Literally half the first thread was arguing over the definitions of the voting class (which make up the interests of the people obviously) but I was hard pressed to find actual policies that dictated what stance the Nazis took on economic conditions, all of which ring true with everything posted in my link. Your second link has people contradicting themselves saying "We yeah he did left-wing policies but he still hated communism so he was therefore a capitalist!" Have you read Mein Kampf? The literal word of Hitler?

[My task is to] “convert the German volk (people) to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists”

The only thing he truly hates out of Left-Wing policies is unions, and even then it was simply the abuse of them. A central union organized and controlled by the government was a solution to that problem whereas a die-hard Right-winger would just kill them off.

note that mine is the stance taken by academic historians.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2sybie/was_germanys_nazi_party_an_extreme_left_or_right/

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/sipie/to_what_extent_was_the_national_socialist_german/

hitler and the nazi party were extremely right wing.

http://www.ibatpv.org/projects/3rdreich/3rd_reich_domestic.htm

When Hitler took gained power in 1933, he disliked, among other things, capitalism, unearned incomes, war profits, land speculations, and unfair taxes. All of this influenced the National Socialist Party’s policies for Germany, which turned out to be a good thing for the non-Jewish Germans, yet Jewish Germans suffered.

One of the most integral parts of Hitler’s domestic policy was his hand in the labor world. All labor unions were disbanded, and laborers were now organized into the National Labor Front, and strikes were now forbidden. Employers still had control and owned land privately, but were under close watch by the government to run their factories a certain way. All Germans had to be put to work, and many public works programs began, including reforestation and swamp drainage projects, housing and superhighways were built. This actually created a stable work environment for the German people, as there was no longer any unemployment. Overall, the labor’s share in the German national income was reduced, but everyone worked and earned a living.

This doesn't sound right-wing at all. Please don't confuse a mixture of racism, authoritarianism, and Nationalism with right-wing.

How dare you, Moogles are cute and infinitely huggable.

And Moogles are obnoxious.

REMINDER: Preorders for Stormblood begin this Tuesday at 3pm. It does come with early access like Heavensward.

Everyone who I half-trust is also a fucking meme lord who is impossible to read.

I don't remember him or that at all.

This is the guy who declared war on 4chan a few years back

I assume points go down after a period of time? It's been a while since my only warning.

You're fired.

You're dumb

Why didn't they get added up to two days?

Verb's ban history for the last 12 months prior to this ban has one day in it and a handful of warnings.

From the start of 2016, through to the start of 2017 he was banned for one day with enough warning points to add up to two days.

A week would have more than sufficed to get the point across.

Good culture does have a way of sticking to individuals.

did someone just take their first college art class or something

How did you know?

I'm not aware of that particular piece in question, I just found it when Googling "Modern Art". However the problem with most modern pieces is: You'll never get an answer into the meaning. Because there is none. It legitimately has no purpose and the artist knows this but hides it under claiming that it's supposed to be "Deep" or that it's "Subjective" and therefore depends on the viewer. The problem is no viewer can get any meaning out of it other than it being bullshit, and every attempted answer is going to be bullshit because it'll be a forced attempt at meaning.

I really do want to understand the artistic qualities of work like this. There must be a legitimate reason why something like that is in the same building as the other work you posted.

I can assure you my scheme of getting people to pay me so I can piss on them is an aesthetic of Capitalism and therefore not Dadaism.

yeah that's like, textbook Dada. is it good art? not unless you have a good angle. but it is art.

He could very well have been informally warned for previous times and we just don't know about it. It's not are place to know about Verb's private interactions with the Mod team.

EDIT: Removed.

I see it as a general rule, 'you can't call it out a foul if no-one's noticed and play has carried on'.

Unless there's been previous warnings about his behaviour to cut that shit out, you can't just say at a random point "right that's it" and ban him for all the other times, otherwise it's setting a precedence for the rest of us so that we can be retroactively banned for shit we did that at the time wasn't called out.

Just because I piss off LC or any of the moderators a bit too much once doesn't warrant all my previous posts being scrutinised for being unruly and then being punished for all of them at once.

Ban/warn for every occurrence then and there, keep the punishments separate (but with previous warnings/bans in mind), or don't ban at all.

I swear we as a group have had this talk before, it's about fucking consistency in moderation.

How many people were beat up at both his inaugurations?
How many people were accidentally shot because someone thought an ordinary citizen looked like Obama?
How many of those extremist groups actually went through with their threats?

Bold words coming from cowards and nothing more. The problem here is that we have people who unfortunately don't have whatever was in the heads of those cowards to prevent them from stopping on their actions.

Yeah there totally wasn't a ton of right wing extremist groups calling for and attempting to assassinate Obama.