6361
Gaming / Re: >site full of weebs >no Persona 5 thread
« on: May 19, 2016, 05:44:02 AM »
Whoa whoa whoa, who is this QT?
I hope she treats you like dirt in her S.Link!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 6361
Gaming / Re: >site full of weebs >no Persona 5 thread« on: May 19, 2016, 05:44:02 AM »
Whoa whoa whoa, who is this QT?
I hope she treats you like dirt in her S.Link! 6362
The Flood / Re: Next Big purchase?« on: May 19, 2016, 05:42:58 AM »
FFXV Ultimate Collectors Edition
6363
The Flood / Re: Find a suitable avatar for the user above you« on: May 19, 2016, 05:40:47 AM »6364
The Flood / Re: What would you do with super speed?« on: May 19, 2016, 04:57:51 AM »
Load fast pupper
6365
The Flood / Re: I'm gonna try being nice to everyone.« on: May 19, 2016, 04:57:12 AM »
Try harder Thunda.
6366
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 08:15:24 PM »
I don't do this though.
they just come home and vent to their other robot friends and everything is fine. 6367
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:51:01 PM »
They wouldn't stay in the job for long though.
yes. Robots cant have outbursts in public because of their anxiety 6368
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:48:35 PM »
Maybe I should give a better example. Would a robot be able to function normally when working with a couple being lovey/dovey in front of him?
ESPECIALLY the children 6369
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:45:47 PM »
Would a robot go out of their way to be friendly towards the people they serve? Especially children?
robots can work retail 6370
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:43:07 PM »
I'd argue that Disney World is literally an Anti-Robot zone and the idea of just working there is enough to clear my name of any "Robotness". The job forces you to be socially active.
6371
The Flood / Re: JUST PS2 MY SHIT UP FAM« on: May 18, 2016, 07:39:39 PM »
That video I linked yesterday of James, yeah people are claiming his reasoning is seixst despite every reason he gave had fuck all to do with the cast.
6372
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:35:47 PM »
You have no recent/up to date proof or evidence of that claim.
Yes you are 6373
The Flood / Re: Very angry for no reason« on: May 18, 2016, 07:35:17 PM »
IT'S AN ENDLESS CYCLE!
YOU MUST BREAK IT! Jacked off but that just made me more angry 6374
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:34:26 PM »
Lol wage cuck.
Cheat pls no pls I have to do social drinking the weekend nights and work all day long 6375
The Flood / Re: Advice« on: May 18, 2016, 07:33:38 PM »
QUESTION FOR EVERYBODY ELSE:
I was dark for most of Sep7's time, was Roman always like this? 6376
The Flood / Re: ITT Post shit that makes you feel great« on: May 18, 2016, 07:29:33 PM »
Monogamous couples with no basis in its sexuality is a better proposition. Two parents together is objectively better than one, but any more than that can lead to confusion/conflict in upbringing.
still seems too broad a brush to paint. there are plenty of entirely monogamous heterosexual couples who have absolutely no fucking business raising children, yet here they are, doing it all the same. its a bad qualifier to use, there are too many other things that go into this for us to really use monogamous heterosexuality (or, really, any type of amorous relationship) as a baseline for proper households. how stable is the household's income, are the parents/guardians religious nuts, is the public school system good or bad, et cetera.. 6377
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:24:08 PM »
I'M NOT A ROBOT!
literally a little girl 6378
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:21:48 PM »
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will hurt forever.
Lol faggot, grow some skin 6379
The Flood / Re: open up anarchy so we can talk shit about other members« on: May 18, 2016, 07:10:22 PM »
No. Call my a butthurt softie but the last thread made about me in Anarchy really got under my skin.
6380
The Flood / Re: ITT Post shit that makes you feel great« on: May 18, 2016, 06:49:37 PM »
The entire building blocks of our development as a species disagrees with you.
its easy for me to say these things because i dont actively seek partners, and i do think that when i do find someone i want to be with my attitude might change, but really, monogamous relationships implode the vast majority of the time. its silly that we're still so attached to the idea when it's been proven time and time again to be extremely difficult to maintain in the long run. 6381
The Flood / Re: If You See This thread While Scrolling« on: May 18, 2016, 04:57:52 PM »
THANK YOU
6382
Gaming / Re: Might start collecting stuff« on: May 18, 2016, 04:53:34 PM »
I....can't.....afford another.....steelbook.....
BUT I HAVE TO HAVE IT!!!! 6383
Serious / Re: Just one more month UK posters« on: May 18, 2016, 04:51:57 PM »
Yes of course, and I'll try to keep my personal prejudice against what I call "Overreach" out of it. I know my views on something like that is a bit ironic considering I work for the biggest entertainment company in the world and like it but....
I'll respond to you in a bit, if you don't mind. Got a major moot court on trademark and banking law tomorrow and my thesis is due much sooner than I would like. 6384
The Flood / Re: ITT Post shit that makes you feel great« on: May 18, 2016, 04:45:24 PM »
Yeah, and in that situation you break up with them and move on. She clearly felt awful about it but apparently a break up and massive guilt wasn't enough for him. He not only ruined her life but the lives of other people outside their relationship. He went above and beyond in being an asshole if this story is true. There is no defending this man and what he did, I'm not trying to be a white knight, but this is really fucking disgusting.
She wasted the time they've been together by being a retard and giving in to lust. I'd be fucking mad losing that amount of time to a person I was going to spend my life with. 6385
The Flood / Re: You went bar-hopping with a user last night...« on: May 18, 2016, 03:55:34 PM »
Nothing because I don't drink, let alone go out to a bar and socialize.
6387
Serious / Re: So, what was the big deal about Benghazi again?« on: May 18, 2016, 03:22:10 PM »
Something something "more marines", something something "No to more marines" something something "People died".
I don't hate Clinton or anything and I really don't care about the topic, but the one thing that rubs me the wrong way with her is that she tried to play it on a Youtube video when half the country probably doesn't even have internet access.... Other than that she hasn't really bothered me on the topic so I usually go back to my news slumber when it's brought up. 6388
Serious / Re: Just one more month UK posters« on: May 18, 2016, 03:16:56 PM »Whether I think that or not is irrelevant. I agree with a lot of the criticism against the EU but still believe that a lot of the arguments in favor of leaving the Union are misguided and based on misinformation.Picking up on only one of these arguments: One such argument is the increasing worry about losing a national identity and become "The United States of Europe" with how much overreach the EU has over everything in a country does, would that be considered misguided? Quote Because it being flawed or dysfunction does not mean it has to go. It's all about the net worth of the Union. Do the benefits outweigh the cons or is it the other way around? I personally still believe the pros are greater than the cons.I never said it has to go, I believe it should be extremely reformed. The US is part of a union as well, the Pan-American union. No one here bitches about it because it doesn't have as much control as the EU does yet still has enough power to remain important. However, getting reformation in the EU seems about as difficult as running a nation without it so it looks more like a "Choose your poison" kind of deal with the cons being the exact same on both turnouts. Quote But that is a very big if, though. I don't see anyone being butthurt about the UK getting freedom while the rest doesn't, as it's likely that the UK citizens will actually end up with less freedom than they would under the EU. What I do see is a lot of people worrying about how leaving will harm both the UK and the rest of the EU. Problem is that for things like this you can't always pick and choose. Many people supporting a Brexit believe that the UK will leave and simply be able to opt in for all the good stuff while choosing not to deal with any of the responsibilities or burdens that come with it. Betting on the remaining EU countries to simply smile and go "you want to not carry any of the burdens, not pay membership fees, not be subject to judicial control or EU legislation, not open your borders to EU citizens and not be subject to the same standards as the other countries but still retain the same privileges and profit from the EU's market? Sure thing friend!" is a pretty long shot.Different avenues of control in the EU shouldn't be intertwined that way to begin with. What I mean is that the UK's policy on EU citizens attempting to come into the UK shouldn't be weighed in with EU legislation in general. These are all different issues that while not exclusive to themselves, shouldn't affect each other to a huge degree if the UK were to leave. And I'm sure that leaving negotiations would sort out these problems before the country is formerly out the door. 6389
Serious / Re: Just one more month UK posters« on: May 18, 2016, 02:41:36 PM »That is your opinion and you're obviously free to have it.And it's not your opinion that the people who are voting in favor of leaving are doing so because they're uneducated and ignorant from misinformation coming from news sources that demonized the Hell out of them for voting in such a way two years ago? If the EU is as dysfunctional as everyone admits, why bother staying? You could say it will get better but nothing in the last several years has shown any promises of the EU changing for the better. I as well hope my UK friends vote for what they themselves believe is their best interest and not the interest of others that want to keep them there so the pot isn't riled. You yourself mentioned that leaving would instill agreements with the council on the relations with the UK and the EU nations afterward, if they can make the process as seamless as possible and still keep agreements that will benefit both parties and allow the UK's independence, I'm failing to see the downsides other than other nations being butthurt that the UK gets freedom and they don't. 6390
The Flood / Re: ITT Post shit that makes you feel great« on: May 18, 2016, 02:30:16 PM »
Yeah nah, this is in no way good. Jared is mentally fucked up and this girl unfortunately got more than she deserved. That's fucking bullshit what happened to her and unfair.
But I'm going to go ahead and call foul on the story anyways because half way through alarms are going off in my head when her new BF breaks up with her when Jared calls and dumps all the bad shit about her on him. What does the new guy have as a basis to believe Jared on anything? And I doubt any reasonable guy would dump her that quick over it too. I certainly wouldn't. Cheating roastie gets 100% BTFO by her alpha male ex, it leads to a mental breakdown. |