This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - big sponge
Pages: 1 ... 326327328 329330 ... 394
9811
« on: November 14, 2014, 12:29:31 PM »
gives the player a sense of immolation
I've heard AC:Unity does that to a lot of people.
9812
« on: November 14, 2014, 12:27:17 PM »
So far I'm liking it, however I'm not a fan of the spray
Use the magnum then.
9813
« on: November 14, 2014, 12:01:46 PM »
9814
« on: November 14, 2014, 11:25:37 AM »
Valkyria Chronicles banner plz
Oh lawd, no weeb banners pls.
You have no idea what weebshit is do you?
First google images result for Valkyria Chronicles.
That's weebshit bro.
Brah, this is my first result.
That's the shitty PSP sequel that nobody liked for obvious reasons.
Second result is slightly better, I suppose.
 It's an alt history WWII tactical RPG (think Fire Emblem set in WWII). It's going to have some Japanese tropes and other shit in it, but that's because it's a Japanese game and Japanese =/= weeb. The sequel was some stupid highschool shit that everybody hated cause it completely abandoned the themes of the first one. It did so poorly in the west that the third was only released in Japan. Which is a shame because the third actually returned to the theme and setting of the first one.
9815
« on: November 14, 2014, 11:20:27 AM »
Valkyria Chronicles banner plz
Oh lawd, no weeb banners pls.
You have no idea what weebshit is do you?
First google images result for Valkyria Chronicles.
That's weebshit bro.
Brah, this is my first result. That's the shitty PSP sequel that nobody liked for obvious reasons.
9816
« on: November 14, 2014, 11:17:53 AM »
LC was just bitching about the Serious banner so I decided to mess around and put up some different stuff to see how people liked something less formal.
Do you have any better ideas? Or did you just like the old ones?
Well the brown imperial flag was just tacky.
9817
« on: November 14, 2014, 11:16:47 AM »
Valkyria Chronicles banner plz
Oh lawd, no weeb banners pls.
You have no idea what weebshit is do you?
9818
« on: November 14, 2014, 10:04:34 AM »
Nah brah, best game of the year is a port of a 6 year old game. Unlike the MCC, Valkyria Chronicles isn't broken.
9819
« on: November 14, 2014, 10:03:24 AM »
Valkyria Chronicles banner plz
9820
« on: November 14, 2014, 01:51:05 AM »
Metropolis? Almost 2 hours? LMAO
Gravemind is acceptable because that level can be a bitch but damn, that's too long.
You can skip plenty of Gravemind.
You can skip most of metropolis too. You can fuckin ninja your way on top of the buildings and skip through the level by jumping from roof top to roof top.
9821
« on: November 14, 2014, 01:47:49 AM »
ITT: people who never played fallout 3 DLC
Was this from The Pit? Cause I can't remember the dialogue in that game, it's been to long.
9822
« on: November 14, 2014, 01:46:17 AM »
lolwut
9823
« on: November 13, 2014, 11:06:22 PM »
I swear to god I'll make a change.org petition to get this resolved if I don't get a response from our web team.
9824
« on: November 13, 2014, 10:04:01 PM »
I was there earlier.
90% of the topics in gaming were destiny related.
#offtopic is still a wasteland when it comes to personality and creativity and the sense of community throughout the site is still gone.
B.net is a primarily a marketing vehicle now while before it was a community hub.
9825
« on: November 13, 2014, 09:46:06 PM »
Soo uhh, are you still rustled about that conversation that took place earlier?
9826
« on: November 13, 2014, 09:41:05 PM »
Why's everyone getting super pissy at this? It's just vandalism. Not that big of a deal. She should be arrested, yeah, but it's nothing to get mad over.
Because it's shit that can't be replaced/repainted. It's not like she drew a dick on a bus stop.
duhdoy
Paint isn't permanent, you know. She's up there with graffiti "artists". Big deal, she painted some rocks. Arrest her, force her to clean up her own mess. I don't get everyone ITT who thinks that she deserves to be fucking hung for vandalism. Ridiculous.
It's acrylic paint. Meaning it's super hard to remove without damaging the surroundings. In the case of the cave art wall they can't remove it without destroying the ancient cave art around it.
9827
« on: November 13, 2014, 08:14:23 PM »
2003fag here.
Take off your rose colored glasses.
9828
« on: November 13, 2014, 02:33:14 PM »
Weeaboo spam is much worse than Russkij yazik master race.
Reported for racial discrimination against weebs.
I thought it was impossible to be racist against white people. /s
Because that's what most weebs are, yes?
Half the weebs here are actually mexican iirc.
9829
« on: November 13, 2014, 02:31:09 PM »
Explain why lemy's threads get locked but te barrage of "join muh shitty music" doesn't.
Anyone?
Because there aren't 20 of these made within the span of 15 minutes.
9830
« on: November 13, 2014, 02:02:45 PM »
I can't believe shit like that actually exists.
9831
« on: November 13, 2014, 01:51:09 PM »
Fucking hell she did it on ancient cave art walls as well. What the fuck is wrong with her?
9832
« on: November 12, 2014, 11:51:19 PM »
What is "insurgency"?
9833
« on: November 12, 2014, 06:39:50 PM »
Fusion would be great, but it's decades away from being viable. Fission is effective and safe right now.
It's closer than you think. As stated earlier Lockheed Martin is confident they can get something up within a decade and believe they can start assembly of fusion reactors in 2017. Even if their claims dont pan out there are others who believe their fusion reactors will be just as viable within a relatively short time frame.
9834
« on: November 12, 2014, 06:25:57 PM »
Spoiler What is nuclear fusion?
Expensive and still in research/trial stages. I'm not expecting commercial use for at least another 50 years seeing as it takes fucking aaaaages for a fission reactor to be planned and built today, let alone development and breakthroughs with fusion past the present, than something to get it past environmentalists, then actual construction.
There's also the other alternative which is Thorium reactors, and from what little I've heard they're the next likely "miracle fuel", with low waste, higher energy output per unit, higher abundancy than current nuclear fuels and would require slight modifications to current fission reactors. (Though don't quote me on this bit).
Lockheed Martin thinks otherwise. They're looking to get something up within a decade.
9835
« on: November 12, 2014, 06:16:43 PM »
Who says I don't support nuclear energy?
You did: I'll support it when it's not producing nuclear waste I just don't support nuclear energy that produces highly toxic and radioactive waste that takes 50k years to decay. Okay, so you don't support nuclear energy.
Sounds like you want a magical energy sources with no waste, no hassle, easy implementation, and preferably it gives everyone free handjobs, too.
Oh boy, taking things way to literally I see. If you weren't looking to nitpick you'd have realized that I didn't mean it like that as the extent of my position was clarified later. Spoiler What is nuclear fusion?
9836
« on: November 12, 2014, 06:02:14 PM »
I'll support it when it's not producing nuclear waste.
Number of deaths in the U.S. due to nuclear power: 0
Number of deaths in China alone due to coal: 400,000 per year
Number of premature deaths in the U.S. due to coal: 24,000 per year
Environmental hazards due to coal: acid rain, erosion, global warming
Environmental hazards due to storing nuclear waste: none
Radiation released into the environment by coal-burning plants: 400x as much as nuclear power plants
Cost of coal vs nuclear is roughly 1:1.
Coal produces more waste two orders of magnitude higher than nuclear.
Coal has killed more people, will kill more people, will destroy obscenely more of the environment, and will deplete far faster than nuclear.
>implying I support coal either
By not supporting *nuclear energy you support coal.
Wut Who says I don't support nuclear energy? I just don't support nuclear energy that produces highly toxic and radioactive waste that takes 50k years to decay. It's nearly impossible to ensure that we'll actually be able to keep that stuff contained over that length of time which is exactly why I don't support us going full ham with nuclear energy until we solve the waste problem. Solve that before we start erecting nuclear reactors in every state/province/county/ et cetera all around the world.
9837
« on: November 12, 2014, 05:53:10 PM »
I'll support it when it's not producing nuclear waste.
Number of deaths in the U.S. due to nuclear power: 0
Number of deaths in China alone due to coal: 400,000 per year
Number of premature deaths in the U.S. due to coal: 24,000 per year
Environmental hazards due to coal: acid rain, erosion, global warming
Environmental hazards due to storing nuclear waste: none
Radiation released into the environment by coal-burning plants: 400x as much as nuclear power plants
Cost of coal vs nuclear is roughly 1:1.
Coal produces more waste two orders of magnitude higher than nuclear.
Coal has killed more people, will kill more people, will destroy obscenely more of the environment, and will deplete far faster than nuclear.
>implying I support coal either
9838
« on: November 12, 2014, 05:28:23 PM »
I'll support it when it's not producing nuclear waste.
9839
« on: November 12, 2014, 05:24:23 PM »
Lord Commissar, what the fuck is that banana?
Why yes it is. It's a banana flasher to be precise.
9840
« on: November 12, 2014, 05:16:33 PM »
I'm actually disapointed that johncena.com isn't a real website.
Pages: 1 ... 326327328 329330 ... 394
|
Show Posts
