Where did I mention over powering? Yeah, I didn't. If you're going to take things out of context and act like you need a bib every time you talk, head over to the Serious forum with all the other fucktards.

LOL

One thing never leads to another, that's like saying "if we allow same-sex marriage then pedos will get to marry children next". That's just being scared of your own shadow.

Rapists will rape no matter what, women wearing revealing clothing does not lead to rape, it's the rapists sexual frustration and predatory nature than leads to rape. Saying it's the girls fault is just victim blaming.

If women were allowed to expose their breasts (like they can do in Spain) men who would never rape will still never rape. And that's the vast majority of men. The rapists would go raping regardless if a girls chest was exposed or not.

No it isn't. At all. This is a very different subject with a very real slippery slope. Why? Because people will start protesting naked crying about freedom.

It's not about victim blaming. It's about creating an extremely perverted culture. It's actually hilarious you bring up Spain as something which helps your point when it destroys it completely. I've lived there. It is of one of the MOST sexist places I've ever been to in my life. From how women are treated, to TV commercials, to the beaches where they take their tops off in front of kids and just about everybody else. I've experienced this shit, which is why I know it's fucking gross and creates a really sexist and perverted society.

Did you learn what synonyms were? Or were you too busy shitting your pants and picking your nose during class?

They aren't synonyms you pathetic excuse of a human being.

There's just no way you're for real. You have a double digit IQ or some sort of mental problem because this is just above and beyond ordinary idiocy.

That can't be your only reason... I mean, breastfeeding is hardly sexual.
Unless you're some kind of pervert or something...

It isn't. I gave 3 reasons. I don't want to see them, we're hard wired to view them as sacred because they feed babies and that should never ever go away, and it has a strong possibility of making kids sexually awkward.

I know, boobs are so scary. We must keep them covered up in order to protect the children.

No. I just don't want to see boobs, pussy, testicles, or penises while I'm walking down the street.

And yes, actually. Kids who are exposed to a lot of nude people who touch them affectionately become sexually awkward. It's called indecent exposure for a reason. Men don't feed babies with their chest, women do. There's a huge emphasis put on women's breasts because they're different from men, and that's a good thing.

Yeah, you didn't even read what I said

Here it goes again. How about using your context clues from kindergarten to better analyze my words

Let's closely examine. Anybody get sick, doesn't matter if you're white, black, mentally handicap, good moral person, bad moral person, murderer, priest, etc. It remains that disease and sickness can infect ANYBODY and EVERYBODY

Now for the next part. However, terrorism isn't a disease, thus not able to infect people. It's a idea that people simply choose to understand. Therefor not everybody can be a terrorist because of a person's choice

If you seriously can't get that through your mentally challenged skull, then that's not my fault, It's yours

I love how he originally said "anybody" and now he thinks he can trick us by saying "everybody".

Lols
On top of
Lols

Traveling to a country that is known to have a deadly, contagious disease going around is much different than traveling to a country with intense terrorism. There is a much more likely chance that you're going to bring home a disease, than there is that you're going to bring home a bomb. You can't "catch" terrorism.

As for the easier methods, I already partially laid that out in my previous post. It's as simple as putting more suspicion on people returning from Iraq and Syria, investigating them more, asking them why they went, etc. Arresting anyone who goes to a specific country is idiotic, IMO, and that's why I've always been against travel embargoes.

Terrorism isn't a disease? Whoda thunk.

You don't seem to understand. A lot of Brits are going to fight in Syria and Iraq. They need to do something. I find it funny that you say "put more suspicion" when that would mean following, bugging, and monitoring that person as a suspected terrorist when they probably went over to visit family 

If you seriously think increasing the monitoring of people is better than signing some paperwork and stating your reason to travel to the country, then it would seem you've done a 180 and are now in love with the NSA.

Wow what the fuck guys.

And even after this people who say that assimilation is the only practical course of action when dealing with immigrants will still be called racist.

P.S. before someone says they weren't pakis understand that "Asian" is newspeak for predominantly Muslim countries in the middle of shitholeistan. e.g. Bangladesh and Pakistan are "Asians" but turkey is not.

What the hell are you even talking about?

I'd take it from you.

I don't give a shit. I wish women would respect themselves a little more and dress a little more decently but whatever.

These things are beyond retarded.

You say that when we have a fairly similar post count.

Look, whatever kid.
You can have your delusions and be angry over nothing all you want. I really don't give a damn.

When did I say anything about post count? I said you play forum cop.

Sheesh you're really insecure.

They have to do something. There are a shit ton of Brits fighting for ISIS.

YouTube

Enjoy.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA