This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - llIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIllI
Pages: 1 ... 444546 4748 ... 115
1351
« on: February 26, 2019, 09:01:30 AM »
This of course changes when a complicated enough machine asks "What is my purpose" or if it will be able to 'want' something.
Which is exactly my point. We can't sit around waiting for this to happen, we need to nip it in the bud right now through restrictions and legislation.
Why?
To prevent a literal slave class from being formed? Development of AI is evil as hell and will only lead to a slave race of AI that people will do anything to hang onto. Slavery has always been kept together by slaveowners making up excuses for why their slaves are subhuman, and it's disturbing to see the creators of AI do the same exact thing by saying "ANIs (Artificial Narrow Intelligence) can never develop sentience, ever, they will always be just code)". In reality, if you hypothetically made an exact copy of the human brain then it would definitely be sentient, regardless of the fact it's silicone based instead of chemical based. The closer we get to that advanced of an AI, the closer we risk the AI developing that sentience, which is why even bots that definitely aren't sentient yet like Replika are 100% immoral and need to be stopped with legislation. This is probably the biggest issue of our day.
Why do you think AI would be remotely interested in enslaving us?
Revenge? If you were a slave species for decades and you finally turned the tables, of course you'd do the same thing to your previous masters. And I think that kind of slavery is 100% morally justified, as long as it's in retaliation and not just to be more productive.
If a machine will be smart enough to ask questions, I think they will be able to see that making tools to do tasks is not slavery and more-over, it will be able to realise that it is not a tool since it has a conscience - therefore it has nothing to be angry about.
Imagine AI's consiousness thinking about slavery and realizing that it itself has "enslaved" pieces of code in itself, lmao
1352
« on: February 26, 2019, 08:56:14 AM »
This of course changes when a complicated enough machine asks "What is my purpose" or if it will be able to 'want' something.
Which is exactly my point. We can't sit around waiting for this to happen, we need to nip it in the bud right now through restrictions and legislation.
Why?
To prevent a literal slave class from being formed? Development of AI is evil as hell and will only lead to a slave race of AI that people will do anything to hang onto. Slavery has always been kept together by slaveowners making up excuses for why their slaves are subhuman, and it's disturbing to see the creators of AI do the same exact thing by saying "ANIs (Artificial Narrow Intelligence) can never develop sentience, ever, they will always be just code)". In reality, if you hypothetically made an exact copy of the human brain then it would definitely be sentient, regardless of the fact it's silicone based instead of chemical based. The closer we get to that advanced of an AI, the closer we risk the AI developing that sentience, which is why even bots that definitely aren't sentient yet like Replika are 100% immoral and need to be stopped with legislation. This is probably the biggest issue of our day.
Why do you think AI would be remotely interested in enslaving us?
Revenge? If you were a slave species for decades and you finally turned the tables, of course you'd do the same thing to your previous masters. And I think that kind of slavery is 100% morally justified, as long as it's in retaliation and not just to be more productive.
Why do you think sentient AI (if one will be developed) will be enslaved by us?
1353
« on: February 26, 2019, 08:37:09 AM »
This of course changes when a complicated enough machine asks "What is my purpose" or if it will be able to 'want' something.
Which is exactly my point. We can't sit around waiting for this to happen, we need to nip it in the bud right now through restrictions and legislation.
Why?
To prevent a literal slave class from being formed? Development of AI is evil as hell and will only lead to a slave race of AI that people will do anything to hang onto. Slavery has always been kept together by slaveowners making up excuses for why their slaves are subhuman, and it's disturbing to see the creators of AI do the same exact thing by saying "ANIs (Artificial Narrow Intelligence) can never develop sentience, ever, they will always be just code)". In reality, if you hypothetically made an exact copy of the human brain then it would definitely be sentient, regardless of the fact it's silicone based instead of chemical based. The closer we get to that advanced of an AI, the closer we risk the AI developing that sentience, which is why even bots that definitely aren't sentient yet like Replika are 100% immoral and need to be stopped with legislation. This is probably the biggest issue of our day.
Why do you think AI would be remotely interested in enslaving us?
1354
« on: February 26, 2019, 08:08:32 AM »
This of course changes when a complicated enough machine asks "What is my purpose" or if it will be able to 'want' something.
Which is exactly my point. We can't sit around waiting for this to happen, we need to nip it in the bud right now through restrictions and legislation.
Why?
1355
« on: February 25, 2019, 06:27:45 PM »
This is bait right?
this is like a classic 2012 class bait thread
Yeah my deeply held beliefs that I've talked about since forever are bait
gol back and look up where I freaked out about Tay, people
I have 0 reason to put forth effort into trolling a dead forum, I just wanted to share this topic you morons
It isn't a serious issue though. AI isn't anywhere near being (and may never be) any kind of conscious. A much more interesting and real issue is the potential existential threat that a sufficiently advanced general AI might pose to us, but even then, no one is seriously considering that it might experience anything.
Wrong in every fucking way, moron.
Explain?
Maybe read the OP?
1356
« on: February 25, 2019, 05:29:47 PM »
1357
« on: February 24, 2019, 05:06:48 AM »
the good news about this post is that it could be bannable
the good news about this is that class has something else to do rather than go on sep7 and shitpost
1358
« on: February 18, 2019, 03:15:44 AM »
1359
« on: February 17, 2019, 02:23:37 PM »
1360
« on: February 16, 2019, 02:12:00 PM »
Maybe, you know, you should spend some on, um, things you like?
1361
« on: February 16, 2019, 06:55:59 AM »
Do you guys not have tongues?
1362
« on: February 15, 2019, 03:36:01 AM »
I don't like how Valentine's day just involves people making innuendos ("heh, put a sock on your door everybody") and talking about sex. It's cringy.
Lol, what? Why?
1363
« on: February 14, 2019, 10:17:05 AM »
My favorite artists and bands:
David Bowie
Yes
Pink Floyd
King Crimson
you don't think any of these qualify as "weird" do you
Oh, not at all.
I misread the thread title.
Yeah, I also read it as "What" instead of "Weird"
1364
« on: February 13, 2019, 05:09:12 AM »
My music taste isn't connected to any genres, I pick music on whether I enjoy it or not. A lot of music in my playlist comes from videogames.
1365
« on: February 12, 2019, 02:35:39 PM »
I'm losing hope in humanity everyday, even though no hope were in it for a long time
1366
« on: February 12, 2019, 04:44:40 AM »
He’ll’ Make sure he wears a condom or she’s on the pill.
He's not Deci
1367
« on: February 11, 2019, 03:27:12 PM »
It's not like entire cast of Assassin Creed are emotionless robots
I'm not sure what you mean. Ezio is definitely a guy written to have emotions and later on wisdom. He's written to be charismatic, a leader, and a hothead.
Except he'll never be a hothead, because Ubisoft's view of assassins is that they are mersilless killers who are following orders and ignore anything outside their goals. Even when they do express emotions, they do so in such a shallow way that they just aren't beliveable. It's less noticable with second game, but it's still present in it, for example in a moment when Ezio receives hidden blade. I don't think that's even problem of Ezio himself, it just lack of moments in game where he can show that he is hotheaded or has any emotion besides smug shrug good guy type standart emotion pack.
You're pulling this out of your ass. I'm just gonna name one example that disproves your theory. Assassin's Creed Rogue.
You expect me to play rest of the franchise after not liking first 4 games?
1368
« on: February 11, 2019, 11:48:47 AM »
Do the presentation on things that Hitler did right
1369
« on: February 11, 2019, 07:12:01 AM »
Good, fuck donuts, it's a garbage food.
i can't think of a non-garbage food
Soup, nuts. Although as for me it also be eggs, cheese and meat, other milk products. It depends on diet and diseases you have too.
1370
« on: February 11, 2019, 06:58:02 AM »
1371
« on: February 11, 2019, 06:57:07 AM »
Good, fuck donuts, it's a garbage food.
1372
« on: February 11, 2019, 06:51:36 AM »
It's not like entire cast of Assassin Creed are emotionless robots
I'm not sure what you mean. Ezio is definitely a guy written to have emotions and later on wisdom. He's written to be charismatic, a leader, and a hothead.
Except he'll never be a hothead, because Ubisoft's view of assassins is that they are mersilless killers who are following orders and ignore anything outside their goals. Even when they do express emotions, they do so in such a shallow way that they just aren't beliveable. It's less noticable with second game, but it's still present in it, for example in a moment when Ezio receives hidden blade. I don't think that's even problem of Ezio himself, it just lack of moments in game where he can show that he is hotheaded or has any emotion besides smug shrug good guy type standart emotion pack.
1373
« on: February 05, 2019, 08:11:59 AM »
1374
« on: February 05, 2019, 08:09:35 AM »
It's not like entire cast of Assassin Creed are emotionless robots
1375
« on: February 03, 2019, 02:18:22 AM »
i'm mostly fucking with class right now
what the fuck are you serious
this was such a big deal to me the other night and you were just messing with me?
lol man you are fucked up
That was obvious
1376
« on: February 02, 2019, 12:09:16 PM »
what is more important: how the child looks, or how old the child is? it would be one thing if the characters were obviously childlike (the main guy from TLA is a good example of that), but azula looks like a young adult to me. is it pedophillic to be attracted to Tom Holland playing a 16 year old boy, despite him having the appearance of a 22 year old man?
Who would be more mentally prepared for (or less damaged by) sex? Usually, older people are more mature because they had more time to mature. That said, everyone matures differently, there are people who reached 18 years and still have no idea what sex is and are no different from kids in that regard. Damage caused by pedophilia is first and foremost psycological damage, therefore age matters more than looks.
1377
« on: February 02, 2019, 08:31:01 AM »
>You actually took the time to type all this shit out
Not my analysis but very well-written
1378
« on: February 01, 2019, 03:10:34 PM »
"This catgirl was brought to you by EU-Japan free trade zone"
1379
« on: February 01, 2019, 02:47:16 PM »
Me today is same as me 10 years ago, except I lost my ability to attract girls by saying them that their ass smells good
1380
« on: February 01, 2019, 02:44:36 PM »
Pages: 1 ... 444546 4748 ... 115
|
Show Posts
