This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Flee
Pages: 1 ... 167168169 170171 ... 520
5041
« on: April 07, 2016, 11:34:31 AM »
Heads up, there's another Hoopa event.
Code: HOOPA2016
It's apparently only for Europe.
5042
« on: April 07, 2016, 09:59:46 AM »
Does anyone else just not use any of the req stuff in Warzone? In all of the time I played it, I think I've spawned like one sniper rifle and a single vehicle to see what it's like coming out of the garage.
5043
« on: April 07, 2016, 08:49:08 AM »
And there seems to be no quick and easy way for me to print posts and pages. Surely a glitch as well.
5044
« on: April 07, 2016, 08:18:01 AM »
Spoiler How do I get the Moonlight greatsword from Seath? I got him to down to almost dead by only damaging his rear tail, but it didn't break off. Do I have to be hitting the very tip or something?
Spoiler You have to be hitting the end of the middle tail. Seath has three tails, so make sure you're targeting the middle one. The easiest way to accomplish this is at the very start of the fight. Enter the boss arena and just run right past him to the crystal that needs to be destroyed before you can damage him. Wait there until Seath starts an attack of his own. As soon as he does, run for his back. His own attack will break the crystal and he'll temporarily be stunned because of it. If you high enough DPS output (I think the tail needs like 500 damage to come off) and attack the tip of the correct tail, you should be able to get it right there at the very start of the fight.
5045
« on: April 07, 2016, 07:17:32 AM »
You have some balls, coming here and talking about Destiny like that. I'd help you if I played or even owned the game still.
5046
« on: April 07, 2016, 04:32:57 AM »
And we're back. Gargoyles next?
Spoiler Speaking of them. Are they usually so easy?
How do you mean? And you might want to spoiler what you say in case Verb lied about beating the game for his ruse.
Spoiler The Gargoyles were probably the easiest boss in DS2 for me (although Nashandra comes close). I didnt even die to them, and I fucking suck at the game...I died to bloody Jabba the Hutt for christ sake
Spoiler Well, Verb is playing Dark Souls 1 so the gargoyles there are somewhat different from the ones you face in DS2. In DS1 they're the first boss you face that doesn't have some sort of trick to beat it easily (Asylum Demon and Taurus both have a place where you can easily plunge attack them from for a lot of easy and safe damage, and Taurus has 3 lightning resins right before the boss that he's very weak to). They're not that hard if you know what you're doing, have a decently upgraded weapon and go after the first one's tail immediately, but they can really be a challenge for new players.
I didn't think the gargoyles in DS2 were that hard either, but the fact that they're an optional boss and that you encounter them later in the game does contribute to that. They only become a major challenge if you're on a low DPS build and don't manage to take down the individual gargoyles fast enough. If you don't deal enough damage, it's easy for them to overwhelm you as more of them start appearing.
5047
« on: April 07, 2016, 04:15:07 AM »
And we're back. Gargoyles next?
Speaking of them. Are they usually so easy?
How do you mean? And you might want to spoiler what you say in case Verb lied about beating the game for his ruse.
5048
« on: April 07, 2016, 03:58:41 AM »
5049
« on: April 06, 2016, 11:58:22 AM »
A weeb game for your gf.
She was actually talking about that earlier. Apparently some weeb game has been out in Europe for a weeks already without her knowing, while it isn't coming out in the US for another week or two.
What game?
Don't remember. I figured you might know it from that vague description. It's pretty popular, I believe.
I don't really keep up with games much, do you at least know the series?
I checked and it's Bravely Second (sequel to Bravely Default). Its European release was in February this year while it doesn't launch in the US until April 16th.
5050
« on: April 06, 2016, 11:41:27 AM »
So you did actually beat it? I was kind of expecting this to turn into a prank. Even more so, I was hoping that it would then turn into "I just haven't gotten around playing it but I'll start the updates again next week" sorta deal. So many fun parts of the game I'd like to hear your tales of.
5051
« on: April 06, 2016, 11:40:09 AM »
A weeb game for your gf.
She was actually talking about that earlier. Apparently some weeb game has been out in Europe for a weeks already without her knowing, while it isn't coming out in the US for another week or two.
What game?
Don't remember. I figured you might know it from that vague description. It's pretty popular, I believe.
5052
« on: April 06, 2016, 10:57:54 AM »
A weeb game for your gf.
She was actually talking about that earlier. Apparently some weeb game has been out in Europe for a weeks already without her knowing, while it isn't coming out in the US for another week or two.
Your girlfriend is a weeb?
I'm alone
I'm completely alone in this fight
Nah man, she just likes a few games like Bravely Default. She's not into anime or weeb culture at all. Still fighting the good fight.
5053
« on: April 06, 2016, 10:47:30 AM »
A weeb game for your gf.
She was actually talking about that earlier. Apparently some weeb game has been out in Europe for a weeks already without her knowing, while it isn't coming out in the US for another week or two.
5054
« on: April 06, 2016, 09:39:09 AM »
5055
« on: April 06, 2016, 09:36:31 AM »
Long story short, I received a $100 Amazon gift card last year. After redeeming it, I discovered that this credit does not transfer to European Amazon locations (amazon.fr, amazon.co.uk, amazon.de...), meaning that I can only use the money on the American Amazon store. Because shipping from the US to EU is either not an option for most products and the additional shipping / potential custom costs almost not even make it worth it, I haven't spend any of it yet. As an American I know will be coming over to Belgium next week, this may just be a great opportunity for me to have some stuff delivered at their place in the US so that they can be brought over here. Problem is, I don't really need anything or have a specific purpose in mind so any help would obviously be appreciated.
tl;dr, I want to spend $100 on Amazon by tomorrow and don't know what. Suggestions and links are welcome.
Eurotrash cunt.
Love you too bae. <3
5056
« on: April 06, 2016, 09:32:12 AM »
Long story short, I received a $100 Amazon gift card last year. After redeeming it, I discovered that this credit does not transfer to European Amazon locations (amazon.fr, amazon.co.uk, amazon.de...), meaning that I can only use the money on the American Amazon store. Because shipping from the US to EU is either not an option for most products and the additional shipping / potential custom costs almost not even make it worth it, I haven't spend any of it yet. As an American I know will be coming over to Belgium next week, this may just be a great opportunity for me to have some stuff delivered at their place in the US so that they can be brought over here. Problem is, I don't really need anything or have a specific purpose in mind so any help would obviously be appreciated.
tl;dr, I want to spend $100 on Amazon by tomorrow and don't know what. Suggestions and links are welcome.
5057
« on: April 06, 2016, 05:14:36 AM »
I'm pretty sure I have what some people call a "problem".
Liking anime is definitely something most people consider a problem.
5058
« on: April 06, 2016, 05:13:33 AM »
Gaara is my best friend
Hurting my feelings there man.
5059
« on: April 06, 2016, 04:30:29 AM »
That being said, it of course needs to reminded that considering gun ownership a fundamental, basic and core human right deserving constitutional recognition is preposterous and that the second amendment should be repealed as soon as possible.
HAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
No.
It's only a matter of time, my friend. Just give in already and vote for Hillary.
Why would we want to give Bush a fifth term tho?
Hm, how about Gary Johnson 2016?
5060
« on: April 06, 2016, 03:01:30 AM »
That being said, it of course needs to reminded that considering gun ownership a fundamental, basic and core human right deserving constitutional recognition is preposterous and that the second amendment should be repealed as soon as possible.
HAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
No.
It's only a matter of time, my friend. Just give in already and vote for Hillary.
5061
« on: April 05, 2016, 10:17:01 AM »
preposterous*
Fuck, I was already doubting myself there.
5062
« on: April 05, 2016, 09:38:14 AM »
It's a stupid argument to make a valid point.
The American founding fathers understandably and forgivably could not account for the later changes in weaponry. The second amendment clearly makes mention of 'arms', meaning all firearms and guns, without limiting itself to muskets or pistols. The mere fact that guns these days have higher rates of fire, pack more of a punch and are more accurate does not change that. While seeing little actual use or private ownership, more technically sophisticated firearms existed even back then and were covered under the amendment just the same. To suggest or assume that the drafters of the American bill or rights did not intend to cover future developments of firearms rather than providing a general 'right to bear arms' is therefore incorrect.
Additionally, this flawed argument could be used in an attempt to invalidate pretty much any other right. Does the right to free speech not extent to the internet, phone calls, fax, text messages or modern media in general because none of those things existed back in the 1700s? Does the American 4th amendment not apply to cyberspace, emails, servers or other situations that were unthinkable back then? Even the freedoms envisaged by the great men of the Council of Europe (praise be) in the infallible and brilliant European Convention of Human Rights have required judicial interpretation to continuously account for developments (the internet, medical and scientific advancements, gay rights...) that weren't foreseen in 1950. To imply that any right in any constitution, treaty or convention strictly and exclusively applies to the situation, knowledge and scientific standards as of the time of its conception is preposterous.
But however flawed the argument, it does have a decent and valid underlying point. Society does change. Things that were entirely inconceivable decades or centuries ago now do exist. They affect our daily lives and change the society we live in, for better or for worse. To ignore this and suggest that just because something came from a certain authority a few hundred years ago and worked back then, it should remain unchanged and apply equally to our current situation is not always the right call either. There were suggestions among the founding fathers to evaluate and renew the constitution every 20 years and one of them, Thomas Jefferson, even said that "laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors." Guns have become significantly more lethal and are a major cause of death and instrument of crime in the US. To advocate that this should at least be considered and accounted for when discussing and evaluating the second amendment in your current society is absolutely not foolish and does serve a genuine and valid purpose.
That being said, it of course needs to reminded that considering gun ownership a fundamental, basic and core human right deserving constitutional recognition is preposterous and that the second amendment should be repealed as soon as possible. HILLARY 2016, MAKE IT HAPPEN.
5063
« on: April 04, 2016, 02:56:43 PM »
Give it time and trans men will be next. I can already feel it, even though we're largely ignored inside and outside of the community as it is.
I don't get why you think this. Most day to day people don't really care if a girl wants to be a guy, but flip it around and everyone loses their minds.
I hear trans women say all the time that trans men have it easier like that's some sort of justification for pretending we don't exist and it's really annoying.
What?
I never said that.
I wasn't talking about you in particular.
oh okay, sorry if it came off that way
Basically it boils down to "trans men have it easier because they have male privilege and don't get murdered as often"
Kind of makes my blood boil.
Murdered...? What do you mean?
Read the news. Gays and Trans people are targeted and killed for what they are.
Specifically talking about Trans people though, is there are any good research to support that claim and that trans people are disproportionately targeted when it comes to homicides?
I'll have to see later if I can find that, but yeah. It's not a very large population but in places like Brazil especially, trans people are definitely targeted. Also there's a pretty nasty track record of a lot of these homicides being rather gruesome and...over the top.
Ah good, I'd like to see that. I don't know that much about this, but I never saw much evidence that trans people are so disproportionately targeted in murder cases. I thought the statistics suggested otherwise, but might be wrong.
5064
« on: April 04, 2016, 12:56:48 PM »
"My main reason to vote Trump is to see the looks on your faces", "Social justice warriors" and "Tumblr bitch-fests"? Yeah, I'm gonna call doubt on this being a genuine 50 year old professor. Regardless of whether I or anyone agrees with him, this just comes across as petty and immature. And for that, I hope this is fake and that this man is not a college level eduvator.
5065
« on: April 04, 2016, 10:59:57 AM »
First time flying by myself. Agent at the gate accidentally rips my passport and tells me he has never seen anything like that happen in the 30 years he's worked there. Every single encounter with airport, security or customs people for the next 4 flights of my trip (Belgium - Montana) took at least an hour and involved me being held aside while people called Brussels police and the airline to validate everything. Missed 2 flights because of it and ended up almost being dumped in downtown Denver at 3:30am in the middle of the winter by an unwilling shuttle driver. God bless the USA.
Also had to spend the night at a desolate airport in Kenya because the plane's radar system randomly broke down right before take-off, and turn back mid-flight coming out of Italy as the plane was spraying oil everywhere and the pilot didn't think we could clear the Alps, after which he made the exceptionally dry comment "the plane does not appear to work anymore".
I doubt anyone can beat those.
5066
« on: April 04, 2016, 08:12:33 AM »
I was expecting this to be about Senegal's Independence Day.
5067
« on: April 04, 2016, 06:38:55 AM »
Give it time and trans men will be next. I can already feel it, even though we're largely ignored inside and outside of the community as it is.
I don't get why you think this. Most day to day people don't really care if a girl wants to be a guy, but flip it around and everyone loses their minds.
I hear trans women say all the time that trans men have it easier like that's some sort of justification for pretending we don't exist and it's really annoying.
What?
I never said that.
I wasn't talking about you in particular.
oh okay, sorry if it came off that way
Basically it boils down to "trans men have it easier because they have male privilege and don't get murdered as often"
Kind of makes my blood boil.
Murdered...? What do you mean?
Read the news. Gays and Trans people are targeted and killed for what they are.
Specifically talking about Trans people though, is there are any good research to support that claim and that trans people are disproportionately targeted when it comes to homicides?
5068
« on: April 04, 2016, 05:46:46 AM »
Octagon.net was always better.
5069
« on: April 04, 2016, 05:04:38 AM »
The fucking issue if you would read the thread is that even women who pass the enlistment test, fully competent, STILL aren't allowed in
But isn't the article about the enlistment tests and competency standards being lowered?
5070
« on: April 03, 2016, 04:32:00 AM »
Is that not the entire point of laws in a liberal republic?
I've never seen a more self fulfilling prophecy than the social conservatives freaking out and passing these bills under the auspices of protecting their religious freedom when in reality it's just discriminating against people or beliefs they don't particularly feel comfortable with.
What happened to that one small line in the Deceleration of Independence people love to champion. The whole "All men are created equal" thing?
Also, can you elaborate on your liberal comment in an earlier post? I wanted to know what you meant.
They were equal until they decided that they want to be a special snowflake.
What is that even supposed to mean?
Pages: 1 ... 167168169 170171 ... 520
|
Show Posts
