T4R. Add RockNumber7 on Xbox.

I can't afford one. Can someone let me have a trial?

If you don't know what I mean by fully immersive virtual reality, think like The Matrix or the anime Sword Art Online but widespread like in the movie/book Ready Player One.This is a topic that has interested me for some time and I have discussed it with quite a few people. My overall thoughts are that with some regulation and moderation, such a technology could be massively and invaluably beneficial for the population of the world as a whole.

I had some simple ideas about how it would work. Things like limiting the playtime to a partial portion of the week, motion-detecting webcams required watching your motionless body, no children logging in at all or at least without parental consent, no forms of virtual intimacy allowed or at the very least severely restricted, and preventing the possibility for people to be forcibly logged in would all be ideas that I thought would make sense. What do you think?

Edit: The idea of having a fully immersive alternate planet for people to live on with countries and all sounds like a lot of fun. Like an entire planet based off of a fictional universe like Ace Combat's Strangereal world or the planet the Avatar: The Legend of Korra series takes place in. It'd be nice to log into your virtual vacation home on a fictional but fully immersive world.

T4R. Xbox one. Gamertag: DrPepperlova07

T4R. I want to talk but don't see any quality discussions going on in here. I long for the days when I could have a meaningful conversation on The Flood back on Bungie.net. This forum never lived up to those days. What's going on here that's worth knowing about? Is there another forum with meaningful discussion that you'd recommend?

T4R. Hi. I've come along for a visit. I wanted to see how this place was doing and maybe make it a little nicer.

T4R. I think not. It eliminates the purpose. I refer of course to the Second Amendment. I believe all gun laws are unconstitutional and the government has no right to regulate the people's failsafe against it. The Second Amendment is meant to counter the corruptible nature of man on a scale larger than violent crime.

I believe pedophilia is a genuine psychological issue that needs a legitimate research-based solution. No matter how much many may wish, execution, violence, castration, and incarceration are not long-term solutions. Nobody chooses to be a pedophile. It is an ailment of the mind. Serious research needs to be done into this illness on all fronts. It's amazing how little we actually know about it. Once we know it's cause(s) whether they be genetic, environmental, circumstantial, etc., we can begin work on curing it or at the very least treating it in humane ways. It has caused so much pain throughout the course of humanity and we have only taken reactionary measures to counter it. It's time we start taking preventative measures instead. It also seems that some people have not made some distinctions. Pedophilia is a warped sexual attraction but it does not define the person. Wanting to cure pedophilia is not kindness or compassion towards pedophiles and their desires but rather a preventative measure to protect children from sex crimes. Pedophile=/=Evil Person, Pedophile=/=child molester, pedophile=/=men exclusively, pedophile=/=criminal

T4R.

If you say yes, then sign the petition: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2
For the uninitiated:

It didn't make sense to me since free speech is already guaranteed in our constitution.

But, thinking logically, the one thing that would scare the data-mining cabal the most is an articulated right to privacy when using the internet.

No more data mining for ads. No more algorithms screwing up how we communicate with others on Facebook. No more capturing my favorite soda to sell to a competitor who might want to make me buy something else.

Also, and really important to me, is the right to be forgotten. It's already been adjudicated in Britain. Here's a bit of the detail:

https://www.theguardian. com/technology/2013/apr/04/britain-opt-out-right-to-be-forgotten-law

We should have a right to disappear.

So if this continues to be a thing, think of it way beyond being censored for free speech. Think of it in terms of privacy, too. No more selling personal information. No more dedicated IPs to track your every move. No more email apps that pre-select your possible replies, because no more email being mined.

Mail could be configured with the same privacy rights as US mail, for example.

Last I'll post on this one. But if it goes forward, please consider expanding the scope.

Also keep in mind that there's more than the WH petition site to make your ideas known. Most of us have senators and congressmen to represent us in Washington, D.C. Maybe talk to a real person?

T4R. Q seems to be a high level government insider giving us a glimpse at the battle between good and evil behind the scenes. Here is a website that covers many of his posts. https://qanonmap.github.io/
Whether or not you believe he is real, you should keep up anyway. If he real, there is some really heavy shit going on behind the curtain. If he's not, it was fun. The website I posted covers many posts but not all. If you're interested enough, finding the rest of his posts is not hard. Just use duckduckgo.

Should the U.S. invade Mexico? The cartels would never expect it. M1 Abrams rolling across the border. Carpet bombing their drug infested rain forests. Liberation of the Mexican people from the oppressive drug cartels. After all that, we annex them and begin a multi-generational effort to improve their infrastructure and way of life. We need to 'muricanize them all. Once we're done with the Mexicans, then we move on to Belize and Guatemala. I figure by 2200, North and South America will be one United America.

In a dangerous world, is the right to arm oneself a basic human right? Would it not make sense that a man should be able to arm himself equally as well as those who would do him and his family harm, regardless if those people respect the law? Should there be limitations to how well someone can arm themselves? If the items being limited are already exceedingly simple, common and available, would this make any difference to those with no regard for the law?

T4R.
On another note, the human trafficking implications of downsizing would be massive. People would collect small people and dress them up like characters and pit them against each other like cockfighting. Rich children would have small human beings as pets. There are so many other horrible implications. There are also some kinky and practical ones as well. Use your imagination.

T4R. Most interesting poll on Sep7agon today.