1411
The Flood / Re: Sep7ball
« on: January 08, 2015, 06:19:44 PM »
ITT we discover only TBlocks snd Desticle actually know the rules for drawing polandballs
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1411
The Flood / Re: Sep7ball« on: January 08, 2015, 06:19:44 PM »
ITT we discover only TBlocks snd Desticle actually know the rules for drawing polandballs
1412
The Flood / Re: Just spent 7 grand on a last place MLB team's tickets« on: January 08, 2015, 06:15:04 PM »
>American sports
You spent that much on watching hyped-up rounders? Lol 1413
Gaming / Re: What do you expect to happen to the Arbiter's faction in Halo 5?« on: January 08, 2015, 03:50:24 PM »
Nigga they still use Spectres, obvs going to lose
1415
Gaming / Re: Bulletstorm« on: January 08, 2015, 03:44:20 PM »Enjoyed the trying to figure out ways to kill my enemiesAnd killing your balls 1416
Gaming / Re: Bulletstorm« on: January 08, 2015, 03:44:03 PM »Yeah, that game was completely under rated.Yeah, but it helped that the gunplay was ridiculously good and the kick and leash mechanics were incredibly solid, plus the humour 1418
Gaming / Bulletstorm« on: January 08, 2015, 11:49:26 AM »
It's possibly the greatest standalone FPS of the last 5 years outside of the main franchises, and it's criminal that there's been nothing so far on a sequel.
But I am curious, wasn't it set within the GoW EU? And so doesn't that mean MS could potentially make a sequel, now that they own GoW 1420
Gaming / Re: Would Bungie be better off scrapping current Destiny and rebooting the series?« on: January 08, 2015, 11:33:49 AM »
They should dump Destiny and focus the whole studio on rebooting Marathon but they won't, Activision are invested in the franchise now. Although, surely it would be possible to sell the IP to Activision, it'd be win-win
1421
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 07:45:44 PM »>1939+76le ebin cumnator post XDPut down that mirrorI know. Your posts have made me laugh once or twice due to the pure stupidity they contain.HilariousYou are like a record on repeatAnd you're like a person with bad diarrhea. You spew shit constantly. >using le Hitler go home 1422
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 07:36:44 PM »Put down that mirrorI know. Your posts have made me laugh once or twice due to the pure stupidity they contain.HilariousYou are like a record on repeatAnd you're like a person with bad diarrhea. You spew shit constantly. 1424
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 07:30:43 PM »HilariousYou are like a record on repeatAnd you're like a person with bad diarrhea. You spew shit constantly. 1425
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 07:15:37 PM »You are like a record on repeat, anyone makes a valid point and you just claim that the facts don't exist, or you insult them, or bothReach has best split-screen>being this wrong 1426
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 07:14:11 PM »That's one thing, go make a massive gravity-defying racetrack on an asteroid insteadReach did, easily, it had the finest forge and the best game options, it was and still is the ultimate game on 360 for game nights and with good reason. You could argue Halo 4 is nearly as strong in the same area.Go make a zombie mode where there's a fat kid and everyone uses swords to break through the tunnels and get to the weapons cache at the end. You can't in reach or h4. 1428
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 06:43:37 PM »Reach has best split-screenCE still has the best splitscreen/LAN. True, but I wasn't counting the MCC Lol, Reach had a far better plot than CE, mainly because CE's was "hurr durr blo up errything and kil teh bad guyz stop teh flud too" CE has about 5 characters, and by the end of the game we've learnt nearly nothing about any of them, at least in Reach there is character development and it pulls on the heart strings with Kat's death and Lone Wolf 1429
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 06:38:55 PM »And the on-foot combat, large amounts of allied ships snd the fact one is a scripted mission and the other is a key part of ConquestThe space battles in Reach handled the same as they did in Battlefront 2. The controls are the same and the ships handled the same. It's basically a mirrored version of it that's scripted and missing the capital ships.Lol, the spacebattle was shit in comparison to SWBF2, they're not even close to each other, I like Halo Reach a lot but i'm 110% certain SWBF2 is superior in every way except the lack of a proper campaignIt's a typical alien shoot'em'up whose only stand out points are simply mechanics and ideas that were new at the time, but are commonplace now, so now it's just a typical alien shoot'em'upThe same thing can be said about Reach. Just like CE you're shooting up aliens and the mechanics and ideas to the game are nothing new. Firefight already existed, the spacebattle is a more limited version of Star Wars Battlefront 2 and the AA's are just equipment. 1432
Gaming / Re: Discuss the perfection that is GRAW.« on: January 07, 2015, 06:34:44 PM »
The newest Ghost Recon was amazing, the 2012 (?) one. What a brilliant way to reboot such a loved franchise, hopefully a sequel is in the works
1433
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 06:28:30 PM »The argument with him has bordered into BurritoSenior levels of faggotry and blindnessLiterally Camnator levels of mental gymnastics right here.but a plot it did have, nonetheless.Yeah, it did, but only during the last two levels. 1434
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 06:26:53 PM »Lol, the spacebattle was shit in comparison to SWBF2, they're not even close to each other, I like Halo Reach a lot but i'm 110% certain SWBF2 is superior in every way except the lack of a proper campaignIt's a typical alien shoot'em'up whose only stand out points are simply mechanics and ideas that were new at the time, but are commonplace now, so now it's just a typical alien shoot'em'upThe same thing can be said about Reach. Just like CE you're shooting up aliens and the mechanics and ideas to the game are nothing new. Firefight already existed, the spacebattle is a more limited version of Star Wars Battlefront 2 and the AA's are just equipment. 1435
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 06:24:51 PM »To judge MP fairly you should remove online from the equation for 2-4, so which had the strongest custom games and local MP? Reach did, easily, it had the finest forge and the best game options, it was and still is the ultimate game on 360 for game nights and with good reason. You could argue Halo 4 is nearly as strong in the same area.Maybe the reason why people think CE is the best Halo is because it has both a strong campaign and MP. So far no Halo game has that. It's either a strong campaign or a decent MP. Halo 2 is unfinished and broken. Halo 3's campaign was rushed. For Reach the entire game was rushed. And Halo 4 has a strong campaign but a weak MP to many people. Like I said with CE both things are decent in that game.Lol, thinking CE is the best Halo is just silly, at least every other Halo has SOMETHING interesting happeningNow the Halo fanbase will become marginally better because it has one less Reach-liking retard.Wow, your opinion is totally new to me and I really value your contribution, I guess i'll just go and kill myself nowReach was unique, neither 4 or 2 can hold a candle to it. 3 is probably closest to CE in terms of how it plays, which I dislike in comparison to 2 and Reachewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww In terms of campaign the levels are just too repetitive, there's no real plot and no character development. Halo 4 wins in that respect, and gameplay-wise it's pretty damn good as well except for some minor annoyances, like the QTEs and how Sprint felt a little out of place at times. Fucking Pelicans man, ever since Halo CE everyone had been dying to fly one (yes, I know, PC Halo CE). For god's sake, somehow doing it this way has lead to the conclusion Halo 4 is the best, hmm. Lol, it probably is and we're all too biased or too busy wearing nostalgia goggles to notice 1436
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 06:18:04 PM »Totally different.One example.How is the lack of something subjective?Umm no.The rest of what you referred to is once again, fucking subjective.Umm, no. Quote Halo Reach can be proven to not exist by playing the game. Making as much sense as a creationist right now 1437
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 06:08:45 PM »One example.How is the lack of something subjective?Umm no.The rest of what you referred to is once again, fucking subjective.Umm, no. God 1438
Gaming / Re: I might get an Xboner« on: January 07, 2015, 06:07:23 PM »I would imagine so, it's all digital now so it's merely about moving data, and USB 3.0 is king when it comes to shifting data quickly. Although, the X1 seems to use a mini HDMI type thing, it does make a differenceFor the most part, yeah. USB gives out much stronger sound.I've never even seen a USB headset, I presume that's a PC thing?It should support USB headsets though. They only took steps back.No, because it's an adapter for the 360 compatible headsets, not fucking USB (?) headsetsThe audio quality is not better through the adapter. It isn't even compatible with USB headsets.Yes there is, how about the fact that the audio quality is so, so much better, and the fact that you can control your headphone/mic via the controller. It's like the difference between the old iPhone charger and the lightning cable, throws up similar problems tooBecause I have the right to complain about bullshit like that.Yeah, but there's nothing anyone can do about it so why complain?It's still bullshitThe adapter is £15, not sure how much in BurgerlandUgh.. Gotta wait for a good price drop, then.Yes, becaise MS are jewsShit I forgot about that game..Sunset Overdrive?Anything that isn't a Kinect or Kinect gameI know, but really, all I can think of is MCC for playing with everyone here. Kinect is the last thing I'd buy. 1439
Gaming / Re: I might get an Xboner« on: January 07, 2015, 05:58:17 PM »I've never even seen a USB headset, I presume that's a PC thing?It should support USB headsets though. They only took steps back.No, because it's an adapter for the 360 compatible headsets, not fucking USB (?) headsetsThe audio quality is not better through the adapter. It isn't even compatible with USB headsets.Yes there is, how about the fact that the audio quality is so, so much better, and the fact that you can control your headphone/mic via the controller. It's like the difference between the old iPhone charger and the lightning cable, throws up similar problems tooBecause I have the right to complain about bullshit like that.Yeah, but there's nothing anyone can do about it so why complain?It's still bullshitThe adapter is £15, not sure how much in BurgerlandUgh.. Gotta wait for a good price drop, then.Yes, becaise MS are jewsShit I forgot about that game..Sunset Overdrive?Anything that isn't a Kinect or Kinect gameI know, but really, all I can think of is MCC for playing with everyone here. Kinect is the last thing I'd buy. 1440
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 05:57:24 PM »I agree with Lemon on Halo 4, it's unfairly criticised, it's Campaign is one of the best if not the best in terms of character development and a plotYou actually don't like Reach? HuhWhat gave you that idea? |