This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sprungli
Pages: 1 ... 424344 4546 ... 130
1291
« on: January 16, 2015, 05:04:45 PM »
It was way better than Jumanji
1292
« on: January 16, 2015, 05:04:12 PM »
Mobile game reviews.
I recommend Monument Valley
So much this, and make sure you use a good pair of headphones and a dark room, genuinely amazing stuff
1293
« on: January 16, 2015, 05:02:17 PM »
Xbox Live
As a token of our appreciation for your continued support of Halo: The Master Chief Collection, we have applied a free one-month extension to your Xbox Live Gold membership. No further action is required. Game on!
Praise be Spencer
1294
« on: January 16, 2015, 04:59:31 PM »
Still need to play this. I'll get it when I paid this month.
Does it not get boring though? I feel like it would.
No, it's rare that a game is so exceedingly good that it just does not ever get boring, but SoM is genuinely that good.
1295
« on: January 16, 2015, 01:14:30 PM »
Guess what else?
Nate's head got smaller?
Dem polygons, m8.
U WUN GO M8?
U WANT SOME I'LL GIVE YA SOME
Bish, you can barely even see that pleb's pores. No contest
That's because the image I used is low-res, Remedy has not released any images of comparative quality to the Drake images-which sucks
1296
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:02:09 PM »
No, you idiot, i'm saying that you obviously cared about the thread enough to click on it and respond. Not that you cared about the thread material. There is a huge difference So why the FUCK would you point that out!?
Because I cared, dipshit
1297
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:01:39 PM »
Fuck this thread, it's 2AM and i'm going to sleep. I've said all I can here
1298
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:00:32 PM »
I was saying you cared about the thread, not necessarily his day (which isn't the thread anyways, it was the Uncharted thread). the uncharted thread is a very poor example of what i'm talking about, because it was extremely clear what i was trying to say--i don't give a fuck about frames-per-second
if you think i care about frames-per-second just because i responded to a thread about it, you are literally braindead
so i came up with a better example
and yes, you ARE saying that i apparently care about his day just because i responded with "i don't care"
No, you idiot, i'm saying that you obviously cared about the thread enough to click on it and respond. Not that you cared about the thread material. There is a huge difference
1299
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:58:18 PM »
The user who posted it has been banned into oblivion, unfortunately they were using Tor so bang goes finding out who did it. Anyway, it's been dealt with and deleted now.
It was honestly probably DeeJ trying to get us shut down
It seems like too much effort for him really.
-Septy
I doubt it, I think it's more just some idiotic troll trying to shock people. If it is a paedophile, then they can enjoy getting vanned in the future.
-Sprungli
It's not comms, he has standards when it comes to trolling.
He does, there's been one or two alts around lately and the fact that Tor was used is obviously suspicious. Remember how Comms took down the site before? You must admit this shares elements
Tor is used on a lot of alts on this site. Very few ever make it through the screening and clearly this one shouldn't have been. We don't automatically ban accounts for having a Tor IP/hostname but I don't see any accounts being allowed should they turn up with a proxy in the hostname now.
And yeah, comms took down the last site but he's not interested in doing it to septagon. Again, he has standards and considering he is looking to move to the EU next year I doubt he's going to be putting that at risk by linking something as haram as that. Meatspin is his style.
Then you must attempt to deduce the person responsible
Well no shit, do you think the mods are all sitting around with our thumbs up our asses?
Aside from reporting the user to the Feds, which cheat has to do, there isn't much we can do. Someone using tor and a throwaway email account doesn't leave many leads. It's up to the people who do this shit all day everyday to find out who the user really was, we just have to bring them to their attention.
Calm your tits, I realise that it's nearly impossible. But out of everyone, I was merely thinking that you may have an inkling as to who might do something like that.
1300
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:55:51 PM »
Tell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it. And then he does it again. Is there a reason that you are siding with him?
By using the word differently than verb uses it you are talking past him. You may very well present a valid position that in no way contradicts verb's position. But then don't pretend you've proven him wrong.
If he is unwilling to use the standard definition required to adequately communicate then I am unwilling to consider his position on the matter, if you were to attempt to do what he is doing in a debate you'd be ignored.
Then you think when verb replies "I don't care" to a thread, that he is using the term incorrectly. You don't think he actually secretly cares but doesn't want to admit it. Why didn't you say so in the first place? (That is, you're not arguing about concepts, you're arguing about words)
That is a valid position to hold. But that said,
if you think he's using the word incorrectly.
We were using the correct term, but we had different subject matters, he misinterpreted my post
1301
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:54:49 PM »
Then would you care to elaborate on your mysterious, personalised meaning of the word? i shouldn't have to
it should be obvious
and i've explained it a million times already
someone makes a topic talking about their day
i don't give a FUCK about how this person's day went
i don't find it interesting at all, and if anything, letting this person know that i don't care just might influence them to stop posting
so i say, "i don't care about how your day went, dude"
so let's check what i care about here
[X] i care to respond
[X] i care about whether he continues to update us about his day
[] i care about his day
you're trying to say that i care about his day
why
that's stupid
I was saying you cared about the thread, not necessarily his day (which isn't the thread anyways, it was the Uncharted thread). We had the same definition of 'care', but totally different subjects. Simple
1302
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:51:25 PM »
The user who posted it has been banned into oblivion, unfortunately they were using Tor so bang goes finding out who did it. Anyway, it's been dealt with and deleted now.
It was honestly probably DeeJ trying to get us shut down
It seems like too much effort for him really.
-Septy
I doubt it, I think it's more just some idiotic troll trying to shock people. If it is a paedophile, then they can enjoy getting vanned in the future.
-Sprungli
It's not comms, he has standards when it comes to trolling.
He does, there's been one or two alts around lately and the fact that Tor was used is obviously suspicious. Remember how Comms took down the site before? You must admit this shares elements
Tor is used on a lot of alts on this site. Very few ever make it through the screening and clearly this one shouldn't have been. We don't automatically ban accounts for having a Tor IP/hostname but I don't see any accounts being allowed should they turn up with a proxy in the hostname now.
And yeah, comms took down the last site but he's not interested in doing it to septagon. Again, he has standards and considering he is looking to move to the EU next year I doubt he's going to be putting that at risk by linking something as haram as that. Meatspin is his style.
Then you must attempt to deduce the person responsible
1303
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:49:48 PM »
Tell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it. And then he does it again. Is there a reason that you are siding with him?
By using the word differently than verb uses it you are talking past him. You may very well present a valid position that in no way contradicts verb's position. But then don't pretend you've proven him wrong.
If he is unwilling to use the standard definition required to adequately communicate then I am unwilling to consider his position on the matter, if you were to attempt to do what he is doing in a debate you'd be ignored.
1304
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:47:29 PM »
Tell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it. because i'm not using the fucking words in same way that you're using them
you seem to think "care" means "think about"
which is fucking retarded, and not the way i'm using the word
Then would you care to elaborate on your mysterious, personalised meaning of the word?
1305
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:44:00 PM »
Again you seem to be choosing your own definitions to suit your argument. This just shows how pathetic your case is and why everyone has disagreed nope, not everyone
and refer to baha's excellent post on the nature of definitions
you seem to suck webster's cock and act like the dictionary is law
The dictionary is certainly a better source than you, and Baha's post should be aimed at you, as you are the one disputing the definition of a word
1306
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:42:46 PM »
...except i never use dictionary definitions as counter-arguments
ever
because i know they're arbitrary
I'd say a dictionary definition of a word is as far from being subject to one's discretion or opinion as possible. Quite simply you are spouting bullshit
Ask yourself this question whenever you're in an argument and that argument is not explicitly about language and diction.
Am I arguing about concepts, or am I arguing about definitions?
If you are ever doing the latter, it's time to stop posting.
Tell that to him, I use a definition, a fact-and he tries to dispute it. And then he does it again. Is there a reason that you are siding with him?
1307
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:40:57 PM »
-blam!-
But there's no expletive filter on this site... is there?
Fuck no
1308
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:40:26 PM »
You did make a contribution. One post and a whole thread neither of which count as contributions because they do not expand on the topic
Again you seem to be choosing your own definitions to suit your argument. This just shows how pathetic your case is and why everyone has disagreed
1309
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:38:28 PM »
The user who posted it has been banned into oblivion, unfortunately they were using Tor so bang goes finding out who did it. Anyway, it's been dealt with and deleted now.
It was honestly probably DeeJ trying to get us shut down
It seems like too much effort for him really.
-Septy
I doubt it, I think it's more just some idiotic troll trying to shock people. If it is a paedophile, then they can enjoy getting vanned in the future.
-Sprungli
It's not comms, he has standards when it comes to trolling.
He does, there's been one or two alts around lately and the fact that Tor was used is obviously suspicious. Remember how Comms took down the site before? You must admit this shares elements
1310
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:36:07 PM »
bottom line, if i actually cared, i would've actually made a contribution
end of the fucking story
You did make a contribution. One post and a whole thread
1311
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:35:35 PM »
bottom line, if i actually cared, i would've actually made a contribution
end of the fucking story
I know u secretly care about me
I think he may have mentally muted you
1312
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:33:23 PM »
Is he a newfoman or oldfoman?
Newfoman, he came because of Destiny.
Lol How does it feel knowing you are more experienced in something that your teacher?
1313
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:29:44 PM »
...except i never use dictionary definitions as counter-arguments
ever
because i know they're arbitrary
I'd say a dictionary definition of a word is as far from being subject to one's discretion or opinion as possible. Quite simply you are spouting bullshit
1314
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:26:41 PM »
In other words, you cared about what they wrote.
But not about the subject they wrote about.
We've established that
1315
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:26:05 PM »
"Lol dictionary definitions only count when they suit me" Arguing about definitions is the worst unproductive nonsense. You are using the term differently than verb is using it. If your entire position hinges on misunderstanding what verb is saying, then that's really your problem and not a problem with the argument.
He used care as a verb, as in to "to be concerned or solicitous; have thought or regard.", not to actually-physically care for someone. As did I, we are both talking about 'care' being used the same way. Not really sure how you can confuse that, we've both been pretty clear
1316
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:19:54 PM »
So by definition, you cared and definitions are completely arbitrary
"Lol dictionary definitions only count when they suit me"
1317
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:19:17 PM »
The user who posted it has been banned into oblivion, unfortunately they were using Tor so bang goes finding out who did it. Anyway, it's been dealt with and deleted now.
Sounds like Comms
1318
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:17:51 PM »
If you truly didn't care, you wouldn't have reacted to whatever you supposedly don't care about. that is so insanely fucking stupid
if i don't care about someone's DAY, for example
they're telling me all about their day, and i just want them to shut up
so i say "i don't really care, sorry" or whatever
OH, I GUESS I ACTUALLY DO CARE NOW, BECAUSE I RESPONDED
HURRR
"to be concerned or solicitous; have thought or regard" You thought about it. It was not a reflex action, the electrical impulses from your optical sensory neurone traveled to your brain, were processed and then you acted accordingly. So by definition, you cared
1319
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:13:41 PM »
I see the thread, did he actually post cp?
Yes
Full-on or just enough for you to tell? It could have been legal stuff designed to look like cp
NOPE IT WAS DEFINITELY C FUCKING P
Bad or? Describe it basically, most people didn't see it-which is probably a good thing
1320
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:10:31 PM »
I see the thread, did he actually post cp?
Yes
Full-on or just enough for you to tell? It could have been legal stuff designed to look like cp
Pages: 1 ... 424344 4546 ... 130
|
Show Posts