1891
The Flood / Re: New Justice League trailer
« on: July 22, 2017, 05:08:29 PM »
Of course you are. Grimdark capeshit is objectively the only capeshit worth watching.
Also, Gadot is <3.
Also, Gadot is <3.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1891
The Flood / Re: New Justice League trailer« on: July 22, 2017, 05:08:29 PM »
Of course you are. Grimdark capeshit is objectively the only capeshit worth watching.
Also, Gadot is <3. 1892
Serious / Re: Wow I hate the EU now« on: July 22, 2017, 02:38:09 PM »And here I was opening this post expecting you to be serious.The EU is the single greatest thing to happen to our world. Why would I ever be serious about hating it? 1893
Gaming / Re: Middle Earth: Shadow of War« on: July 21, 2017, 07:32:06 PM »YouTube Shelob is hot now? 1894
Gaming / Would anyone watch me stream?« on: July 21, 2017, 05:16:04 PM »
I like playing games, providing commentary and explaining stuff. It's pretty damn fun to do. What I like less is managing a all of the clips, editing everything together and rendering it all. Streaming seems like it would cut that part out of the process and allow for more direct interaction.
Thoughts? 1895
Gaming / Re: List of games I need to play:« on: July 21, 2017, 04:36:22 PM »Completely forgot to respond to this.no i'm asking, in terms of quality, how is quake's single playerQuake 1, 2 and 4 have single player. Quake 3 has a play vs AI / bots mode, which sort of counts I guess.QUAKEhow is quake single player Quake's single player is good, but pretty outdated at this point. Quake 1 is one of the "founders" of the 3D FPS genre and it's still fun to play, but aiming and weapon controls are pretty wonky by today's standards. The others are better but again, the story is pretty limited and the levels are pretty linear. Fun though, if you're into fast paced jumping around keeping hordes of monsters at bay. 1896
Gaming / Re: How much time have YOU wasted on Destiny?« on: July 21, 2017, 01:54:09 PM »i mean, i grind in pokémon and RPGs and shit, and i still enjoy those kind of games quite heavilyThe difference is that in those games you kind of grind for a purpose. You grind to improve your Pokemon so you can move on, beat the next gym, not lose any team members on a nuzlocke, catch shiny pokemon, or beat the game / the League / any other challenges. Or maybe you grind for perfect stats to get a team for online matches. Same goes for RPGs. You may grind but it's pretty much always to reach a certain goal, beat a certain boss, complete the next area or achieve something difficult and impressive. In Destiny, you grind for the grind. You grind for better weapons, equipment, stats and whatever, but the only thing they give you is the ability to grind better and even more. I don't mind the occasional grind myself, but it seemed so pointless in Destiny. Unlike RPGs or other games like this, I felt like the only thing you got out of grinding was the ability to grind marginally better. And I hated their cosmetic stuff, so that didn't give me any incentive either. Oh and the way the levels work is just horrendous. People are not joking when they say the game is really just "you have to press this button. Kill enemies standing in front of the button. Press button and kill waves of enemies coming at you while this gate opens / this PC gets hacked. Repeat ad infinitum". The gunplay itself was pretty solid, but the game really did suck. And I wasn't even anti-Bungie at all, I even pre-ordered that shit and was really hyped to play it. Such a letdown. 1897
Gaming / Re: How much time have YOU wasted on Destiny?« on: July 21, 2017, 12:56:27 PM »
16 hours. Got the game on release, beat the campaign, reached level 20, played some PvP (which was disappointingly easy) and then sold the game for nearly full price because there was nothing left but the boring grind.
1898
we talking english pronunciations?Yeah, like rapid but with a V. 1899
lolI don't think I ever really said the word. I just imagined it pronounced differently, lol. 1901
Gaming / Re: List of games I need to play:« on: July 20, 2017, 01:51:35 PM »Quake 1, 2 and 4 have single player. Quake 3 has a play vs AI / bots mode, which sort of counts I guess.QUAKEhow is quake single player And I don't think Prehistoric ever said they had to be single player though. Reznor did the soundtrack for Quake 1 single player, and now the NiN drummer is doing the one for Quake Champions I believe. 1902
Gaming / Re: It's impossible to build an affordable PC. - Update: Ordered, part list in OP.« on: July 20, 2017, 01:08:36 PM »I guess I'll hijack this thread.Solonoid's build was pretty decent, but your budget is higher. Any preference for brands? 1904
Gaming / Re: DOOM Update 6.66 Adds All Multiplayer DLC For Free (34gB)« on: July 20, 2017, 10:52:04 AM »Tall talk for a man who's chickened out on facing me for months because it's too hot or some BS. Get that AC running boy.Holy fuck, hahahahaha Flee BTFOHmm, I don't have it on PC but I might get it if enough people are interested in getting their ass beat.What platform?Doom game night? 1905
The Flood / Re: Verb gives his shitty opinions on anime (redux) #FuckAnime« on: July 20, 2017, 09:57:20 AM »
I never understood the title of your thread. I think it's general knowledge that the only shitty opinion one can have about anime is one that is even remotely positive in any way.
1907
Gaming / Re: DOOM Update 6.66 Adds All Multiplayer DLC For Free (34gB)« on: July 20, 2017, 06:37:26 AM »I might join inI look forward to it. 1908
Gaming / Re: DOOM Update 6.66 Adds All Multiplayer DLC For Free (34gB)« on: July 20, 2017, 06:13:51 AM »OK, I'll be sure to.Tonight for sure if not you can ban meSure thing brosef but I've asked you to play like a few dozen times over the past couple of weeks. How does tonight sound?DOOM, Quake, doesn't matter. I will literally beat the fucking shit out of you in any pathetic game you decide to challenge me on, you stupid motherfucker.Hmm, I don't have it on PC but I might get it if enough people are interested in getting their ass beat.What platform?Doom game night? 1909
Gaming / Re: DOOM Update 6.66 Adds All Multiplayer DLC For Free (34gB)« on: July 20, 2017, 05:43:50 AM »Sure thing brosef but I've asked you to play like a few dozen times over the past couple of weeks. How does tonight sound?DOOM, Quake, doesn't matter. I will literally beat the fucking shit out of you in any pathetic game you decide to challenge me on, you stupid motherfucker.Hmm, I don't have it on PC but I might get it if enough people are interested in getting their ass beat.What platform?Doom game night? 1910
Gaming / Re: DOOM Update 6.66 Adds All Multiplayer DLC For Free (34gB)« on: July 20, 2017, 04:24:56 AM »Hmm, I don't have it on PC but I might get it if enough people are interested in getting their ass beat.What platform?Doom game night? 1911
Gaming / Re: DOOM Update 6.66 Adds All Multiplayer DLC For Free (34gB)« on: July 20, 2017, 03:22:19 AM »What platform?Doom game night? 1912
Gaming / Re: It's impossible to build an affordable PC. - Update: Ordered, part list in OP.« on: July 19, 2017, 07:40:53 PM »god bless you, fleeJust giving my 2c. Solonoid probably knows more about hardware in general than I do, but it seems that his PC has a different purpose than what you had in mind and doesn't offer twice the performance for the same price (especially for gaming it'll probably perform even worse). He's right in saying that there could've been some skimming here and there (mainly by going all AMD instead of Intel + Nvidia, which are usually seen as more reliable and high quality but more expensive), but I think you have a solid build picked out for what you want it do. It's a reasonable price and nothing is stopping you from investing in an i5 and another 8gb of DDR4 down the line for a build that I would consider downright good. 1913
Gaming / Re: It's impossible to build an affordable PC. - Update: Ordered, part list in OP.« on: July 19, 2017, 07:30:34 PM »I see what you're saying, but the AMD is a much older and more outdated CPU with barely better (and often worse) performance for gaming due to much faster single cores and hyperthreading in the Pentium. And while it may come with a cooler of its own, I'd still recommend a proven brand name especially since he's in a hot environment. The motherboard may offer an extra PCIe slot and more RAM space, but it only works with older RAM and doesn't support anything other than DDR3. As far as GPU's go (which will be the most important part for him by far), the 1050ti comes in at up to 35% faster than the 460.Very similar build sporting DDR3, a slight downstep with monetary advantages (especially in this performance range) one more full sized PCIe slot, and an 8-core CPU that I recently installed in a friend's PC (he likes it a lot, it's better than the Core i5 Black I swear by), and a Radeon RX 460 4GB I found priced at 120 CAD (no price population on pcpartpicker since Radeon is flying off the shelves) I agree with what you said in your later post about getting more out of a PC, but I think that for what he had in mind, his build is probably going to perform better for gaming. You can debate about things like the motherboard and importance of the added cores in the CPU, but this is definitely not twice the performance at the same price. For things like video games, it's probably going to perform even worse. Also, where did you find that GPU for $120 CAD? I haven't found a single store that has it in stock under $200+. 1914
Gaming / Re: It's impossible to build an affordable PC. - Update: Ordered, part list in OP.« on: July 19, 2017, 06:34:59 PM »
That doesn't really prove your original claim. Could you link a build at the same price with twice the performance?
The massive bottlenecking also seems overstated when looking at the reviews and benchmarks. "The Pentium offers around half the performance of a stock i7 7700K for 20 per cent of the cost". Yeah, it's expected to be bit of a bottleneck, but it's still enough to run Witcher 3 or Crysis 3 at 60+ fps on Ultra / Very High, Far Cry Primal and Assassin's Creed Unity at 80+ fps on Ultra, and the Division at over a 110+ fps on Ultra as well (all when paired with a Titan). It might be a bit of a bottleneck, but when it's capable of supporting a very CPU heavy game like Battlefield 1 at 70+ fps on Ultra, even when paired with just a 1060, you've got a solid CPU that won't hold you back much unless you go for really high performance. A "massive bottleneck" is a CPU that limits you to sub 60 fps even when paired with much better GPU's, not one that can achieve these results with recent games on ultra settings. And at such a low price, it's easily one of the best budget CPU's out there. I agree that he could've saved some cash by going with AMD (as I suggested in one of my earlier posts), but I don't see anything wrong with this build. Hell, even the Rx 470 (which I believe is the closest equivalent to the 1050ti) appears to be even quite a bit more expensive in Canada. Some costs could've still been cut, but this looks like a pretty solid budget build to me. I'd be very surprised if you could put together one that's twice as powerful for the same price. For $600, he got himself a PC that'll let him play all the games he wants, including some very recent ones at high settings with high framerates. It might not be the most min-maxed build possible, nor will it be great for really demanding tasks like 3D modeling, but it looks solid to me. One of the best low budget CPU's on the market, a good GPU, and components from prominent high quality brands like MSI and EVGA. I'm not the biggest expert here, but I think it looks pretty good. I'll be happy to concede otherwise, but you're going to have to show some actual results and specific components to prove your point. You can't just say "you should've gone AMD", "you should've grabbed a quad or 8 core" or "you skimmed where you should've spent" without posting some specifics on how this could be improved. 1915
Gaming / Re: It's impossible to build an affordable PC. - Update: Ordered, part list in OP.« on: July 19, 2017, 05:38:12 PM »Oh dude.I'm not the biggest PC buff of them all, but color me curious. Note that this is in Canada money too, so the price is going to be significantly higher as it is. 1916
Gaming / Re: Help me build a PC for $200. - Update: Budget now $600USD~« on: July 19, 2017, 04:03:04 PM »I'd recommend you look at these two for cooler fans:A CPU cooler and maybe a case fan is never a bad idea. Other than that, it looks good.because it's illegal not to and you get more features when you have a real copyIt's 100% legal and literally the only feature you miss out on is the ability to change your computer's theme and background. And even then, I still managed to change those things on mine. https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/product/hmtCmG/cooler-master-cpu-cooler-rr212e20pkr2 https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/product/FNXfrH/cooler-master-cpu-cooler-rrht228pkr1 The Hyper 212 EVO is widely considered to be one of the best and most popular mid tier ones (35$). The other one isn't quite as good, but serviceable for 20$. You'll definitely want a cooler fan, so I'd recommend one of these two. If you want another case fan (not necessary, but I'd recommend at least 1 so you have both a fan at the rear that comes pre-installed, and you could put in another one at the front to suck in cool air), any 120mm will fit (I checked myself). I'd recommend one of these two (I have the same one in my PC): https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/product/wL3RsY/cooler-master-case-fan-r4l2r20arr1 https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/product/sdZQzy/cooler-master-case-fan-r4l2r20acgp Same fan, just one is red and the other is blue. They're only $8, so not much of an expense. 1917
Gaming / Re: Help me build a PC for $200. - Update: Budget now $600USD~« on: July 19, 2017, 03:56:38 PM »
Your case comes with a built in case fan, so scrap that. A CPU cooler I would recommend though.
1918
Gaming / Re: Help me build a PC for $200. - Update: Budget now $600USD~« on: July 19, 2017, 03:55:34 PM »A CPU cooler and maybe a case fan is never a bad idea. Other than that, it looks good.because it's illegal not to and you get more features when you have a real copyIt's 100% legal and literally the only feature you miss out on is the ability to change your computer's theme and background. And even then, I still managed to change those things on mine. 1919
Gaming / Re: Help me build a PC for $200. - Update: Budget now $600USD~« on: July 19, 2017, 03:52:54 PM »so there aren't any issues with this? you guys think i should spend my money on this? i'll buy it right now if that's the case/Let me see. 1920
Gaming / Re: Help me build a PC for $200. - Update: Budget now $600USD~« on: July 19, 2017, 03:52:26 PM »because it's illegal not to and you get more features when you have a real copyIt's 100% legal and literally the only feature you miss out on is the ability to change your computer's theme and background. And even then, I still managed to change those things on mine. |