This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Flee
Pages: 1 ... 909192 9394 ... 520
2731
« on: March 11, 2017, 05:36:43 PM »
I signed up for the Beta even though its a PC exclusive. Maybe it has Intel HD mode?
If it's anything like the previous Quake games, you'll have extreme customization options and will be able to turn down the graphics to the absolute minimum. You could legit make Quake Live look like this (and even worse) by changing the graphical settings.
2732
« on: March 11, 2017, 05:34:37 PM »
Summary of new updates:
- Quake Champions will be free to play. You'll get the entire game but only one Champion if you remain F2P. - Other Champions are either purchasable all together with real money or through in-game currency called Favor. - Favor will be easy to obtain making it so that it doesn't feel like you're renting Champions but just cycling through them. - Heavy user customization will be present, allowing you to edit your characters in detail. - Favor can also be used to play Rune Challenges which give you loot boxes unlocking common, uncommon, rare and epic cosmetic items and skins (think CS:GO and Overwatch). - Challenges and unlocks for gameplay related "achievements" will also be present. - Console releases are not entirely ruled out. - Tiered matchmaking makes a return so that new players can be paired up with others of similar skill. - Release set for somewhere in 2017.
All good news. The one thing I'm still waiting on is an official confirmation of a classic mode. Other than that, this is all really nice. I wouldn't have minded paying full price for this game, but this business model and system of unlocks sounds like it'll draw in big crowds and new players. Looking forward to it.
2734
« on: March 11, 2017, 05:16:04 AM »
>The CIA can hack a smart car and drive you off a cliff with you having zero control of your imminent demise
I find this both scary on the part of our government and stupid how smart cars don't have a feature that gives the driver behind the wheel more control over what the computer says.
That's part of what I'm working on now. It's actually a lot more complicated than what you might think.
2735
« on: March 11, 2017, 04:26:09 AM »
I need to try harder to make the cuts and edits a little less obvious, I think. Whenever I cut out pauses/stumbles, the next cut sounds like I'm in a completely different room or something. Sorry if that's annoying to anyone else.
Looks good to me. I'm not watching with headphones so can't really hear it that well, but your editing is pretty great for someone with little experience. It's smooth, funny and it all goes together well. Good job.
2736
« on: March 11, 2017, 04:11:49 AM »
What journal edition is it coming out in? Also what was the topic of your paper?
Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk
It's scheduled to be in one of the Spring editions, so it'll be out any time now. Very generally put, the paper conducts an adequacy evaluation and impact assessment of international and European legislation, standards and best practices to asses predictive and automated intelligence analysis in deep and dark web environments, as well as issue some policy recommendations following conversations I've had with government analysts and such. As I said, not something many of you would be interested in reading anyways.
2737
« on: March 11, 2017, 02:16:59 AM »
No break for me, unfortunately. Just work.
2738
« on: March 10, 2017, 05:50:36 PM »
Woah, Pax just revealed that Quake will be free to play with the option to buy the full character roster. It'll also have customisation and all that stuff. Looks great.
2739
« on: March 10, 2017, 05:49:23 PM »
What aboot Unreal Tournament?
I'll respond soon.
2740
« on: March 10, 2017, 02:12:13 PM »
Post it here when it's published so far I can tell you why you're wrong.
Damn. What makes you think I'm wrong?
Because I say so.
Well shit. If I hurry I can probably still have it pulled before too many people read it.
2741
« on: March 10, 2017, 01:32:36 PM »
Post it here when it's published so far I can tell you why you're wrong.
Damn. What makes you think I'm wrong?
2742
« on: March 10, 2017, 01:25:35 PM »
Thanks, all my best friends. I wish I could share it with you all. Get yourselves published too and we can cite each other or something.
2743
« on: March 10, 2017, 01:04:06 PM »
link?
It contains my contact details and full name, so I'm gonna have to keep it to myself.
Will you copy + paste it here without the personal details?
Someone could still use that to find him if they were so inclined. There's really no "safe" way to do it, unfortunately.
that's very true
Congratulations either way Flee!
What Verb said is unfortunately true. It'll be on all major academic databases and Google Scholar will pick up on it too if you just search for an excerpt of the text. No safe way of sharing it with you guys. Besides, it's 30 pages long, highly legalistic and deals with data protection and intelligence analysis in places like the deep web. I don't think anyone here would actually be interested in reading it.
2744
« on: March 10, 2017, 10:41:42 AM »
link?
It contains my contact details and full name, so I'm gonna have to keep it to myself.
2745
« on: March 10, 2017, 10:40:49 AM »
What discipline?
Law. The journal is a well known Law Review.
Are you ending jewish oppression of the white man?
Eh, I do express some serious criticism of certain EU legislation, if that counts.
Good job! And congrats btw.
Thanks.
2746
« on: March 10, 2017, 06:18:52 AM »
What discipline?
Law. The journal is a well known Law Review.
Are you ending jewish oppression of the white man?
Eh, I do express some serious criticism of certain EU legislation, if that counts.
2747
« on: March 10, 2017, 06:18:09 AM »
Congratulations
Thanks man.
2748
« on: March 10, 2017, 05:38:02 AM »
What discipline?
Law. The journal is a well known Law Review.
2749
« on: March 10, 2017, 05:29:17 AM »
Just got word from the editor-in-chief that my first paper has passed review and will soon be published. Pretty damn stoked as it's my first publication and a pretty good one too. I'm not going to give details for obvious reasons, but the journal is very highly rated, internationally peer reviewed and one of the top ones globally in my field, so I'm pretty happy I managed to get in.
AMA me anything or something, just wanted to share the first good news in a while. And bump my post count, obviously.
2750
« on: March 10, 2017, 04:57:28 AM »
Just gonna say that I fully appreciated your laugh after you recited "kill yourself you miserable brony cunt" for me. Takes me way back.
2751
« on: March 10, 2017, 02:33:23 AM »
So should I get this game?
2752
« on: March 10, 2017, 01:42:28 AM »
Yeah, looks pretty good. There's already a thread about the game, BTW.
2753
« on: March 09, 2017, 04:25:26 PM »
Investopedia - Senator Wants to End ISP Consumer Privacy RulesConsumer privacy may turn out to be the loser in a bill introduced by Republican Senator Jeff Flake that seeks to curtail the Federal Communications Commission's authority to regulate online privacy. Senator Flake's bill, which was co-signed by 25 senators and introduced in Congress yesterday, seeks to revert responsibility for regulation of online privacy back to the Federal Trade Commission, an agency tasked with overseeing anti-competitive practices. This would result in an annulment of rules introduced by former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler last year to put checks on the sharing of consumer data by internet service providers with third-party agencies.
The FTC was responsible for overseeing online privacy until the previous administration transferred responsibility to the FCC in 2015. In a recent Op-Ed for The Wall Street Journal, Flake characterized the Obama administration's move as a "power grab." He wrote, "It is unnecessary, confusing, and adds yet another innovation-stifling regulation to the internet," adding that the move set the stage for a "bureaucratic turf war" between the FCC and FTC. "[It is a] two-track system under which the FCC applies its own set of rules for ISPs while the FTC monitors the rest of the internet ecosystem," according to the senator. Flake's resolution uses the Congressional Review Act, a 1996 law that enables Congress to repeal recently passed regulations. (See also: FCC Backs Off Cable, Telecom Proposals.)
Last year, Wheeler proposed a series of rules to strengthen privacy protection for broadband customers. The rules required internet providers to seek customer permission before sharing "sensitive" information, such as browsing history, email content and medical information, with third-party agencies. The rules left the door open for ISPs to anonymize and share the data with service providers, and they were approved by the FCC in October. If they remain in place, the privacy protection rules will negatively affect the merger between AT&T Inc. (T) and Time Warner Inc. (TWX). This is because a compelling rationale for the merger was the prospect of combining consumer data gleaned from broadband connections for targeted advertising. (See also: AT&T-Time Warner Deal Won't Face a Review by FCC.)
Under its new chairman Ajit Pai, the FCC has promised a "light touch" to regulation. In a recent address to the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Pai reiterated as much and said that the agency was on track to return to the approach that existed before the 2015 ruling. Spoiler Ars Technica - GOP senators’ new bill would let ISPs sell your Web browsing data / Senate resolution would throw out FCC's entire privacy rulemaking.Republican senators yesterday introduced legislation that would overturn new privacy rules for Internet service providers. If the Federal Communications Commission rules are eliminated, ISPs would not have to get consumers' explicit consent before selling or sharing Web browsing data and other private information with advertisers and other third parties.
As expected, Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and 23 Republican co-sponsors introduced the resolution yesterday. The measure would use lawmakers' power under the Congressional Review Act to ensure that the FCC rulemaking "shall have no force or effect." The resolution would also prevent the FCC from issuing similar regulations in the future.
Flake's announcement said he's trying to "protect consumers from overreaching Internet regulation." Flake also said that the resolution "empowers consumers to make informed choices on if and how their data can be shared," but he did not explain how it will achieve that.
Flake called the FCC's privacy rulemaking "midnight regulation," even though it was approved by the commission in October 2016, before the presidential election, after a months-long rulemaking process.
“The FCC's midnight regulation does nothing to protect consumer privacy," Flake said. "It is unnecessary, confusing, and adds yet another innovation-stifling regulation to the Internet." Flake's announcement also said that the FCC-imposed "restrictions have the potential to negatively impact consumers and the future of Internet innovation."
The privacy order had several major components. The requirement to get the opt-in consent of consumers before sharing information covered geo-location data, financial and health information, children’s information, Social Security numbers, Web browsing history, app usage history, and the content of communications. This requirement is supposed to take effect on December 4, 2017.
The rulemaking had a data security component that required ISPs to take "reasonable" steps to protect customers' information from theft and data breaches. This was supposed to take effect on March 2, but the FCC under newly appointed Chairman Ajit Pai halted the rule's implementation. Another set of requirements related to data breach notifications is scheduled to take effect on June 2.
Flake's resolution would prevent all of those requirements from being implemented. He said that this "is the first step toward restoring the [Federal Trade Commission's] light-touch, consumer-friendly approach." Giving the FTC authority over Internet service providers would require further FCC or Congressional action because the FTC is not allowed to regulate common carriers, a designation currently applied to ISPs.
US Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) blasted Flake's proposal.
“If this [resolution] is passed, neither the FCC nor the FTC will have clear authority when it comes to how Internet service providers protect consumers’ data privacy and security," Schatz said in a statement issued yesterday. "Regardless of politics, allowing ISPs to operate in a rule-free zone without any government oversight is reckless."
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) offered similar criticism. "Big broadband barons and their Republican allies want to turn the telecommunications marketplace into a Wild West where consumers are held captive with no defense against abusive invasions of their privacy by internet service providers,” Markey said. "Consumers will have no ability to stop Internet service providers from invading their privacy and selling sensitive information about their health, finances, and children to advertisers, insurers, data brokers or others who can profit off of this personal information, all without their affirmative consent." Spoiler Reuters: Congress may overturn Obama internet privacy rulesRepublicans in the U.S. Congress are moving to repeal regulations adopted by the Obama administration in October that would have subjected internet service providers to stricter scrutiny than websites to protect customers' private data.
Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona introduced a resolution on Tuesday backed by 34 other senators to undo the regulations under a provision that allows Congress to repeal recently approved federal regulations.
Representative Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, who chairs a House panel on telecommunications, introduced a companion measure on Wednesday. Republicans control both chambers of Congress.
Last week, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission temporarily blocked some of the rules from taking effect, a victory for internet providers such as AT&T Inc (T.N), Comcast Corp (CMCSA.O) and Verizon Communications Inc (VZ.N). Consumer advocates opposed the FCC move.
Under the rules, which were scheduled to take effect last Thursday, internet providers would need to obtain consumer consent before using precise geo-location, financial information, health information, children's information and web- browsing history for advertising and internal marketing.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, nominated by Republican President Donald Trump on Tuesday to serve a new five-year term, told a Senate panel on Wednesday that consumers would have privacy protections even without the Obama administration rules.
Republican commissioners including Pai said in October the rules unfairly give websites like Facebook Inc (FB.O), Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) or Alphabet Inc's Google unit (GOOGL.O) the ability to harvest more data than service providers and dominate digital advertising.
The American Civil Liberties Union criticized Flake's proposal to undo the rules. "With this move, Congress is essentially allowing companies like Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon to sell consumers’ private information to the highest bidder," ACLU general counsel Neema Singh Guliani said. As someone who deals with this kind of stuff on a daily basis: this is legitimately scary stuff capable of setting a worrying precedent. The fact that this is being sold as a way of "protecting consumers from overreaching internet regulation" which "empowers consumers to make informed choices on if and how their data can be shared" is borderline hallucinatory. You Americans definitely need a GDPR of your own.
2754
« on: March 09, 2017, 01:37:55 PM »
You should come to Belgium sometime, Turkey. Best sprouts in the world and also famous for top tier asparagus.
But can I put them on a waffle?
I wouldn't recommend it, but I won't stop you either.
2755
« on: March 09, 2017, 12:37:26 PM »
You should come to Belgium sometime, Turkey. Best sprouts in the world and also famous for top tier asparagus.
2756
« on: March 09, 2017, 12:25:16 PM »
Just got all achievements for Shadow of Mordor. That fucking level 25 rune one was a pain for me.
2757
« on: March 09, 2017, 12:23:43 PM »
gameplay trailer
Looks pretty great. The new RPG elements especially.
2758
« on: March 09, 2017, 04:10:53 AM »
Either the (no lying) was taken with a grain of salt or the average here is what you'd expect from Congo.
2759
« on: March 09, 2017, 03:36:24 AM »
Most recent decent picture I have
What were you in court for?
2760
« on: March 09, 2017, 03:34:29 AM »
This thread got real interesting real fast.
Pages: 1 ... 909192 9394 ... 520
|