I can't really picture him as Thrawn TBH. I mean, he has the face for it, but every time I picture Thrawn I can only think of Benedict Cucumber.

Where is Thrawn in the new timeline anyways? I haven't seen Rebels. In the old timeline he comes back from his campaign in the unknown regions to lead the remnants of the Empire and dies shortly after Palpatine's clone is revived. There's no indication Thrawn is even around in the sequel trilogy.

"He was very angry at what he saw."

This seems to contradict that though. Sounding like what he meant by "If he was a little later" to be taken as "If he was President a little later" and not necessarily alive a little later.

I can't comment on the Jackson/Civil War topic itself because I know nothing about it, but c'mon now. Trump's a moron, but we don't need to be nitpicking at everything just to further solidify what we already know.

Thou speaketh as though is above being a mortal.

silly humans with their silly desires

>Only three years

Try fucking eight and going.

tfw 3 years overdue of the first fukn thing.

I dunno bruh, having your own home sounds kinda comfy.

i meant it in the sense that it's pretty much the only thing i have to look forward to in life

Not have a house? If money wasn't an issue I'd like a really nice house.

Not that anybody in their right mind would want to lmao

Verb, you get two freebies and can skip 28 and 31.

I asked for validation. It's easy to just say you're a professional at X on the internet without needing to back it up. That's why I would never call myself a historian and call myself an armchair one because it's just a hobby for me.

Nor would I get upset at people asking me for validation when I say I know about the film-making process. After all it's what I'm going back to school for and took some classes on art though film when I first went. You say nobody really likes you, I doubt that but maybe if you weren't so aggressive right out of the gate, I have stated many times there's only one user on here I seriously don't like and it's not you, but that doesn't mean certain users aren't difficult from time to time. Even some of my favorite users on here royally piss me off a good amount of the time they're online.

And furthermore, this is about TRUMP.

ive had history professors who would gladly join me in labeling jackson as evil. you can disagree all you want, i cant control your life, but attacking my credentials & all the hard work ive put in to understand something i care deeply about is fucked up. i know aint nobody here actually likes me but damn.

This is what I was talking about half a year ago over perceived tone on the internet. I'm in a really good mood tonight, however a thread that was supposed to be about Trump being a bumbling idiot about facts is now about perception of good and evil. Out of all the history professors I've had, and all the historians that have chimed in on Jackson, including the interviewer of Trump tonight, they have steered clear of using the term "evil". Because he's not so far on the edge as Hitler. No one denies his serious wrongdoings, but controversial is a more appropriate term.

dont have the degree yet. im taking things kinda slow because of extreme depression + anxiety ruining my life. but im a senior. dunno why youre so adamant about this shit man. i know we've had disagreements in the past but you're just being petty rn

my degree is in history. lol.

Post it.

there are many forms of evil, i don't like throwing around the word in a general sense

Would you say it's a difficult word to pin on an individual that has done significant good for their country? 

Didn't you call him the best president last night?

what do i care

>Hitler understood the need of unions and as a construction worker (when he initially started Mein Kampf) wanted strong social services under the control of the government for the people in times of need
>This is a far-right wing ideology

Meanwhile, you never did counter the sources I provided nor did you when I proved to you that Imperial Japan had no intention of surrendering even after the first bomb dropped. You're the revisionist here.

EDIT: No wait, you did provide a source for the Nips and it only backed up my claim that they had no intention of surrendering. The Emperor was willing but everyone else (who was controlling the emperor like a puppet) did not.

dude you thought hitler was left wing lmfao get your revisionist bullshit out of my face

I edited it out because it had no bearing on the argument but it still holds true. People whining about someone like Jackson being "downright evil" are the same people that decry Washington just for even owning slaves. They honestly don't give a shit and if they did it would require them to denounce any of the positive aspects of the country we have over such events.

it was wise of you to edit this out

you were too late though

One can not deny the tremendous amount negativity General Jackson has caused. However "Evil" is not as black and white as you make it out to be. Jackson is controversial, but he also did a lot of net good for the country and that is also undeniable. He is merely a product of the era he was from, and one should remember that when judging former leaders.

jackson is one of the most evil motherfuckers to ever preside as president of the USA, and that's a position with a lot of evil motherfuckers.

I am a seeker of knowledge.

But some knowledge is best left beyond my reach....

I remember my first dildo

it was white