4261
The Flood / Re: EURO 2016/Copa America: The Final is set, Argentina vs Chile
« on: June 26, 2016, 02:30:27 PM »
Already 1 goal ahead 9 minutes into the game. Go Belgium go.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 4261
The Flood / Re: EURO 2016/Copa America: The Final is set, Argentina vs Chile« on: June 26, 2016, 02:30:27 PM »
Already 1 goal ahead 9 minutes into the game. Go Belgium go.
4262
The Flood / Re: What are you doing ATM« on: June 26, 2016, 11:53:59 AM »It's short lived, but not too bad while it's lasting. Playing through the Master Chief Collection with the girlfriend.Not wearing pants, eating cereal, posting on the interwebs and playing some Halo.literally me five years ago 4263
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 26, 2016, 04:48:43 AM »For what it's worth, I never signed. I shared the petition around on here because I support it, but I'm not going to vote in it. That being said, even if it's only one third British signatures, the petition is up to 3 million votes now. That's still a million Britons or 10 times the required amount for Parliament to give a response. I don't think it's going anywhere, but I appreciate the sentiment. 4264
The Flood / Re: What are you doing ATM« on: June 26, 2016, 04:34:21 AM »
Not wearing pants, eating cereal, posting on the interwebs and playing some Halo.
Living the post-exam life. 4265
The Flood / Re: if we leave europe i will record myself off my nut on ecstasy dancing to this« on: June 26, 2016, 04:19:13 AM »
BREAKING: The Leave Campaign's 5 BIGGEST LIES finally REVEALED:
1. Voting Leave will give us 350 million pounds a week to be spent on the NHS. 2. If you don't vote Leave, there will 80 million Turks standing at our doorstep looking for benefits and a EU army assimilating that of Britain. 3. Voting Leave will get rid of all the EU-imposed rules and bureaucracy. 4. Voting Leave will stop mass immigration. 5. Voting Leave will result in Meta Cognition dancing, and I quote, "off his nut on ecstasy" to Omen by The Prodigy. How can you British folk even stand for this madness and deceit? 4266
Gaming / Re: I barely won my first match on Quake Live« on: June 25, 2016, 06:12:14 PM »Best way to learn how to play is do the Training Center tutorials. It teaches you the basics of combat and movement, both of which are obviously pretty important. As for actual resources, I'd recommend the following guides. Not sure how familiar you are with the Quake series as a whole, but it has an extremely steep learning curve so the following might help.Ahh, I was hoping to learn how to play by beating the "campaign."Yeah, that was never intended. Quake Live was supposed to be nothing but a standalone updated version of Quake 3 Arena's multiplayer, and that's exactly what it is now. Just with more maps, gamemodes and content.Last time I played a bot on Quake Live I went 52-0 against a CPU on the highest difficulty.Let me practice I'll improve you'll see, (I'm sad to see that they didn't add the Quake "campaign") http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=315482318 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=315321941 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-jumMdn1VE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofX9_r9dFZQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y9MwWn5x6Q 4267
Gaming / Re: I barely won my first match on Quake Live« on: June 25, 2016, 05:59:32 PM »Yeah, that was never intended. Quake Live was supposed to be nothing but a standalone updated version of Quake 3 Arena's multiplayer, and that's exactly what it is now. Just with more maps, gamemodes and content.Last time I played a bot on Quake Live I went 52-0 against a CPU on the highest difficulty.Let me practice I'll improve you'll see, (I'm sad to see that they didn't add the Quake "campaign") 4268
Gaming / Re: I barely won my first match on Quake Live« on: June 25, 2016, 04:32:48 PM »
Last time I played a bot on Quake Live I went 52-0 against a CPU on the highest difficulty.
You sure you still want to take me on? :p 4269
The Flood / Re: How does your intelligence fare against a Swede's?« on: June 25, 2016, 03:38:05 PM »How many days will it take for the task to be completed in 4 days?Uhm. 4270
Serious / Re: . . . and today EU unveils its plans for military« on: June 25, 2016, 03:35:23 PM »
Curious to see what it's going to end up being.
4271
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 25, 2016, 02:05:33 PM »Oh yeah, I fully understand that. I'll get back to the rest of your post in a bit.Although, to be fair to you, I probably do find it easier to cosy up to less desirable types if I think the cause is worth it. If only because I'm cynical and pessimistic about the state of society as a whole. 4272
Serious / Re: Farage didn't break his promise on the NHS« on: June 25, 2016, 02:00:48 PM »It's slightly misleading, not going to deny that, but I wouldn't go as far as to categorise it as a "blatant lie."Claiming you're going to spend an extra 350 million pounds on the NHS every single week when you know you're not going going to be able to is a blatant lie. Calling it "slightly misleading" is a major understatement. Quote IIRC we're still expending more money than we're getting back, rebates and other economic jargon included.That is of course not counting the other non-quantifiable economic benefits the UK currently receives from being part of the EU's common market. The point is that promising hundreds of millions of pounds a week to go to the NHS is simply facetious. Leaving the EU doesn't come close to freeing up that kind of money and the suggestion that literally every single penny would go exclusively to the NHS is bullshit. As far as I'm aware, the budget and funding of the NHS has always been a pretty contentious issue in the UK. Now unless I'm mistaken, even the most pro-Brexit economic analyses only predict the UK to benefit from leaving on a long term. So to suggest that the Leave campaign promising that at a time where even pro-Brexit economists say it is going through economic hardships, the UK will somehow get billions of extra pounds a year to spend on the contentious budget of its health care system out of leaving the EU is nothing but "slightly misleading" is incredibly facetious. Meta is right in saying this shouldn't be pinned on Farage the way some people are doing. But as for the Leave campaign as a whole, I'd call this a pretty significant lie. Quote And a little tip, would appreciate a cut down on your posts. Gets pretty tedious having to sift through paragraph after paragraph of repeated points you've said in previous threads.Better? 4273
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 25, 2016, 12:31:08 PM »We are going to crash and burn. Not because we've left, but because we're too dumb to shut up and get on with what's necessary. And the worst part is we probably deserve it.Gotta be honest, but I could've told you that. And I have been saying it for a while. This referendum has been wrong since the very start. In Britain, you can't have a legally binding referendum. But that is not the way this was treated. Not once have I seen people on either side make clear that this was supposed to be nothing but advisory. There were only two ways this would've ended well. One, to put it out there beyond any reasonable doubt that the outcome would not be binding. That the referendum would be entirely advisory as a way to gage the public's opinion and perception of the UK's membership of the Union. Nothing more. The referendum should've been a way for political parties, the UK parliament and the British government to get insight in the issue and go from there. Or two, that the referendum would be more than just an advisory poll, but only when certain conditons were met. A certain voter turnout, first, and then a significant majority (60%, perhaps?) for one side to be required for this to actually be used as a guideline for the government to avoid complete division like this. But no one spoke out. Not even when poll after poll revealed that no matter what the outcome would be, it would be incredibly close and no considerable support would exist for either option. And that was a fatal mistake for the country. Because now you have two pretty much even groups disagreeing on a very important issue. Leave won, but only with a 52% majority, making it so that effectively half the entire country is adamant in its support of the complete opposite and wants something entirely different. So now, you have two extremely divided groups. Leave, which is still divided among its own people, is now gloating and victoriously prancing around thinking they've got it all because they ended up 1.9% of the votes above the halfway mark. And Remain, which is just about half the population that wants anything but out of the EU, is now trying to still get their hands on whatever they can. It's licking its wounds, left alone with the painful and unfair feeling of how a significant portion of their future, prosperity and opportunities is being abandoned by an absolutely marginal majority. And this is tearing your country apart. And what I think is just as worse is that it's the Leave campaign that won. Not that these unrests wouldn't still exist if Remain won by 52%, but Leave is a much worse choice. And I'm not saying that because I want the UK to stay or because I condone the fearmongering and shitty campaigning from Remain. I'm saying that because the Leave campaign is downright terrible. And that doesn't mean that all of the arguments of people voting Out are terrible or that every leave voter is a moron, because they really are not and there are plenty of valid complaints with the Union. But it means that Leave thrives on anti-intellectualism. More so than Remain, it is incredibly populist. When Leave leaders openly and publicly announced that they've had enough of experts, it was clear how doomed they were. Because fuck the intelligent with prestigious degrees, titles and achievements. Screw the esteemed authorities with decades of experience in their respective fields. Down with the men and women who actually know what they're talking about and have a thorough understanding of these complex and important issues. "The people" will undoubtedly know best. Let them have the illusion of control and focus their grievances not on what actually matters, but have them take out their anger on the faceless Brussels elitist bureaucrats. As the Financial Times put it, they have now succeeded in swapping the one distant and unreachable elite with another one. Don't educate with facts or research, but hammer with endless propaganda, lies and misinformation. And that isn't going to change now that they've won. You're an intelligent person and have some sound grievances against the EU. But you voted not for the party that'll do anything about it. This goes well beyond Union membership. Your intentions may be good, but you inadvertently voted for anti-intellectualism. Leave winning is not just a slap in the face of the EU. It's a slap in the face of some of the things I have admired the most about your country. And that country is more divided than ever. And now, the people in charge are not the ones who look to reason, facts and research. They're the ones who praise populism, anti-intellectualism and misinformation carried on the backs of the uneducated and gullible. Your intentions and reasons for voting Leave may have been good and sound, but your vote was nothing but a drop in an ocean of "Make Britain Great Again", "out with immigrants" and "undemocratic European tyrants rule Britain" drivel. And those people are now in control. Everybody knew that the UK was entirely capable of existing outside of the EU. But simply being outside of the EU and being ran by lying populists riding on the backs of the naive and uneducated using Brexit as a mere platform to push their stupid rhetoric even further? They're two very different things. And honestly, that's what worries me the most. Not that the UK is leaving. But that this is becoming the new standard in a lot of places. That facts, logic and reason do nothing when faced with empty promises, baseless lies and endless streams of propaganda aimed at the most gullible in our society. And all jokes and banter aside, this genuinely frightens me and has me legitimately worried about the UK and even the rest of Europe. 4274
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 25, 2016, 11:37:53 AM »At this point I just feel sorry for anyone who has career plans involving the NHS or EU related get-ups, and immigrants who are forced to go balls to the wall.Virtually all positions at the EU require ihe people it employs to be a EU citizen. For the European Commission alone, this means that close to 1,500 Britons working there are almost guaranteed to get the boot unless something extraordinary is negotiated here. And that's just counting the Commission, not even considering all the other EU institutions and programmes with similar requirements. So unless all of these rules would be changed, Brexit basically destroyed the prospect for any Britons to be permanently employed at any EU institution. 4275
The Flood / Re: Yay I passed uni« on: June 25, 2016, 11:29:20 AM »Same here. Out of my entire graduating class for the Master's in law, only around 20% of people got a distinction / cum laude, which is getting a 70% here.well whether you'll believe me or not, my own tutors haven't seen anything higher than an 80 either70 is very good herethat article is full of inaccuracies 4276
The Flood / Re: Yay I passed uni« on: June 25, 2016, 11:27:36 AM »Yeah, it's completely different here.I can only speak for my university and ones I know about buthow do grades work then?Lol, and the Europoort say the the US has it too easy.that's a passing grade???50%-60%.I still have no clue what that means.What's a 2:2? I'll be receiving my grades next week. 0-49% = fail. 50-60% = satisfactory pass. 60-70% = good. 70-80% = great (distinction, cum laude). 80-90% = amazing (high distinction, magna cum laude). 90+% = practically unachievable (highest distinction, summa cum laude). 65% might not sound like a lot, but when the class has a 40% pass rate and an average score of 52%, it means you did a good job. 4277
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 25, 2016, 10:12:46 AM »help Quote Following the United Kingdom's shock decision to leave the European Union after yesterday's referendum, hopes by Leave supporters for the swift establishment of new trade relations with China might prove to be nothing more than hot air. Quote China Daily reports an estimate doing the rounds is that it will require 500 British negotiators and 10 years before any such deal could materialize, suggesting that the economic case for a Leave vote was never as strong as its advocates had claimed. Quote Chinese investors are also said to be concerned for their interests in the UK, as many chose to base their European operations in Britain to take advantage of the friendlier business climate and access to the 28-nation free market. Welp. 4278
The Flood / Re: Yay I passed uni« on: June 25, 2016, 06:51:28 AM »Yeah, it's all relative. Gotta take into account averages and such. Like, for some of the classes I took this year, a considerable number of people failed or struggled. The class average was 60%, so people scoring a 75% had actually done incredibly well and got a great grade. But if you'd just compare that number to some other class in the US, people would scoff at a 75% and consider it very low by they standards, which are completely different because they're graded so much easier and have a class average of a B+ in the 80% range.Well, I heard their way of teaching is easy or rather shit, but grades aren't the easiest things. But this is from my american friend who's a dumbass.I've always heard education was easy in the US.Heard the opposite tbhLol, and the Europoort say the the US has it too easy.that's a passing grade???50%-60%.I still have no clue what that means.What's a 2:2? I'll be receiving my grades next week. The main difference appears to be that over here, your exams and classes are drafted in such a way that 50-60% is acceptable, 60-70% is good and anything over 75% is amazing. In the US, I'm getting the impression that it's a lot easier to get these high grades, making an 80% just average and requiring you to score a 95% to be considered great. Doesn't mean that one is any easier or better than the other, but just means that you can't just compare percentages when one place drafts its exams in such a way that their 75% is an average pass while others put that at 50%. 4279
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 25, 2016, 06:23:04 AM »
So British stocks lost £125 billion in the first day after Brexit, which is more than it contributed in 15 years to the EU in membership fees. Let's hope it'll recover some of it soon.
http://qz.com/715845/british-stocks-lost-125-billion-after-brexit-or-15-years-worth-of-eu-contributions/ 4280
The Flood / Re: Yay I passed uni« on: June 25, 2016, 06:21:32 AM »I've always heard education was easy in the US.Heard the opposite tbhLol, and the Europoort say the the US has it too easy.that's a passing grade???50%-60%.I still have no clue what that means.What's a 2:2? I'll be receiving my grades next week. 4281
Serious / Re: Farage didn't break his promise on the NHS« on: June 25, 2016, 04:30:10 AM »You don't see how "hey guys, we lose 350 million pounds to the EU every single week, so vote Leave, and we'll use all that money to fund the NHS!" is now a blatant lie?Never thought that to begin with. Point is that it was a blatant Leave campaign lie which is now becoming obvious after having duped thousands into it. It's a shame that this debate ended up like this, albeit predictable. Besides, as arguably the most publicised Leave campaigner, Farage is equally complicit in this for lacking the courage to address blatant lies but condoning the talking points of the largest Leave group in the UK.Exactly how is it a lie? It's our money to spend as we choose once we secede. It might've been presented in a glamorised fashion but the fundamental idea is still there. 1. There is no 350 million pounds a week lost to the EU. That is a vast exaggeration that does not take into account rebates and Union funding. The real figure of membership fees sent to the Union was only around a 3rd of this incorrect claim. 2. Saying that all of this money will now go to the NHS is equally proposterous. Nige already debunked that not even 2 hours after the results were in. And to argue that it wasn't a lie because he personally didn't say it is pretty facetious. Farage, even more so than Johnson, has been the prominent Leave politician. You and I both know that not a single voter differentiates between these Leave campaign factions. None of them make the distinction between Vote Leave and Leave EU. Both work together, cooperated and campaigned jointly, making little to no distinction between the two of them. To now claim that "oh yeah, but it was the OTHER Leave faction who said this, not me so can't accuse me of lying" after deliberately and knowingly condoning these talking points for weeks is despicable. I've never been the biggest fan of Juncker, but at least the man has the balls to come out the day before the referendum and say that he doesn't see there being a better deal for the UK when those claims are being made by Remainers. It's something populist cowards like Farage could take an example of. Leave said there would be hundreds of millions a week that they'd spend directly on the NHS. It's probably the main reason that drove tens of thousands of elderly, sick, caretakers or people employed in the health care sector to vote Leave. Now, we see the reluctant admittance that there's absolutely no intention of spending all of that money "saved" on the NHS. It's a blatant lie for the sole purpose of misleading gullible people into voting for them. They'll let it calm down first, of course, and hope the people will forget (which they will). And in a few months or years, the people who were led to believe that there would be an additional hundreds of millions of pounds going directly to the NHS every single week will likely be left in the cold, as the amount of money saved has been exaggerated and won't all be going to the NHS. 4282
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 25, 2016, 04:08:26 AM »wait so what does this mean for research that involved EU countries with britain? would this delay scientists until they figure out what to do with the contracts and such or reduce some aspects?That's all unclear at this point, but I assume the status quo will be retained for quite a while. Once the UK formally decides to leave the EU, a period of negotiations is started to settle the terms of the separation with the Union. Until then, everything stays the same (in theory, at least, because it's unlikely that the EU is as enthusiastic in dealing with Britain now as it was before). In the end, it will likely be bad (whether it'll be moderately bad or really bad remains to be seen) for UK research and higher education. A large portion of UK academic and scientific research is funded by the EU and Union institutions along with Commission groups are involved in literally thousands of research projects. It's very likely that Brexit will harm the competitiveness of British universities and lower its currently very good standing when it comes to scientific and academic research, as it has really bloomed because of EU coordination in that area (I believe around 50% of all higher British research now involved international cooperation with other EU authors in different countries and universities). There's a reason why British universities, researchers and scientists almost unanimously spoke out against Brexit. It's another reason why I'm concerned for the country, as populism and anti-intellectualism are rearing their ugly heads with Leave. So while it's still possible that the UK can be included in some of those projects and deals will be negotiated, it's expected to ultimately be rather detrimental to science and academic research in the UK. http://www.nature.com/news/boon-or-burden-what-has-the-eu-ever-done-for-science-1.20089 http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/06/is-brexit-bad-for-science/488624/ http://www.nature.com/news/how-scientists-reacted-to-the-brexit-1.20158?WT.mc_id=SFB_NNEWS_1508_RHBox http://www.euronews.com/2016/06/24/what-does-brexit-mean-for-science/ 4283
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 25, 2016, 03:40:43 AM »He's typically very careful about his racist remarks, but there's been a number of scandals. And not just the "Qoran should be banned" or "give me the tools and I'll brick every Mosque in country" kind of remarks, but other stuff too. I believe there's currently a class action law suit going on against him for footage of him leading a chant along the lines of "how many Morrocans do we want? Less, less, less! That can be arranged!" which targets an entire nationality (a majority of which are now second grade immigrants) consisting of a number of different religions. And then there's things like him being caught referring to foreigners as "it / that" in the context of "that comes here and just breeds like rabbits". I can't really properly convey it in English because it lacks equivalent words, but the term he used to refer to foreigners is a neutral / non-gendered word that is only really used for animals and objects. Using it to refer to a group of people is very denigrating.Islamaphobic? Yeah.Somewhat racist Dutch far right politician.it's Wilders, whoever that is.Dutch calling for an EU referendum.Are they really or is it just Wilders again? So not really racist in the sense of "all niggers should be lynched", but I think many people do believe that his beliefs go beyond standard islamophobia, even though he does a decent job at hiding it. 4284
Gaming / Re: The witcher 3 is a shit game« on: June 25, 2016, 03:23:08 AM »Gerald is the generic gruff voiced tough guy with poorly delivered lines. He's medieval Marcus fenix.The combat is what worries me too. I abandoned the Witcher 2 pretty early on because of it. Dark Souls has spoiled me. 4285
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 24, 2016, 02:37:32 PM »in light of all this, i have learned myself a neat little term: "pyrrhic victory"This is not common knowledge in the US? I'm pretty sure that a majority of 15 year olds here would know it. It's taught as part of Latin, Dutch and history. 4286
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 24, 2016, 01:55:36 PM »Oh wow, Wilders is top of the polls for the Dutch.Doesn't make it any better. I disagree with things the EU does but would never support populism or leaving because of it unless it's absolutely necessary. 4287
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 24, 2016, 01:53:00 PM »Somewhat racist Dutch far right politician.it's Wilders, whoever that is.Dutch calling for an EU referendum.Are they really or is it just Wilders again? 4288
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 24, 2016, 01:35:51 PM »Dutch calling for an EU referendum.Are they really or is it just Wilders again? 4289
Serious / Re: Unofficial Brexit Thread« on: June 24, 2016, 01:11:47 PM »
I usually avoid this stuff, but I'm now seeing similar comments on mine for the first time. There's this one guy who isn't from the EU in my programme who so far failed all of his European Law exams and is now going off on the most stupid and populist rant on how glad he is to see the UK leave.
4290
The Flood / Re: HAHAHAH THEY DID IT THE ABSOLUTE MADMEN« on: June 24, 2016, 01:02:56 PM »
The British were so concerned with immigrants ruining their economy that they just went ahead and preemptively fucked it themselves. Jolly chaps.
:^) |