This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Zonda
Pages: 1 ... 157158159 160161 ... 307
4741
« on: March 21, 2016, 03:35:29 AM »
I've had a match go for 11 hours on Enemy Territory: Quake Wars one time. But tbh I've probably had a few 15-18 hour sessions on Halo Custom Edition. The ¬G3« server from a few years back had a quality Gametype/Map rotation tbh.
4742
« on: March 21, 2016, 12:06:24 AM »
um excuse me why was Assblaster banned
4743
« on: March 20, 2016, 07:01:15 PM »
Link isn't working
Lazy sack of shit
4744
« on: March 20, 2016, 06:58:59 PM »
4745
« on: March 20, 2016, 06:03:03 PM »
(っ◕‿◕ )っ浸透ロケットマンの肛門(っ◕‿◕ )っ
(~Tsu◕‿◕) sshintō rokettoman no kōmon (~tsu◕‿◕) ~tsu
(っ◕‿◕)っpenetrate rocketman's anus (っ◕‿◕)っ
4746
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:33:27 PM »
>Destyposting
4747
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:23:36 PM »
What's the worst weapon in Halo 3?
Probably the Spiker tbh. No kill potential at all.
4748
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:58:41 AM »
I remember playing Pokemon crater, almost every Anorith up for trade was asking for every shiny legendary under the sun in return. Top shit m8.
4749
« on: March 20, 2016, 03:45:51 AM »
I usually leave it on tbh. I like having the feedback, although it feels weird using a rumble pak. The integrated rumble in later controllers just feels right.
4750
« on: March 19, 2016, 03:25:31 AM »
houley dooley.
4751
« on: March 19, 2016, 03:24:45 AM »
You literally told me if I don't disclose my opinions you'll continue to venomously call me out. That's the definition of a threat. If your skin that thin that the prospect of words can actually threaten you, I doubt you'd have stayed with this community for more than a week before deciding they were just way too toxic to interact with. Oh, now it's just "whatevs"? Few posts ago it was a threat. Now you're just being difficult. You should be able to put two and two together and figure out I don't care so much for Halo itself as I do about clear discussion. Some more thought!? I made a neutral statement! Do I need to spell out my thought process!?
1. Hmm. That's not right about Co-Op Matchmaking in Halo 5 2. Frankie actually explained why it's not in Halo 5; the explanation was the same Bungie gave about no Raid Matchmaking 3. Most people here know about the issues of Destiny, I'll explain it like that and let people come to their own conclusions. You only need to spell it out as far as you want to, but yes, it does help to be as clear as possible. Practice what you preach. But I am. These arguments don't affect my view of you as an overall decent person. That literally doesn't excuse anything. I wasn't using it to excuse myself from anything other than you trying to pass this whole debacle off as Harassment. No opinion? Are you kidding me? The fuck is this?
"At least with Lemon we all know he's just a shit stirrer but you genuinely seem to have some deep emotional attachment to this studio." Key word: Studio, not franchise. Come to think of it, I actually recall you having an in depth lore knowledge of the Universe. You suck complete ass at giving advice. My advice is to stop giving advice. Alright, I'll take that on board. At least I was trying to be as clear as possible. I'm sorry to hear that you won't stop shilling for 343i and will continue to get in the way of discussion that you deem to be negative to their interests.
4752
« on: March 19, 2016, 02:37:02 AM »
You're arguing against a non-existant opposition, retard.
If you had the foresight and consideration of a decent human being to ask me what my opinion was instead of threatening me to "reveal my emotionally attached ways", I would have happily told you I completely agree with you.
But, hey, at least I get to know think I'm demented when it comes to Halo.
I don't remember threatening you over anything? You're clearly just glazing over my replies now without reading them. If you don't want to talk about Halo and openly state your thoughts on the topic of not having Matchmaking for Co-Op Campaign then that's fine. Your opinion is welcome but whatevs. I'm just pointing out that maybe you could put some more thought into how your posts may be interpreted by other people instead of taking the topic somewhere else because you obviously wanted to divert any possible flack away from 343i. Naturally I could've been a lot more polite in my replies as well. To a new member it might seem like I genuinely intend to be hurtful, but you've been here and on b.net long enough that you should understand perfectly well that not a lot of ill will is genuinely shared between members of this site. Moreover, you should know that I'm not singling you out. Mainly when heated debates flare up in Anarchy I'll call out other users when they make a mess of arguing their points. When it comes to Halo I have no opinion of you. I just think you could stand to shill less for 343 Industries, and stop shooting down a post that expresses a distaste for a particular feature in a Halo developed by them. Take this however you want to but I'm trying to give you advice more than a grilling, I'm happy to continue this discussion over Private message to save further derailment of this thread.
4753
« on: March 19, 2016, 02:14:39 AM »

What!?
Anybody who doesn't grab items out of the air deserves it tbh
4754
« on: March 19, 2016, 02:09:16 AM »
I'm required to disclose my full thoughts and opinions or face the threat of harassment?
Yeah, no. Fuck that.
No, not really. Even a '343 decided not to include Campaign matchmaking in Halo 5. Given the low population in previous iterations of Co-Op, It's not hard to see why." would suffice. It's concise, contributes discussion, and you don't even have to spend an extra 20 seconds thinking/typing the reply. "That was actually intentional; like Bungie did with Destiny's raids" as a reply to a complaint about a missing feature can not be interpreted as anything other than trying to defend said action to even the most neutral of minds. As such, my interpretation of the thread was you were just shilling for 343 without bothering to even discuss the relevant point of contention (and I'm not entirely convinced you weren't just backpedaling after the callout). I haven't yet seen you try to make some semblance of a valid line of reasoning clear when dealing with dissenting discussion of 343 industries. You just try to shut other users up by going out on confusing tangents from the original topic, and then say you're getting harassed the moment somebody tries to call you out on a bad practice. You know full well nobody actually wishes death upon 343i developers, and nobody even has any genuine ill will towards you. Feel free to disagree, but from my point of view you're just trying to get away with making certain nobody says a single bad word against 343i. At least with Lemon we all know he's just a shit stirrer but you genuinely seem to have some deep emotional attachment to this studio.
4755
« on: March 19, 2016, 01:35:48 AM »
Well the first thing I'd do is not be a retard and use a framerate dependent physics engine lmao
Then we get to some other questions. If I was making a game like Melee or F-Zero X where the game is fast paced and competitive play revolves around spacing and almost frame-perfect timing on attacking other players/moving just outside their reach, you can get a bit of choppiness happening making 60FPS pretty important if you're catering to a competitive crowd. A limit on AI numbers, polygon count and maybe even reduced support for local MP may be important here.
If I was going for a recreational approach for current gen games (again, let's assume it's a fighting game that's similar to Smash Bros.) I'd be more inclined to prioritize support for 8 player local MP, more on-screen characters and something akin to Brawl's Subspace emissary with better level design over 60 FPS.
In the context of Halo 5's split screen removal, I can see the benefits of having 60 FPS, and it was sort of unforseen that Split screen wouldn't be able to make it in. That being said, if I had a choice between the two, split screen wins every time for me. Reach looked like absolute ass with split screen, but it's still a better experience to be able to get a few friends together and play on the couch, rather than go solo but have an admittedly smooth visual experience.
4756
« on: March 19, 2016, 12:58:14 AM »
Is it so hard to believe that I would acknowledge such a thing?
The way it looks on text one can be forgiven for thinking so, but for me not at all. My cuntiness is more trying to call you out on giving a blanket statement such as "It was intentional," as every time I've seen somebody state that exact phrase in the context of a flaw in a game being pointed out (which is a lot) it invariably comes across as somehow trying to defend the action in question. I encourage elaborating on (your take of) the reasoning behind excluding such a feature and your thoughts on it in future rather than stating whether it was deliberate or not. Otherwise I'm happy to continue dishing excessively venomous callouts on what comes across as blatant shilling.
4757
« on: March 18, 2016, 08:20:52 AM »
4758
« on: March 18, 2016, 07:28:02 AM »
60fps is good though
But yeah other than that, deliberately planning releasing an unfinished game doesn't excuse the fact you sold an early access game for full price.
I know fam, that tradeoff was almost fair enough, on top of them reportedly making a reasonable effort to include both features. I was saying without Split Screen, a matchmaking feature becomes more important for Co-Op campaign.
4759
« on: March 18, 2016, 06:18:51 AM »
That was actually intentional; like Bungie did with Destiny's raid's.
That just gives even more reason to criticize 343. You understand this, right? Like, a deliberate misstep is actually worse than at least trying to include a feature. It was underused in previous titles, but the lack of local Multiplayer support for Halo 5 makes it a bit more important to give players (especially those with limited friends lists) more of a chance to play Co-Op online. Unless they plan on releasing this further down the track to iron out any kinks, I can't see a reason to axe a feature that was introduced 8 years earlier than Halo 5 itself.
4760
« on: March 18, 2016, 06:06:55 AM »
don't really care tbh
4761
« on: March 18, 2016, 05:31:14 AM »
Septy, real talk, you're a preppy fucking faggot rich ass spoiled white kid and nobody here likes you because you're a fucking retarded liberal hypocrite who wants me to pay more for the niggers on welfare while you buy a fucking 100 dollar gay ass fucking turtleneck sweater you yuppie piece of shit.
Now lay off my homie Verb
4762
« on: March 18, 2016, 05:18:51 AM »
4764
« on: March 18, 2016, 12:09:29 AM »
What are the specifics behind setting up a stream for Smash games? I know a couple of cameras/mics are desirable for commentaries, but what do they use to capture the gameplay itself? I was under the impression most capture cards induced at least a few frames of delay, which would be particularly bad for Melee tourneys.
4765
« on: March 17, 2016, 04:55:06 PM »
YoYorast Island in Halo 5 when?
4766
« on: March 17, 2016, 04:49:09 PM »
I swear you were one of them until a month or two ago you literally pulled a 180 during one of LoA's shilling runs in the Halo 5 megathread.
The fact that you can think anybody who disagrees with where they took Halo (Especially the Story and Multiplayer aspects) is invariably a retard is beyond me tbh
4767
« on: March 17, 2016, 12:30:12 AM »
About 343 specifically I'd have to say their art direction for the Armour. Easily the worst in the series tbh. And their story direction is far outside where I'd like the Halo trilogy to have gone.
4768
« on: March 16, 2016, 05:08:47 PM »
Smash 3DS/Wii-U cross platform when?
4769
« on: March 16, 2016, 05:50:35 AM »
WHO TF IS UP
SMASH DAT MF LIKE BUTTON 🔥🔥😂😂
4770
« on: March 16, 2016, 05:11:37 AM »
Pages: 1 ... 157158159 160161 ... 307
|