Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Flee

Pages: 1 ... 184185186 187188 ... 520
5551
Gaming / Re: I got stuck in GMOD starwarsrp...
« on: January 26, 2016, 07:45:33 AM »
I didn't even know that stuff existed on GMod.

5552
The Flood / Re: I'm hornier now than I was when I was younger
« on: January 26, 2016, 07:37:52 AM »
My kids are 3 and 1. (Feel old yet? Some of you read the post when my oldest was born)
I remember that. How are they doing?

5553
The Flood / Re: Whose avatar is the best
« on: January 26, 2016, 07:34:21 AM »
Cheesy Potato and RC have good ones.

5554
The Flood / Re: How many pillows do you sleep on?
« on: January 26, 2016, 07:33:15 AM »
Just 1, you diva.

5555
Serious / Re: Commiefornia to start seizing guns without notice next year
« on: January 26, 2016, 02:16:55 AM »
Yeah, that's one reason why gun control will never happen in America. But seriously, 300 million guns, you cant take even half of them without military action and probably hundreds of death.
Gun control and confiscation are two very different things, though. Gun control in the US already exists and works.

5556
Serious / Re: Well this is funny to me (Planned Parenthood related)
« on: January 26, 2016, 02:15:19 AM »
"It is a sad day in America when those who harvest the body parts of aborted babies escape consequences for their actions, while the courageous truth-tellers who expose their misdeeds are handed down a politically motivated indictment instead," Black said."

Just lol.

5557
The Flood / Re: fun fact
« on: January 25, 2016, 09:40:45 AM »

5558
The Flood / Re: So I misspelled sep7agon on google
« on: January 25, 2016, 08:25:29 AM »
Well will you look at this.



http://siterankdata.com/sep7agon.net

5559
The Flood / Re: No one here has a darker backstory than sol
« on: January 25, 2016, 06:33:19 AM »
Solonoid is a she?
Trans, I think, so it depends on your view.

Then again I may be completely wrong, haven't paid attention to this stuff.
I thought sol was cis gay.
Never heard about any of this before. Thought he was just a guy.

5560
The Flood / Re: No one here has a darker backstory than sol
« on: January 25, 2016, 05:59:26 AM »
Solonoid is a she?

5561
The Flood / Re: Which bumber sticker would better trigger the Berniefags?
« on: January 25, 2016, 04:21:23 AM »
B, of course. A is too general.

5562
The Flood / Re: 22 users online and no one to talk to
« on: January 25, 2016, 04:08:47 AM »
Hey now, I'm right here.

5563
Gaming / Re: This guy on Bungie wants my mythic account for Destiny
« on: January 25, 2016, 03:19:25 AM »
Seeing how a lot of these people have absolutely no problems with shelling out some dollars for a dancing emote, you might be able to make some money out of this.

5564
The Flood / Re: MAGA for Sep7
« on: January 25, 2016, 03:16:11 AM »
Lol at Turkey's.

5565
This was my first "live" update--I'm experimenting a little bit.
I liked it, you're doing very well. You've got a wide array of weapons and have a repairbox. My first real playthrough I went with a class that had a more durable starting weapon. Like you, I was unaware that weapons break in this game, which it didn't do until I made it to a certain town of blight, which is quite possibly the single worst place in the game to have that happen to you as backtracking is such a pain and because it's far enough into the game that you can't just swap out for another weapon that isn't upgraded.

But yeah, keep at it. I'd recommend you keep trying out some of the different weapons you find to discover the playstyle and weapon type you're most comfortable with. You're going to have start making some early choices soon when you run into blacksmiths and can start upgrading your weapons. At the start of the game, upgrades don't come cheap, so you definitely don't want to invest in a weapon you'll regret shortly afterwards.

Glad you're having fun. :)

5566
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 24, 2016, 11:24:42 AM »
Update #3. As much as I would like to just farm the same boss a few times and get my soul memory up to 1 million and bypass the Shrine of Winter, it just isn't feasible. I'm over 800k souls short and From designed the game in such a way that there's hardly any ascetics in this part of the game. Just have to continue normally, I suppose.

After killing the Sentinels and leveling up some more, I went back to Majula and headed for Huntsman's Corpse. Fighting the Forlorn NPC invader was one of the hardest parts yet, as NPC's don't exact follow normal combat rules (cancelling during any attack, jumping attacks that are capable of doing full 180s in mid air, poising through everything whenever they feel like it). But we won and continued onwards. I set Creighton free and cleared out the area (including the dark skeleton cave) so I could summon him for the Skeleton Kings boss fight. Easy fight, but Creighton decided to go wreck the main bosses rather than focus on the little skeletons so that I had to fight a number at once. All good though. We looted the shit out of everything in Harvest Valley, killed the lizards and took down Covetous. A very near  death experience followed when I ran up the stairs and one of the assassin's dropped down behind me with another in front. Two hits and I nearly bled out. Managed to run back, heal and take them out. I also upgraded my bow now and bought a bunch of arrows to play more of a distance game. Next off we ran by pretty much everything and fought Mytha. Easy fight as always, even though she stuck around the poison which heals her throughout the entire fight.

Current situation: just made it to the first bonfire in the Iron Keep. Mace +8, Estoc +6 and shortbow +5. Soul level 55 with 20 Vigor, 20 str, 15 dex and 15 adp. Currently trying to decide whether I should go through the Keep or go back and take on Rotten, as he should be considerably easier. I also went into offline mode to have a look at the death counter in Majula and praise the lord, because it still says 0 deaths.

So, do I go to the Keep or backtrack for Rotten?

5567
Serious / Re: "The EFIList" movie
« on: January 24, 2016, 09:34:02 AM »
I'll just be very short as this is obviously going nowhere and you still have a ton of misconceptions about me.
Quote
I just did. Some would argue it's against the primal urges of our species to allow women to have the same rights as men. Others would argue it's against the primal urges of our species not to enslave blacks. In fact, some people do argue that. So no, they're not terrible comparisons. Sorry.
Allowing two men to marry is comparable to choosing the extinction and termination of our entire species by going against what's demonstrably one of our most fundamental and primal urges? Like I said, one is something that is in no way related to our actual primal desires and basic biology and doesn't directly affect millions of people, the other is something that is absolutely not fundamental and affects the lives of millions. Not a very good comparison.

Quote
Because you're too scared/weak-minded to think for yourself on the issue, and use the majority as a safety blanket.
No, it's because your philosophy is so negligible and extreme that it won't result in anything in the near future. I've already tried making this clear. I'm not arguing against anti-natalism or its substance. I'm arguing that it isn't going to catch on. Not an argument ad populum at all.

I don't care if humanity decides to go extinct or even commit collective suicide ages after I'm already dead. What I'm saying is that anti-natalism does nothing to me and won't have any impact on my life whatsoever. Had I never joined this website, I probably wouldn't even have heard about it. And as it doesn't affect me at all, I am not worried or scared about it. For someone adhering to a philosophy which is supposedly the end all of reason and logic, I don't see how you're having such a hard time understanding that. If there was an actual movement gaining momentum to ban having children, then yeah, I'd be scared. But there isn't. And society isn't just going to turn on thousands of years of evolution and fight a primal urge just like that.

Quote
I've already preempted this exact response, so I don't see why you felt the need to beleaguer the point again, as if it was needed.
It's an illustration as to how a philosophy that has existed for nearly a millennium and had it most influential supporter back in the 1800's still has not managed to get more than a dozen notable people supporting it. And that is stretching it, like I already said, as apparently a free culture cartoonist is now considered "notable" too. It just isn't catching on, Verb. That's my point.

Quote
You've beleaguered on this point at least five or six times in this whole diatribe. The fact that it's all you have to say about the philosophy is telling.
Strange, seeing how I specifically said I wasn't going to actually discuss the philosophy. I'm only talking about how it is being perceived and why it won't become mainstream or generally accepted.

Quote
You can't. You'd have to concede that having kids is wrong, and that you'll never be able to justify impregnating your girlfriend--ever, and doing so would make you--well, no better than the average scumfuck human being (and that's pretty evil). You probably haven't even considered adoption--you probably put some kind of invisible value to your precious bloodline, or some other stupid shit like that. This fact does scare you, quite clearly--if it didn't, there wouldn't be such denial. You wouldn't be trying to assure me that you truly don't care about the philosophy. Truly, truly.
Yeah, I know, I know. I'm a scumbag because I drink alcohol, have done drugs, eat meat, enjoy certain things and actually consider having kids one day. I'm practically Hitler at this point. Still not going to debate the actual substance or merits of your philosophy with you, as I don't have the time or energy.

Quote
I mean, to be clear, you don't fear it because you see it as a threat--you fear it because of its mere existence.
Nope. As I already said, it won't catch on any time soon enough (if at all) to make an impact on my life, so I don't fear it in any way. Thinking otherwise would be completely delusional.

Quote
And it's obvious, and you make it more obvious with each and every response.
You're right. As soon as I'm done writing this, I will assume the fetal position and cry out of fear just because some people on the internet believe that having children is wrong, which does not affect me at all. The horror of it all is just too much for me to bear. Really now?

Quote
You'll find that across history, the best ideas always tend to win in the end. That's all I have left to say.
Then I'm afraid yours just might not be very good. And that's all I have left to say too. Final exam (copyright law) tomorrow and I'm gonna make some use of my free time.

5568
Serious / Re: "The EFIList" movie
« on: January 24, 2016, 08:41:41 AM »
Those are terrible comparisons. You can't equate movements that already saw a lot of success in other parts of the world or history and that pertain to topics like women voting to a movement that literally goes against one of the number one primal urges of our species. A global and absolute choice of all people to pursue the extinction of our race is in no way comparable to some of those examples that you linked. They're fundamentally different and you know that. People cared about those things because there were large groups of people who were systematically discriminated against by the establishment and who united for their cause in a way that it affected the entirety of society. As unfortunate as it might be for you, such a basis just doesn't exist for anti-natalism.

Quote
Even if you're right, simply saying that it's never going to happen doesn't make it true.
You're right. Of course, I don't know with absolute certainty that it won't be true. There's always a chance. But seeing how your philosophy is so extreme and rejected by well over 99% of all people, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that it won't become mainstream or generally accepted any time soon.

Quote
It seems like this statement is merely a trembling mantra rooted in wishful thinking. You don't WANT it to catch on--so you say it repeatedly, in hopes that it never will, because surely it never will. You're scared of it, whether you're willing to admit it or not. And that's okay, I guess, but it doesn't lend your outlook on the philosophy any credence or merit or... anything, really.
You really are missing the entire point here with those broad assumptions. I don't care if it catches on. I really don't. I know that there is no way that this philosophy will become the norm in my lifetime. Thinking otherwise and assuming that somehow, a philosophy that receives virtually no support and the vast majority of people (outside of some groups on youtube and Reddit where the same people talk to themselves on topics and videos that hardly even break a 1000 views) don't even know about will suddenly convince billions to go against one of our primal urges is pretty delusional. And that is why this doesn't scare me. Why I honestly don't give a damn whether or not it catches on. Because it doesn't affect me one bit. I will very likely have children. My girlfriend and I would like to have them some day. And I know that the same goes for millions of others. Our society is based on that and will continue that way for years to come. There is no imaginable way that anti-natalism will even make the tiniest impact for decades to come. And if it ever does, I will be long dead and will probably have lived a life with children and a family, not even caring about efilism in the slightest. It is an ideology that attracts very few people outside of the miserable ones or the outcasts. One that is too extreme and unconventional for most people to even consider. And that reality is why your philosophy doesn't scare, bother or worry me at all.

Quote
"But I've never heard of this author, and he doesn't appear to be very popular--this philosophy will never catch o--"

Sure, sure. Please, feel free to keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel better.
The fact that you linked the only actual academic book on anti-natalism that I happen to know of is kind of telling. The fact that it hasn't even received 40 reviews in a decade kind of is too. And so is the fact that most people on the references page are long dead, don't support anti-natalism for anything other than practical reasons (environment, legal wrongful births) or are more or less nobodies. Even looking at book compilation sites, I can't find more than a dozen books on anti-natalism (and that number includes general books on nihilism tying in with anti-natalism and such).

The only person who's trying to make himself feel better is you, Verb. I don't care about your philosophy. And the truth is that the incredibly vast, vast majority of people out there don't either. I mean, a few dead philosophers and a handful other notable references (which apparently include "free culture cartoonists", for what merit that holds)? A very small number of extremely obscure books and articles that no one outside of a very small group of people that care about the academics of the morality of life cares about or would ever read? I'm sorry, but that is about as far from a convincing argument as you can get. People don't care and they likely never will. Unless something major happens (drastic overpopulation that forces us to stop having children or all die, for example) which has absolutely nothing to do with the moral and ethical ideas behind anti-natalism, this won't catch on.

And I'm not saying that because I'm "scared" or because I'm trying to convince myself that a negligibly small fringe philosophy might somehow threaten me (which it doesn't). I'm saying that to be honest with you. People don't care about this. Gay marriage happened because of millions of gays that were being discriminated against. Black rights movement happened because millions of blacks were still treated as second class citizens. Women's suffrage happened because just about half the population in developed countries was denied a right. Anti-natalism won't happen because procreation is a primal drive that has shaped and directed our society, species and lives for hundreds of years, and because the only people who take issue with that make up less than a fraction of a fraction of a single percent of the global population, who are not united, have no platform to spread their ideology on to the masses and is little more than something that a handful of philosophers talk about while the rest of the world carries on carrying on, dismissing it as equally unimportant as the other thousands of philosophical and ethical questions.

I'm not here to discuss anti-natalism with you again. If anything, this is some good advice to you. Unless something directly affects a large group of people, you're not going to have it go mainstream without a much better basis. You need to step out of the shadows of obscure academic philosophic publications and people making cringe material on youtube. What you need is an actual movement. Someone eloquent and capable of spreading the message. High quality video productions going viral. Public action at schools and whatnot. Otherwise, this isn't going anywhere beyond being a fringe philosophy adhered to by a handful of "famous" people (like some lawyer trying to bank on wrongful birth and a free culture cartoonist) on wikipedia and an extremely small reddit community that hardly breaks a thousand views on videos that are considered major in their field.

5569
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 24, 2016, 06:58:19 AM »
You're above playing such a trash game.

Or maybe not :O
DS1 PVP is pretty much dead for me. I recently tried it again and managed to get 2 fights in an hour and a half. If it was still active enough for me to go and invade randoms on, I'd be back in a heart beat. But I gotta do something to hold me over until DS3 comes out.
What system are you on?

Xbox 360 is still active.
360 here too. Tried to invade in Burg, Kiln, Township and ran around the forest with the ring on for a bit. Not many results.
Forest was super active last time I played a few weeks ago.

We should duel
We should. I used to be somewhat decent at the game. Haven't really played in ages though, I'm rusty as hell.
I always wanted to host a Sep7agon tournament for Dark Souls, with real gifts for winners and such.

If enough people are interested I'd do it.
If I had the time I'd practice some and join. Gonna be a paint to put together though. Cross-Atlantic latency is pretty fucking terrible and with how the game pools its players together, you might never see the other guy's red sign.

5570
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 24, 2016, 06:09:28 AM »
Hah yeah, don't want your death run to be spoiled by the damn drop in Majula of all things
Question though, where did you get all of those ascetics? I know you come across several of them through normal play, but 30 is quite a bit. I'm trying to think of a way to get quick and easy access to a bunch of them for Rotten. This might be a pretty big issue. Not many ascetics I can get to without playing through most of the areas I'm looking to avoid.
Oh I just had them from playing through the whole game per usual on NG and NG+, and I used all of them to basically skip the entirety of NG++ to just get to the spells I wanted and then called it quites haha.

From memory there are a few spots where you spend one bonfire ascetic and then the area that's reset gives you more than one, essentially farming them. Been ages since I played so I don't remember though sorry.
Looks like I might have to actually farm some non-boss creatures too then. >_>

Or probably just play through the game normally. Even if I use the one ascetic I have easy access to and farm Rotten twice, including consuming his souls, I'll still be like 700k souls short. I guess I'll just keep on playing normally for now. If I die, I'll do a new character and do no bonfire first on NG. Stack up on a ton of souls by the end and do no death in NG+ by bypassing Shrine of Winter.

5571
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 24, 2016, 05:40:48 AM »
Hah yeah, don't want your death run to be spoiled by the damn drop in Majula of all things
Question though, where did you get all of those ascetics? I know you come across several of them through normal play, but 30 is quite a bit. I'm trying to think of a way to get quick and easy access to a bunch of them for Rotten. This might be a pretty big issue. Not many ascetics I can get to without playing through most of the areas I'm looking to avoid.

5572
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:14:48 AM »
Yeah that's true. I just found the Old Iron King easiest because I was on a miracle character, so even at those ridiculous NG tiers I was still doing decent damage with all my lightning spears
Yeah, neither are really hard bosses. I just think that Rotten is less of a risk for a no death run at least. Aside from his grab attack, none of his moves are particularly lethal and there's no real environmental hazards (the fire pits hardly do any damage). Old Iron King is easy too, but the hitboxes on some of his attacks (I'm thinking about the two handed fire punch in particular) are dodgy at best. A single mistake or poor hit registration might send me flying backwards down the hole in the arena for an instant death and RIP run.

Plus, getting to the King is also a lot more of a pain with a bunch of risks. Huntsman's Corpse with its many pitfalls, small edges and NPC invaders. Skeleton Lords with bonewheels (even though they're a really easy boss). Harvest Valley with poison, fire sorcerers, skeletons and those dark beasts? Covetous demon, the little assassin guys that can be quite dangerous, more fire sorcerers, another NPC invader and then Mytha. Iron Keep with two dozen Alonne knights, archers, lava, fire breathing minotaur heads and turtle guys. That's a lot of risk.

Rotten? Get cat ring, drop down the well a few times. Go through the gutter (only real danger are exploding mummies knocking you off or the big dog things) slowly with a torch. Down the ladder, sprint through Black Gulch after stacking some poison resistance and there you go. Still plenty of places where things can go wrong, but it's a lot shorter and there's no prior bosses as opposed to three for the King.

I just have to make sure I can survive the falls. I'll probably try it another account with equal HP first, no equipment other than the cat ring.

5573
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:46:18 AM »
The easiest way I found to farm souls for the Shrine of Winter door is to just get up to the Old Iron King and then farm him with ascetics. He's easy as fuck and there's only one enemy between you and him if you get the closest bonfire.

I got him to NG+ 21 because I wanted to breeze through from NG to NG++ to buy the spells from Wellager and 100% the game
I might do that, actually. I think I'd go down to the Rotten rather than the Old Iron King, though. They give pretty much identical souls (Rotten slightly less), but Iron Keep is a pain in SoTFS. Drop down the well, get through Blighttown 2.0 and farm rotten a bunch. I'd just need some bonfire ascetics because I doubt I have very many. Thing is that I also want to keep my soul memory pretty low and keep this character primarily for PVP. I'm gonna get the agape ring in due time to make sure I don't up there too high. Probably gonna wanna stick at a soul memory of like 2M.

5574
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:38:17 AM »
The easiest way I found to farm souls for the Shrine of Winter door is to just get up to the Old Iron King and then farm him with ascetics. He's easy as fuck and there's only one enemy between you and him if you get the closest bonfire.

I got him to NG+ 21 because I wanted to breeze through from NG to NG++ to buy the spells from Wellager and 100% the game

Iron King is the easiest route to take. But he's punishing if you slip up even once. That fucking hole in the arena I swear.
What about Rotten? I always thought he was the easiest boss out of the main 4.

5575
Serious / Re: "The EFIList" movie
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:33:45 AM »
You people really need to find someone who knows what they're doing to get your philosophy and message across.
Nothing and nobody will ever make this movement appealing to a large amount of people. That's just the truth.
That's true. This is never going to become mainstream. It goes against our most basic urges of procreation and will be easily dismissed by a majority of people who look at their own lives and those of others before deciding that, in the end, life is well worth living. Anti-natilism is never going to work or catch on. The best shot the philosophy had was years or centuries ago back when life was pretty much objectively crap for almost everyone. But now and especially in the (near) future? Poverty rates are falling, crime is at historical lows, the general quality of life is improving, science and medicine are ever progressing and so forth. From what I can tell, the philosophy is one that thrives of what's essentially misery. It seems to appeal the most to severely disgruntled people, social outcasts and those who had some very bad things happen to them.

And that's kind of what I meant earlier with the movement having such little appeal to them. I know that all that should count is the message and not the people bringing it or the way it is being brought. But that's not how the world works. Those things really do matter and it surprises me that a philosophy so bent on educating others about its merits (going as far as stating that it's one of the primary reasons they continue living life) don't get that. From an outsider's point of view, the group has done an awful job at presenting itself. The term "efilism" does not exist outside of reddit and urban dictionary, lacking even a wikipedia page. There is no production value or organized message. There is no particularly eloquent person to get the message out there. There's the extremely long and rather incoherent ramblings from a seemingly depressed old guy who sort of looks like he hasn't had a hair cut or a bath in in ages, set against the backdrop of a dark and messy (borderline hoarding) house. There's videos that wouldn't be out of place in a cringe thread made by a very obese trans person who seemingly has pretty serious social issues and thinks that dressing up as an elephant and slathering herself in juice when screaming about her dead elephant parents is a good way to get the point across. There's an assortment of what's essentially shock videos made by people who don't speak on camera but think that putting images of war next to the bold words of "YOUR CHILDREN WILL SUFFER AND DIE" is going to do the trick. But that's about it.

It's never going to work or catch on, but I don't see them trying very hard (or rather, effectively) either.

5576
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 23, 2016, 04:30:39 PM »
You're above playing such a trash game.

Or maybe not :O
DS1 PVP is pretty much dead for me. I recently tried it again and managed to get 2 fights in an hour and a half. If it was still active enough for me to go and invade randoms on, I'd be back in a heart beat. But I gotta do something to hold me over until DS3 comes out.
What system are you on?

Xbox 360 is still active.
360 here too. Tried to invade in Burg, Kiln, Township and ran around the forest with the ring on for a bit. Not many results.
Forest was super active last time I played a few weeks ago.

We should duel
We should. I used to be somewhat decent at the game. Haven't really played in ages though, I'm rusty as hell.

5577
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 23, 2016, 04:29:46 PM »
Sentinels got fucked. Upgraded both the mace and estoc to +6, which is the highest they can go without titanite chunks. Currently at level 45 with 15 vigor, 20 str, 15 dex and 16 adaptability. 100k soul memory and 0 deaths. Pursuer, Last Giant, Ruin Sentinels and Dragonrider down after an hour and a half of game time. Done playing for the day but I might farm a bit tomorrow to get my vigor up to 20 before continuing on. I guess I'll make my way through the Lost Bastille and see if we can take on Lost Sinner.

So yeah, give all the advice you can, especially when it comes to routing and whatnot.

5578
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 23, 2016, 04:14:07 PM »
Oh and being cursed doesn't count as a death, right?

5579
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 23, 2016, 04:08:07 PM »
BUT WAIT! No need to despair just yet. Just for you guys, I got back to the same point I was at before. More or less the same strategy, even though I saved time now by focusing only on the mace. Full tseldora, level 35, 18 strength and a mace +6. Just about ready to go at the Sentinels again.

Place your bets. >_>

5580
Gaming / Re: Dark Souls 2 No Death / No Bonfire
« on: January 23, 2016, 03:37:58 PM »
Well, RIP run. Whirlwind attack OP. Strange, because I normally rare die to Sentinels.

Pages: 1 ... 184185186 187188 ... 520