
A better question: is a single molecule of water wet?
I would say no. Wetness implies the existence of at least two entities--one of them being water, the other being virtually anything.
13793
« on: September 18, 2016, 05:13:34 PM »
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA
0.9... = 1
13794
« on: September 18, 2016, 05:12:30 PM »
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.
Doors can't shut. Fire isn't hot.
Wet as an adjective can only be applied to non-water entities.
Says you.
That's not an argument
Neither is "wet as an adjective can only be applied to non-water entities." That's just a claim--says you. Why should I believe you?
13795
« on: September 18, 2016, 05:09:50 PM »
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.
Doors can't shut. Fire isn't hot.
Wet as an adjective can only be applied to non-water entities.
Says you.
13796
« on: September 18, 2016, 05:08:55 PM »
I'd rather kill myself than have suicidal depression.
Now this is just in bad taste
Sounds about right, I have bad taste.
>august burns red >brand new >evanesence >five finger death punch >bring me the horizon >lamb of god >a day to remember >knuckle puck >real friends >SRV >dün I'LL SAY
13797
« on: September 18, 2016, 05:00:34 PM »
Water gives other things the property of being wet
It is not wet itself
Like how fire can't be on fire
Fire IS on fire.
13798
« on: September 18, 2016, 05:00:12 PM »
I'll do this again I don't give a fuck. It's not wet.
watch out, i have the strung-out degenerate wastoid on my side now
13799
« on: September 18, 2016, 04:55:26 PM »
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.
Doors can't shut. Fire isn't hot.
13800
« on: September 18, 2016, 04:52:40 PM »
In other news; Water: wet.
Water is not wet
Water is the wettest thing possible.
Pages: 1 ... 458459460 461462 ... 1601
|
Show Posts
